Jump to content

User talk:Dr. Blofeld: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
You have been blocked from editing. (TW)
m Reverted edits by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) to last version by Peter Damian
Line 292: Line 292:


[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 18:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 18:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

== March 2017 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''14 days''' for your persistent pattern of abuse and insult against the article subject [[Graham McCann]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 19:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

Revision as of 19:06, 13 March 2017

Template:Reducing workload


User:Dr. Blofeld/nav


Music venues

I'll take a look sometime. Working on WiR stuff at the moment. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!

For the barnstar and the recognition! Well appreciated and a motivation to keep going with the improvements and expansions. All the best, Tisquesusa (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rambling Ramblings

Hi Doc. Hope you are well. How are things with you? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to hear that Doc. Films like La La Land and Moonlight are setting the screens on fire. The former, esp., makes me believe that musicals are here to stay in Hollywood. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Clive Mantle as Dr Barrett.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clive Mantle as Dr Barrett.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tencreek deletion

I've put a delete request on the Tencreek page as I think you meant Trencreek. All maps I can find show it as Trencreek.

A tag has been placed on Tencreek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Smb1001 (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Individual bikinis has been nominated for discussion

Category:Individual bikinis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing the discussion as Delete is bizarre. Recognizing that 'it is not a vote', the overwhelming consensus was plainly Keep. 7&6=thirteen () 12:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it should never have been closed as a delete! Perhaps another admin can look into it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hitomi Tanaka

I've created another Hitomi Tanaka page which was put up for deletion. I used sources from New York Daily News, Playboy, TV Tokyo and I don't see how it could really be deleted. You were involved in this discussion last time and I wanted to reach out.ChiefWahooMcDonalds (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr. Blofeld. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

7&6=thirteen () 23:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination). As you have participated in a previous AfD on this article, you may be interested in commenting on this third AfD. Thank you. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 00:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Are we supposed to list contributions only by members? Because Ssven has listed contributions by those who are not on the list like Editor 2050 and Shakthi Saba. But I hope they don't have anything against being listed as members there. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally people put their own articles up, but adding entries by others is OK if they're OK with it. Might be better to invite them first though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting to them between RL demands. :-) We hope (talk) 13:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. So many idiots about on here at the moment, difficult to want to write anything!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I'm doing maintenance type work. :-D We hope (talk) 14:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FrancoGraziosi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FrancoGraziosi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Hotel Panafrica was Prodded but you were never notified. I thought I would let you know before actually deleting the article. - GB fan 15:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If we can have 100 articles on hotels in the US or UK, you'd think just having two hotels for Equatorial guinea would be acceptable. Is there not two notable hotels in the country? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Baron Hill (house)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Baron Hill (house)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for El Progreso, Jutiapa

On 25 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article El Progreso, Jutiapa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that maize, cacao, and achiote were historically the main crops produced in El Progreso, Guatemala? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/El Progreso, Jutiapa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, El Progreso, Jutiapa), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:JamesTienTheChase.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JamesTienTheChase.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Howzat? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Purrfect, thanks for that Ser Amantio di NicolaoDr. Blofeld 19:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RIP Bill Paxton. The last actor you'd expect to die aor have health issues. Died of a stroke following a heart op. A great actor and warm presence on screen.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really a natural actor to watch. RIP Bill Paxton. My favourites are Twister and Titanic.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 13:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, though his role in True Lies was funny!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, "I lie to people to get laid". So much for sex addiction, lol. And he pees after! It was funny but I kinda like him more in his dramatic roles. Apollo 13 is another one I liked. He held his own alongside Hanks and Bacon there.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Africa barnstars, again

I see you're back to your normal prolific editing again, so I was wondering if you could finish off the Africa Destubathon and award the national barnstars as promised. I do appreciate the work you've done in setting it up - I think it was very helpful to the project. I just don't think these sort of projects should be left hanging at the end. StAnselm (talk) 20:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would mean having to make a ton of barnstars because not every country has a barnstar. Sorry, I currently don't have the time or energy. Weren't the Amazon prizes sufficient enough? I thought I thanked everybody for their effort and that people acknowledged that. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, thanks for the lovely barnstar you gave me. Secondly, I guess it was the fact that it was promised that makes it important to follow through on it. Thirdly, perhaps you could recruit someone to help you in those sorts of things? (I know absolutely nothing about designing barnstars, but there must be editors who do!) Maybe for the next big event line up someone to do that sort of hackwork. StAnselm (talk) 19:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't my idea to "promise" barnstars. Somebody said that they'd prefer a barnstar than a financial prize that's all. I didn't think many people were bothered whether they had a barnstar or not. I often reward people, and a lot of people don't even say thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it doesn't matter whose idea it was - it was announced on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon/Prizes and bonuses page: "Barnstars will be rewarded to the most prolific editors. A National Barnstar will be awarded to the winner of each country..." StAnselm (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well do barnstars really matter either? Let's move onto something constructive, people got their prizes and wikipedia was 2041 articles better off, as far as I'm concerned the contest was a major success and I more than did my part to reward and take care of the contestants. Expecting me to make dozens of barnstars several months down the line is not on. Why don't you make them and reward the contestants if you think they're important? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Promising "rewards" and not delivering on them is not on either. I see you are contemplating similar events in the future - you may need to take care what you promise then, too. As far as the "several months down the line" thing goes, you had gone into semi-retirement: I had, in fact, mentioned it on the Destubathon talk page and on your talk page. And as I mentioned above, I don't know how to make barnstars, and YOU were the one who promised them.[1] StAnselm (talk) 22:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where to ask, but I am sure it would be possible for someone to generate lists of red links from navbox templates like the ones in Category:Buildings and structures navigational boxes (and subcategories). This would greatly help in creating missing article directories for the Challenges. 103.6.159.71 (talk) 06:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maria Eugenia Bozzoli

On 27 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Eugenia Bozzoli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Maria Eugenia Bozzoli was one of the founders of anthropology in Costa Rica? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Eugenia Bozzoli. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Eugenia Bozzoli), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Country houses

I can try working on them county by county as time permits. We hope (talk)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Timo Puustinen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FriyMan talk 16:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timo Puustinen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timo Puustinen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timo Puustinen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FriyMan talk 17:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

Hi, Dr. Blofeld. I'm just posting to let you know that Meryl Streep on screen and stage – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 24. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dr. Blofeld

I hope you have an excellent day. I saw your contribution in a discussion of 7 years ago about the mass removal of microstubs about German politicians and I was pleased to read your opposition to mass destructions and voiced very strong arguments against that behaviour. No matter that I do not think that microstubs have any value, but I wanted to share mine on a minor point/page but with similar character; people who are destructionists and not expansionists here on this project, please see Talk:Fucha if you're interested. All the best, Tisquesusa (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Things I might have cared about 7 years ago no longer do I'm afraid. I'd rather have a good article on Helmut Kohl now than several hundred "microstubs". There are hundreds of thousands of decent articles which can be translated from other wikipedias using sourcing though. We need more people translating from German in particular.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Dr. Blofeld! How you have been? I hope you are doing well. BTW, would you like to take a look at my second solo FAC? I would appreciate your kind gesture.Krish | Talk 16:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't feel like reviewing (or editing) at the moment.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheManWhoHauntedHimself.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheManWhoHauntedHimself.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google Street View

You know what else is on Street View? Pitcairn Island. Incredible. (Saves me trying to get there myself some day, although of course I'd love to...) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.2

Newsletter Nr 2 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)

Participation:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Progress report:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at: #wikimedia-genealogy connect

(In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see Wikipedias IRC tutorial)

At m:Talk:Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Wikimedia_user_group is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia user group: please submit comments and suggestions, and whether you would like to be a member in such a group. Prime goal for the group is the creation of a new, free, genealogy wiki, but there is also a discussion weather we should propose a new project or support the adoption of an existing project?

Read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

Future:

The future of the Genealogy project, and creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

You can

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Dear Dr B, Many thanks and I'm glad you like it. The bridge certainly merited more than a C. I'm pushing it along to Peer Review, hopefully on its way to FA, and any comments at either stage, or both, would be much appreciated. But I quite understand if you're not in a Wiki phase just at present. Nevertheless, I hope that you're keeping well. Best regards. KJP1 (talk)

Torben

Hi. When you google "torben chris comedian" you get over 50,000 returns. When you google the title in Danish you get even more. All those Google returns in my opinion suggest notability. I myself am Danish so I know that he is notable since he's pretty well known. Could you please move Draft:Torben Chris to mainspace please? Thank you. 92.13.139.173 (talk) 11:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alturas del Yapacaní River

The article Alturas del Yapacaní River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gamebuster19901 (TalkContributions) 14:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Tiffany Club

http://jazzwestcoastresearch.blogspot.com/2014/03/tiffany-club-surf-club-james-a.html Check this out. ;) We hope (talk) 15:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool We hope but a RS?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, outside of some very much copyrighted photos at Flickr, this is the most information I've found thus far about the place. We hope (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Now in newspapers, getting more. ;) We hope (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
More pics are available via a 1954 Jet magazine. We hope (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Haig Club also notable. Perhaps Yoninah is interested? There's some missing old LA jazz clubs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teatro Oficina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Launchballer 18:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested the deletion. Another waste of time. If we had someone who read Portuguese this could easily be expanded. 7&6=thirteen () 18:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, yes this deletionism exhibited this year is getting tiresome. And the worrying thing is that it's a lot of different editors!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, if only they had a kitten to cuddle .... Coolabahapple (talk) 00:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Came across this and I have expanded and fixed the article a little bit. I'm Brazilian so I can find Portuguese sources to properly expand the article. Teatro Oficina is well known here in São Paulo, particularly among actors and other theater artists, and there's definitely room for more content here. I'll see what I can do. Cheers, κατάσταση 06:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ruth Young (singer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Let's Get Lost and Bruce Weber
Chet Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bruce Weber
List of jazz standards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to You're My Everything
Terence Stamp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bruce Weber

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnLawMa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnLawMa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fire on the film set of The Shining

You've been mentioned on Jimbo's talk page.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ianmacm. Peter bringing that "issue" up at such a time is in as bad taste as DM publishing that attack article!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The irony of journalists—especially journalists writing in British tabloids—complaining about self-appointed busybodies with time on their hands who chip in with their views and judgments on people they probably do not know is impressive. ‑ Iridescent 13:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's laughable. As is the fact that McCann claimed to be "concerned" about the invasion of privacy yet again manipulates the media to suit his own ends and not worry about it when he benefits from it. No doubt he's used to getting his own way, and because he didn't he's behaved like an insufferable spoiled brat. Amazed that a writer considered so "reputable" could be like this as a person, but I guess a lot of them have huge egos.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The ambiguity in The Shining (film) could have been cleared up with a quick edit. WP:SOFIXIT, as the saying goes.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Iridescent: I don't think these are regular Mail journalists. Michael Cole writes for some East Anglian paper, I think. These are just ordinary people who have been the Wikipedia experience, and who contacted the Mail, or were contacted, whatever. McCann's treatment was truly awful. Peter Damian (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Fut.Perf. 18:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]