Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales

Copyright of Welsh Dragon

I have uploaded an image of a Welsh dragon, and I would be interested if the emblem is copyrightable, community input (especially from this project) would be most welcome at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_July_4#File:Wales_Ireland_1950.png Fasach Nua (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Scope of Template:Economy and Industry of Cardiff

Comments from editors would be welcome in the discussion here. Thanks,--Pondle (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

forts around Milford haven

there are two more forts to add to your list 
 1 Dale Fort
 2 Defenable barracks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.216.59.149 (talk) 04:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC) 

Locator maps for Welsh placename articles

There is a discussion ongoing about which Locator map is used on Welsh placename articles at Template talk:Infobox UK place. This has implications for every article using the UK place template (which is nearly all placename articles). Please add your comments and indicate a preference between the options. Skinsmoke (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

AFD notice: Sport in Anglesey

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport in Anglesey. East of Borschov 12:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

AFD notice: Evan Vaughan Anwyl

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Vaughan Anwyl. ~Geaugagrrl ^talk 10:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Wales

For those who may have missed it, I have placed the article for Wales onto the list for GA status. This will take a while to be picked up, but I hope a review will focus minds and help this project get the most important article up to a GA article. Thanks to all those who have posted positive messages to this action. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar - Part II

		The Wales Barnstar
		Your message here. FruitMonkey (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Can we go with this award? Or are there any objections? FruitMonkey (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Wales articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Wales articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Featured Portal nomination

The Law of England and Wales portal has been nominated for featured status at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Law of England and Wales, and I am notifying related WikiProjects as requested in the nomination instructions. All comments for and against its promotion are welcome, ideally with reference to the featured portal criteria. If anyone knows of any decent law-related Welsh articles that could be included, I'd be delighted to hear about them. Bencherlite^Talk 11:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Bump, no comments from anyone in two weeks. Anyone interested? Thanks, Bencherlite^Talk 15:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Politics

I dont fully understand Wikipedia but think this article National Assembly for Wales election 2011 is a very important article considering the elction was next May, and really with so many more candidates being selected the info boxes shpu;d be filled in quite a bit more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.160.174 (talk) 02:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Aberdaron

Aberdaron was promoted to good article on 7 November 2010. Thanks to everyone who helped it through the assessment process! Skinsmoke (talk) 08:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Concern about Pembrokeshire articles

I'm concerned about the quality of the Pembrokeshire articles, many of them have questionable sources and some of them have entire sections completely without sources. Are there any other Pembrokeshire based/knowledgeable users who would be willing to increase the quality of these pages? PrettyxVacant (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Hedd Wyn edit war

There seems to be a bit of an edit war going on at Hedd Wyn (film) over whether it should be called a Welsh or a British film. It's getting rather heated and childish (see, for example, here and here). I think it would be useful to try to establish consensus (one way or the other) in an adult fashion, for which it would probably be helpful to have more editors contributing to the debate. Thanks. garik (talk) 11:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The neutral position, it seems to me, would be for the article text to recognise that, in common with many other things, it is both Welsh and British - as well as stating very clearly that it is a Welsh language film. Flags in infoboxes are generally deprecated, and I think that should be removed. That leaves the question of whether the "country" in the infobox should be stated as the UK or Wales, which in my view is a matter where there should be consistency across WP and across different projects. I'm not aware that there is a consistent line everywhere. One of the participants in the "edit war" has already been warned for incivility and has been blocked for similar offences in the past. Apart from all that, I'm planning to stay out of the discussion. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

That the references for it to be noted as a Welsh film are reliable has been confirmed by the Reliable sources/Noticeboard (see here) who also provided futher references that Wales is a country. There is a Welsh film industry, distinct from the 'British' flim industry. Just as there is Welsh literature and Welsh music. I see no reason to alter the article for some supposed neutrality that will inevitably give a British POV, by airbrushing Wales out of Wikipedia. Daicaregos (talk) 12:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The fact that Wales is part of the UK and therefore covered by the term "British" is, in my view, an undeniable statement of reality, and the "neutral position" is to acknowledge that. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

It is no more relevant to note that Hedd Wyn is a British film than a European film. It is a Welsh film, as supported by reliable sources. Distinct Welsh film and cinema is acknowledged by the BBC, for example. 'British' is irrelavent in this context. Daicaregos (talk) 13:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Where was the film made? GoodDay (talk) 13:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

It was made in Wales, GoodDay. With a Welsh writer, director, cast and crew, by a Welsh company and with Welsh funding. But, as it was good/successful, it must be British. plus ça change. Daicaregos (talk) 15:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

