User talk:LM2000

Yes, this is my talk page. I'm honored that you have chosen to pay me a visit.

Ability: Keen Eye

Whoa, I hadn't noticed that, thanks for the link. I did notice a recent GameFaqs thread though. Starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Whoops

No problemo! I was a bit surprised when that came up in my notifications but I figured it was either a mistake or you had a good reason for it. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 22:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Excuse Me

Daddy Day Camp was panned. It has a very low rating on IMBD, and was ranked as the 16 lowest rated film on RT. Are you completely sure? Please inform me if I was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C4CB:C810:C5F2:50D6:B6D7:4F39 (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. 2602:306:C4CB:C810:C5F2:50D6:B6D7:4F39 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

You're quite active...

I see you have a history. :) I left the Melissa Harris-Perry article be, with no mention at all of her tampon earrings, which I find quite interesting. I did link to the Romney subsection on the main MSNBC page, though. Hope that sits better with you. Cheers. -- Cirrus Editor (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Millionaire Edit

I made a valid edit on Millionaire. It ORIGINATED in the United Kingdom! Then came to the US as the EXACT same show. Same graphics, same music, same lifelines, same logos, same cash tier, and even almost an exact replica of the original UK stage.

LOOK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0aMrkbUAxQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI2SXUzMFtQ

All I want edited was country of origin. Get your facts right, people! You're supposed to have the "valid information" ...bullcrap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BugleBoi (talk • contribs) 07:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Seethisway SPI

"David"? Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Work Shall be done

Done, I've gotten almost a 100 reliable sources for this article. Honestly, if people could give me a chance I can show them what I can do. -- Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack and Jill (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battlefield Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Abuser

Stop violating Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into articles and stop abusing your rollback rights. --77.70.37.138 (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in, but what you are accusing simply didn't occur; your changes were reverted, nothing was added by LM2000 (talk). In my experience, LM2000 (talk) has always acted in good faith. Why are you so passionate about moving an article that has been nominated for deletion anyway? Did you consider the fact that you could interrupt the discussion by moving pages that are under review? —Josh3580_talk/hist 22:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I reverted the move because the article under its current name is being nominated for deletion and your redirect removed the nomination tag. Also, the page that you redirected it to has previously been undone by someone else. Seems controversial, you may want to request a move. You may want to assume good faith in the future, and also brush up on WP:BLP as Josh points out no BLP violations have occurred here.LM2000 (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	This barnstar is awarded for your key contributions to removing the scourge of Brimstone from our esteemed website. starship.paint (talk | contribs) 11:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Harpalji

Hello LM2000. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Harpalji, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 13:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Giant Haystacks move.

Were you thinking of Haystacks Calhoun? You did help move him recently. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:23, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Meatpuppet Question

No, nobody ever asked me to do anything of the sort. RaveBlack (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Pro Wrestling Community

I didn't want to clutter the AfD by asking, but I wanted to ask someone who was a lot more knowledgeable than me regarding this. I didn't even know there was a wrestling community here until recently, and I would like to contribute in whatever way I can, even if it's just helping to clean up/proofread articles. I have found my way to the project page, but beyond the pages listed there, is there any other reading that I should do before contributing to the community? Thank you in advance for any guidance you can provide this neophyte! RaveBlack (talk) 07:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for replying to me, and for that page on sources. That seems to be the thing that trips me up in attempting to contribute here beyond just proofreading. Too much time on TVTropes leads one to believe that everything has merit. I have an additional question regarding them: is there an official stance regarding the use of social media as a source, like an official Twitter or Facebook account? One of my past edits was reverted due to attempting to use an official Twitter account as a source, and it wasn't really explained how it wasn't valid then.

I understand fully how bad this all looks. I really should be more active, and now that I'm learning what to do and how not to look ridiculous in the process, I'm sure I can be. And even I thought that it was odd how people seemed to appear out of nowhere to vote. RaveBlack (talk) 05:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I now have a lot of reading to do. Thanks again! RaveBlack (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

WWE Countdown

Thanks dude, my first time making a wrestling article so I will try and use these sources in the future. Also thanks for the table fix.

