User talk:Diannaa

Archives Archive 1 (November 2009 to May 2010) Final newsletter Hi, could you do me a favor? I've got a lot going on IRL in the next couple days. Could you and SMasters work out a final newsletter to send to everyone? He's pretty good with graphic layout, and you're the communications deputy for the drive, so you two should make a great team on this. You're going to want to provide some statistics, like total number of words copyedited, total articles edited, etc. If you don't have time to do any of this, that's okay. I'll just do it when I get back. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 01:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC) I can do it. I will post it to SMaster's Talk when it's ready and hopefully they will have time to help with the technical bits. Thanks for your work on the drive!!! Diannaa TALK 01:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Hi Diannaa, you can post it at the bottom of User:SMasters/Workshop and I will add the graphs, etc. Cheers. - S Masters (talk) 04:29, 1 June 2010 (UTC) OK, done. Please feel free to edit the draft as appropriate. Thanks for your help. :D Diannaa TALK 04:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 10k+ Copy Edit The 10k Copy Edit Barnstar For the following amazing copy editing: 10,826 words in USS Constitution during the May 2010 backlog elimination drive. Torchiest talk/contribs 04:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you so much. This was a reaallly good article. Diannaa TALK 06:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC) You're welcome, and thanks for the perfectly balanced barnstar as well. I didn't think I'd be able to find the right combination of articles to hit those even totals, but it worked out pretty nicely. :) Torchiest talk/contribs 12:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up Thanks very much to all who helped with the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive. We were very close to meeting our target of 7,500 articles remaining in the backlog. Our most shining success is the incredible reduction in the backlog of Special Requests. That part of the project saw a drop from 62 articles in the queue, some dating back to February of 2009, down to a stunning THREE, all of which were being edited at the close of the drive. The Special Requests page will now be a great resource for people looking to tidy up their article in advance of a GA or FA nomination, instead of a place where articles go to die. Moving forward GOCE backlog elimination drive chart up to 31 May The drive has not only forced a great leap forward in reducing the backlog. It has helped promote the Guild, and led to a greater awareness of the level of vigilance required to keep the backlog manageable. Ideas such as charts, graphs, and barnstars helped motivate editors, and meeting other users helped quell any feelings gnomish editors may have had in the past that they were toiling all alone. Keep up the good work people!! Stats Almost everyone who participated will receive a barnstar. We will be handing these out over the next week or so. Five people will receive the highest award for word count (80,000 or more), the Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star: Bullock, Diannaa, NielsenGW, S Masters, and Torchiest. The Order of the Superior Scribe (40,000+) goes to Auntieruth55, Bobnorwal, Kojozone, Lfstevens, and Mlpearc. fds wins the Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (30,000+). The Old School League of Copyeditors Barnstar for 20,000+ is awarded to A. Parrot, mono, Truthkeeper88, and The Utahraptor. the Tireless Conributor Barnstar (12,000+) goes to dtgriffith, Laurinavicius, and Quinxorin. Buggie111, Brickie, cymru lass, liquidluck, noraft, and Yellow Monkey get the Cleanup Barnstar for 8,000+ words. The Working Man's Barnstar for 4,000+ words goes to Annalise and fetchcomms. The Modest Barnstar is awarded to Theo10011 and The Tito. Gold Star Award The Gold Star Award goes to the top editor in three challenges: Number of special requests fulfilled, number of articles edited, and number of words. Here are the final results. Final results: Gold Star Award: Requests Articles Words 1. SMasters (17) Torchiest (250) NielsenGW (150,360) 2. Bobnorwal (13) Diannaa (212) Diannaa (136,200) 3. Bullock (9) kojozone (76) Torchiest (125,000) Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) Drive Thanks for helping coordinate the drive, Diannaa. I had a lot of fun. fdsTalk 15:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC) You're welcome. Glad to do it. Diannaa TALK 03:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010 Photography: Making money with free photos News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC) The Signpost... ...wants to interview us. Please answer any or all questions at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/WikiProject desk/Interviews2 if you'd like to participate (I'd like you to participate!). I've reserved the last question for you and SMasters only. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 10:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks. Just got back from Wikibreak, will do instantly. Diannaa TALK 02:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010) The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC) German Type IXA submarine Hey there Diannaa! Can you please copy edit this article for me so it can pass a GAN? Sturmvogel 66 wishes for the prose to be reworded and fixed up a bit. Thanks.--White Shadows stood on the edge 01:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC) Just got back from Wikibreak, and will get started soonest. Regards, Diannaa TALK 02:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Rollback Diannaa, as I was cleaning out CAT:TEMP, I kept noticing your name. Accordingly, I have turned on the WP:ROLLBACK feature for your account. Please let me know if you don't want it, and please read that page to see when and when not to use the new button. Happy editing! Courcelles (talk) 15:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you! I will review the instructions and start using this feature. Diannaa TALK 02:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC) Now that you're a rollbacker (welcome to the club), you should get a hold of Huggle. It makes vandalism fighting really fun, and super fast. You can rollback and warn 10 vandals in a minute when you're really cooking. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) You know what you're doing. WP:Reviewer... with flagged revisions coming in 2 days, the permission needs to be given out, so you've got it. You won't see anything different for a few days, but I think your head's screwed on straight. You'll have a couple more buttons, but this right is as active as you want it to be-it also serves to let you "patrol" your own edits on flagged protected pages. Courcelles (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Help! I started giving out the barnstars, then got bogged down with other things right after the Working Man's Barnstar. Can you give out the Cleanup and higher awards? I'll do the leaderboard awards. If it is too much for you, shanghai S Masters too. You can grab the language for the award off the page of one of the Working Man Barnstar Awardees. Pretty basic. Just notes the number of articles and total words, really. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 07:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC) ok. Diannaa TALK 02:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010 From the team: Changes to the Signpost News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more In the news: Cancer coverage, cognitive surplus, Wikipedia monarchy, and more Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC) Talkback User:IBen/TB mono 03:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Surprise Gold Star Award! The Guild of Copy Editors' Award Diannaa, for your hard work and dedication to the encyclopedia during the May 2010 Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive, copyediting the second most articles (212) and the second largest amount of text (136,200 words); for your service to the GOCE in co-coordinating the drive; and for being there for me when I needed your help; I hereby award you this special GOCE Gold Star Award, for an absolutely stellar performance. You have my warmest thanks. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC) BTW, in case you're considering it, don't give me one back. I really didn't do enough to earn one. I gave the April 2010 Good Article Backlog Elimination Drive coordinators Motivation Awards, which seemed appropriate, and aren't often awarded. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you for the special award. Maybe I'll send you some cookies or something, one day when you need them. Your work is appreciated. Diannaa TALK 04:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC) This is a job for...the Communications Deputy! Hi Diannaa, I've been thinking a lot about marketing the drive, and I think one thing that would help is if we monitored the signups closely, and sent a welcome message to each new sign-up, with an exhortation to ask friends to join the drive. My target for participation this drive is 60 active participants, about double the last one. I'm also about to send out a notice to all GOCE members announcing the drive. Do you have any other ideas? ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC) I like the "welcome" idea and will look after sending out the welcome messages to peple who sign up. I think you should send out another sign-up reminder to all Guild members about a week from the start of the drive, say on June 24, if that does not strike you as being too spammy. What's your opinion? And hopefully our Signpost write-up will help as well. Diannaa TALK 01:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Hi, saw your message on my talk page. Hopefully you get this before you send the message out to those who have signed up. I've reworked your draft to sort of...get them into the spirit of the drive...make them want what we want. You'll see what I mean: Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can to get it down to a manageable number. We've ambitiously set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog this month. In order to do that, we're going to need more participants. Is there anyone that you can invite or ask to participate with you? If so, we're offering an award to the person who brings in the most referrals. Just notify ɳorɑfʈ Talk! or Diannaa TALK of who your referrals are. Once again, thanks for your support! — Diannaa TALK ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 02:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC) OK. A few went out, but I will modify them. Diannaa TALK 02:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Grab some glory, and a barnstar Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC) This is the message that went out to 250 members of the GOCE. It resulted in 8 signups over the next 10 hours after it went up. I'm sure there will be some more over the next 36 hours, so that's good. The Signpost article will come out in a dew days, and that should help as well. Basically I need two signups a day every day until the drive starts to hit the participation goal of 60. If we want a reasonable chance at making the backlog goals (below 6000 and clearing all of 2008), we'll need at least 60 editors, with some high-performers again. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 23:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC) I got Jimbo! I invited Jimmy Wales to sign up, and he did! I told him that if he symbolically copyedited a single article for the drive, that we give us a lot of good exposure, which would help participation. I also offered to find him a short article to work on. I have a little assignment for you. I'd like you to post on his user page, introducing yourself as the drive communications coordinator, welcoming him to the drive as a participant (in reality what you're doing is both welcoming him and advertising to everyone who watches his page that he's signed up), and saying something along the lines of "we know you're busy, so would you like us to find you a short article to edit, or would you like to proceed on your own?" ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 10:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC) Good work, Noraft! I will think about this and post a draft here later today XD. --Diannaa TALK 14:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC) We are already up to 27 people! Diannaa TALK 14:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC) I am not sure it is appropriate or wise to assume he is only going to copy edit one article. Perhaps his intentions are wider than that! I would not like to presume otherwise. Nor do I feel we should choose an article for him; if he browses the backlog the way other users do he will get a better picture of the enormity of the task. That's just my opinion though. Here is the first draft: Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can muster to get it down to a manageable number, so the exposure this project receives from your participation will be incredibly helpful. If you would like to take Noraft's suggestion and symbolically copyedit a single article, one of us would be happy to choose one for you if you want. Or if you have time to do more than one, that would be great too. As the drive communications coordinator, I thank you on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors for your support! Diannaa TALK 16:05, 11 June 2010 (UTC) I just saw this tweet so I hope he is going to be an active contributor to the drive! Let me know when you make up your mind. Diannaa TALK 21:49, 11 June 2010 (UTC) I think you should go to his talk page and read my invitation to him. That will explain why I think he may only copyedit one article. Since I made an offer we need to see if he wants to take us up on it. I don't want him to feel snookered into joining, like we offered something just to get him in, then didn't follow through. He may want to do more than one article, and he may want to find articles himself, this is true, but he hasn't indicated one way or the other, so we need to find this out. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Here is a revised draft which I will move to his talk page once I get the OK from you. Diannaa TALK 02:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC) That looks great. I'd add in "Just let us know" to encourage a response one way or the other regarding the option we're presenting him. Go ahead and send it, and thanks! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC) The message has been delivered!!! This is gonna be huge. We already have 37 participants including high profile users such as Nerdy Science Dude and Fences & Windows. I have placed an announcement on the Military History wikiproject page as per your suggestion. It grows Diannaa TALK 04:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Talkback User:IBen/TB mono 00:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at NerdyScienceDude's talk page. Message added 03:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. CopyEdit Refferal Hello, regarding your request for referrals to the CopyEdit Drive, User:SuperHamster might like to join. |:-) ~ QwerpQwertus ·_Talk_·_Talkback Me_· 05:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Super! I will place an invite on their talk page. Thanks. Diannaa TALK 05:44, 12 June 2010 (UTC) User:Pdcook says he would also like to help. Derild4921 14:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at Jubileeclipman's talk page. Message added 20:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Talkback User:IBen/TB —monopending changes begin june 15 03:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC) British Commandos Thank you for the copy edit very much appreciated. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC) You're welcome, Jim. An interesting read; it was fun. Diannaa TALK 13:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Back log drive Hello Diannaa, nice to say hi, you've been to my talk posting things and I've never come by to say Hey. Have a small (Dumb) question, I recently opened my Public alternate account, my dumb question is can I edit in both accounts for the drive and log my complete articles under my main, or both, or none, or I can Only edit for the drive under the account I've signed up with (this one is my guess), but the only dumb question is "the one NOT asked" t Thanks Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 16:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Hi, Mlpearc, nice to meet you! My feeling is that your public account was only set up to use at libraries, school, or what have you. I see no reason to restrict you to the home account only. When you have a minute, edit! You could check with Noraft to be sure. --Diannaa TALK 16:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks, I'll ask him. Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 16:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Can you help on another one I see you are active on the pop history articles again. Can you go through the Dusty Springfield article for grammar? I have written it but I'm not a native speaker. Thanks! --Jaan Pärn (talk) 10:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the reminder. I've been meaning to get this one done! Diannaa TALK 20:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 07:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC) That one is done. It was already in good shape. :-)) --Diannaa TALK 23:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks again. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC) Stuart period Hi Diannaa, I've just re-edited Stuart period, from the original Stuart period (England). I've fixed the dabs, and put a {copyedit tag} on it. I would like to take this to (my 1st) - {WP:GA+} article. As this article covers over 100 years of history, (social, royal, political and military &c), I would be most pleased if you, or anyone you suggest, could help me with any suggestions, or improvements, &/or Copy-edits? Thank you kindly for your time, and concideration, regards Steve. Stephen2nd (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC) I would Love to work on this. Will get started today or tomorrow. Diannaa TALK 20:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Hi again, and thanks very much for your contributions. I've left some edit suggestions on my User page. (I didn't want to edit these in, whilst you were working on it.) What do you think? Regards Steve. Stephen2nd (talk) 15:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Hi Stephen. Unfortunately due to time constraints and other commitments (both here on Wikipedia and in real life) I will have time to copy edit the existing material but will not be able to stay on board long term to help you develop the article. Sorry about that. I will continue to work on the article today. --Diannaa TALK 17:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC) I have looked through the remainder of the article and from a copy editing point of view and it looks ok. For GA status, inline citations will need to be included for each fact presented; that is my main suggestion. Good luck! --Diannaa TALK 17:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Hi again. Thank you for your fine copyediting, and advice on the Stuart period article, and especially for the good luck, which is always appreciated. Many regards Steve. Stephen2nd (talk) 10:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010 News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC) You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC) I flagged you a couple days ago, but there was no template then to tell you about it... now there is, so here it is. Courcelles (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Okey-dokey. Its a great honour. Thanks. --Diannaa TALK 21:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC) "Honour"... I don't know. I've flagged a couple hundred editors today in preparation for this trial... don't let it go to your head ;) Courcelles (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2010 (UTC) History of the Yosemite area Thank you for your copyedit! Commas before quotes seemed odd to me too, but I added them after reading this. But this gives exceptions. So now I know. :) --mav (reviews needed) 01:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the links, Mav. These are great resources. --Diannaa TALK 02:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Russian-Americans Hello Diannaa, I certifiably don't wish to be involved in an edit war, however the other user, simply ignored the discussion posted by me and another user and kept reverting changes with any discussion at all. What is the best course of action in that case? Also I see that you have reverted the changes that I have made, this article is about an ethnic minority in the US, Russians, Ukrainians are not the same ethnic group, there is already a separate page for Ukrainian-Americans, etc. Please take a look the discussion and re post my changes. Sotnik (talk) 04:32, 16 June 2010 (UTC) I did read a lot of the talk page comments before I reverted your change. User:Hmains has over 187,000 edits to Wikipedia dating back to 2005 so I trust his judgement in this. Sorry. Diannaa TALK 04:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC) Can you please explain what you mean? If you have read the discussion page, you will see that there are multiple sources that back up what I said. He provided no sources at all, not to mention he ignored the discussion completely (both from me and another editor) and started reverting my changes. Certainly facts are not decided by who has more edits. Also I don't meant to repeat all the things that have been said on that discussion page, but you do agree that Russians and Ukrainians or insert_any_ethnic_group_here are different by definition and cannot be in the same category. That's the whole purpose of categories, to categorize. Sotnik (talk) 04:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC) I am not interested in getting involved in the content disute on the article. I just posted a warning to you as you were engaging in an edit war to restore your edit. According to the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle guidelines, when a change you have introduced is reverted, your next step should be to take it to the talk page. Not to revert back to your preferred version of the article. Diannaa TALK 19:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC) With all due respect, that is exactly what I did and my posts on the discussion page were ignored (along with the posts of another user). Why am I getting this warning and not the person who is unwilling to participate in the discussion, who started the reverts? You seem to hint that you know the other party involved personally and you are taking their side without any merit at all. In addition, I went back and looked at the comment you made when you reverted my change, It's not appropriate to exclude people because they're Jewish or Ukranian. That is just HIGHLY offensive and insulting! You're implying that I'm trying to "exclude" someone based on ethnicity/national orgin, etc, but this article is about an ethnic group. What you said, is exactly like saying, "its not appropriate to exclude Buddhists from a list of Muslims scholars", i.e. total nonsense! If you don't like that there are groups and lists based on ethnicity, you can appeal to have them removed, but don't apply a double standard to Russian-Americans. Sotnik (talk) 05:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC) No, I have never encountered the other user before. I looked up their edit history using Soxred's edit counter after they posted an inquiry at WP:EAR. --Diannaa TALK 14:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC) So given that high edit count and the fact that most of his edits seem to be on this and related topics, I decided to trust his judgement and reverted the edit. --Diannaa TALK 18:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Jack Merridew Thank you very much for your help, and sorry I misspelled your user name twice. 1. I've read Lord of the Flies and know who Jack Merridew is. What this Jack Merridew has done, however, is link his user name to that page. Did you notice we have two Lord of the Flies pages? The real one, and the one he copied and linked to his user name. Here are the two: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_Flies Oh, now I see--I thought WP pages labeled "(Redirected from...) permanently carried the label. 2. I know how to find user pages and talk pages and revision history pages. I was asking how to find user account history pages. Nuujinn provided the User:Jack Merridew/History link; I'm asking how I would find that on my own. Would I have to type in "user:jack merridew/history" to Google search, or can it be found from his user page? I googled for one for you and for me, and found we don't have one. I'm astonished at the hijinks WP allows. Thanks again, --Yopienso (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC) OK; sorry for assuming. The thing is called a "subpage" and many users have them. We do not all automatically have a subpage called "History." This history subpage of Jack's is a specially made page he created himself. To see if a user has any subpages, go to their contributions page, scroll all the way to the bottom, and click on "Subpages". I have several. Some people have their own personal sandbox, or articles in the process of development, drafts of items they are thinking about posting, etc. Jack Merridew is a returned formerly banned user who chose to keep this user name out of several he was editing under. As I said he seems a bit of a trickster; I am not prepared to comment on his activities or trustworthiness as I only know of him second hand from reading about him at WP:ANI. When I said I fixed the redirects, clicking on Jack Merridew used to direct to the top of the Lord of the Flies article. While that was amusing and confusing, it was not helpful, so I changed the redirects from Jack merridew and Jack Merridew to go directly to the section about the character at Lord of the Flies#Jack Merridew. If you have any more questions please let me know. Diannaa TALK 01:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC) You're a dear; thanks for the explanations. Next thing I'll want to know is how to create and subpage...and why I would want to.  ;) But I'm not asking yet--don't want to stretch my brain too far in one day! --Yopienso (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC) fyi, I added the #Jack Merridew anchor in teh LotF article; it was after I last edited the redirects. And you can get to the /History page by clicking the sock icons. I didn't specifically choose this account, I was directed to use this one because I scuttled my original account years ago by blanking the email in prefs and scrambling the password. Jack Merridew 04:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks Jack, for clearing up my misconceptions. Hope nothing else I said was inaccurate (or offensive). Diannaa TALK 04:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC) No worries, and no offense taken; I shrug off a lot.where I was a volunteer —Sincerely, Street-Legal Sockpuppet Jack Merridewthis user is a sock puppet 05:10, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Pleased to meet you. It's been fun. :-)) Diannaa TALK 05:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC) try repeatedly previewing my talk page; and note that my user page is dynamic— it will be different on different visits, over time. And please, no talkbacks; I hate teh things. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Ok, I will remember. Love the tiger! Diannaa TALK 05:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC) -- Why are you editing pages like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Public_School,_Rajajinagar? It's a private school, not a public school. Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_school_(India_and_Sri_Lanka). Vvneagleone (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2010 (UTC) The title of the article is National Public School, Rajajinagar so I assumed it is a public school. Sorry for the mistake. --Diannaa TALK 18:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC) Super work! Hi, I wanted to say that you've been doing an awesome job of contacting folks who have signed up for the drive. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 15:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC) Big numbers! It's gonna be huge. :-)) Regards, --Diannaa TALK 15:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Stubs Roger Aguilar Labrada BTR-94 Pablo Quert EE-T1 Osório Raul Santoserpa Kha Carlos Rafael Uribazo Garrido BTR-T Julio Breff Liliam Cuenca Friulano Juan Francisco Elso Bhakral Jaitawat Hon (tribe) Kheechee Pablo Borges Delgado Armando de Armas Romero Ahirwar Cleanup Bhatia (caste) Rafael Zarza Gonzalez BTR-D Merge T-10 Heavy Tank Locus Award for Best Novel Mariko Mori Add Sources Luis Vega De Castro German tanks in World War II Nathawat Wikify Dor rajput Disiz la Peste TVM (Malta) Expand Kavanthandalam Eastern Front (World War II) Mexican Armed Forces SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC) Feedback on edit Biositemap HI Thanks for the reply. I didn't put any refs in myself but should have spotted that punctuation after ref. As there were already external links I thought it would be best to keep to the established format as I didnt what to change the ones there already into. I will make sure I remove them in future. Also I didn't realise that if the article is Sugar and I link to sugar it would work - past experience has shown me that I had to get the capitalisation the same as the article name or the link would fail. I must have missed something there along the way. I thought headers that were names would follow the same as for page titles - As it was the Biositemap Information Model (the name of it) I thought it should have been caps. Thanks for your time on that and for the kind words :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 04:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Hi! I looked again and I think you are right about the header in this instance; the phrase is capitalised elsewhere in the article. For links, the first letter of the first word does not have to be capitalised for the link to work. example: electric guitar. However if intermediate words are capitalised in the article name they must be capitalised in the link or Apple-based computers will not find the link. Example: Oregon Trail. PC's will find the article as long as there is a redirect in place. Hope this makes sense! Thanks. --Diannaa TALK 04:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010 Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more In the news: Wikipedia better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more WikiProject report: WikiProject U2 Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Something, Something, Something, Dark Side Just wondering if you have finished copyediting the article. Gage (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Yes; that one I finished. I did not get to Spies Reminiscent of Us and it is still in the queue on the Requests page. --Diannaa TALK 19:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Inviting editors I'd suggest you invite User:Nihil novi. I told him about the copyediting drive, but an invitation from you should inspire him further :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you for the tip. I will put a message on his talk page. --Diannaa TALK 16:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC) Didn't want to start an entire new section, but just wanted to say thanks for the welcome. I'm afraid I don't really know anybody else who would be interested, but maybe some talk page stalkers will see it and join of their own initiative. :) — e. ripley\talk 15:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010 Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content News and notes: 2010–15 plan, Smithsonian outreach, Teaching Wikipedia, brief news In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos? Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships Features and admins: Approved this week Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Thank you Thanks for copyediting Spies Reminiscent of Us, still needs just a slight expansion in the reception section on my part, but I hope to have it at GA sometime in the near future. I was wondering though if you could help me out again by taking a few looks at Road to the Multiverse. I've added it to the GOCE requests page, so if you can't I'm sure someone else can take a glance, but I really envy your work ethic, and hope you'll consider giving the article a somewhat thorough copyedit, as I've also listed the article for a peer review, in hopes of eventually getting to featured status, though that is a long way off. Thanks again. Gage (talk) 03:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Backlog Elimination Drive Has Begun Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. Enjoy! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 03:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC) Long Range Desert Group THANK YOU for the copy edit, very much appreciated. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC) No worries, Jim. An interesting article! --Diannaa TALK 13:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC) Referrals for the Copyediting drive... I got AirplanePro2000 and HJ Mitchell both invited to join. AirplaneProRadioChecklist 00:42, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Thanks! We will have to do a tally pretty soon. --Diannaa TALK 00:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Also got OnePt618 to join. AirplaneProRadioChecklist 04:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Stuck Re this issue. I am doing the best I can to communicate on the talk page of the associated article. Trust the relevant Wiki editors will do likewise. It's probably ok to clear the thread for now if you want. Neil Parker (talk) 11:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Thank you for the update. I have marked the thread as resolved. By the way, you might like to file a request for comment on the article as this could attract knowledgeable editors in the field that could help edit the article. --Diannaa TALK 13:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC) One more request in order to get this GAN through I know that you've already copy-edited this article before but can you go over the Armament and crew section one more time on the German Type IXA submarine article? I only have to fix up the prose, fix any spelling mistakes in the article and seperate the paragraphs a bit more and then the GAN will finaly pass. Thank you so much :)--White Shadows There goes another day 19:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Yeah, no problem, I noticed you folks were doing a lot of edits so it is an excellent idea. I will finish up Al-Qaeda in Iraq and get to your article later today. --Diannaa TALK 19:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Torpedo trouble: this adds up to 23 torpedos, not 22. --Diannaa TALK 20:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Actually I think that there could have been a "spare" torpedo or perhaps the number in the article was wrong. I've seen other sources say 23 and some say 23 so I'm not quite sure which one is correct.--White Shadows There goes another day 20:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC) I have rearranged the information and that is how I noticed it didn't add up. Otherwise the copy edits are done. Nothing much else to report. --Diannaa TALK 20:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC) WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/July 2010 Hi, Diannaa, I'm having a problem with activating the link for page size. I have followed the instructions, but the page size option has not appeared when I have visited different articles. I'd really appreciate some help - thanks! David Rush (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC) I have looked at your cologneblue.js and everything seems in place. Try clearing your browser cache (windows: control F5 or an arrow icon thingy up top). Let me or Noraft know if you are still having trouble. Hope this works! --Diannaa TALK 15:11, 3 July 2010 (UTC) I tried what you said, but it still doesn't appear to be working. I should be able to see the words page size on the left of the screen when looking at any Wikipedia article, right? Thanks for your help so far! :) David Rush (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Yes, it should be at the bottom of the "Toolbox" menu (at least that's where it is on mine). I am using the Vector skin and it works on that one. I also had it working on Monobook. You could try rebooting your computer and if that doesn't work I am out of ideas; Maybe Noraft will have more things you can try. --Diannaa TALK 16:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC) I changed to the Vector skin as you suggested and it's working now! Thank you! :) David Rush (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Glad I could help. :-)) --Diannaa TALK 16:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC) Hello, Diannaa. You have new messages at TEK's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010 News and notes: WMF expansion, community hires, award for MediaWiki, admin recall In the news: Accidentally anonymized donation, democratized learning and more Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature Features and admins: This week's highlights Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:54, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Giving advice I have absolutely no reason to doubt your good faith and committment to this encyclopedia in offering help and advice to some editors and contributors, and I sincerely hope that you will continue to do so. However, Alistair Stevenson to whom you offered help without perhaps having fully examined the situation, is firmly convinced that you clearly sympathised him. and that your advice gives him licence to continue to game the system. I have no interest whatsoever in getting involved or in escalating the situation by rasising official complaints about him, in firm belief that there are other ways of resolving situations without detracting otherss from their valuable editing time, but there might be people who are, and there is a very , very strong consensus that he might wish to review the way he communicates on talk pages..--Kudpung (talk) 01:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Hi, Kudpung. I did thoroughly examine the situation, looking at virtually all of the editor's edits to user talk pages and article talk pages before responding to his inquiry. As I am not an admin, you may wish to discuss Mr. Stevenson's behavior elsewhere, if there are still problems or ill feelings between you. Regards, --Diannaa TALK 01:26, 8 July 2010 (UTC) July 2010 Dianna, Thanks for the notice. I think unsolicited advise at end of the string of discussion was good.Jason Riverdale (talk) 03:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)