It was funded by S4C wasn't it? Which is itself funded by the U.K. government, no? Ivor Stoughton (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

And Welsh people pay their taxes straight to the Exchequer. What's your point? Daicaregos (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

The point being that the funding of the film was not as solely and unambiguously Welsh as you suggest. It was funded by S4C which is directly funded by the U.K government, to which Welsh people pay taxes, certainly, but so do English, Scots and Irish. I'd go with the NY Times on this one: Hedd Wyn is a "Welsh language film produced in the United Kingdom". Ivor Stoughton (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Other than illustrating the John Donne concept that "no man is an island", Irvine, do you actuaally have a point? All I get so far is you are trying to say that from wherever the money originates somehow makes some special difference for noting a film's country. Are Hollywood films now Colombian? Daicaregos (talk) 20:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

It does tend to be the case that a film's country (or countries) of origin is (are) determined by where the production funds come from. Hence the Harry Potter films are American, despite all the British talent involved. The correct analogy here seems to me to be with films produced in Quebec, in French. They are classified as Canadian, on Wikipedia and elsewhere. Ivor Stoughton (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Not that I necessarily agree with your thesis Irvine, but as S4C is a Welsh company, the funding for the film is Welsh, Q.E.D. Daicaregos (talk) 21:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Do you disagree that the analogy to Quebec is useful to us here? Ivor Stoughton (talk) 21:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

No, Wales is a country, S4C is a Welsh television channel. If Harry Potter was funded by a British production company then it would be British even if that company raised funding from other countries. --Snowded ^TALK 21:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

The Harry Potter series was funded by Warner Bros, and the country of origin is given as "USA" in every film guide I can presently lay my hands on. The country of origin for Hedd Wyn is those sames guides? "U.K.". Ivor Stoughton (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Agree on Harry Potter - Warner Brothers is American. S4C is Welsh. As I thought I had made clear if Warner Brothers had funding from say Japan, it would not make Harry Potter a Japanese film --Snowded ^TALK 21:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Except the relationship between the United States and Japan is not analogous to that between Wales and the U.K., is it? The Quebec/Canada analogy is much more like it. Incidentally, I have to wonder how Hedd Wyn is classifed by the Library of Congress? Ivor Stoughton (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

GoodDay, it is a Welsh film. Leave it at that.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

See my talkpage for my views. GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moelfre (hill)

The article Moelfre (hill) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced article with no mention of notability, fails WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 22:47, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau is a Featured Sound

This, the earliest known recording in Welsh, has been promoted as a Featured Sound because of its historical importance. Does anybody have any ideas for further nominations? Bencherlite^Talk 07:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed change to wording at Tom Pryce

A proposal has been made at Talk:Tom Pryce#A Welsh racing driver to change the wording in the lead paragraph regarding Pryce's nationality. It's a proposal specific to that article and not applicable to other articles, not yet at least. Anyone wanting to have their say, please do so. Daicaregos (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Does anyone have access to Transactions of the Anglesey Antiquarian Society or Archaeologia_Cambrensis?

I've made a request for a few articles at this location to help with an ongoing attempt to write about every listed church on Anglesey. Can anyone help? Thanks, Bencherlite^Talk 22:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Wales good aritcle not mentioned?

Heavy metal band Bullet for My Valentine's page is a good article, but it is not mentioned in the 'Good Article' section. Could someone please change that?Beaverbillins (talk) 02:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. FruitMonkey (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Moylgrove or Moylegrove - Pembrokeshire

I was writing an article for Ceibwr Bay on a stub page, when I discovered the long over due merger discusssion for the articles on the same village in Pembrokeshire, either called Moylgrove or Moylegrove. I suspect that the original spelling in Welsh was without the "e", but the spelling with the "e" now seems far, far more common. Suggestions on which one we should adopt as to where the real article should go, and hence merged to? Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

A Google Books search gives far more results on Moylgrove (including both contemporary and historic sources) than Moylegrove. If Moylgrove is still used then go with this one.

