User talk:Becksguy: Difference between revisions

** January 22, 2011 (tentatively 9:30 AM - 5 PM)

reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. 

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.  Courcelles (talk) 18:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Surprise!

I'm a Democrat.  Who knew?  APK whisper in my ear 20:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently that anon thinks Democrat is a very bad name to call someone...  And tool even worse. Don't worry, I won't tell them that you are an L word. — Becks ^{Talk to me} 20:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Minor edit default

Hello. You appear to have the option in Special:Preferences for "Mark all edits minor by default" turned on (by default it is off), however the majority of your edits are not WP:MINOR. Please go to Preference -> Editing, and turn this option off. Thanks! (If interested, see the discussion thread to remove the option entirely, at Help talk:Minor edit#Should we remove the Preference setting to "Mark all edits minor by default" ?) -- Quiddity (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the time I set that option, I believed the vast majority of my edits would be minor. Such is not the case, so I turned it off shortly after your posting. Thank you for noting it. I will also comment at the discussion you linked to, as my experience is that it's not a useful option, since far too many edits wind up being marked minor by default and it seems a bit dangerous for that reason. — Becksguy (talk) 03:59, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages?

I appreciate your concern that consensus is followed and that secret pages are given a fair hearing; however, Jclemens' edit did follow consensus after this fairly detailed discussion. Your revert is the edit that people might feel does not have consensus, especially as a revert of a good faith edit is in itself considered against consensus. If you wish to create some support for a position of tolerance toward secret pages that is an appropriate and laudable campaign. However, it is not considered appropriate to revert consensus edits because a person does not agree with them. And updating policy or guideline pages cannot be held up because there are discussions or edits going on elsewhere that will be impacted by the update - I do believe we have at least one ArbCom ruling on that. Jclemens' edit should be restored until such time as it can be shown that there is a consensus supporting secret pages. To reduce any drama or ill will, it would helpful if you restored the edit. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 23:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my life I have learned to listen to friendly advice.  I very strongly believe that a guideline discussion about a change in WP:UP (specifically for WP:UP#GAMES) does not apply—nor was it meant to apply—to a policy page at WP:NOT (specifically WP:MYSPACE), and therefore it is not a reversion against consensus. If I thought it was, I wouldn't have done it. Also note that Jclemens didn't mind. I believe the Jclemens edit and my edit both were good faith edits. I will write up a summary and a rationale for the RfC at WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages?, and restore the phrase I reverted per your advice.  Thank you. — Becksguy (talk) 02:52, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Consider yourself recognized

It's entirely possible to be civil when "winning", but the true test of a person's character is how they behave when not prevailing.  Your conduct with respect to the WP:NOT change I proposed and the ensuing RfC has been truly exemplary and something entirely too rare on Wikipedia.  You have won my respect through your conduct.  If the opportunity arises, I'd rather "lose" an argument to you than "win" one with most of the other participants here. Wikipedia needs more folks like you. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 03:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to believe I wasn't trying to win (well, maybe a little bit), rather hoping to convince some editors that being overly strict wasn't always in our best interest in keeping new and younger editors. So be it. I was impressed that you didn't take my questioning personally, so it was your initial attitude that really helped set the tone. Others might have have been affronted. For that, I thank you. And reaching out the way you did above speaks volumes about your character. You have my respect as well. Regards, — Becksguy (talk) 04:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)

Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.
There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session.  Register for the Wiki-Conference here.  And sign up here for on-wiki notification.  All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking suggestions for new title for WP:AMORAL

You have previously commented regarding the essay WP:Wikipedia is amoral; I am soliciting suggestions for a better title for the essay. If you have any, please list them at Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_is_amoral#Suggestions_for_new_title.3F. Thanks, --Cybercobra (talk) 07:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

For your cogent comments at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Bearian (talk) 23:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Anon responds

You might be right regarding Media Matters for America edits.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.156.201 (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

RfC: Partisan sources

I have proposed an edit for the mainspace of an important Wikipedia policy, the Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources policy. Essentially, I believe that some sources are so partisan that using them as "reliable sources" invites more problems than they're really worth. You've previously participated in the RfC on this subject, or another related discussion indicating that you are interested in this important policy area. Please indicate here whether you support or oppose the proposed edit. The original discussion is here. Thanks. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 01:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborative news on quippd

