User talk:श्रीमान २००२

1. Aug 2015
2. [| Sept 2015]

You Have Mail

Hello, श्रीमान २००२. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)

Coffee production in Cuba – Robusta coffee beans at a coffee plantation in Viñales valley in Cuba Hello, Ankit hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Coffee production in Cuba Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Goods and services • Marie Serneholt Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)

The First Geneva Convention (1864) is one of the earliest formulations of international law. Hello, Ankit hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: International law Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Coffee production in Cuba • Goods and services Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2015)

Princess Leia with characteristic hairstyle cosplayed. Hello, Aryan hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Princess Leia Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: International law • Coffee production in Cuba Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Help me!

Please help me with...

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2020)

Hello, Aryan hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: The Sims (video game) Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Meatloaf • Ignorance Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2020)

Hello, Aryan hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Anna Lindh Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: The Sims (video game) • Meatloaf Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools

Read this in another language • Subscription list

This early version of the Reply tool automatically signs and indents comments.

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

In a future update, the team plans to test a tool for easily linking to another user's name, a rich-text editing option, and other tools.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

• On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
• The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
  • an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
  • a rich-text visual editing option, and
  • other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2020)

Elements of the human body by mass. Trace elements are less than 1% combined (and each less than 0.1%). Hello, Aryan hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Human body Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Russian Academy of Natural Sciences • Anna Lindh Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2020)

The beach promenade in Kühlungsborn, Germany runs along the coast of the Baltic Sea. Hello, Aryan hindustan. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Coast Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Human body • Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 4 May 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

Hello श्रीमान २००२. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates

Read this in another language • Subscription list

The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

• Reply tool: This is available as a Beta Feature at the four partner wikis (Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian Wikipedias). The Beta Feature will get new features soon. The new features include writing comments in a new visual editing mode and pinging other users by typing @. You can test the new features on the Beta Cluster. Some other wikis will have a chance to try the Beta Feature in the coming months.
• New requirements for user signatures: Soon, users will not be able to save invalid custom signatures in Special:Preferences. This will reduce signature spoofing, prevent page corruption, and make new talk page tools more reliable. Most editors will not be affected.
• New discussion tool: The Editing team is beginning work on a simpler process for starting new discussions. You can see the initial design on the project page.
• Research on the use of talk pages: The Editing team worked with the Wikimedia research team to study how talk pages help editors improve articles. We learned that new editors who use talk pages make more edits to the main namespace than new editors who don't use talk pages.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Harsh Mander, you may be blocked from editing. Nothing in that article says that he played a critical role, in fact he's only mentioned once (we don't pay a lot of attention to headlines) Doug Weller talk 12:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

"In an affidavit filed in the Supreme Court, the police said the activist's speech in question not only incited violence but was seriously contemptuous, as it made derogatory remarks against the top court before a huge gathering of people.", " Harsh Mander visited the site on December 16 and told protesters to not have faith in the Supreme Court and to fight their battle on the roads to get justice." and " ... सॉलीसीटर जनरल तुषार मेहता ने कोर्ट को बताया कि मंदर ने जामिया में हुए धरना प्रदर्शन में न सिर्फ भाग लिया बल्कि वहां पर विवादित बयान भी दिया था।" ( Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court that Mander not only participated in the Jamia Protest but also gave controversial statements.. All the 3 news article mention his role in inciting violence. This must be mentioned at his page. --Aryan ( है?) 05:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Sorry, I forgot to ping you. --Aryan ( है?) 06:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

The problem, as you've been told already by Tayi Arajakate, is that you are presenting statements made by the Delhi police as statements of fact. Please carefully read WP:DUE and WP:WIKIVOICE carefully before further editing such contentious topics. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Vanamonde93: So the problem is that I am stating the fact without mentioning the source of information. But, not including this statement would be a delibrate attempt to whitewash his image. I think a statement such as " Delhi Police have accused him of ... " would be fine ?  

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 12:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Shaheen Bagh Protests, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 12:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tayi_Arajakate None of my edits were personal analysis.

1. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday said there has been no discussion on implementing a National Register of Citizens (NRC) in India, even as he clarified that the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019, would not affect Muslims who have been living in the country for generations."
2. "The document then mentions incidents of violence around New Friends Colony on December 15 when some current and former JMI students, and people having allegiance to political parties as well as their supports, assembled at JMI to protest the newly enacted Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens. They planned to march to Parliament and President House. The mob kept switching roads when prevented from moving and indulged in stone pelting, states the chargesheet."
3. "The police then mentions that later in the night, on December 16, the mob retreated strategically inside JMI campus and used the premises as a cover and started pelting stones. The mob positioned itself to ambush the riot control unit. The police were able to control the situation by temporarily apprehending 52 people under Section 65 of the Delhi Police Act. A total of 97 public persons, 35 police officials were injured; three police booths were also damaged, stated the document."
4. "The illegal occupation of the areas for protest and continued presence on streets drew large gatherings, especially during the evening, and caused incalculable inconvenience to commuters and residents, and created extremely tense and polarised atmosphere in the area,” the police stated in the chargesheet."
5. . Hindu Sena stated that they would remove all "Shaheen Bagh Jihadis" at 11 am on 2 February. This does not mention Yogi Ji indulging in hate speech.
6. "Delhi Police's crime branch on Tuesday revealed that Kapil Gujjar, the youth who opened fire at anti-CAA protest site in Shaheen Bagh on February 1, is a member of Aaam Aadmi Party "
7. This article doesn;t evn use the word " fundamentalist".

If there are any other problems with edits, please let me know. --Aryan ( है?) 06:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tayi Arajakate: Sorry, I forgot to ping you. --Aryan ( है?) 06:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

The primary issue here seems to be that you're taking statements made by the Delhi Police as statements of fact which is a belligerent party in the civil conflict and disregarding already cited independent sources. The representation of Prime Minister's statement made during an election rally as equivalent to government denial is also original research without any official correspondence on the matter considering the context in which contradictory statements were coming from the Home Ministry with procedures of implementation already taking places in Uttar Pradesh. I'd also suggest taking it up to the talk page of the article if you have issues with specific words used to summarise sources instead of making large scale edits which alter the semantic in contradiction to the one in the sources. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 15:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tayi Arajakate:The current state of article is ignoring all instances of violence by the Jamia mob. No source mention Yogi Ji giving hate speech.

official written statement by Nityanand Rai is equal to government denial. --Aryan ( है?) 04:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

What exactly is this "Jamia mob"? Dogwhistling is completely inappropriate on wikipedia if that was the intention. If you are referring to the incidents at Jamia Militia Islamia then no, the article on the Shaheen Bagh protests do not cover it. A quick search would also show that multiple RS do mention Yogi's hate speech. Nityananda Rai made a verbal statement on the floor of the parliament after being questioned on the election speech, not through any documentation. The statements also contradict that of repeated assertions from other officials on the same floor, which is likely an example of Obfuscation than anything else. One can potentially write the whole episode as a section or even a whole article but not in the form you added without it being OR or without violating WP:NPOV. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

References

@Tayi Arajakate: By "Jamia mob" I refer to the stone pelting protesters who have illegally blocked roads and are referred as " sit-in peaceful protest, led by women" in the concerned article. Nityanand Rai issued a witten statement, not a verbal one as you have claimed.. Both your sources say that Yogi ji called then terrorist, but neither explicitly calls it hate speech. Now saying that calling them terrorists would be classified hate speech, would be adding your personal analysis or synthesis ( assuming that the classification is correct ).Speaking of Delhi Police, if their statement is not a RS, then many of the sources on the article are based on the protesters/mob members' statement would have to to removed. Further, the article does not mention Islamist extremism ( as claimed by Tharoor Ji), mishandling of journalists by mob or accusation on Kejriwal for supporting the protest.. The article does not adhere to WP:NPOV in its current state. --Aryan ( है?) 11:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

References

"I refer to the stone pelting protesters who have illegally blocked roads", now who is this being attributed to? Yogi Adityanath? Because "sit-in peaceful protest, led by women" is attributed to three articles from The Hindu, Livemint and BBC that are verifiable. On the matter of Yogi himself, extract from the The Guardian article states:

Standing before a political rally in Delhi, Yogi Adityanath, the firebrand Hindu nationalist chief minister of Uttar Pradesh known for preaching hate and violence against India’s Muslims, did not mince his words. The thousands of women who have been gathered for two months in the Delhi suburb of Shaheen Bagh in protest against India’s new citizenship law were “terrorists”, he said...

Extract from the Frontline (magazine) states:

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, who the BJP roped in as its star campaigner, was given a long rope to peddle hate (see box). His entire campaign was loaded with innuendos against Muslims and the ongoing protests against the CAA/NRC/NPR. In one of his speeches, he said if these people did not listen to words, they would definitely listen to bullets (“boli se nahi to goli se to samjhenge hi”).

Per the RS, calling them "terrorists" is being classified as hate speech and that is not the only thing. Both the citations can be used individually to attribute hate speech in the election campaign to Yogi Adityanath, so no it is neither synthesis nor is it any personal analysis. It is as unambiguous and specific as it gets, original research refers to material whose conclusion can not be attributed to any single RS.

On the matter of Nityananda Rai, it seems he did provide written answers to the question in parliament but even that still does not address the entire sequence of events and can not be left only as a vague "government denial" without contextualisation. Note that WP:OR also states "It is important that references be cited in context and on topic." On the other hand statements from partisan individuals (in this case politicians; who are not RS) involved in the protests do not have anywhere near the same weight as reports of mainstream news publications (please read WP:FALSEBALANCE) and need not be included. WP:NPOV refers to "representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic". If you have examples of material where publications are attributing something to protesters but is unattributed and given wiki-voice in the article, you are free to bring them forward and please take any and all of your "concerns" to the talk page of the article where they can be addressed with greater input because I'm sorry but I'd rather not waste my time here anymore. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giraffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panther (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Ramesh Pokhriyal June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Rhode Island Red (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

@Rhode Island Red: Kindly see this section the talk page of the concerned article.--User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 05:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #3

On 16 March 2020, the 50 millionth edit was made using the visual editor on desktop.

Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:

• The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
• More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
• Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
• The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
• Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
• On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
• In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
670		Citizenship Amendment Act protests (talk)	Add sources
10		Hilsa, Nepal (talk)	Add sources
184		East Delhi (talk)	Add sources
38		Udal of Mahoba (talk)	Add sources
22		Amrohi Syed (talk)	Add sources
6		Okhla Vihar (talk)	Add sources
278		Radia tapes controversy (talk)	Cleanup
133		Sino-Nepalese War (talk)	Cleanup
192		Tamil Maanila Congress (talk)	Cleanup
831		Shantaram (novel) (talk)	Expand
2,614		Article 370 of the Constitution of India (talk)	Expand
875		Minister of Education (India) (talk)	Expand
50		Greater Kashmir (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
480		Sangh Parivar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
952		Kshatriya (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33		Stone pelting in Kashmir (talk)	Merge
106		State units of the Bharatiya Janata Party (talk)	Merge
1,978		Maruti Suzuki (talk)	Merge
17		K. N. Dandayudhapani Pillai (talk)	Wikify
104		Community mobilization (talk)	Wikify
6,766		Amit Shah (talk)	Wikify
17		Ready To Wait campaign (talk)	Orphan
3		NDTV Arabia (talk)	Orphan
16		CBSE expression series (talk)	Orphan
12		Rasuwa Fort (talk)	Stub
20		Banaphar (talk)	Stub
8		Tejaswini Singh (talk)	Stub
82		All India Mahila Congress (talk)	Stub
10		Modern Vidya Niketan schools (talk)	Stub
6		Dehradun Literature Festival (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sapna Chowdhary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sapna Chowdhary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ktin (talk) 06:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello, I'm SerChevalerie. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Stone pelting in India have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This edit brought in blatant violations of WP:BLP. So did some of your other edits at Tahir Hussain (politician). SerChevalerie (talk) 13:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:ARE

There is a discussion concerning you at WP:ARE. SerChevalerie (talk) 16:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Can you please leave a statement to this request at WP:AE? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You're repeating the same behaviour everywhere, assuming that a media report is true when it is NOT PROVED IN COURT. SerChevalerie (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi श्रीमान २००२! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Are opinion pieces from journalists of 'deprecated outlet' banned ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi श्रीमान २००२! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Are sources published by parent organisation considered reliable, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are indefinitely banned from editing all pages and discussion connected with India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan.

You have been sanctioned for persistent insertion of original research, use of unreliable sources or no sources at all, and tendentious editing.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. Doug Weller talk 10:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)