As far as the "original" spelling goes, in either case it's a mangling of the Welsh moel combined with an English word, so neither is any more authentic in that regard.Svejk74 (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be a lot of consistency on this. This page from "Visit Pembrokeshire", developed by the Pembrokeshire County Council, calls it "Moylgrove". One would think the county council would be informed about such things. However, the council's own web page tends to call it "Moylegrove".[1] Additionally, for what it's worth, though, this site evidently put together by local businessmen call it "Moylegrove", and it's "Moylegrove" on Google Maps (even if you type in "Moylgrove"). Just to keep it interesting, some sources use the form "Moyle Grove" as well. I'd say we should just pick whichever one appears to be more common, by however much, and redirect the other to it.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Ah, Moylgrove. Went there on hols almost 40 years ago. The Ordnance Survey map of the area doesn't use an "e". --Redrose64 (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Llangeler

Re. the bathing rite at Llangeler, Ffynnon Celer: the missing megalith 'llech' appears to be 3km away near to Ffynnon Fair so possibly Capel Mair at Ffynnon Fair [Lwynffynnon] was the original location for the healing ritual?

http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=7456 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megalith6 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

St David's Day

As far as I'm aware there are no Welsh articles ready for FA status on 1 March. That said if anyone would like to get multiple Welsh DYKs for 1 March then please try to get them in soon and we'll try to get a special date for this. Thanks FruitMonkey (talk) 00:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

If you mean to feature on the main page, how about William Cragh or Tom Pryce? Daicaregos (talk) 08:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't think Malleus Fatuorum, the primary author of Cragh, would be anxious to see that on the main page, given the stresses he has had with recent TFAs. There might be just enough time to push through Pryce at WP:TFAR - it scores two points for time since promotion, but would need to find another point from somewhere to displace one of the current five articles nominated there. It won't be author history (as the main author has had a TFA) or "widely covered" (it has 19 interwiki links, 1 short of the 20 needed for a bonus point). If nominated for 5th March, it would gain a date relevance point (anniversary of death) but not for St David's Day (that's too tangential a link for TFA points purposes). If no similar article had appeared in the last three months, that would gain it a point, or if someone wrote a stub on Simple Wikipedia and linked it in the interwikis, that would gain a point. Bencherlite^Talk 08:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

That was just scarey. It transpires that there is much to do in a short space of time. As Wales is now a GA, what are the chances of getting the article on the main page in twelve months time? FruitMonkey (talk) 23:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Good if we work on it, not so good if we don't;)--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Huzzah. Is there anyone who knows how to drive this forward, as Bencherlite's points thing is way above my head. I'm happy to help as much as possible, but I have never tried to get an article to FA ststus before. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

The points thing is described at WP:TFA/R. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Afonwen

I grew up in the village of Afonwen. It was never known as Afon-wen to the locals but is listed as Afon-wen on WIkipedia. I don't know how to edit the article title. Can someone edit it to Afonwen? --ChemConnector (talk) 04:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

OS maps use "Afon-wen", hyphenated. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

"Anglesey" or "Isle of Anglesey"?

There's a page name discussion taking place at Talk:Isle of Anglesey at present, which might be of interest. Bencherlite^Talk 08:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Principality of Wales

This page (Principality of Wales) is wildly inaccurate and based more on wishful thinking than on actual academically researched historical facts. Worse still other Wikipedias use the English version as a reference, further disseminating what basically amounts to misinformation. I suggest you visit the Welsh version to get an idea of what a thorough, researched, academically accurate and comprehensive article on this subject should look like. Sanddef (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

First Minister bio infoboxes

I've deleted Elizabeth II from these infoboxes, as she's not the 'Monarch of Wales'. What's the view here, concerning my deletions? GoodDay (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

My view is that you're wrong, but for convenience, please let's everyone concentrate the discussion here.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 01:31, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

GoodDay is wrong, reversing yet another set of edits that he knew would provoke. GoodDay, please get agreement before making mass changes to information boxes, you have been told about this time and time again. --Snowded ^TALK 07:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Deputy First Minister for Wales RM

Howdy, we need more imput at that article's RM. GoodDay (talk) 00:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiConference UK 2011 16 April 2011: Watershed Bristol

If you missed the Wikibanner, full details of the above at {http://wikiconferenceuk2011.eventbrite.com/} Diolch yn fawr! Jezhotwells (talk) 00:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Iwan Huws

This new BLP article may be of interest to this WikiProject.  Chzz  ►  12:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Kidwelly and Llanelly Canal

I am intending to submit this article for WP:GAN. However, I need a bit of advice. The article is named using the modern spelling of Llanelli, but an IP editor changed the spelling in the article to use the old spelling of Llanelly, so there is an inconsistancy between the title and the content. I wondered if anyone on this project had thoughts on the best route to resolve this. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Personally, if the canal was known as the Llanelly Canal, and was still known by that spelling at the time it ceased to be used, then I would go for Llanelly as that is what would be found in reference books.FruitMonkey (talk) 18:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I have renamed the page. Bob1960evens (talk) 19:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Portal:Wales and Super Furry Animals

