Jump to content

User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive24: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
House10902 (talk | contribs)
Look: new section
Peter Jennings: new section
Line 597: Line 597:


This is not a critical article Downtown San Bernardino is just a district you need to tell him because its not right to be writing stuff down and when wrote stuff down he deleted it and considered it VANDALISM! so thats why i told you you need to talk to him because he wont tell me nothing!![[User:House10902|House10902]] ([[User talk:House10902|talk]]) 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
This is not a critical article Downtown San Bernardino is just a district you need to tell him because its not right to be writing stuff down and when wrote stuff down he deleted it and considered it VANDALISM! so thats why i told you you need to talk to him because he wont tell me nothing!![[User:House10902|House10902]] ([[User talk:House10902|talk]]) 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

== [[Peter Jennings]] ==

Hi. Since you seem to be one of the main admins who is watching this page, I was wondering if you would comment on the talk page about the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Jennings&diff=179788519&oldid=179727826 sentence I added] about Jennings' last marriage. The anonymous IP who keeps reverting me seems to think I'm vandalizing the article... Sorry this is turning into a rather lame edit war. If s/he reverts again, I think I'll open up an RFC on the article so we can resolve this rather petty dispute. [[Special:Contributions/69.202.60.86|69.202.60.86]] ([[User talk:69.202.60.86|talk]]) 15:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:20, 23 December 2007

I have two requests for people coming here:

  • If you intend to revert to personal attacks could you please use the {{subst:unsigned|user name|date}} template instead.
  • If you are here to complain about something I deleted could you please tell me the name of the article that you are talking about. If you do I will respond but if you don't I will ignore you.

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions:

Archive Special, Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7, Archive 8, Archive 9, Archive 10, Archive 11, Archive 12, Archive 13, Archive 14, Archive 15, Archive 16, Archive 17, Archive 18, Archive 19, Archive 20, Archive 21

Hippo

I recieved a message from somebody asking whether I could contribute some references to the hippo article and I lost it already. I have no computer skills. Can you please retrieve the message for me or tell me who the person was? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heterozygous Tiger

What they're talking about is called a "golden tabby tiger." Not all heterozygous tigers look like this. I think that's what they're talking about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heterozygous Tiger

I wrote a few lines about golden tabby tigers in the stripeless white tiger section of the white tiger article a while back, which are still there. That's all I know about them. I know it was JayHenry who contacted me about the hippos, but I can't figure out how to leave a message for him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Blanchard page

Hello there, I am wondering why you keep deleting my entry of Francis Blanchard. I would appreciate if you tell me the reason.Do you think I am infringing copyright of this page ? (http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/dgo/staff/formers/blanchard.htm)

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsagaan (talkcontribs) 09:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heterozygous Tiger

Thanks for the message. If by Heterozygous Tiger they don't mean golden tabby then I think it's confusing. On the white tiger article the term heterozygous is used in reference to the white gene only, but the same tigers would be both heterozygous for millions of other genes and also homozygous for millions. To give an example Queen Victoria was heterozygous for the gene for hemophilia. She was'nt a hemophiliac, but she carried the recessive gene. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JayHenry

I have gone to his user page and tried clicking on discussion and talk in blue, but I can't figure out how to leave a message. Will you please tell him if I can help with the hippopotamus article I'd be happy to. Does he know I added to the reference sections of pygmy hippopotamus and Billy (pygmy hippoptamus) already? Sorry for the bother. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heterozygous Tiger

I wrote about heterozygous tigers being larger than average, like white tigers, in the white tiger article. The source was Kailash Sankhala's book Tiger ! 1977. The complete bibliographical reference is in the white tiger bibliography, including the publisher. He never uses the term "heterozygous" or heterozygote in his book. Neither does Sara Iversin in her 1982 article, but she talks about heterozygous tigers, like Kanchana. Both of Thornton's Journal of Zoology articles from 1967 and 1978 could be used as references for the Heterozygous Tiger article. I was reading the "Golden Tabby Tiger" article. It says their coloration is due to a separate gene, but I'm sure this is false. The golden tabby tiger coloration results from the interaction of the white and orange gene, and they are a form of heterozygous tiger. Both the golden tabby tiger and the stripeless white tiger appeared more or less simultaneously in the early 1980s out of the white strains. Golden tabby tigers are often born in litters with white tigers. I am convinced that the golden tabby results from the combination of a stripeless white gene and an orange gene. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billy pygmy hippo

Will you please tell JayHenry I left him a message in Billy pygmy hippo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talkcontribs) 15:37, 8 November 2007

Thanks for the note. He has access to some remarkable sources... stuff I've been unable to find anywhere. --JayHenry 16:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Region of Nunavut

Hi, I noticed you place the Ottawa Islands in a specific region. here is your edit. Could you please tell me where we could find information which says specifically the Ottawa Islands are part of that region. I looked at the article Qikiqtaaluk Region and it's references and couldn't find anything to substantiate. --CyclePat 07:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. The reason I ask you that is because of reference #1 from the Ottawa Islands which says Standard Geographical Classification Volume II: Reference Maps (SGC 2006). Online database: Map Series: Census Division - Census Subdivision. Geography: 23. Nunavut (9.9 MB). Map "Nunavut". Statistics Canada, Ottawa, 2007. Accessed 05-11-2007. Note: This information is based on the analysis of primary information provided within the map and is supported by secondary information in reference #2 (NRCAN). Reference #2 clearly states that the location of Ottawa Islands is within Nunavut. By cross referencing with NRCAN it is possible to conclude that Ottawa Islands is not only part of Nunavut but of Census Division #4 or Baffin Region, Nunavut. This, may or may not contradict your inference. Are census divisions different compared to regions? --CyclePat 06:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billy

I left another message for JayHenry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed facts

What exactly is your objection to the disputed facts section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xreenberg (talkcontribs) 01:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Loughrey13

Thought you might be interested that User:Loughrey13 is still uploading copyright images despite your polite message, just tagged Image:Belfastairport.jpg. MilborneOne 22:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zoom belfast.jpg was not copied off airlines.net! I pasted it of the Belfast International Airport Masterplan which isnt copyrighted! The only picture that i got of the net was the jet.com aircraft at the airport and after you telling me i know not to upload items off websites! Please reply! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loughrey13 (talkcontribs) 22:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Loughrey13 has now uploaded the image again with a different name Image:BelfastAirport.jpg, I have checked the Belfast Airport website T&Cs which clearly states that the contents of the web site may not be copied, reproduced, distributed, republished, downloaded, displayed, posted or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of Belfast Airport.. MilborneOne 22:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following have also been updated from the same source Image:Bfs-outside.jpg. Image:Checkin hall.jpg, Image:Zoom belfast.jpg. MilborneOne 22:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian prime ministers

Hi CBW- FYI, I replied at my talk. Cheers. --G2bambino 06:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sabah Wildlife Department

while trying to understand an edit of user Tabdulla I accidentally noticed your deletion of Sabah Wildlife Department. The reason was (Prod:lack of notability).

As a reader (sic!), I'm interested in some info on legal institutions in some distant countries. Accidentally - I do know something of the wild life in Sabah, and even thought about a trip to there. I don't sure about this case... SWD (I confused it first with an other organisation, research one, which i intended to defend here:)) as i see at 1st glance - is primary licensing-permitting (and may be sometimes research) government organisation. My intended objection was that i came across the name twice last year, reading popular geographic magazine and watching TV (being far away from Borneo)... but now i examined... i confused it:) So i do not sure that SWD deserves being here.

But i remember where i saw your name 1st time. The article on Eureka or some other Ellesmere station... with a few ppl staff. Thats why i'm leaving this note:) Else i would pass... Well, I'm Russian, not Canadian. But still was interesred in those stations for some (silly) reason.


So, please. Be carefully, what is distant country for us - is home country for somevody else (Tabdulla?). How do you think - do US/Candian/UK gov.institutions deserve coverage on WP? I'm sure, Wiki (it's main difference between WP and any paper pedia) won't get 'too big' because of 'too many' articles. And there some topics, may be, for which it's best to write short description, history and the link rather then a huge text, but which are still deserving separate header? http://www.sabah.gov.my/jhl/ - SWD http://www.vokrugsveta.ru/img/cmn/2006/11/28/049.jpg - just forest in the state of Sabah:) --83.237.27.0 16:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Restored at Sabah Wildlife Department as it was deleted under Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you... i didnt intend to restore it... I just wondered 'wow, the same guy whom i saw discussing weather stations at the end of a world is deleting smthng placed at the another end of the same world. And I happened to hear of both topics!'. So i proposed to be carefully with the ends of that crazy world. Well... then i'll try to improve it... Damn! Another pain in my ass... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.237.27.0 (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re User talk:Texens10

Cheers...

I'll give him a second chance i suppose... But wont hesitate to block again if needs be


Reedy Boy 18:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Reedy Boy 18:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge, Thanks for starting discussion about surname on Lena's talk page. I left a comment and than a question. Rosiestephenson 18:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgiest: The ongoing problem

I was thinking of writing a little guide that can be referred to by pro-ZtM and unnecessarily-anti ZtM editors, and I was wondering if you could help me find the deletion history of ZtM? I can't find it, probably capping or punctuating wrongly. Thanks in advance. Anchoress 05:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The main listing is at Wikipedia:Protected titles/July 2007/List#M - Z and there is also Zeitgeist (video) and The zeitgiest movie. Did you want them emailed to you? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info, and no, I don't need them emailed. I appreciate it! Anchoress 23:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
v/v Zeitgeist, the Movie - if it sticks then my project is irrelevant. Thanks for the heads up. Anchoress 02:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting weather instrument photos

I intend to use some or all of the following images in a college-level textbook I am writing on atmospheric thermodynamics:

Image:Indoor_hygrometer.JPG

Image:Exterior_tipping_bucket.JPG

Image:Interior_tipping_bucket.JPG

Image:Maximum_thermometer_close_up_2.JPG

Image:Ceiling_balloon.JPG

Image:Barograph.JPG

Image:Aircraft_altimeter.JPG

Image:Sling_psychrometer.JPG

Image:Regulator_valve_&_pressure_gauge.JPG

Image:Stevenson_screen_exterior.JPG

Image:Stevenson_screen_interior.JPG


I'd like to thank you for releasing them to the public domain. I plan to acknowledge them as follows: "Photo released to the public domain, courtesy of Alan Sims." Please let me know if you prefer a different wording.

Gpetty 16:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Reversion on Ed, Edd n Eddy ==

Just to clue you in, there is an edit war going on over what the last airdate of the original runs is. The correct date is May 11, 2007, the date the last episode aired for the first time. Repeats are not part of the original run, but a lot of people don't seem to grasp that concept. The reversion you made actually restored the wrong date. Just for your information. Thanks. -- Elaich talk 03:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI.

I was wondering if you can nomonate me to be come a southern califonian articles administarater becouse people are putting false information to pages ill really be thankfull!

User:Ie909 —Preceding comment was added at 02:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emirates Airline

Hi, i'm new here. I respect your recent edits to the Emirates Article, but can we please keep the destinations table. I worked so hard on it, and leave the engines it took me hours to find that information. Thank you. Bye the way your user page is quite interesting.(Klop09 18:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC));[reply]

Thanks, i think your a great adminstrator by the way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klop09 (talkcontribs) 18:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for restoring my page. --Nlu (talk) 05:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Praht Thai School

Can we get this page back as there are so man schools on Wiki and I cannot see why we are the only ones targeted. Here is a list for you. Please delete all of them or put us back up. We were originally deleted in error I believe and have since become some sort of table tennis game. We worked hard to fix any crtiscisms of the article and content and to Wikifyit too yet to no avail. Please support us is all ewe ask. PTSch (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Here is the list on Wiki in our category:[reply]

List of schools in Thailand 42 of these listed schools (blue links) have Wiki Pages.....how so different?....no notability or anything like we are being asked to provide Thanks in anticipationof your help. PTSch (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments on your pagePTSch (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also here is a copy of my submission to the Deleted page review I am anout to submit


1. Internationalised Curriculum

We read the above discussion and remain confused as to what everyone was looking at as we saw:-

  1. added notability-proving articles on the site
  2. Following the article we also note how the so-determined 'advertising aspect' was removed even to the extent that the school mentioned as the first site of implenmentation was removed from the article though we feel that was strange as it was the first school comminssioned to run the curriculum
  3. One user we note who was blocked by one of your "editors" because he put up a series of article links to support the Internationalised Curriculum area. This was clearly ignored as the resource that it was and the user was simply cut off - consensus?

Was no one looking at all this or was that improvement effort secondary to consensus on deletions? I note with some dissppointement the 'stars' editors proudly display on their talk pages showing how prolific they are in Deleting or Stopping Spammers etc smacks of the BoyScouts not serious international responsibilty of editing a serious work such as Wikipedia and certainly not in the Wikipedia spirit I would have thought at all. At least not consistent ewith the little comments that pop up on the top on my Wiki screen.


2. Praht Thai School

Well how did this get so out of control??? Praht Thai is a school just like:

List of schools in Thailand 42 of these listed schools (blue links) have Wiki Pages.....how so different?....no notability or anything like we are being asked to provide

These are all happily listed with articles all beautifully left in peace...so why the Praht Thai Target??? Will these now be all summarily deleted or will Praht Thai SchoolItalic text be allowed back up?

It cannot be sensible that the prime reason for agreeing to delete an article is that someone had deleted it before and then it was reposted. What? Did someone take offense to the repost of a legitinmate article and dig their editing heels in? But alals I see from the above that it is the main reason for deletion...."someone had previously deleted it and look the naughty people put it back...how dare they!"

Oh, and please stop quoting Wikipedia guidleines...they are followed only when justifying a negative action. No reasonableness ensures - discussions on this site have lasted 1 hour and been by one or two editors only - see the Praht Thai Schools Disccussion page...which is where it is supposed to be discussed.....I only just found this page here thanks to a courteous editor who let us know about it.

By the way I have read many of the home pages of the editors who eem to have targeted our site and I must say juvenile opinion abounds in many. One "editor" even stated that including of a certain information type was not to be tolerated calling it "bollocks" - so it seems his view takes precedence over consensus - well why not I believe he was almost 22 years old and so I guess is the holder of the key of knowledge and understanding.

Please help me understand this attitude before we totally give up on Wikipedia as a resource worth considering any further. Are we frustrated - you can bet we are. Can we resolve this ....or will someone simply block our account now that we speak our mind? PTSch (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sikiwiki

Ah! Thank you. I did try to find the licensing information on the site and failed. You might want to put a short note on the talk page so that nobody else gets confused. — Coren (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your reversion of Rush Limbaugh

My edit was to move a section down to the appropriate place in the chronology. I think that it originally got reverted because someone vandalised the page after my edit, and then someone using popups rolled back too far. (It has happened elsewhere too.) I keep trying to tell folks to check very carefully before reverting. Whether you agree with the edit or not, I can't say. But common Wikipedia courtesy requires the use of an edit summary when the reversion is not for simple vandalism. Cheers, 71.182.215.210 (talk) 13:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For this. Best, shoy (words words) 01:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

I was trying to change one of the references in the white tiger article, the second one, from one source to another. I think I messed it up. Will you please take a look and fix it? I think Kailash Sankhala is a much more credible source than Dr. Laughlin and he is used repeatedly in the article, Sankhala I mean. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

Yes that's where I messed it up. There's a sentence and a reference missing when I look at the article which are still there if I go into the edting section. I just discovered messages you've left for me previously which I did'nt see before today. Sorry about that. For the part in the white tiger article where it says (India imposed an export ban) the reference could be (Gee, E.P., 1964 The White Tigers, Animals 3:282-286) or (Gee, E.P., The Wildlife Of India, London: Collins 1964) or (White tiger exports banned, India, NY Times D. 4, 1960 12:2), and Clyde Beatty also mentions the ban in his book. All these references are in the bibliography. Will you look at the messages I left for JayHenry under (Sumatran rhinoceros & white tiger), and also (BigCatRescue), where I explain why I don't think that BigCatRescue or Daniel C. Laughlin's article The White Tiger Fraud are good or credible sources for the wikipedia article. This key board won't let me make a question mark or quotation marks. I also only just got your message about the Crandon Park Zoo. Thanks. I was just going to add a reference to the white gorilla article when I got your messages. Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

The 2nd reference should be Iverson, S.J., (1982) Breeding white tigers, Zoogoer 11:5-12 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Ivery

I just redirected the page to his wife. There is no apparent encyclopedicity in anything about his life, except that he's married to Ellen Pompeo. FCYTravis (talk) 07:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elections NWT photo request

Hi, I was wondering if you are traveling to Yellowknife anytime soon, or know someone else who can do it. I am looking for a free photo of the Elections NWT office to enhance the article. I am working on bringing it to Good Article status. Let me know what you think of the article. I thought it would be thin with just Elections NWT related info, so I thought it would be relevant to include a background on how elections were administered from the beginning. --Cloveious (talk) 11:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I appreciate it, I will ask him.--Cloveious (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Times Behind the Signs - COI

Hey, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I mean, I really should have thought this over more (I guess this gets filed under the "it seemed like a good idea at the time" category), as I like to think I'm moderately aware of Wikipedia policy. Anyway, I've declared a COI (using a template) on the article page; are there any further steps I should take? -YK Timestalk 16:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

White Tiger

I have been trying to improve the white tiger article. I noticed that somebody changed the way I spelled "Indo-Chinese tiger" to "Indochinese tiger", and created a link to the Indochinese tiger wikipedia article. The link does'nt work unless it's spelled Indochinese tiger, but I'm sure that Indo-Chinese tiger is the correct spelling. I checked it in the Oxford dictionary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 18:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Created Indo-Chinese Tiger as a redirect. If that is indeed the correct way to format/spell it, it probably should be put up as a proposed move. If its just an alternative spelling, leaving as a redirect is fine... Reedy Boy 19:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Chinese Tiger

I also found both spellings used on the internet, although my dictionary only gave one. Thanks for looking into it. Sincerely Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You closed this with MfD tags, instead of AfD. I wondered if this was a mistake or deliberate - if latter, I'd be interested to learn what was the cause. Thanks. Tyrenius (talk) 01:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! I was going to fix it, but I wasn't sure if it was something to do with the copyvio bit. :) Tyrenius (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back in February you put a proposed deletion tag on this article. Unfortunately, you made a bit of a typo. It's fixed now, if you want to keep an eye on it. ... discospinster talk 02:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of airports by ICAO code: K. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cf38 (talk) 09:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen Pompeo

Why do you constantly revert edits about her spouse Chris Ivery? He's a 13 times convicted drug dealer and felon, it's relevant to who he is. Please refrain from doing this, it is censorship plain and simple. There are plenty of vandals on here that you can block and revert, have at it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.117.6 (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not properly sourced. Tabloids and IMDB are not relialable. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed the same info when referenced from The Boston Globe. Quit censoring legitimate info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.117.6 (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CambridgeBayWeather,

I noticed you reverted MNEO620, but didn't block the account. While he does seem like a good-intentioned contributor generally, he obviously doesn't have a basic handle on the English language nor the wiki-conventions of consensus-editing, not to mention copyright. User:Rlevse extended his block to indefinite following his double (now triple!) voting on an IFD here: Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_November_18#Image:Snow_in_San_Bernardino_Streets.jpg. Leaving his active accounts unblocked will lead to more clean-up work, I'm afraid. Best, Ameriquedialectics 17:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hellow...Ihave a question??

How do you put a picture in wikipedia, i also ask another administrator but dosent reply back? Nelry (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you did'nt get the point. I'm doing it only for pages which are a copy from META.

In some pages like Help:Page name‎ you can see a template like this:

Template:H:h Help

In these pages, if you put inter-wikipedia links - they will be lost on next synchronization. To help them remain in place, there are some templates and macros.

Try to have a look at the call to {{h:f}} in last lines of Help:Page name‎.

You can see a line like this

{{h:f|langs=|enname=Page name}}

This will call Template:Ph:Page name‎ where you should put inter-wikipedia links and keep them safe from next synchronization of the meta page copy.

Don't hesitate to contact me if you need more explanation.Ammar 11:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved interwikipedia links from Help:Page name to Template:Ph:Page name‎ again. Check the results and let me know your idea. I think this method needs more documentation. Ammar 11:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your suggestion. I normally forget writng them and this is my most usual mistake. Ammar 12:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TBRHSC

That is weird.. In my bookmarks, it's .net! I imagine they had .ca at one time, then it was changed to .com? When I add links to pages, I check the page and copy the url from the bar, so it had to be .ca at one point. I have no idea why they might have given up that url. Thanks for noticing it though. :) vıdıoman (talkcontribs) 16:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked http://www.archive.org, it has history of .com back to 2004, but when you click it, it redirects to the .net version. Typing .com into the bar or using the link on the article page doesn't do that, though. .net has the more page update information than .com. It doesn't seem to have the .ca site's history. vıdıoman (talkcontribs) 16:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Amish school shooting

An article that you have been involved in editing, Amish school shooting, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amish school shooting. Thank you. A. B. (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source of reference for SOMALILAND

Dear Sir

Im somewhat surprised that the information on “Somaliland” is allowed on this site as it is FACTUALLY false. There is no recognised such country, Somaliland is a clandestine group of people namely the Isaq clan who have been inciting clan conflict in the north of Somalia in attempt for recognition. Oct 15th saw another attack on the civilian city of Las Canod causing 90k IDP's reported by the likes of Unicef etc.

Puntland is not a country either but a state of Somalia (such as Texas is to the US). Im happy to pass this information to the Somali authorities in order that this site remains a source of information and not a tool for clan warlord propaganda.

Im not entirely sure how your site determines what is a personal opinion and what is factual as it would seem the personal opinion of war lords is taken as fact in this instance. Please advice me on how to ensure this deliberate misinformation is made visible to the appropriate —Preceding unsigned comment added by SomaliVoice (talkcontribs) 01:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emirates Airline

CambridgeBayWeather, i think the Emirates Airline page looks really good and most information has been placed into other pages. But i think it is time we removed the clean up template, since the page does't need it anymore. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Hasanie (talkcontribs) 13:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...im so,so sorry

Its User:House1090 again remember? well im here to tell you im done playing games I created a new account to tell that to give me a 1 week block and start all over I was Ie909 but because i made alot of errors but please dont block me for ever if imake 1 more mastake the block me but give me a new chance please! write back i dont want no more probloms im only 16 and taking the California High School exit exam... but please give me 1 more chance i dont want any more pobloms writ back!! please House10902 (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

There has been a notice up for a long time saying that wikipedia frowns on trivia sections, above the popular culture section of the white tiger article, so I took the hint and deleted it, but it was put back within seconds by Undead warrior. I went to his user page, but could'nt figure out how to leave a message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger trivia

Thanks. You did that amazingly fast ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias

Thank You! —Preceding unsigned comment added by House10902 (talkcontribs) 18:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Mapepire Balsain

Why you deleted that redirect despite the fact that the CSD was contested? Guettarda (talk) 02:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't delete it a second time? How gracious of you. But why do you delete active discussions contesting a CSD? The deletion rationale was nonsense - it wasn't a new page, and quite frankly, one of the reasons we have redirects is to capture alternate capitalisation. What difference does a search box use (does anyone actually use Wikipedia's crappy search engine?) when Mapepire Balsain is a red link? Red links don't lead to search boxes, or have you not noticed?
And since when do you delete active discussions without explanation? Guettarda (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did I give you permission to edit my page? --Jay Turner (talk) 12:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I often use AOL but there is one IP which repeates over and over again which is my BT brouadband box at my mums house, and to be honest I didn't mind but you cudda' told me

--Jay Turner (talk) 18:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont blame you.

--Jay Turner (talk) 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

It was a collection of vandals who took offence at my nominating their article about their precious forum. It's people like that who give Welsh people a bad name. – PeeJay 20:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...

Does User:Amerique and all the other Administrators know im User:House1090??

Hey...

Does User:Amerique and all the other Administrators know im User:House1090??House10902 (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you did the page move of Cornwallis Island (Nunavut), your edit summary suggested that you were unsure of why this was required. It was required per WP:MOS, naming conventions for duplicate island names. The person who first did this move did so by copying and pasting, and redirecting the original page, hence the need for cleanup to preserve the edit history. He has done the same thing with Egg Island (Bahamas) and Cockburn Island (Antarctica)‎, both of which are still tagged CSD G6. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 03:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

Nibras23 inserted a couple of lines into the white tiger article about a member of the rock band Linkin Park killing a white tiger, and being gay. I deleted it. I could'nt find any evidence on the internet that a member of Linkin Park has killed a white tiger and as for whether he's gay-why put that into an article about white tigers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

Thanks for the message. I have continued looking and can't find any evidence that Chester Bennington killed a white tiger to impress a friend and has been charged with killing an endangered animal, or that he owns any white tigers. There's a wikipedia article about him and he lives in my home town of Orange County CA. Sincerely Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Dream

Hello As component of our capstone to earn our B.S. in sociology, my class and I have created a Wikipedia entry for the American Dream from a sociological perspective. You reverted it to the original and said you didnt know what happened to it. It came out a little funky when we tried transferring it from WikiSpaces to here but we are working on it. I just wanted to let you know what we are doing. I didnt want you thinking that were going back and forth putting up our stuff. Its an assaignment that a group of us are required to work on. Thank You Johnielle Eastwood —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnielle927 (talkcontribs) 17:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Chemical Romance/Buzznet

Hi there. You deleted my addition of the My Chemical Romance Buzznet community link as well as a few others. Could you please explain why MySpace links are allowed to remain while Buzznet ones are not? We work with the artists, their managers and their record companies directly and have forums, interviews and media that is not available elsewhere. I've had this discussion with other people who have removed my links and they have allowed them to stay. I only put up links to communities that have exclusive content. Our MCR one happens to be the biggest on the web. You marked the link as spam and that felt a bit rash. Could you please reconsider? Should I be explaining all of this in the edit summary? Would that have made a difference? Thanks for reading. Smogqueen (talk) 04:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So...are you ok with putting those links back up? I noticed that you took them down on several bands/individual musician pages. I don't want to put them back up myself just to have you take them down again. I appreciate your feedback and will do my best to explain better in the future. Smogqueen (talk) 18:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wasrsangeli sub-clans

Hello there,,

I have seen some of your contributions and its wonderfull,

I am new to this, I mean editing in Wiki, but some one with the name of Mabruuk or from this IP# 202.63.109.236 is editing with faul language.

My question is How to ban or do something about this?

Also added few things on Maakhir (The arabic bit), Created pages for some towns and cities, please if you dont mind correct them or let me know what to correct them( in term of language or layout)


Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdirisak (talkcontribs) 13:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you..

Thanks

Thank you.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdirisak (talkcontribs) 14:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Infobox Airport and "none" in IATA code

There isn't any particular reason I changed those infoboxes from "IATA=" to "IATA=none". The program I wrote to generate infoboxes for U.S. airports puts "none" in there. Then I just manually copy any differences from the existing infobox before replacing it with the new one. I should probably leave those fields blank or remove them, since I do prefer the look of the automatically generated none in italics. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Zyxw (talk) 15:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been removing flag icons that were added to airlines to this airport and User:Cdeujm keeps adding it back saying that the flag icons make the article look better. I noticed that you removed the flag icons not too long ago that were added to this airport. Can you send a message to User:Cdeujm telling him about flag in airport articles. I was going to message him about it but he will disagree with me. Thanks! Bucs2004 (talk) 17:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

There was more vandalism on the white tiger article which was done on 10, Dec., and was promptly repaired on the same date. The vandal left the words "hi it's rhys" in place of a deleted section. Will you please trace the vandal's IP address and see if it's a computer in Seaford, Australia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Google Earth again

In response to your message at User talk:Zyxw #Google earth again:

Thanks for the info. It appears the Google Earth team fixed that bug in their coding, since coordinates assigned to an infobox parameter named "coordinates" (as is the case in the articles you mentioned) were supposed to be accepted by Google Earth regardless of whether the {{coord}} template used "display=inline" or "display=title". -- Zyxw (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals

Thank you very much for that. Is it possible it could have been routed through another computer in a different country because I know a Rhys? Also I think the last time the same section(s) were deleted it was also coincidentally from Aukland, New Zealand, but I think it was done from a university by someone with a user name on that occasion. Thanks again. Sincerely Paul

Vandals

Thanks again. It seems like a strange coincidence that the last time that same section was deleted it was also from Aukland. It was on 1:44, 15 October 2007 156.62.3.22 Aukland University of Technology. It's not the same IP address, but it's the same city both times. I guess it does'nt really matter since the damage was repaired in less than a minute from the time it happened. Sincerely Paul

Personal Attack?

What are talking about, I didnt leave a personal attack that guy kept editing the Douglas MacArthur High School (San Antonio, Texas) page on the part that says Football(USA Football) 1998 State Finalist , I added information that they were State Finalist on the account that the other team that would have played them Katy High School had a player that failed or something so they played in their spot for the State Championship game and lost to Midland Lee High School 53-0. There so dont say I did a personal attack. You got it all wrong dude.Phoenix X91 (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cambrige , uh.. I though that guy was an idoit he though I vandlize the article. Look above this post to the info about that article.I know because I attend that HIGH SCHOOL.Phoenix X91 (talk) 01:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been edited endlessly for days. Mainly by the user who you've just warned for profanity. Any suggestions on how to keep said article free of unnecessary editing? Midnight Q (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What if the article was rewritten to look more like John Marshall High School (Leon Valley, Texas)? Replacing the "success" section with a "notable alumni" section would eliminate the need for every school organization/athletics to update every year bloating the article. Midnight Q (talk) 22:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I've created the temporary article and posted it in the discussion. Hopefully I'll get constructive criticism and not just another edit war. Midnight Q (talk) 03:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not getting anywhere with this kid (Phoenix_X91). Was my explanation for the temporary article too complex? Midnight Q (talk) 04:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

I should have mentioned that I know someone who has a website about white tigers who recieved a number of unpleasant e-mails from a Rhys who seems to think he owns the subject. That's why I thought it was probably the same person who deleted the section and left the message "hi its rhys". I still think it's a little too coincidental. I think there's a connection.

Yesterday I created a user page for myself and found that you deleted it today. Here is the record:

01:31, 12 December 2007 CambridgeBayWeather (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Arikahn" ‎ (CSD G12: Copyright violation: http://www.greatlandholdings.com/team.html)

I, Ari Kahn, wrote the copy of the Great Land Holdings web site. As you can see from the Web site, Ari Kahn is the Chairman & CEO of the company.

Please replace the deleted page or tell me what I need to do to make it acceptable.

Regards,

  Ari Kahn

vandalism

Thanks. Sincerely Paul

Template talk:US-airport

Hey, if you have a chance, you might want to take a look at Template talk:US-airport. A bunch of guys trying to spam their web sites throughout wikipedia (see edit history) and sock puppets (see edit history). I've replied a few times but it's pretty much going in circles at this point. Touchdown Turnaround (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference "fixes"

Thanks for catching that. That was the only page on which I noticed AWB doing that -- I'll point it out to the maintainer so it fixes it the right way next time.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 15:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

white tiger

I will create an account. Regarding the other matter he also sent me an e-mail, before the section disappeared twice, in which he objected to the content of that section. He said that private breeders would'nt appreciate having their information put on the internet. I told him that all of that information has already appeared in print and is available elsewhere on the internet. I also told him that I spoke to two of them on the phone and told them I was doing research for a website before asking them any questions. The other two private breeders are dead and this is all ancient history anyway. He did'nt answer. After I saw that message "hi its rhys", left in place of the deleted section I e-mailed him and asked whether he did it. I also told him it was restored before I knew it had been deleted (in under a minute). He did'nt reply to that either. I wonder whether other vandalism was perpetrated from Aukland or Australia. He does'nt live in New Zealand. I know his full name, mailing address and e-mail address. I've mailed him articles about white tigers and spoken to him on the phone. I may not have time to create an account today, but I will soon. Thanks for all the help. Sincerely Paul PS I never heard back from JayHenry about whether he wants those pictures of Sumatran rhinos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.195.4 (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User

I assume I'm signed in now because of the red thing at the top. I have actually made a point of not using information that came from him in the article because I did'nt want to upset him. He has'nt claimed that any of the information is his or objected on that basis.LagunaBeachCA (talk) 20:05, 13 December 2007 (UTC)LagunaBeachCA I'm sorry I screwed that up some how.[reply]

Polar Bear

Hi. There's a problem with the edits done on the polar bear article. It is simply wrong to say that polar bears include berries, seaweed, and roots in their diet. In another location is says "Polar bears may attempt to consume almost anything they can find, including hazardous substances such as styrofoam, plastic, car batteries, ethylene glycol, hydraulic fluid, and motor oil", yet nobody is claiming that motor oil is part of a polar bear's diet. The facts are exactly the same however.

The western hudson bay bear population is unique, in that the bears go without a source of food for 3-4 months, and in the process are starving. What they try to eat is merely a case of what they find. Motor oil or berries, it makes no difference... it has no food value and would be ignored by a healthy bear that had a proper food source.

In fact,no other polar bears typically eat garbage, motor oil, or berries. They sometimes explore dumps, but mostly out of curiosity, and typically do not eat or return.

The problem with the way it was worded, prior to my recent edits (which I made because of an example of this) causes people to believe that polar bears are omivorous like brown bears are. They are NOT. They've lost the teeth to even eat plants! And food like berries might go down, but it does not sustain the bear. See Can. J. Zool. 63(10): 2291?2297 (1985) | doi:10.1139/cjz-63-10-2291 | © 1985 NRC Canada The Significance of supplemental food to polar bears during the ice-free period of Hudson Bay" Lunn and Stirling.

I don't have time to re-edit it right now, but within a day or two will do so. Please to not revert it without discussion and research. The false impression that is currently being given about diet is damaging. Floyd Davidson (talk) 01:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y did you delet my pic of downtown San Bernardino??

Y did you there is no better pic of it???House10902 (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Northern mountain ranges

From looking at the atlas you found, the Challenger Mountains and the United States Range seem to parallel each other. So I guess both ranges would be considered the northernmost. Black Tusk 20:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Important Subjects

Hello and thank you for your feedback. However, Wikipedia:Lists of Important Subjects clearly states that we should be making these lists and making sure theyre up to date with all of the current most important subjects around. THank you! --HandsomeDave (talk) 06:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, you need to check the sources of the wikipedia! I have duties. Duties to wikipedia. Duties like making these lists and keeping them important and crucial. -HandsomeDave (talk) 06:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey listen, I put the page back now. Its better, I took care of its subjectivety. --HandsomeDave (talk) 06:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Handsome Dave

Kind sir, if you keep vandalizing my walls, I will have to block you. Please follow the rules.  :) -HandsomeDave (talk) 07:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cry about it

tough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meingott7 (talkcontribs) 07:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for adding the (ballet) to Morgen (ballet) and "piping" it. Robert Greer (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP

Will you please trace this one 68.186.212.100 ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LagunaBeachCA (talkcontribs) 16:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What (QUE)??

Look I have that Picture saved i live in San Bern. and its not like any other picture of downtown please let me save the downtown picture view please !! House10902 (talk) 02:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IPs

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LagunaBeachCA (talkcontribs) 15:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

well i dont know??? i have a picture just like that one that i took!!! just let me upload it one more time plz!! its a nice pic!House10902 (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pic of Downtown SB

yes thats the one i uploaded!House10902 (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Downtown SB

Well i will upload it but you wont delet it right?House10902 (talk) 01:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"white tiger cruelty"

Somebody added a section to the white tiger article titled "white tiger cruelty". I deleted the whole thing. It was rubbish. It said that "people make Siberian tigers mate with Bengal tigers to produce white tigers" and that only 25% of the cubs are white. I know my spelling is bad, but even by my standards the spelling was atrocious. Also what was said about tiger farms and inbreeding problems had all been covered elsewhere in the article. I also believe that it's against wikipedia policy to represent a point of view in this manner. LagunaBeachCA

Removal

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LagunaBeachCA (talkcontribs) 15:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bug you but...

User:Amerique has been writing critics about Downtown San Bernardino that dont need to be in the article so i deleted it i think you should talk to that user, i allready tried he or she keeps on rewriting it it is considered VANDALISM!! TELL HER OR HIM TO STOP !House10902 (talk) 02:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look

This is not a critical article Downtown San Bernardino is just a district you need to tell him because its not right to be writing stuff down and when wrote stuff down he deleted it and considered it VANDALISM! so thats why i told you you need to talk to him because he wont tell me nothing!!House10902 (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since you seem to be one of the main admins who is watching this page, I was wondering if you would comment on the talk page about the sentence I added about Jennings' last marriage. The anonymous IP who keeps reverting me seems to think I'm vandalizing the article... Sorry this is turning into a rather lame edit war. If s/he reverts again, I think I'll open up an RFC on the article so we can resolve this rather petty dispute. 69.202.60.86 (talk) 15:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]