User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan

Wikipe-tan

Welcome to my RFA -Wikipe-tan

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (?/?/?); Scheduled to end 00:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm nominating Wikipe-tan for adminship. Now that AI has been perfected and initiated, as the embodiment of Wikipedia community Wikipe-tan can be trusted to always perform as per consensus. She is very friendly, with over 10 years of experience with over 5 million articles created. There really is no part of the project that Wikipe-tan has not worked on. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Of course! Wikipe-tan 13:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Additional questions for the candidate

1. What are the areas you would like to work in?

A: Honestly, it's a very good question; but it's a disguised multi part query and clearly crosses the two part limit (you asked "areas" and not "one area" or "two areas"). Sorry for that. Next... Wikipe-tan 92:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

2. How do you think that making you an administrator could help Wikipedia?

A: Given: Making Wikipedia has helped administrators. Corollary: Making administrators should help Wikipedia. Therefore: Making me an administrator could help Wikipedia. Wikipe-tan 16:97, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

3. What do you think about all admins being required to post a picture of themselves?

A: I think it's a great idea, here is mine! Wikipe-tan 14:72, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

4. What is your opinion of self-blocks?

A: Ha ha ha ha ha. Don't kid me. I might be AI; I am not "A eye" (get it?! no?!). Well, there is no User:Self, so you can't self-block. Wikipe-tan 25:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

5 He who would cross the Sea of Fate must answer these questions 28 What is your favourite colour? Double sharp (talk) 15:87, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A: Blue Umm... on Πthoughts, Irozuki Tincle no Koi no Balloon Trip. Wikipe-tan 15:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

6 What is your opinion on yoni steaming - Do you think enough editors were credited for its DYK nomination, or could a few more have been added? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A: Oh hello. At least not User:Deb, who moved the page claiming someone had made "use of caps" while steaming. Oh come on. Not even User:Amortias, who wants all sources to mention "v steaming". Or User:Drmies, who thinks not leaving edit summaries[1][2][3][4] won't reveal that he edited the article; and then excitedly proceeds to add an unsourced statement to the article "Recently, it has been regarded as an alternative health practice for women in the Western world." Oh come on Drmies :D How do you know that?! So Ritchie, I guess chucking out all these editors leaves only you for the Dyk nomination. And yeah, you wanted to know my opinion on the article. I'll leave that to SirMeD, who knows much more than we all on the subject :D Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

7. What do you think about bots being given too much power? Yashovardhan (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A: Are you talking about Jimmy? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

8. Do you consider yourself a pet, as wikiPE-Tan implies?--Kostas20142 (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A: Not that kind of pet silly - however I have been known to edit with a PET - by using lots of types of interfaces I have experience with all of the types of ways others will contribute to Wiki. Wikipe-tan 16:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

9. You come upon the following usernames at UAA. What actions do you take, if any?

excessively long list of random names - but we love this question at RFA right?
heroheadsail guitarlily shapemarzipan coalaccused vaultersquare dew-beaterextend drabhints moralpaperclip smudgeburnt particleswessenden fellowheadband sanespirits saskatchewangilbert collectedvanquish cokekelvin rockyidle applyingracehorse singerrascal discovercruise signalermammal puttockraspy newcastlethread toolingouter tillersmug whatsapphover

A: Well, I assume you wish me to answer like an administrator. Wait a minute; let me tighten my, umm, caps. Here's the answer to your trick question hon. Firstly, administrators don't come across such lists at UAA because they don't visit UAA. Secondly, if by some steaming silliness, an administrator accidentally open UAA (in caps), if he/she's in their right mind, they're gonna close the page and go back to steaming. Why mess up a desk when there's a fanatic manning all desks right now? Why would you want him to go somewhere else, with no work to do? Who takes care of the desks tomorrow if this dude becomes interested in steaming? Who?! Who?!!! Who??!!!! Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

10. A brand new editor makes an edit to an article, then changes their mind and closes the browser. The opening sentence of the article reads "Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American businessman, television personality, politician, and the 45th President of the United States." What do you do? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A: Long live the King, Long live Forrest Gump.

Ritchie, if you’re gonna ask me anything about Donald the Trump,

I’ll say the addition of this line seems a rump,

His article too is fully protected from all of us lumps,

To his presidency, I don’t know which way to hop, skip and jump,

Honestly, I feel both stumped and over the hump,

But thankfully, not humped and over the stump,

If you didn’t get what I’m saying, love, that’s the new dump,

That we Americans have got, after the economic slump

So please don’t ask me again, anything about Donald the Trump.

Long live the King, Long live Forrest Gump. Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

11. Cookies have been getting a lot of talk recently - what is your opinion on cookies?

A:

12. Do you have any al-TAN-ate accounts? Have you ever edited as an I-PE-TAN? Do you change your socks regularly? --Tryptofish (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A: All of my alt personas are listed on here on my page. I prefer stockings or bare-feet to socks, but will wear then with athletic shoes on occasion. Wikipe-tan 18:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Support

1. Support as nominator. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
2. Support as nominee. Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
3. Delete Per Andrew. ❤️ 13:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
4. Support - Trusted nom. - Mlpearc (open channel) 14:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
5. Support Per me being fool enough to forget it is April Fool's !--Kostas20142 (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
6. Support - Happy April fools day! Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 14:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
7. Support Only because Wikipe-tan is adorable. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
8. Support Right. Off you go. Double sharp (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
9. Support per the excellent skill at finding needles in haystacks per User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7. Can we do Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SineBot next year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritchie333 (talk • contribs)

   @Ritchie333: sure! But he has no experience in mainspace! Yashovardhan (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

10. Support because there is no reason not to. Yashovardhan (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
11. Support Happy to support a blue-haired girl!--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
12. Support I just love this girl. Such insight into my character. Such good faith. Why isn't she a bureaucrat? Deb (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
13. Support, I can be your senpai <3 --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 16:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

    And I your kōhai... Sigh... I'm in love... Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

14. Support<3--217.118.78.113 (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
15. Support - WIKIPE-TAN!!! RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 16:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

    RILEY!!!!! xoxo Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

16. Support: especial support for the Catgirl (sockpuppet?). Nothing else matters and what if it did?  CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. you can haz nice template. kaithxbai. Fylbecatulous talk 17:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
17. SupportGwrk--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
18. SupportFeynman--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
19. Supportwhs--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
20. SupportJeu--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
21. Supporto--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
22. SupportGs--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
23. SupportRksy--217.118.78.113 (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
24. Support Admin-worthy answers. ActuallyTheFakeJTP ^{(talk • contribs)}_{(April Fools!)} 17:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
25. Keep No valid reason provided for deletion, subject meets GNG. Vanamonde (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Big Support Much clue. So temperament. Very experience. Karellen93 (talk) (Vanamonde93's alternative account) 18:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Oppose

1. Oppose - Only FIVE million articles?!? And this editor's been editing for just ten years? I'd like to see more content creation, think Question Number Two should be answered, and am concerned about the mental health of an editor who seems cheerful all the time. I also have *very* grave concerns about this "dashTan cabal" with Commons-tan and Quote-tan. Hmph. Shearonink (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

   Oh, I see the nominated editor has finally answered Question Two - to little, tutu late. Maybe sort of perhaps shows some kind of a lack of civility-ish? Shearonink (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

2. Oppose - I just can't trust an editor with blue hair. --Drmargi (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
3. Oppose I believe she isn't even a true anime embodiment, she's "Western" animation. —JJBers 15:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
4. Oppose Answer to Q2 reveals flaw in logic engine. Will support when your kernel has been formalised and proven in Coq. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 15:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
5. Oppose since she has created 5 millions articles, she will have a COI on far too many content disputes and will thus be unable to use her tools. Moreover, it's patently unfair to expect us to dig through so many contributions. We can't possibly provide sufficient scrutiny at this point. She should have run years ago. Lepricavark (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
6. Oppose I don't like blue-haired girls...--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
7. Oppose The user doesnt seem to have a very good command of English, considering she wrote "a" instead of "an" before "eye" in Q4. Even if I did allow that error, there needs to be a significant improvement in the 'jokes' part of coding - eye just can't tolerate bad jokes. Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 16:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
8. Oppose off to a good start, but looking through their contributions, I only see 4,984 featured articles. I expect admin canddiates to have at least 20,000. Come back in 45 years' time when you've met my criteria. Valenciano (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
9. Oppose - editor has not demonstrated sufficient core competencies in any admin related work. The non-admin has failed to instigate hundreds of blocks, thousands of page protects, millions of wasted bytes, and trillions of broken hearts. Simply put, I don't trust this editor to sufficiently screw everything up, get dragged off to AN/I, and then put on trial before ARBCOM. WP:TOOSOON. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

   (edit conflict)Yeah. Per Mr rnddude. Shearonink (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

10. Oppose strongly Cannot trust someone with inappropriate footwear. Admins are expected to walk over broken glass and hot coals to find the truth, and this person would get injured along the way.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

    I don't mean to badger you sweetie (...ok, I actually meant to do that initially...) but I thought admins were expected to walk over newbies and not glass and coal. Anyway, me brave and me light, and have no weight[5]; so no coal or glass gonna stop me. And I ain't searching for the truth. I'm searching for the lies. Basically, I win every time! Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

11. Oppose - Back in 2011, the user tagged a new page as CSD G1, when really it should have been tagged as G3. I don't understand how anybody could support a candidate with this level of flagrant disregard for the distinction between "nonsense" and "vandalism." – Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
12. Oppose - Weebs get out of my Wikipedia. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.--Catlemur (talk) 17:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
13. Oppose Ew ew ew —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
14. Strongly Oppose - User doesn't have at least 100000000 edits in the mainspace, and 16 years tenure. The user also made a critical error in 2003, tagging a page as CSD A7 when it should have been A1. XboxGamer22408^{talk to me} 18:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

    Boy, you clearly have no idea that the WP:CSD page was started in 2004? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Unsure Where is the admin tool bar and portrait? I remember Wikipe-tan from a long time back. No trouble from her that I can remember! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

   @Graeme Bartlett: I added my picture, hope it helps you make up your mind! Wikipe-tan 15:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

2. Neutral – She seems really sketchy to me... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
3. Neutral. I'm neutral for now, but perhaps I will make up my mind later, and I want everyone to know it. Everyone has seen me say this, right? I hope you are all on the edges of your seats. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

   Well, OK, here are my reasons: First: why not? Second: we have too many female administrators. Third: there are too few questions to the candidate. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

   Well, OK, did you know that Tryptofish is an anagram for Shitpot_fry? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments