Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Vhann (talk | contribs)
244 edits
→‎William Buckels: new section
Fuhghettaboutit (talk | contribs)
85,115 edits
Line 394: Line 394:
*{{revisions|William Buckels}}
*{{revisions|William Buckels}}
This article was deleted as vandalism, but I think it was a misunderstanding. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bill_Buckels#Not_a_joke -[[User:Vhann|Olivier Diotte]] ([[User talk:Vhann|talk]]) 01:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
This article was deleted as vandalism, but I think it was a misunderstanding. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bill_Buckels#Not_a_joke -[[User:Vhann|Olivier Diotte]] ([[User talk:Vhann|talk]]) 01:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
:@[[User:Vhann|Olivier Diotte]] [[File:Yes check.svg|18px|link=]] '''Done'''<!--template:done-->. I knew the admin who deleted this (whose been inactive since 2010) and he was a careful fellow but I see how he made the error. The user name was also "Bill Buckels", it read a bit fantastically, and we often see joke articles take that form. I've added the 1886 Pall Mall story as an image.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 04:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:24, 24 April 2015

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts


Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Antoine_Fadavi

This page was deleted due to a false copyright infringement. The bio written is the Wikipedia article is taken from the site www.antoinefadavi.com, which is not copyrighted, so free to use on any platforms. -88.164.12.192 (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Hello. All sufficiently unique expression is automatically granted non-free copyright and must be assumed to have that status unless affirmative evidence is found to the contrary (there is no need to place a copyright symbol for this to be true). If you are the copyright owner then you can release the copyright under a suitably free license or into the public domain, but that would have to be done in a verifiable way, such as placing that release on the external website. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more. However, the content could not have been used unmodified even without the copyright issue as it was quite promotional.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I placed the public domain copyright license on every pages of http://www.antoinefadavi.com/wordpress/. Please let me know about how to continue the un-deletion process.

 Not done for multiple reasons:
  • The article would be quickly deleted again at WP:AFD due to lack of any evidence of notability, and lack of evidence that Antoine Fadavi meets any of the criteria spelled out in WP:MUSICBIO. It is not worth restoring pages that have no hope of being kept. See Wikipedia:Golden rule for a general overview of what is expected.
  • It appears to be written by the subject for the purpose of self-promotion or publicity. Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity, and Wikipedia:Autobiographies are strongly discouraged. Please see WP:COI for further guidance.
  • A statement that the website is "free of known copyright restrictions" is not the same as releasing it under an acceptable free license or stating outright that it is public domain.
You are welcome to try to re-create the article via the process described at WP:AFC, which is really the best venue for an author with a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverly Hills Sports Council

I, Nyfan2007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nyfan2007 (talk) 23:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Two deletions so far, no edits at all in the six months elapsed between your last restore request and the latest delete. Wikipedia does not host unsuitable material indefinitely. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was a subpage of a user who was permanently blocked for some reason in which I wasn't involved. However the information on this page was important to a project in which he and I were both involved and I would like to recover it for personal use (and the use of anybody else interested in the project). Given that the user is banned I'm not sure how it would work but if needs must I would be happy for it to be restored in my namespace rather than his. -Keresaspa (talk) 00:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. I will note, however, that G5 deletions will not be overturned here the best that can be done, possibly, is for an admin to send you the text of the page at time of deletion in the Bossanoven userspace (The Hoops gza userspace page was moved to the Bossanoven one). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An admin to send me the text would be perfect. I'm not bothered about the actual page being restored just having access to the contents and I didn't know how to request that. I can find a home for the contents on my sandbox or somewhere, no problem. Keresaspa (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Disco Orange

I, Victoddy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Victoddy (talk) 12:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have not had time to edit and re-write the article since my initial submission -Victoddy (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Victoddy: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Disco Orange. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ella Linnea Wahlestedt

I, Lwahlestedt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lwahlestedt (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC) There are lesser actors in the same movie Earth to Echo that have wiki pages. She was one of the lead actors. She has also appeared in several other tv shows since and Good Morning American and Entertainmnet tonight.[reply]

You cannot use the existence of another article to argue for the existence of your own. All Wikipedia articles must satisfy our notability criterion in and of themselves. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Lwahlestedt: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wikimezmur

I, Genemie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Genemie (talk) 02:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Genemie: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB)

I, 121.171.147.151, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 121.171.147.151 (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:The Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves: an article should be based on significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yiannis Misirlis