I have been working on Portal:Wales, trying to bring it back to a state worthy of being called a featured portal. I think it's getting close. As part of my efforts, I have been looking for more recognised content that could be showcased by the portal. In particular, I was hoping to unearth more featured pictures of Wales; there seem to be very few indeed (just one?). One thing I did rediscover, however, was a number of good articles on works by Super Furry Animals, comprising one standalone GA and two featured topics with four and five GAs respectively:

• Mwng
• Rings Around the World ("Juxtapozed with U", "(Drawing) Rings Around the World", "It's Not the End of the World?")
• Phantom Power ("Golden Retriever", Slow Life, "Hello Sunshine", Phantom Phorce)

I was wondering whether the members of this project thought that these should be tagged with {{WikiProject Wales}} or not. It's not a field I often edit in, so I am unsure of the precedents. At the very least, I would think that Mwng would be a valid topic, as the best-selling Welsh-language album ever. I welcome your opinions. --Stemonitis (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. Yes, they should. I'll do that now. Cheers, Daicaregos (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added them to Portal:Wales/Features, too. --Stemonitis (talk) 07:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

A Call to Arms

The Welsh Wicipedia needs help. We've lost three or four of our Admins (and a Bureaucrat) in the last few months. There are many jobs that non-Welsh speakers can do; one of which is mentioned by me in the Caffi. There are too few of us, and mountains to climb, battles to be fought... Mae eich gwlad a'ch iaith eich heisiau. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Er, which job(s) specifically? I'm most definitely a Saesneg-only speaker, and having briefly looked through the cy:Wicipedia:Y Caffi page, I don't see which might be "jobs that non-Welsh speakers can do; one of which is mentioned by [Llywelyn2000]". My contribs to cy: are, so far, limited to establishing interlanguage links where none previously existed. I'm not sure what else I can do. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I agree Redrose, I feel as a non-Welsh speaker that I have nothing to add to the project as there appears to be no information as to where English language speakers can aid the project. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Refs of Y Gododdin

I copy here the message which I left on the talk page of the article:

Hello. I work this article for the french wikipedia, and I have a problem with certain references. The reference 19 and 56 ("Williams") refers to what book quoted in bibliography ? Idem for "Jackson" (refs 26, 50, 51, 57 and 59), and "Williams (1972)" (52, 53, 55). There are several books of these authors in bibliography, and for William, none of the 1972 (unless it is the first edition of that of the 1980?). Thank you, and sorry for my bad english.

Could you help me ? It's a Good Article. Thank you very much. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

This is an excellent point well raised. I have added the dates to all the cites where only a single book was present, but as Harmonia Amanda states Williams and Jackson can not be assumed due to multiple books. If anyone has just one of the books it will help cut down or solve most of the problems raised. Diolch. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Using the 1978 paperback of Jackson's 1969 work, I confirmed that all of the ambiguous Jackson references in the citations were references to the 1969 work, and modified the article accordingly. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Great work Notuncurious, that just leaves Williams work to pin down. If anyone is off to a decent library soon, could they make a note of the book, it would be much appreciated to ensure this article's GA status with correctly noted cites. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 09:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, can I remember you this problem ? References called "Williams" (19 and 56) doesn't refer to a book f the bibliography... Sorry for my very bad english. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Tudor House of Penmynydd: much older than Henry Vlll  !!!

Take a look at this], please... and VOTE! Ysgol Dinas Bran (talk) 16:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Vote where and for what? Daicaregos (talk) 07:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Tudor dynasty#Move?, I think. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, there's a vote there on whether the House of Tudor began with Henry Vll or was it much older: in fact the Welsh article on Penmynydd has much more details on the Tudors family which goes back 400 - 500 years before Henry. Thanks, Ghmyrtle: Talk:Tudor dynasty#Move? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Cwmafan / Cwmavon

I've hit a problem with a bit of disambiguation. It appears there are two Cwmavons. One is Cwmavon, Torfaen, while the other is the village of Cwmafan in Neath Port Talbot. In recent encyclopedias, Cwmafan NPT is called Cwmavon. Should the article be moved to its English name or does the town now call itself Cwmafan? It's a bit of a mess as the electoral ward that encompasses it is Bryn and Cwmavon. Though streetmap calls in Cwmafon. Advice please. FruitMonkey (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

NPT council seem to use both versions. The Library is called Cwmafan. Residents' walking and action groups call themselves Cwmafan (same ref). The community centre is Cwmavon, as is the ward as you say. The Centre and schools are Cwmafan. The Welsh Academi Encyclopaedia has it as Cwmavon, but doesn't have an entry for Cwmavon, Torfaen. I would leave it as Cwmafan. Daicaregos (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Englynion y Clywaid