--Moonschool (talk) 03:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

No hard feelings Vjmlhds 22:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

No hard feelings! Upon rereading my edit summary, it sounds a bit more snooty than I intended. Hopefully no offense was taken.LM2000 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I am so sorry.

		The Good Friend Award
		I'm so sorry you got mixed up in this mess...we usually work well together, and this got outta hand. Please accept this award as a token of appreciation for your efforts and intents, and as a token of apology. Vjmlhds 02:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Take a looksie at the WWE roster talk page at the proposal I laid out. I'm basically removing the tumor that caused the problems to start with...whatcha think? Vjmlhds (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LM2000. You have new messages at Musdan77's talk page.
Message added 05:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Musdan77 (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

I understand where you're coming from, but the subject of the discussion was whether the urban legend the film bears so many similarities to should be mentioned on the page. That is an appropriate subject for discussion on the talk page per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. I've left the wipe and will re-phrase the issue more succinctly, because the discussion better resembled an argument. I would ask however, in the future that you try to be more clear on the issue being discussed before making such a wipe. Thank you. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 04:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

I have to agree that my initial remark was not productive, however I didn't remove it myself both because it began a discussion, and because I am leery of removing my own words from a discussion, as the act reeks of deception. I believe than any civility issues I may have had began and ended with that remark, however it is difficult to engage someone as confrontational as that IP editor without the appearance of loosing one's cool. I have already re-phrased my opinion on the talk page, if you wish to involve yourself in the discussion. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Show

Right now, I'm watching WM. Spoiler free (maybe show is the new WWE World champ). If you want, ask for the ban yourself. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I saw the show and I cryed a lot. About the user, It's better to ask for a ban. Some users warned him months ago and he doesn't learn. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Warrior image

Hi LM2000, just sayin' your Commons upload was incomplete starship.paint "YES!" 05:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

mm. I'm in a bit of a mess now. Will probably do other stuff than Warrior's in the next few days. starship.paint "YES!" 07:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Information pertaining to the "Death" section of recently deceased public figure/professional wrestler, Warrior aka Ultimate Warrior aka James Hellwig". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

ric flairs gonna return dumbass!!

 it has been reported that ric flair is gonna return to monday night june 16 hes gonna manag the miz so if you think im not gonna write again yo ass is wrong if you delete it again ima write again if you do delete it ill report you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwelover620 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC) 

Titles

Michael22 finaly appeared in the talk page. Some help? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Did you know we also have this --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (2011) peer review

Hi LM2000, due to your experience in editing professional wrestling related articles (and other experience for GAs), I'd like to invite you to comment on the peer review for Money in the Bank (2011), which I have an interest to eventually push for Featured Article status. Thank you very much. starship.paint ~ regal 15:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Veda Scott

FYI: The article Veda Scott, which was previously deleted per your vote to do so, has been recreated and is up for deletion again. Your input would be appreciated. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Veda_Scott_(2nd_nomination) Tchaliburton (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Hey, LM2000. I've been watching this AfD, and I need to respond to several questions that were raised. I am not actively involved in editing pro wrestling articles, and wanted to talk with someone who is. Do you edit wrestling articles? If so, would you mind trading an email or two about questions I have? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Team Dixie

I have absolutely no "Ownership" issues all I'm trying too do is use the proper wrestling terminology that was created too describe certain characters in professional wrestling JMichael22 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Broker

I added convenience store broker. Why was it removed?

Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talk • contribs) 09:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Spammed Link?

I don't know what you mean? I just signed up today to add an edit?

Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talk • contribs) 09:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

There is no external link under broker? Only see also

I see a bunch of other brokers, but I can't add convenience store broker? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talk • contribs) 09:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

WWE Reliable Source

i want to thank you for showing me what websites are okay and not okay to use, and trying to find a reliable source on what i posted is by websites are there not reliable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salineb (talk • contribs) 01:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Yea i've been trying to fix stuff, like HHH Pedigree, deleted all of Stings Themes off his Wiki, and left one theme on there and that source was from a website i never heard of and the link was dead, so i had to take 4 hours out of my day and try to find sources, and i bet HHH Pedigree will remove what i did anyways — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salineb (talk • contribs) 01:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

(professional wrestling) -> (wrestling)

I saw you sorta proposed moving the articles as so, and so did InedibleHulk. I support that as well. If anyone of you is willing to propose it after the current requested move fails, I compiled a list. Controversial ones like Referee (professional wrestling) are at the top and might not be wise to move those. starship.paint ~ regal 07:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry about Cruiserweight. Unlike boxing and MMA, wrestling weight classes have boring names like "66 kg" and "84 kg". The Authority is probably safe, too. Amateur wrestling's authority is called FILA. The (WCW) and (TNA) bits are probably enough for Team Canada. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:38, September 24, 2014 (UTC)

Apparently, FILA's called United World Wrestling now. Sounds sort of fake. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:41, September 24, 2014 (UTC)

Sounds totally "professional", heh. I have already inserted a note at the top of the Authority pointing to UWW. starship.paint ~ regal 23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Great work as always starship. One that stands out for me is Shoot (professional wrestling), which should probably stay where it is so it is not confused with Shoot wrestling.LM2000 (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Also, "shooting" in wrestling wrestling means going for a takedown. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:44, September 24, 2014 (UTC)

Updated the list. LM2000 do you agree with Hulk's explanation for Cruiserweight? starship.paint ~ regal 23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

I don't have much of an issue with it as the MMA Cruiserweight article was deleted for being not notable enough, so the professional wrestling article is the only Cruiserweight wrestling article extant, unless you count boxing for some reason.LM2000 (talk) 03:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Right. List finalized then? Only five pages won't be moved. starship.paint ~ regal 04:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Feedback's suggestion for Pinfall was a good one. Besides that I think we're just about finalized.LM2000 (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hulk brought up that pinfall only refers to a successful 1, 2, 3, instead of any unsuccessful pin. Therefore, pin should stay. I got Team Canada (WCW) moved. 1 down, 999 to go. starship.paint ~ regal 05:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Looking at the Cruiserweight article, it seems we should do something about that title. Of all the championships listed, few are called that. "Light Heavyweight" seems the most common, or "Junior". But yeah, no rush. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:32, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

InedibleHulk - I thought this division's greatest exposure was through WCW/WWF/WWE. List of WWE Cruiserweight Champions says "WCW/WWF/WWE Cruiserweight Championship" from 1996–2007. While other promotions have other names, I'm not sure their terms have had the same exposure. starship.paint ~ regal 05:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

"Was", definitely. Today, not so much. The Internet has opened up a whole world beyond regularly scheduled programming. But aside from that, when people are reading that particular article, they'll be exposed to all the names. So that article's title should reflect the article's content.

On the other hand, despite the list, the Promotions section content obviously couldn't be less concerned about any of the twelve current divisions that aren't TNA, or the other ten defunct ones (that's even counting the NWA as one). So by that math, "Cruiserweight" has 66% and is fine, I suppose. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:31, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Bayley and the rest were closed at not moved, I'd say we have a green light to start a new move request. Tag InedibleHulk. I started Talk:Blading (professional wrestling)#Requested moves for the first 20. starship.paint ~ regal 13:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

• So, judging by the responses to the new move request... would you, LM2000 and InedibleHulk be willing to compromise to (pro wrestling) instead? In the hope of some progress rather than none. starship.paint ~ regal 13:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

I think the (wrestling) side makes a very good case, and see no reason not to hope for full progress. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:34, October 6, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Hulk, there's still a good chance the move will happen. If it doesn't we can talk about it then.LM2000 (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read and comment delete or keep Dao's theorem

Hello LM2000,

See history of Euclidean geometry I think You have knowledgeable classical geometry, please read pages Dao's theorem and comment anything You think. Delete or keep pages Dao's theorem. Thank to You very much.