I, Bestwikimis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to add citations and references to the article -Bestwikimis (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bestwikimis: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Yiannis Misirlis. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Vanguard World

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 66.188.12.58 (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: I can't find any trace of this. Please give the exact title of the page you mean, or the username of the account that created it. If you had a notification that it had been deleted, copy and paste the name from that. JohnCD (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think they may be looking for the restoring of Draft:Vanguard World, Incorporated.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 12:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, McM! That's one variation I hadn't tried.
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
All of the draft article's references are to the company website or its Facebook, except one which does not mention Vanguard; but Wikipedia requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, both to establish notability and to provide independent sources for an article. An encyclopedia article should not be just the company telling the world about itself.JohnCD (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Bensoussan

I never understood what was controversial with the following data -65.94.20.208 (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

<copy of article removed - not required here, administrators can see the deleted article>
Note: Article was deleted per WP:PROD in 2012. Stated reason according to User:Alan Liefting/PROD log/2012 was "non-notable. Fails WP:PROF". --Finngall talk 14:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Alan Liefting (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article would be improved by references about Dr Bensoussan, not just lists of his publications, to show how he meets the relevant notability standard at WP:Notability (academics). JohnCD (talk) 16:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arman Noori

The page about Arman Noori contained true and verifiable information from reliable sources. It was about a real person, and credibly indicated the importance and significance of the him. -TheGreatArman (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shon Brooks

StockPicker.Cali.79 19:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DMitchell.78 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 16 April 2015‎

@DMitchell.78: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aaron Jarman

I, Aaronbh15, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aaronbh15 (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Aaronbh15: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mikroton Recordings

I, Staalvlaad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Staalvlaad (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FinTP Project

I, 5.2.141.168, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 5.2.141.168 (talk) 08:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fruits de Mer Records

I, 77.102.206.240, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 77.102.206.240 (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Siu Kee

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hosiukee (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC) his page is not unambiguously promotional, because we are only a group of student of Hong Kong City University, working on a project which needs us to create a Wikipedia page for any artist. Ho Siu Kee is a prestigious artist in Hong Kong and thus, we created this page simply because we believe it worths to do so. Since we are only students and beginner of using Wikipedia, we sincerely hope that someone could help us to modify or guide us, so that the page won't be deleted. Thanks a lot![reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Has your course educator co-ordinated through Wikipedia:School and university projects? If not, point them to that page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christian Oldham

I, 73.129.55.197, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.129.55.197 (talk) 14:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Christian Oldham. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dredhe15/sandbox

Please undelete. OTRS problems solved.Ticket#2015041710017111 -Willy Weazley 14:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Willy Weazley:  Done though, as usual when people copy in their own websites, it's too promotional and will need considerable reworking to be an acceptable article. Will you now add the permission template to the talk page? The system won't let me. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD:. Well, idk. My job as an OTRS member it's confirm the release. If the page don't fit on wiki's notability guidelines it's an editorial stuff. I can reject the text, if you delete the page as spam.Willy Weazley 05:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Willy Weazley: no, not to worry, those remarks weren't aimed at you, but at the page author in case they watched this and supposed that OTRS clearance meant the article was acceptable and could be published. It's in a sandbox, so it's not so bad as to need speedying. All too many newbies think WP is just a noticeboard to pin up copies of their promotional fluff, and have to learn that an encyclopedia article is different. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Global Traveler

I would like request that the deleted content be emailed to me so the content can be improved upon prior to republishing on Wikipedia -76.124.195.246 (talk) 16:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, but I will do it if you register an account, or sign in if you have one, and enable email, which you do by clicking "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and then at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users".
If you prepare a new version based on the old one, you should not simply post it (a) because the old one was deleted at WP:Articles for deletion/Global Traveler, and (b) because a history-merge will be necessary to ensure that contributions from earlier authors are properly attributed. You should make a page at Draft:Global Traveler and then apply at WP:Deletion review giving a link to it. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

user:sanjit.khulal

My user page is to infor my information to others user. user:sanjit.khulal is my user page not wikipedia page so i request that don't delete my user page. -sanjit khulal magar 16:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion.. You actually do not own your talk page. NOTE TO ADMINS: The link above is blue and has content, but the page seems bugged, as it's acting like it's an empty page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jéské Couriano: it's not a bug, user has made himself a (quite acceptable) global user page, which is copied automatically from his user page on Meta if he has no local user page defined. JohnCD (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware that was even possible, thank you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Sanjit.khulal:  Not done - consult the deleting administrator RHaworth (talk · contribs), but first read WP:UPNOT and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Troll Station (YouTube Channel)

much more coverage since the article was deleted, restore to Draft:TrollStation for me to work on.[1][2][3][4][5] -Theamazo (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Theamazo:  Done, but since this was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll Station (YouTube Channel) you should not restore it directly. When it is ready, check with the closing administrator, Joe Decker (talk), and then if not satisfied go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dilute (band)