A Welsh speaker is need to translate from Welsh wikipedia.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Welsh Rarebit (radio programme)

Just dropping a note here (and I'll drop a copy on the talk page at WP:BBC) on the off-chance someone might have sources for the Welsh Rarebit (radio programme) article. I came across it at Special:Newpages and while I had heard of it, I haven;t been able to find more than few sources for the article (particularly for dates), which the article could do with. I am fairly confident that it did start in 1938 on the Welsh Regional Programme and a figure of 12 million listeners given in a source is a reasonable figure. (Actually that would make it one of the most popular Welsh made BBC programmes ever; 12 million is about 1600-1800 milliWhos by my calculation). One other thing that springs tto mind is that the producer from 1941, Mai Davies, along with one of the performers, wrote We`ll Keep a Welcome (in the Hillside) which was played at the end of the programme (and of course became a bit of a standard); anyway, if anyone has any sources that couldn't be found online, the article needs them. FlowerpotmaN·(t)

What makes a good local article?

I'm writing a blog post about what makes a good local article (or set of articles) on Wikipedia - in other words articles about a specific place, such as a town or village, and its features, people, etc.

What do you think we currently do well, or badly, in that regard. What do you, or would you, like to see, in such articles? What are the best examples?

Please feel free to prior discussion, if you know of any. Cheers, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean Wales, Britain or places world wide. Also is good just good or GA status? FruitMonkey (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Any or all of those. Thanks. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

New article: Llanelli railway strike

Following an excellent BBC article published today, I have started the Llanelli railway strike article. Please improve if you can, especially additional quality / academic refs. Ta. (By the way, I have redirected "the great unrest" to this article, but now doubt the wisdom of this, as the strike seems to be only a part of wider unrest. Maybe another, wider, article is needed?)--Mais oui! (talk) 12:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Football task force

Are there any members of WP:WALES who would be interested in helping out with a new task force focused on Welsh football? The scope of the task force would include all Welsh players either born in Wales or to Welsh parents, as well as anyone who has played for a Welsh national team (any age group or women's football), or for a club in Wales and/or in the Welsh league system (so as to include Cardiff, Swansea, Wrexham, Newport, Merthyr Tydfil, Colwyn Bay and The New Saints players). The clubs themselves would also be covered, as would the national teams and all the related football grounds. Finally, Welsh football competitions would also come under the task force's umbrella. The structure of the task force would be based on the successful task force model employed by WP:FOOTY, which would be the primary parent project for the task force. If I can get five people on board for this, I will create all the necessary pages and categories, and I will begin tagging article talk pages with assessment tags. I hope this will spark some interest in the project. Looking forward to hearing from you all. – PeeJay 14:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Anyone? – PeeJay 15:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Seriously, is everyone in here so apathetic towards football? Or is WP:WALES merely going the way of the dinosaur? – PeeJay 10:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

I enjoy football and I do support Wales, but it's not really what I do much of on Wikipedia. Sorry :o) — OwenBlacker (Talk) 22:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Maybe those who are potentially interested don't watch this page? Might be worth looking at the edit history of related articles and leaving a message on editors user talk page. I'd love the content of what you're proposing to be on Wikipedia (need a back up of stats pages from the excellent welsh-premier.com), but it's not my main priority, sorry.--Rhyswynne (talk) 15:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

I've just got too much on my plate. I actually saw the Who's Who of Welsh Football Internationals (going back to year dot) in a Book Shop in Cardiff and had to force myself to keep my money in my wallet. With the work that I do on Welsh places, Welsh film, Welsh rugby and Welsh boxing, I just couldn't take on another stream. Sorry mate. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Gwbert

When Gwbert was last reviewed, it was a stub comprising just two sentences. I wonder if someone would like to re-evaluate it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hogyn Lleol (talk • contribs)

Reviewed. A good effort. Article raised from stub to C class. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello, there may be more traditional welsh bands to go on Music of Wales article. Traditional music is actually a bit more widespread :). the are many folk/traditional festivals all across Wales during the summer. Celtic music in the United States and Celtic music in Canada seem to think that Welsh music is highly influential to them, yet music of Wales page is deemed , low importance. I guess the Canadians and Americans are talking about traditional Welsh (Celtic) music (folk) rather than choir music (folk) which is far more widespread (traditional I mean) ok thanks.

Proposal being made on WT:IMOS

Might be of interest this proposal Mo ainm~Talk 15:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC)