User talk:PBS/Archive 17: Difference between revisions
→Slight change in the White Album move discussion: new section |
Diacritics RFC |
||
Line 380: | Line 380: | ||
The proposed move of ''[[The Beatles (album)]]'' to ''The White Album'' has been altered slightly, to the simpler ''White Album.'' I'm letting you know in case you'd like to review your vote. '''''D'''''[[User:Dralwik|'''ralwi''']][[User:Dralwik/sandbox|'''k''']]|<sup>[[User talk:Dralwik|Have a Chat]]</sup> 01:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC) |
The proposed move of ''[[The Beatles (album)]]'' to ''The White Album'' has been altered slightly, to the simpler ''White Album.'' I'm letting you know in case you'd like to review your vote. '''''D'''''[[User:Dralwik|'''ralwi''']][[User:Dralwik/sandbox|'''k''']]|<sup>[[User talk:Dralwik|Have a Chat]]</sup> 01:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Diacritics RFC == |
|||
I am working on a diacritics RFC [[User:Taekwondo_Panda/diacritics_RFC|here]]. It's a rather elaborate proposal, so I thought I'd get some comments going public with it. You can put a response on the proposal's talk page. [[User:Taekwondo Panda|Taekwondo Panda]] ([[User talk:Taekwondo Panda|talk]]) 23:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:19, 11 April 2014
|
|
Typo in AWB edit summaries
Hi Phil, there's a typo in your AWB edit summaries: "tempates" should be "templates". Graham87 14:40, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your message in my talk page
I replied there and thank you! --Lvhis (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
BracketBot
| ||
---|---|---|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Osnabrück may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christopher Hatton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Andronikos I Komnenos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Lodge may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Waters (1774–1842) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Picket (military) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC) |
Refrences
You are making numerous AWB edits like this and this, which change the correct spelling of "References" to the incorrect "Refrences" - Please stop - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Adelbert Lipsius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC) |
Please can you check references for
THanks so much Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.160.17.244 (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- I am not sure what it is that you think needs checking. -- PBS (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Navigator
In your Navigator, you have a slight misspelling. You have "sandboxs", the correct spelling is "sandboxes". I attempted to make the change myself (cause I know a message about spelling mistakes seems rude), but wasn't able to. Just letting you know. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucy Walter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Flushing and Gilbert Gerard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks?
Well, thank you for your appreciation. Though I have been wondering if that was for what I said, or what I didn't say. :-) ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
Talkback
Message added 08:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Temploux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Namur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
This wiki-kitten wants to thank you for your copyediting and other fixes. Such gnomish edits are always appreciated!
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Hump may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Claude Louis Petiet may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Laure Junot, Duchess of Abrantes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Definitions of pogrom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1814 campaign in France may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC) |
Battle of Berlin article
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
-YMB29 (talk) 02:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Houyoux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Bruyère (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC) |
Bismarck
Hi. I answered your question at the ref desk, and have added his birthday as well in case you missed my addendum. μηδείς (talk) 20:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Genocide definitions, Definitions of pogrom and Definitions of fascism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genocide definitions, Definitions of pogrom and Definitions of fascism are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genocide definitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oncenawhile (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Dicdef / village pump
PBS, firstly I acknowledge that you are disappointed that I brought Genocide definitions to multiafd today. I may have gone about it the wrong way, but I hope you will give me the benefit of the doubt when I say that it is a genuine (perhaps misguided) attempt to reach consensus on the questions of dicdef and copyright as they relate to such articles.
Anyway, I'm coming here to ask whether you would mind if i bring up the same question at village pump.
I would really like to achieve closure on this point - and the only way i know to do so is to find a process to reach a real consensus.
Oncenawhile (talk) 15:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Just left you a message at my talk page. Oncenawhile (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Definitions
Just a message to say thanks for resolving the situation at that article. I recognise my thanks likely means little or nothing given your negative view of me, but your intervention has saved a few of us from continuing our endless circular arguments, so thank you. Oncenawhile (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 26 February
Extended content
|
---|
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1814 campaign in France (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Montereau, Montmirail, Vauchamps and Victor
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Battle of Berlin again
Just a note to let you know I mentioned you in a discussion on my talkpage as to the Battle of Berlin matter. Kierzek (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
What is your reasoning for ignoring WP:ASF?
- The text of Wikipedia articles should not assert opinions but should assert facts. When a statement is a fact (a piece of information about which there is no serious dispute) it should be asserted without prefixing it with "(Source) says that ...", and when a statement is an opinion (a matter which is subject to dispute) it should be attributed to the source that offered the opinion using inline-text attribution.[1]
Is that so hard to understand?
I did verify this on the NPOV noticeboard, so you can't claim that this is only my opinion.[2] -YMB29 (talk) 18:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Frederick Lyon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Constable may have broken the syntax by modifying 22 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lieutenant of the Tower of London may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John I de Balliol may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Devon heraldry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Constable (died 1591) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sir Harry Burrard, 1st Baronet, of Lymington may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eyre Coote (British Army officer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rufane Shaw Donkin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
Discretionary sanctions 2013 review: Draft v3
Hi. You have commented on Draft v1 or v2 in the Arbitration Committee's 2013 review of the discretionary sanctions system. I thought you'd like to know Draft v3 has now been posted to the main review page. You are very welcome to comment on it on the review talk page. Regards, AGK [•] 00:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hitler was known to be kind to children and dogs ...
Hi, PBS.
Re this edit: Hitler was known to be kind to children and dogs, and sometimes even banned users do exactly the right thing. I'm not saying you weren't within your rights to revert, but the rub is that now the title is a mismatch to the text and needs to be changed back to include the cedilla. I'll leave it with you for prompt action. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Extended content
|
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Dryden (1668–1701), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congreve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC) |
Reflinks
Please don't use the Reflinks tool on Google Books links, as you did here: the output is inaccurate at best. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Harry Burrard
I have reverted your recent edits as they created a load of redlinks. Perhaps you would like to try again. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 22:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies - I shouldn't try to edit after an evening out! -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Whenever an IP (or any user for that matter) adds a large chunk of unedited text (no refs/wikilinks), then I get suspicious. The good news is that the deleted edits and this version are entirely different pieces, so it wasn't taken from a mirror. I also copypasted several phrases at random into Google to see if anything came up, and for any I used, the entry was the only result. So, perhaps surprisingly, the additions appear to be legit, unless it was someone copying something from a book source, which would be beyond my ability to find. Wizardman 02:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Proposal to move the Orphan tags to the talk page
Yes, I didn't knew. OccultZone (Talk) 12:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I just saw, somebody had notified AWB community about this proposal. But nothing seems to have done. You got any idea, why? OccultZone (Talk) 12:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Eyre Coote (British Army officer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mansion House, Charles Grey, Battle of Brooklyn, Bandon and Battle of Bergen
- Sir Harry Burrard, 1st Baronet of Lymington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Arthur Wellesley and Hew Dalrymple
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- George Wilkes Unett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cambray
- William Douglas of Balgillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to 74th Foot
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Re: WP:TITLE
I disagree with your assessment of consensus. Although there is no strictly defined numerical ratio, outside of RfAs and RfBs, anything over 2/3 is frequently considered to suffice to show consensus. In this case, there was actually 70.5% support for the change, which should be more than enough. bd2412 T 23:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles
I have started a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles. Anomalocaris (talk) 08:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Question about underlinking
I know it certainly depends upon the size of the page, but still, if the page has 3-4 or more links, it cannot be said as 'underlinked' anymore? OccultZone (Talk) 10:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Slight change in the White Album move discussion
The proposed move of The Beatles (album) to The White Album has been altered slightly, to the simpler White Album. I'm letting you know in case you'd like to review your vote. Dralwik|Have a Chat 01:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Diacritics RFC
I am working on a diacritics RFC here. It's a rather elaborate proposal, so I thought I'd get some comments going public with it. You can put a response on the proposal's talk page. Taekwondo Panda (talk) 23:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)