The reason the article was deleted is that they weren't "of note". Videos of their songs on youtube have several thousand views, and you can find them on spotify. Being "of note" seems like a highly arbitrary criteria for deletion and I don't think it's true. -90.42.74.7 (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Surajt88 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article has no references at all: Wikipedia's test for inclusion, called Wikipedia:Notability, looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solution chain

The page was prodded on the grounds that it was a neogolism (sic) but there are no new words in the title. The author's other work seems to be good faith and so I want to see what can be made of this too. -Andrew D. (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Kvng (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Check out WP:NEO. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:University of California, Riverside School of Public Policy

This article was left idle for over six months but we intend to edit and work on it as soon as possible. I request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 169.235.173.210 (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neon Roots

I was actually just hoping to get access to deleted article -NamesAlreadyTaken (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NamesAlreadyTaken:  Done - I have emailed you a copy of the text. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User: Qazi Ahtsham

This Page have great informations which may be useful to users. So it is highly requested that do not delete this page -Qazi Ahtsham (talk) 06:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion U5, which indicates a user page being used as a personal webpage, blog, or social media site. U5 deletions will not be restored here or anywhere else, though you may ask that its contents be emailed to you if you have an email address associated with your account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Wikipedia is not a social network or a place to write about yourself. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 10:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wagtail_(CMS)

Wagtail is an Open Source CMS that has a large community of users. Similar Open Source platforms have comparable informational pages on Wikipedia. The intention is to provide more historical information about the software and its roadmap than is available elsewhere. -Pvetch (talk) 07:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pvetch:  Not done. That was a copyright violation from https://www.cmscritic.com/dir/products/wagtail/, but quite apart from that it was not an encyclopedia article, it was a blatant advertisement, full of glowing adjectives: "fast, powerful and elegant... unrivalled user experience... lightning fast... slick, responsive UI..." etc. Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. If you can show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability, you are welcome to try again, but you will need to start with a clean sheet. Read User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for advice. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD:Thanks, should have started with a clean sheet as you suggest. I intended the text as a placeholder only (I wrote that CMS Critic text in fact) but will restart page with newly written and neutral prose. Grateful for your feedback.

aakarshanbhardwaj

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Aakarshanbhardwaj (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC) why my page has been delected[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion U5, which indicates a user page being used as a personal webpage, blog, or social media site. U5 deletions will not be restored here or anywhere else, though you may ask that its contents be emailed to you if you have an email address associated with your account. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Charity Checks

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 66.209.120.59 (talk) 03:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Draft:Charity Checks

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Murray Harris

I, MichelleQuinn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MichelleQuinn (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MichelleQuinn: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I see that you have already re-created it at Draft:Ian Murray Harris. It can cause confusion to have two versions about, so I have done a "history merge" and the history of your previous version is now there "underneath" the new one. You may like to look at the advice you were given on this version of the old one. JohnCD (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pocket PC 2000.png

Please restore this file for which I plan to provide a fair use rationale. (The deleting admin has been inactive for a while.) -Mdrnpndr (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdrnpndr:  Done. I have reset the di-no-fair-use clock, so you have a week. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UNMATA

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) WeeRedLass (talk) 02:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerking title/links to the article Hasteur (talk) 02:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qatari Businessmen Association

I, Shadid200, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shadid200 (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadid200:  Not done - this page canot be restored, even temporarily, because it is a copyright violation from http://www.qataribusinessmen.org/support/aboutqba.htm. Wikipedia cannot accept copied text without a formal copyright release from the actual copyright holder.
In any case, even if the copyright issue were resolved, this is quite unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, written in the first person ("We are very proud... Our association..." and in a highly promotional tone, full of "peacock terms". An encyclopedia is not a place for the QBA to tell the world about itself. See User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

THE FABULOUS DEE HARRELL

My Article page was deleted I believe by mistake can it be restored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzangel11 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See below. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Fabulous Dee Harrell