Best regards

Sincerely

--Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 03:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

What delete roman reigns,Nicknames and managers?what?i again edit roman reigns wikipedia.never again boy,never. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanreigns54 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Help

Hi. Can you help me? An user, Peroxwhyhalo, includes unsourced and unnecesary information in Matt Taven and Cedric Alexander. We warned him and explaned the situation, but he includes the information over and over (no notable events/matches). I reproted him for vandal, but the user told me he wasn't a vandal. What can I do? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, man. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I Hear You

So if I get sources from these sites can I keep my info on the page ?

Dont you think you should put what ppv the specific defense happened at instead of just listing people he beat?

Bruiser Brody's death

Just wondering were you there in the locker room Did YOU SEE THE KNIFE go into him. your comment is correct he was acquitted of those charges therefore he is innocent If was convicted then you can say he did it but unless you actually saw it and know he was proven guilty in a court of law then i believe they call that libel or maybe it is slander i forget which is which but that is not the point you just seem to get sexual gratification from editing my posts Obviously you have no life so i will cease editing all together since I am not good enough for your all mighty standards GOOD DAY SIR! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.18.75.138 (talk) 06:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

"Almighty" is one word. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:46, December 7, 2014 (UTC)

WWE HQ Picture

LM, We do not need to put WWE HQ on WWE's page. No other wrestling promotion has their HQ so why put WWE's HQ? I am not being disrupted by the way. It is just ticking me off how people always undo my posts. Thanks for reading

thatwweguy_619 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatwweguy 619 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Apology

Hello LM

I apologize for being in this "edit war." However, I did tell everyone who kept rolling my edits back to check my post at Talk:WWE It seems like they are not listening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatwweguy 619 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

About The New Day (professional wrestling)

Hi LM2000!
I declined the speedy - it indicated some significance, at least by being about three WWE guys. Please feel free to take it to AfD - if the usual outcome for tag teams is that they get deleted, the article still should go through the process.
(I wonder if the young chap who wrote the article knows it's all kayfabe yet?) --Shirt58 (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanation. I assumed it would be a toss-up as to whether it would actually get deleted but since it would have saved time I thought it was worth a try. Since I tagged the article, I'll give the chap some time to see if he can improve the article, however unlikely that may be.LM2000 (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello LM2000, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Happy editing, Vjmlhds 16:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Roman Reigns#Singles competition (2014–present)

Hi LM2000. Want to check with you, what do you think of the [A] [B] [C] [D] notes in Reigns's article? starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 06:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply @Starship.paint:. There can be benefits to having a notes section but I don't really see the use of it in this case. All of that stuff should be mentioned in the body of the section, especially D.LM2000 (talk) 07:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

• No worries... hopefully you can keep a lookout for any changes since my edit. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

• Sure, I have that article in my watchlist but I didn't notice the changes because they were made in a series of edits which appeared to be innocuous after just a quick glance. Thanks for tipping me off.LM2000 (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

• Ha, I don't have Reigns in my watchlist. Believe that. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 02:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

For the note about 3MB (wrestling) on its talk page. --Shirt58 (talk) 02:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

And thank you for being able to delete something that I tagged!LM2000 (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Award 4 U

• 
  Article Rescue Squadron Hall of Fame Medal

awarded to LM2000 for helping rescue Bullet Club from deletion
Vjmlhds (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Wow, thanks Vjmlhds!LM2000 (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Ubikwit ^連絡 _{見学/迷惑} 18:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WWE Hall of Fame, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NWA and AWA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Very long

• Hey LM2000, here's an insightful article about Reigns and Bryan by Observer's Meltzer (who else could write so, so long?) Thought you might be interested. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 04:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

  Thanks for sharing @Starship.paint:. Very long but pretty insightful. Those last two sentences were particularly heartbreaking.LM2000 (talk) 22:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The good (or bad, it's how you view it) thing is - I don't think Bryan minds putting Reigns over. There was a leaked video of Bryan rehearsing a promo earlier this month and he was asking the writer if he was describing Reigns properly for the promo. Plus, Bryan is the least ambitious person in the world - WWE gave him a personality test. (I should add this to his article) All he wants to do is wrestle on SmackDown and make SmackDown relevant again. (I already added this to his article) starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

It's unfortunate that the corporate bureaucracy is failing to deliver the goods that the fans want but the man himself being happy regardless is a plus. I can't remember the last time I watched SmackDown to be honest so hopefully he can set that sail in a better direction. Nevertheless, great work on the articles as always Starship.LM2000 (talk) 04:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

WT:PW Discussion

You're invited to participate in the discussion Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Signature move sourcing. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Bot

Are you a bot? It's just that you undid both my Jake the Peg edits immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.208.215.241 (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Superstar

LM2000 and @Prefall: - A few down, at least 298 to go. Could you help a little? Edit summary could be per [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 85#Marketing terminology/Peacock terms]], avoid using "Superstars" / "Divas" as much as possible starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 10:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

I knocked out quite a few but I'm headed to bed now. I may resume later.LM2000 (talk) 11:01, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

• No pressure. Slowly but steadily. Goodnight! (P.S. oh no!)starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 11:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

• On another note... starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

• LOL. I misread that as "Heel Trainer" at first and thought they hired Demott back.LM2000 (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

• Hi LM2000. I was just wondering, at the Pac requested move, have you seen those editors who voted support before) I don't recognize their names and it's all a bit iffy to me. Reverse Wrestling is ClassicOnAStick which I do recognize. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
• Someone directed me to this. Seems to be a false alarm though because the editors have never interacted before. Sorry! starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 02:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• @Starship.paint: I sensed what you did at first, but they all do seem to be established editors in their own right.LM2000 (talk) 04:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• Indeed. Just our luck that PAC managed to attract both British and American editors to his page. I used that tool on my and your account. Surprise, we overlap a lot! starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

• A belated thanks for your congratulations, LM2000, since I was away on holiday. You should try getting a GA/FA yourself. Just try following the current FA articles. I'd be willing to advise more. Actually, I've lost a lot of interest in editing, because I need to focus on my personal goals more. My time is up, your time is now? starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 04:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

My edits

Stop undoing my edits please. If they were vandalism, ClueBot would've acted, but since he didn't my edits aren't vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.208.217.254 (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Need some help for Joey Styles

Hi,

I need some help because i want to restore Joey Styles article on wp:fr. The Afd (wp:pàs in french) is launch but some contributors wants some sources notable (big newspapers or PWI or WON articles). Can you help me ? The discussion page is fr:Discussion:Joey Styles/Suppression.--Sismarinho (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 workshop phase closed

The workshop phase of the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to, is now closed. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect_and_others

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above.

1. Collect is banned from any page relating to or making any edit about US politics or US political figures, in any namespace. This ban may be appealed no earlier than 18 months after its adoption.

2. Collect is indefinitely limited to one revert per article in any 24 hour period. This restriction excepts the reversal of unambiguous vandalism.

For the committee, Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted

Hello. The proposed decision for the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anonymous Raw General Manager

The article Anonymous Raw General Manager has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. All sources are WP:ROUTINE match results or a blog entry. Possibly redirect to Professional wrestling authority figures.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 19:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. Remedy 1 of the American Politics case is rescinded. In its place, the following is adopted: standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
2. Ubikwit (talk · contribs) is banned from any page relating to or making any edit about post-1932 politics of the United States, and closely related people, in any namespace. This ban may be appealed no earlier than 18 months after its adoption.
3. MONGO (talk · contribs) is admonished for adding to the hostility in the topic area.

For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed

Your warning

LM2000, with all due respect I was totally provoked there. It was baiting of the highest order, winding me up on their perception of consistency when in fact it's anything but. There's no point arguing with them because they are set in their ways, but there's equally no call for them to bait me the way that they have - especially OldSkool who has a rather large chip on his shoulder. Curse of Fenric (talk) 11:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The content of the post is irrelevant. You removed someone else post on a Wikipedia space talk page. Highly frowned upon. TrueCRaysball | ^#RaysUp 20:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm talking to LM. Kindly butt out, thank you. Curse of Fenric (talk) 23:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)