Hey, I noticed that you listed yourself as invoked in the WikiProject Journalism project, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project. 
I run quippd, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: http://quippd.com/about/intro
Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Wikipedia. We are trying to take the ideas of WikiFactCheck  -- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews). By combining social elements to the project, we hope to bring the benefits of wiki enabled fact checking and npov ideas to the masses. 
I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns. 
--Yoasif (talk) 04:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Wikiconference

Hi Becksguy, just wanted to pop by and let you know that I really enjoyed working with you on the Pending Changes panel.  It was good to see you again, and to share a sangria or two. :-)  Risker (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:  Matthew Shepard discussion

Rationality doesn't always go very far on Wikipedia, as I'm sure you know.  But thanks for the compliment, appreciate ya bud.  Textorus (talk) 04:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Secret pages 2

Hi, Becksguy. I have created Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Secret pages 2. Cunard (talk) 06:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Guttenberg

Hi, and thanks for the links. I've been away but had seen that. The good Grey Lady goes into the digital age sans forest products. What do you think? Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I hate the term forest products, as it's newsprint. Just like it's not human resources, it's personnel. Some have said that's what important in all this cultural/technology change is the craft of journalism. Whether the copy came by horseback, ship dispatches, telegraph, or computer. Whether printed on the early single sheet presses, or modern color high speed web presses, and delivered/sold by newsies, paperboys, or folks delivering before their regular job. Or even delivered via TV broadcast and digital technology. I've heard the expression that the newspaper is just a medium, a delivery system, as it were. A way of delivering the thoughts about what's important that happened from the mind of a reporter to the mind of a reader. Yet, I can't help feeling a sense of loss.  Yes, American newspapers are dying financially, and the NYT had to decrease costs to stay in business. But I will miss being able to have a paper in my hands. And the ink stains (although less so nowadays). But if there was more of the "comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable" ethos, that would be even better. Some of that's happening with the rise of internet only non-mainstream news sources. — Becksguy (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some of it may be, but nearly enough, in my book. Those 'internet only non-mainstream news sources' have to rely on precarious financial models. As David Halberstam pointed out in The Powers That Be, most of the press's bite (and its ability to bite) was as a result of financial models that guaranteed some measure of independence and staying power. I see some nice reporting by the new models you mention, but not nearly enough. Perhaps that will come in time. MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you

Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsimulated sex in movies, etc.

Kerry Fox and Alexander Linklater have been married for some time. I guess we don't update that because they were not married at the time of Alex's piece in the Guardian? If not 'husband', then how about 'then-boyfriend'? --89.211.152.117 (talk) 10:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --89.211.152.117 (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine as "then-boyfriend" is supported by the reference. Being married now probably doesn't have much to do with that table entry. Sorry I didn't respond faster.  Nice job in fixing it. — Becksguy (talk) 11:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16

New York City Meetup

Next: Saturday October 16th, Jefferson Market Library in Lower Manhattan

Last: 05/22/2010

This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference NYC 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Ambassador Program and Wikipedia Academy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia DC Meetup, October 23

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #12 on Saturday, October 23, 6pm at Bertucci's in Foggy Bottom.  Special guests at this meetup will include Wikimedia CTO Danese Cooper, other Wikimedia technical staff and volunteer developers who will be in DC for Hack-A-Ton DC.  Please RSVP on the meetup page.
You can remove your name from the Washington DC Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia DC Meetup 13

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #13 on Wednesday, November 17, from 7 to 9 pm, location to be determined (but near a Metro station in DC). 
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can join the mailing list.
You can remove your name from future notifications of Washington DC Meetups by editing this page:  Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.
BrownBot (talk) 13:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. 
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator. 
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. T. Canens (talk) 02:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the trust, Tim. Caveats understood. Becksguy (talk) 04:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Meet-up follow-up

www.nerowolfe.org  :)
Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup:  Saturday, December 4

We meet outside by the trees at 5:00 PM.
Our next Wikipedia NYC Meetup is this weekend on Saturday Dec 4 at Brooklyn Museum during their awesome First Saturdays program, starting at 5 PM.
A particular highlight for the wiki crowd will be 'Seductive Subversion: Women Pop Artists, 1958–1968', and the accompanying "WikiPop" project, with specially-created Wikipedia articles on the artists displayed on iPads in the gallery.
This will be a museum touring and partying meetup, so no excuses about being a shy newbie this time. Bring a friend too!
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiXDC: Wikipedia 10th Birthday!

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)
You are invited to WikiXDC, a special meetup event and celebration on Saturday, January 22 hosted by the National Archives and Records Administration in downtown Washington, D.C.

Date: January 22, 2011 (tentatively 9:30 AM - 5 PM)
Location: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), downtown building, Pennsylvania Avenue & 7th St NW.
Description: There will be a behind-the-scenes tour of the National Archives and you will learn more about what NARA does. We will also have a mini-film screening featuring FedFlix videos along with a special message from Jimmy Wales.  In the afternoon, there will be lightning talks by Wikimedians (signup to speak), wiki-trivia, and cupcakes to celebrate!
Details & RSVP:  Details about the event are on our Washington, DC tenwiki page.
Please RSVP soon as possible, as there likely will be a cap on number of attendees that NARA can accommodate.

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List. BrownBot (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grey lady's pay wall

Thanks for your message. I've been following this, and noticed the paywall went up today. I've been meaning to update Future of Newspapers with mention of this, as well as updates on the Apple subscription plans and apps, as well as what Murdoch and others are up to. I hope to get to it soon. Hope all is well. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for the barnstar! My first! I'll move it to my user page so it won't get archived. Jeh (talk) 02:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DC Meetup: May 7 @ Tenleytown Library

The next DC Wikimedia meetup is scheduled for Saturday, May 7, 3:30-5:30 pm at the Tenleytown Library (adjacent to the Tenleytown Metro Station, Red Line), followed by dinner & socializing at some nearby place. 
This is the first official meeting of our proposed Wikimedia DC chapter, with discussion of bylaws and next steps.  Other agenda items include, update everyone on our successful Wikimania bid and next steps in the planning process, discuss upcoming activities that we want to do over the summer and fall, and more.
Please RSVP here and see a list of additional tentatively planned meetups & activities for late May & June on the Wikipedia:Meetup/DC page. 

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

Hello

Wanted to drop by and say a quick hello. Hope all is well with you :) Caden ^cool 08:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey buddy. It's been a while. I hope that means that your editing life is going smoothly, and that all is well with you. — Becksguy (talk) 13:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

Hi, hope all is going well with you these days. I wanted to run something by you. I inserted today's news on the Keller-Abramson turnover at The Times. Normally, I wouldn't assess an editorial change as deserving to be in the lede, but because she will become the first female top editor in the Grey Lady's history, I think it deserves mention, and probably up top. What do you think? Thanks and take care. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 21:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An early take on it by The Guardian.[1] MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:07, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Everything is going well, just getting older, one day at a time. 
I noticed that someone reverted your inclusion. That inclusion is really an editorial judgement. I don't think any of us would normally include a change of newsroom leadership. But considering the importance of the NYT as the "paper of record", breaking 160 years of tradition, the Guardian piece on the change, and the history of women at the Times—about which a book was published in 1992, Girls in the Balcony by Nan Robertson—I'd say a brief mention in the lede was warranted. — Becksguy (talk) 22:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope everything is well with you.  Maybe we should move this discussion to the NYT talk page. Regards — Becksguy (talk) 23:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Glad all is well on your end, and thank you for the speedy reply. I agree with you about most personnel changes being non-events, but I also agree with your take on this one warranting notice, and within the lede. Given the Robertson book, and the gender issues referenced in the piece, I think the Abramson appointment needs to be included (with The Guardian piece footnoted). I'll restore, and thank you for getting back to me. I'll also, per your suggestion, take to NYT talk as well. Hope you have a great summer. MarmadukePercy (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and thank you again. MarmadukePercy (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, Jim Lehrer had an interview with Abramson on the NewsHour this evening, in which she referenced the fact that she'd never had the opportunity to meet Nan Robertson. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for weighing in with that good summary of events. Now I just have to figure out where to insert it. MarmadukePercy (talk) 21:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just wanted to assure you I haven't forgotten about including the Abramson news, but have been mulling over about how to incorporate it. I think I've got it figured out now. In the meantime, wanted to be sure you saw this from VF about Gay Talese comments on publisher Sulzberger.[2] Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're invited to the New York Wiknic!

You could be having this much fun! Seriously, consider coming.
This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape (directions) in Manhattan's Central Park.
Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.
If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.
Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

To subscribe to future events, follow the mailing list or add your username to the invitation list. BrownBot (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Appreciate your recent comment at the Media Matters article

The more I've been thinking about it, the more my position has returned to where it was every other time the discussion has happened.  It's kind of bizarre to think we should force a label on the organization.  It's fine to quote others (as we do in the rest of the article) who use "liberal" to describe MM, but the idea that we should go out of our way to call attention to that characterization, to force the label on them, seems very weird to me.  For a parallel situation with a politician, if a left-of-center Senator said something like, "I stand for progressive values, such as high quality public education, civil rights," and so forth, would it be right to modify that quote or crop it to avoid saying "progressive" and instead say "liberal"?  Should the article say, "Senator Jones says that he stands up for liberal values, such as "high quality public education, civil rights..."?  That seems utterly crazy, but it's basically the same as what's being proposed for MM.  Though I suppose that it's not quite that way, since their formulation would be "Jones says he stands for values that are often described in news sources as liberal..."  Croctotheface (talk) 09:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay and thank you. And I think you did a wonderful job in finding that link to Modern liberalism in the United States#"Liberal" as a derogatory epithet. Maybe that will help support our contention that using the single-word-one-size-fits-all term "liberal" is not as neutral as some editors believe it to be. — Becksguy (talk) 04:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Smithsonian Archives of American Art Backstage Pass

Archives of American Art Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch (talk) 14:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GLAM-Wiki Baltimore meetup

You are invited to the first Wikipedia Baltimore meetup on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the Walters Art Museum. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area!
There also is a Wikipedia & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist Happy Hour on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.

Note: You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

Thanks

for that. LOL. My psychic powers are improving: when I logged out, I was pretty sure there'd be something of the sort when I logged back in! Rivertorch (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject National Archives Newsletter

The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic·t 21:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject National Archives Newsletter
July 2011

News

Featured article contest
This week, our first multilingual featured article contest was announced. We are aiming to improve the articles on the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, or Bill of Rights to featured or good status in English and other languages. Prizes for winners will be a gift package from the National Archives including a book of your choice or a tote bag, and other swag, plus, of course, a special barnstar.
August 6 backstage pass
Plans are in the works for a meetup and backstage pass event at the National Archives II facility in College Park, MD. There  will be a regular social meetup, a discussion with Dominic about WP:NARA, a tour of the building by NARA staff, and then time for a scanathon and editathon in the research rooms and library until the building closes at 5 pm. Keep your schedules open!

From our recent uploads:

...see more.

Special requests:
This section includes special requests from the NARA staff:

Archival Recovery Team
The National Archives' Archival Recovery Team (ART) is a team of law enforcement agents and archivists who investigate NARA's lost and stolen documents. They have received media attention ([3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]) and would like to request an article be written for the team, if Wikipedians deem it notable. It is hoped that making more information about the group available on Wikipedia will increase public awareness of the documents they are seeking to recover.

Ongoing

Today's Document challenge
The Today's Document challenge is an opportunity for Wikipedians to get their work related to National Archives holdings spotlighted on Archives.gov and the National Archives' tumblr. Each day the National Archives selects a document related to the day's date to showcase. The goal is to get articles related to the selected documents on the main page in ""Did You Know...?" the same day that the National Archives features the document. Alternatively, other appropriate articles related to National Archives holdings not already selected will be used for new documents of the day by NARA staff and posted to their tumblr.
Wikisource
WP:NARA has a sister WikiProject on Wikisource, WS:NARA. On Wikisource, editors transcribe, proofread, and arrange documents. This helps to make little-known documents more discoverable, or well-known documents more searchable, and improves accessibility. See the files being worked on. If you are new to Wikisource and would like to participate, there are experienced Wikisourcerors willing to be mentors.

New contributions
A list of some recent contributions to the project:

Wikipedia

District of Columbia Compensated Emancipation Act (Fetchcomms)
Court of the Patriarchs (CutOffTies)
Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom (Fetchcomms)
Wikisource¹

Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii
Petition from women of Brookline
Resolutions of the Joint Committee on the Washington Monument
H. R. 4982
A Petition For Universal Suffrage
Susan B. Anthony petition for remission of fine
Alexander Hamilton's commission to take rank as Colonel
¹Credit goes to Prosody, Theornamentalist, Inductiveload, Digipoke, George Orwell III, Kathleen.wright5, BirgitteSB, and Zhaladshar

Tools
Archives.gov grabber (Slakr)

Future plans

Major image contribution
The National Archives has hundreds of thousands of digitized documents in its holdings. We are working on a bulk upload to Commons of one particular cache of about 123,000 TIFF master files in the next few days! Once uploaded, these will require a massive community effort to help categorize the files on Commons and add them to articles on Wikipedia or transcribe them on Wikisource.

Inclusion in the online catalog
We are currently working on a system for including links to pages on Wikimedia projects in the National Archives online catalog. The Wikimedia projects are hosting an increasing number of transcriptions of National Archives documents and high-quality image and video files that are not available through NARA's own site. Links to these Wikimedia pages in the documents' actual catalog records will benefit the end user by providing them access to further resources about the documents, and they will also demonstrate the National Archives commitment to supporting Wikimedians' efforts.

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your name from the list.

DC Meetup, July 29

DC Meetup 21 - Who should come? You should. Really.

DC MEETUP 21 is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. See you Friday! SarahStierch (talk) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DC-area Meetup, Saturday, August 6

National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really.

On Saturday, August 6, the National Archives is hosting a Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Dominic·t 21:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting

DC Meetup 23 & Annual Membership Meeting

Wikimedia District of Columbia, the newest officially recognized chapter, is holding its Annual Membership Meeting at 1pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011 at the Tenley-Friendship Neighborhood Library. 

Agenda items include:

election of the Board of Directors for the next two years
approval of a budget for the 2011-2012 fiscal year
report on the activities and accomplishments of the past year
social gathering afterwards at a nearby restaurant
Candidate nominations are open until 11:59pm EDT on Saturday, September 24. We encourage you to consider being a candidate. (see see candidate instructions)
The meeting is open to both the general public and members from within the DC-MD-VA-WV-DE region and beyond.  We encourage everyone to attend!
You may join the chapter at the meeting or online.

Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

DC-area Meetup, Saturday, October 8

National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really.

You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic·t 16:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoosexuality

What about this as a sexual orientation? You want to support its inclusion at the Sexual orientation article? Homosexuals and zoosexuals, in the same boat. You can come in and comment on the talk page. 120.203.215.11 (talk) 01:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 382: / Line 382: @@
 |You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special [[Wikipedia:Meetup/NARA 2|backstage pass and scanathon]] meetup with [[Archivist of the United States]] [[David Ferriero]], on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! [[User:Dominic|Dominic]]·[[User talk:Dominic|t]] 16:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 |}
+== [[Zoosexuality]] ==
+What about this as a sexual orientation? You want to support its inclusion at the [[Sexual orientation]] article? Homosexuals and zoosexuals, in the same boat. You can come in and comment [[Talk:Sexual orientation|on the talk page]]. [[Special:Contributions/120.203.215.11|120.203.215.11]] ([[User talk:120.203.215.11|talk]]) 01:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:16, 12 October 2011

Wikipedia Day NYC

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21

Hey dude

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22

Happy Memorial Day

You are now a Reviewer

Surprise!

Minor edit default

WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages?

Consider yourself recognized

Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)

Seeking suggestions for new title for WP:AMORAL

Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

Mr Anon responds

RfC: Partisan sources

Collaborative news on quippd

NYC Wikiconference

Re: Matthew Shepard discussion

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Secret pages 2

Goodbye Guttenberg

Thank you

Unsimulated sex in movies, etc.

Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16

Wikipedia DC Meetup, October 23

Wikipedia DC Meetup 13

IP block exempt

Meet-up follow-up

NYC Meetup: Saturday, December 4

WikiXDC: Wikipedia 10th Birthday!

Grey lady's pay wall

Thanks

DC Meetup: May 7 @ Tenleytown Library

Hello

Your opinion

You're invited to the New York Wiknic!

Appreciate your recent comment at the Media Matters article

Smithsonian Archives of American Art Backstage Pass

GLAM-Wiki Baltimore meetup

Thanks

The WikiProject National Archives Newsletter

DC Meetup, July 29

DC-area Meetup, Saturday, August 6

You're invited! Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting

DC-area Meetup, Saturday, October 8

Zoosexuality