Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Lake Victoria: Declined – not enough recent disruptive activity (using responseHelper)
1BGhimire (talk | contribs)
44 edits
→KP Sharma Oli: Requesting full protection of KP Sharma Oli.
Line 147: Line 147:


'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Page was protected up until today due to constant removal of cited content by IPs. As soon as the page was unprotected, the same removals started again. Subject is currently involved in a state-wide election so may be worth protecting until that's over. '''[[User:Ser!|ser!]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ser!|chat to me]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ser!|see my edits]])</sup> 10:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
'''Semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Page was protected up until today due to constant removal of cited content by IPs. As soon as the page was unprotected, the same removals started again. Subject is currently involved in a state-wide election so may be worth protecting until that's over. '''[[User:Ser!|ser!]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ser!|chat to me]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ser!|see my edits]])</sup> 10:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
=== [[:KP Sharma Oli]] ===
* {{pagelinks|1=KP Sharma Oli}}

'''Temporary full protection:''' Content dispute/edit warring – Constant vandalism and POV push by user YetiDai and its possible sockpuppet IDs, i have submitted checkuser for these as well/. [[User:1BGhimire|1BGhimire]] ([[User talk:1BGhimire|talk]]) 11:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:07, 8 November 2022

Shortcut
Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Yevgeny Balitsky

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arb case concerning the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Some sock activity, it seems like. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of equipment of the Pakistan Army

Reason: Long term disruption. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 10:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Los Angeles County elections

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow edit war between BottleOfChocolateMilk and IP users over colors. —twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 12:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes list of the world's highest-paid athletes

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.

This page was already protected six time in the last 3 years because of IP vandalism. And this page needs only one edit peer year to add the new list which was done by users in the past.

So could you please add a indefinite semi-protection of this page. If you look at the page history more as 80% of the edits is vandelism of IP's and reverts. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 13:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

American University of the Caribbean

Reason: High level of page modification regarding an inaccurate and damaging statement. Requesting temporary editing protection to prevent continued inappropriate edits to this page. 2600:1700:6750:6FB0:ECD0:74B5:E0E4:FDB3 (talk) 16:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-fascist Assembly for the National Liberation of Serbia

Reason: High level of disruptive editing and bias. Jingiby (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was months ago. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clay Hill, Florida

Reason: People keep putting the nick name "meth hill" as the city name Tyler.904 (talk) 00:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Not that I can find: [1]Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey Manger-Weil

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by blocked user:Hrstcms and his counterpart user:Foxtrot620 all in a bid to mess up the page and have it deleted. Padibso (talk) 00:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I object to this request wholeheartedly. I am not a counterpart or coeditor for anyone. My disclosures are clear, and present on User:Foxtrot620, and I am not editing on anyone's behalf or bequest. Adding a speedy deletion nomination, which was removed without cause or explanation does not constitute vandalism, let alone persistent vandalism. I have a proven history of editing with quality and in good faith. If you have questions, please let me know by dropping me a line on my talk page.
Thanks
Foxtrot620 (talk) 00:20, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Deleted the page instead. Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Materialscientist, thanks a lot for helping here. But I humbly appeal you undelete this page after getting to know the true scenario which I'll explain shortly.
Take a close look at the history of the page. You'll discover it has been a subject of attack for years. I found this out when I checked the page history. I wasn't the page creator. I only noticed the vandalism and decided to assist.
This Hrstcms had vandalized the page severally and also tagged it for speedy deletion severally but it kept getting declined by admins.
Yesterday, November 7, I tried adding 3 new WP:RS to boost WP:Notability on the page and fix the notability tag placed by Hrstcms. Shortly after that, this Hrstcms reverted all edits and went ahead to clear almost every content on the page leaving it nearly blank. I tried warning him on his talk page, but he insisted on messing up the page. I filed a vandalism report against him and he got blocked by the admin Favonian who also reverted his changes and declined the speedy deletion.
Within a space of few minutes, this Foxtrot620 followed the same trend. He had an older account with lots of edits. He returned the same notability tag and tagged the page for speedy deletion. He had earlier made the same bad faith edit and it got reverted. I didn't want to engage in an edit war with him nor revert his changes since an admin had already settled the issue. I tried talking to him on his talk page but he didn't agree. I also tried contacting the admin Favonian who that handled the issue before now. But it seems he was offline at the time.
I reported the account for vandalism and also appealed for page protection. But sadly, you got the page deleted without checking the history of what transpired.
I believe the page ought not to be deleted because it was a clear case of an attack on the subject matter. The attack on the page has been there for quite some time.
Deleting the page simply means the vandal had his way at the end.
Kindly review the page history to discover the true scenario. I appeal you undelete the page if you find reasons to do so from the inquiries.
Thanks Padibso (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don Valley Parkway

Reason: There has been IP vandalism of a sexual nature over the last several days. Perhaps pending changes would be sufficient? Imzadi 1979 → 01:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Victoria

Semi-protection: There are a lot of bad edits. Perhaps I recommend semi-protection. SpyridisioAnnis (talk) 03:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Warn the ip if they persist. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DC League of Super-Pets

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – That Gordon Freeman fanatic is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Coyote

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A lot of socking from one user. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Coyote

Reason: Either SEO spamming or fluffing, but whatever the case, under a sock attack from someone wanting to WP:RESUME up this BLP. Nate • (chatter) 04:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eighty Years' War

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking by a blocked user. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:21, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gembloux (1578)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking by a blocked user. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic number announcement circuit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IPs about WP:NOTDIRECTORY. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disagree. The editor who has been repeatedly removing factual information from the article without consensus is a registered user, not an IP, so full protection is needed and the article needs to be reverted to the last stable version (Oct 7, as this has been going on for a month with multiple editors involved). Using semi-protection would be favouring one individual in this edit war over others solely because he's been registered for longer - even though his edits are not constructive. 66.102.87.40 (talk) 05:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aqua Plays

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP/new editors are repeatedly reverting AfD template. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Page has been deleted. Lectonar (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nipsey Hussle

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant stream of disruptive editing from IPs and new users. Binksternet (talk) 06:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maram Susli

Reason: High level of brand new account vandalism (including Nick names like “Parmesan girl” , removing stuff arbitrarily, mostly it looks like just efforts to provoke random edit wars) Volunteer Marek 07:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Madagascar (2005 film)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content: semiprotected for one thousand years. MLAATR, Sans, Papyrus and Frisk 2022 (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of programmes broadcast by Colors TV

Reason: Addition of poorly cited or unsourced material repeatedly . Imsaneikigai (talk) 09:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by All TV

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of hoaxes by two anonymous users after protection expired. See history page, multiple hoaxes has been added even before protection. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Folklore (Taylor Swift album)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits from IPs and freshly-registered users. ℛonherry☘ 10:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Bailey

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was protected up until today due to constant removal of cited content by IPs. As soon as the page was unprotected, the same removals started again. Subject is currently involved in a state-wide election so may be worth protecting until that's over. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KP Sharma Oli

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant vandalism and POV push by user YetiDai and its possible sockpuppet IDs, i have submitted checkuser for these as well/. 1BGhimire (talk) 11:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase&oldid=1120705920"