I was unaware that I could not use excerpts from Articles that were written about Ms. Dee Harrell. Any copyright infringement was truly unintentional. I was asked to write this article for Ms. Harrell, but there was no intentional misuse of copyright material on my part or on the part of Dee Harrell. Please restore the material that was deleted. We will delete any material unacceptable to Wikipedia. The Article written by Hoops McCann is in the possession of Ms. Harrell and can be submitted for verification should that be necessary. } — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzangel11 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jazzangel11:  Not done. I can't trace any deleted article by that name, nor are there any deleted articles from your account. No matter: if the deleted article contained copyright violations it cannot be restored, even temporarily.
If you are writing on behalf of Ms Harrell you have, from Wikipedia's point of view, a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and should carefully read that page and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In brief, you need to be very careful, and should not edit directly about your client/employer, but may submit a draft using the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, writing in your own words and not copy-pasting other people's work. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site and is not for any kind of advertising or promotion. It requires a neutral point of view - no opinions, just plain facts about what Ms Harrell has achieved, cited to reliable sources. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:MUSICBIO for the relevant WP:Notability standard. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd note that I was also searching and could find no trace, including going back in the deletion log to April 1 and looking for a partial title match.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kevin Harman

I, HamishMedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HamishMedia (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@HamishMedia: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

University of Limerick Debating Union

I'm completing this for an IP that contested the deletion on my userpage. They asked for the page to be sent to them, but since it was deleted via PROD I don't see any reason not to restore it to the mainspace so they can work on it from there. I've restored it, but I'm listing it here just for records' sake. -Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MD Rabbi Alam

I, Michaeltleslie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Michaeltleslie (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jayme Gutierrez

I, Truthless, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The article was deleted from the Articles for Creation space, before I could review and make any necessary changes. -Truthless 08:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Truthless: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Jayme Gutierrez. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aakash_Pandey

Genuine people are suffering coz of some selfish people. As far as i know Aakash Pandey is a genuine actor and a very nice human being. -Sahmed083 (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahmed083: the article has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakash Pandey, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:DISCUSSAFD. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Pearl Driftwood Sculpture

Maxentius (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxentius: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Black Pearl Driftwood Sculpture. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material not reviewed for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jinanez/Josiane el zir

I, Jinanez, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jinanez (talk) 11:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jinanez: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crimes Against Humanity Initiative

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 128.252.33.1 (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Crimes Against Humanity Initiative. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The North Bay Hootenanny

The page I was working on was deleted because I did not finish it in time. I now have all of the sources I need prepared to finish the article very quickly. Thanks so much! -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedlimit76 (talk • contribs)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Speedlimit76: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material not submitted for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law

I, 92.21.160.249, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.21.160.249 (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Amoroso

Gene Amoroso is an American film and television actor, known for such films as Mystic Pizza and Spotlight. -Geneamoroso (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Geneamoroso:  Not done - there is nothing useful to restore, the article deleted in 2009 was a piece of silly vandalism. Any article would need to be created from scratch; if you are Mr Amoroso, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elizabeth Lennox

I, 74.96.69.97, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have external references now - two books made the USA Today Best Sellers list and I can point to those usatoday.com pages -Whwright87 (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvester Rivers

Please undelete (OTRS) and please insert on talk page {{ConfirmationOTRS|source=https://plus.google.com/+SylvesterRiversMusic/about|otrs=2015041710028645|license=CC-BY-SA-3.0}} @RHaworth: -Willy Weazley 20:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; didn't know there was a filter for this kind of editing.Willy Weazley 03:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"An automated edit filter has identified that you are trying to add or modify an OTRS permission template but do not have the global OTRS members user right." JohnCD (talk) 09:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mojos Wings Burgers Beer

The page was not done being edited I was in the process of making changes to keep it from breaking any copyright issues. The websites that the information was taken are ours to use, but I still wanted to make the wikipedia page unique. Please put it back up so I can fix the copyright issues. -James.JNEInc. (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Not only was it a copyright infringement, but it was hopelessly promotional. I've also blocked your account - per this guideline, the username must read "James at JNEInc", and you also breached the terms of use because you have a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not an advertisement platform. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William Buckels

This article was deleted as vandalism, but I think it was a misunderstanding. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bill_Buckels#Not_a_joke -Olivier Diotte (talk) 01:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Olivier Diotte Done. I knew the admin who deleted this (whose been inactive since 2010) and he was a careful fellow but I see how he made the error. The user name was also "Bill Buckels", it read a bit fantastically, and we often see joke articles take that form. I've added the 1886 Pall Mall story as an image.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=658941409"