User talk:JG4236: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:01, 27 February 2021

This is JG4236's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Ballinger (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Clearly does not meet the notability requirements. Please review WP:BIO for further information on establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Ballinger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JG4236, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hermera34 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joe Walsh (Illinois politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Curt Schilling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not add speculation about future elections. —C.Fred (talk) 01:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JG4236, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add that, looking at the subpages you've created, you would be better off at a website like Ancestry.com. Wikipedia is not a web hosting service, and the majority of the pages you created are clearly not intended to improve the encyclopedia, and they also expose personal information that the subjects may not want on a public website. Please save the information you need then add the code {{db-u1}} to the pages so that they will be removed. You may also reply here and I will delete them. —DoRD (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes please, delete them! I've been trying to do this for so long and can't figure out how to do it, thank you!--JG4236 (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm A guy saved by Jesus. Your recent edit to the page Aroldis Chapman appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wilson Ramos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ian Desmond. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 21:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Atkinson

It would be nice if you're going to bury someone to at least cite sources. Please see the talk page where I can find 'mentions' of his death, but nobody points to anything citeable! Shenme (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Ballinger

Hello, JG4236. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Chris Ballinger".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to December 30 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andre Iguodala. —Bagumba (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Hey there, in this diff, you added an entry (twice) without any citations. Could you find a source to add? See WP:ENDORSERFC. Bobbychan193 (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at October 2. Toddst1 (talk) 02:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidential campaign announcements in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at November 1. Toddst1 (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced personal information or related content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Marc D'Amelio, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of The Office (American TV series) characters into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 18:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marc D'Amelio.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Marc D'Amelio.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thehour.com/news/article/D-Amelio-blames-Democrats-after-drunken-driving-13267277.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Devon Abner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devon Abner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://herbalskiey.weebly.com/blog/the-office-cast, https://homeoftvnostalgia.wixsite.com/00stvnostalgia/the-office-an-american-workplace, and https://weheyy.merrychristmas2020.info/2922-article.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Devon Abner moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Devon Abner, has no sources or citations and cannot remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved it to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, JG4236! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time.

Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts: AP and BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

FYI. ―Mandruss ☎ 04:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RichardRobbins.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:RichardRobbins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://twitter.com/rar624. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2018 Florida gubernatorial election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 United States presidential election. Template:Z189 Sundayclose (talk) 04:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Kirkman (character) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tom Kirkman (character), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistent addition of unsourced content, but also, as early as a month ago, for plainly disruptive editing. Please review the multiple warnings and notices above this space. Continuing with this behaviour is unsustainable. Thanks and good luck. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 10:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing my Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JG4236 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is absolutely outrageous! The reason I removed information on Joint Statistical Meeting was because the event was cancelled due to COVID-19 and nobody removed it. While I do apologize for inserting SOME unsourced content (and I promise to not do that) but I feel that the information I inserted was useful information like when I added that Bianca Andreescu was back from injury hiatus on 2021 Australian Open - Women's Singles and I think that I should not be blocked for that. Finally, I am very frustrated that we are being penalized for being creative on our own subpages that people won't find because they are under our own username. I thought those subpages and our Sandbox are for us to be creative by playing around with Wikipedia features that I find fun to use. Of course, it would be ridiculous for me to be creative on real pages but I would never and have never done that. Thank you. JG4236 (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I will agree with you that the first edit you mention was probably good, although the place to bring up your reason for removing it was in the edit summary. But as for a lot of your other edits ... all this information can very easily be sourced, and most editors would have done so, but you never showed any interest. (This edit also shows that you aren't familiar with MOS:N'T, but unfamiliarity with the MOS is not by itself a blockable offense).

However ... I am very troubled by a serious contradiction between what you assert in your request and what your record reveals. You say, regarding your humorous subpages (themselves sort of troubling, as anyone willing to put in that level of work should really be putting it towards actual content, and is additionally clearly demonstrating the ability, if not perhaps the inclination, to put sources in articles supporting the facts they add) that "it would be ridiculous for me to be creative on real pages but I would never and have never done that."

Then what, exactly, were you doing here? It sure looks to me like you linked one of your play pages from a real article.

The general immaturity level of your request, as well as the many final warnings you have received over the past year that have not been followed through with blocks (commented on at the AN/I), suggest to me that if you do serve out this block and return to editing as you have been, the next block should be an indef NOTHERE block because you will have demonstrated better than anyone else what behavior that category of blocks exists for.

"Mend your ways, young man, mend your ways" — Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have admitted that I should have sourced the 2021 Australian Open - Women's Singles edit, and for that I apologize. I also apologize for linking one of my own pages to a real page WHICH WAS AN ACCIDENT! But this block is seriously unnecessary. If you don't feel inclined to completely lift the block, then please consider reducing it to 2-4 days.--JG4236 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JG4236/dadabadada

Hello, JG4236. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JG4236/dadabadada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I WOULD LIKE IT DELETED!--JG4236 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JG4236/lilguss

Hello, JG4236. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JG4236/lilguss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I WOULD LIKE IT DELETED!--JG4236 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Martin Garbus

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block again, same thing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing my Block... again

{unblock|reason=Here we go again. The reason you see unsourced material on Martin Garbus's page is that I KNOW HIM! How am I supposed to source something that I know personally. Am I supposed to source the cell of my brain that knew about what I wrote? C'mon. With all due respect, Wikipedia is becoming tyrannical, blocking people left and right. I could be do something far worse like deleting entire pages or completely vandalizing them.JG4236 (talk) 02:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

@@ Line 201: / Line 201: @@
 ==Block again, same thing==
 <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for persistently adding [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|unsourced or poorly sourced content]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock --> <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 23:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
+== Appealing my Block... again ==
+{unblock|reason=Here we go again. The reason you see unsourced material on Martin Garbus's page is that I KNOW HIM! How am I supposed to source something that I know personally. Am I supposed to source the cell of my brain that knew about what I wrote? C'mon. With all due respect, Wikipedia is becoming tyrannical, blocking people left and right. I could be do something far worse like deleting entire pages or completely vandalizing them.[[User:JG4236|JG4236]] ([[User talk:JG4236#top|talk]]) 02:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)}}