Jump to content

User talk:SunnyBoi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: Your Articles for creation submission has been accepted (AFCH 0.9)
Notification: Your Articles for creation submission has been accepted (AFCH 0.9)
Line 454: Line 454:
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
[[User:The Drover&#39;s Wife|The Drover&#39;s Wife]] ([[User talk:The Drover&#39;s Wife|talk]]) 22:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->
[[User:The Drover&#39;s Wife|The Drover&#39;s Wife]] ([[User talk:The Drover&#39;s Wife|talk]]) 22:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Fishlove]] has been accepted ==
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">[[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] '''[[Fishlove]], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on the article's [[Talk:Fishlove|talk page]]. You may like to take a look at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme|grading scheme]] to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to [[Wikipedia]]. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can [[Wikipedia:Starting an article|create articles yourself]] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] if you prefer.
* If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fishlove help desk]</span>'''.
* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
'''[[User:JDoorjam|JDoorjam]]''' <small>[[User Talk:JDoorjam|JDiscourse]]</small> 19:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->

Revision as of 19:00, 10 October 2018

SunnyBoi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi SunnyBoi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, SunnyBoi. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Pimms, Intermillennial Sleuth has been accepted

Dr Pimms, Intermillennial Sleuth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ProgrammingGeek talktome 14:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wear it Purple Day has been accepted

Wear it Purple Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 14:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
494 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C JD.com (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The Racket (radio program) (talk) Add sources
400 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Fiserv (talk) Add sources
254 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Triple J (talk) Add sources
1,310 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Selenium (software) (talk) Add sources
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Maverick (book) (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Paul Hetherington (talk) Cleanup
225 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C VIA Technologies (talk) Cleanup
770 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C New product development (talk) Cleanup
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Richard Marsland (talk) Expand
121 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ray Martin (television presenter) (talk) Expand
1,107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Adobe Acrobat (talk) Expand
63 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Gardein (talk) Unencyclopaedic
434 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Continual improvement process (talk) Unencyclopaedic
63 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Safe Schools Coalition Australia (talk) Unencyclopaedic
114 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Transcend Information (talk) Merge
205 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C China Telecom (talk) Merge
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Workplace democracy (talk) Merge
3,162 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Nova Scotia (talk) Wikify
323 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Atlantic Canada (talk) Wikify
187 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Tata Teleservices (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mikeius hartigi (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mikeius gatesi (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mikeius neumanni (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dorothy Johnston (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Adobe Certified Expert (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Michael Byrne (poet) (talk) Stub
139 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Wistron (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Gary Burrill (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Stromlo (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi, SunnyBoi,

Welcome to WikiProject Women! ...and to editing Wikipedia, too. I read Wear it Purple Day and your work is impressive-- good detail and thorough coverage.

I began editing after I retired a few years ago, and find it a good way to learn about new topics. I, too, like writing women's biographies, so we have that in common. Have you had a chance to attend any edit-a-thons to meet Wikipedians in person? The reason I ask is very often there will be a list of articles you can create on notable people. I helped organize one last year for an "Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon" at the University of Oregon, and I have a list of draft biographies that still need to be written, listed on my user page, here.

You would be welcome to research and write on any of these draft biographies. I've whittled it down over the last 18 months, but any draft not touched within 6 months is considered "abandoned" and is subject to deletion. So if any of these appeal to you, be BOLD and work on the draft. I'm happy to review and move to article space when you are ready!

Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work so far on Betsy Wolfston! Let me know when you are ready for main article space. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 15:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Grand'mere Eugene, thank you for inviting me to contribute to the drafts! I was wondering what you'd suggest as the best example of an artist biography listing? I have found that the advice for chronological listing of exhibitions/awards seems to vary? Thanks in advance for your advice! Best wishes, S SunnyBoi (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm so glad you are interested in developing quality articles. There's a listing of "Featured" and "Good" biographies of women artists at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women artists/Recognized content. See Constance Stokes, for example. All the articles on those lists have undergone peer review for accuracy and the quality of writing. (See the review, here.) You'll find links to the reviews of any of the "Featured" or "Good" articles on their Talk pages. "Featured articles are deemed of high enough quality to be on the Main Page for a day, with these criteria in mind. You'll see there is not specific advice on chronological listing of exhibitions/awards, but rather an emphasis on interesting, comprehensive material and appropriate summary style.
You can view the criteria for article quality on this page if you scroll down to the multicolored section "articles" below the "How you can help" section. Click on any of the quality links to see the scoring criteria. Some editors subscribe to the idea that it's better to start with a "stub" article and let the community of editors contribute, but I prefer more developed articles, preferably "C" or "B" rated pieces before I publish to the main space. Stubs are okay, but more likely to be deleted, especially if there are not multiple reliable sources cited.
Don't be too concerned about "filling in" the headings on the drafts that were created for our "Art & Feminism" event-- if the material you find in your research lends itself to a chronological listing, fine. But if the exhibitions/awards are not part of the subject's story, feel free to delete those subheadings, as they were meant as suggestions to help new editors at the event to begin looking for supporting research. My own preference is away from chronological bullet lists, in favor of sentences an paragraphs, organized in a way that makes sense, even if it's not chronological. All the best, — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gardein

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gardein you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Codyorb -- Codyorb (talk) 02:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gardein

The article Gardein you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gardein for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Codyorb -- Codyorb (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michelle Law for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 14:11, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hi SunnyBoi, thanks for the thanks

Coolabahapple (talk) 13:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SunnyBoi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T2 (Australian company) has been accepted

T2 (Australian company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josephine Moon has been accepted

Josephine Moon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 08:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Gough (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 10:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 11:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello David.moreno72, thanks for updating me about the Draft:Julie Gough (disambiguation). From the disambiguation style guide, it says that red links may be used if it's likely that there is an article to be created in the future. I believe that the Bristol designer would be a likely future page candidate, given the publicity of her publications on women's suffrage. Would it be considered permissible if I red-linked her name, but left the others unlinked? I believe there is possibility for confusion as the other artist (also UK-based), could be confusing in the future, as the Indigenous artist has shown work in England. Thank you for your time. SunnyBoi (talk)5 March 2018 SunnyBoi (talk) 12:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SunnyBoi. I helped to write the disambiguation style guide that you are referring to, and unfortunately your interpretation is incomplete. It states that 'A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when a linked article (not just other disambiguation pages) also includes that red link.' That is, there must ALWAYS be a blue link in the entry, no exceptions. If the entry title is red, then the blue linked article (of which there MUST be one), MUST mention the entry title. See the 'Flibbygibby' example. Thank you David.moreno72 12:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dont defame me!

Dont defame by calling me transphobic! I never said anything transphobic! Defaming is against wiki rules! and also the law! I never denied he is not legally female (he is legally female) I never said he should not be legally female! The point is about what is required for IOC and Commonwealth competition as a female. Ill give you a hint ITS NOT BEING LEGALLY FEMALE!--DaraOBrien (talk) 05:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, Dara. I'm unsure of the best way to respond, I will do my best. From my perspective, your edits and talk page comments seemed specifically unsupportive of the LGBTIAQ+ community. I can accept that you don't identify as transphobic - it is challenging when people are labelled in a way which doesn't align with their personal truth. I'd like to highlight that in your comments on my talkpage about this weightlifting athlete, you have chosen to use the wrong pronouns in an antagonistic way. I also noticed that your comments on ChamithN (talk) talkpage were rather inflammatory. I understand that you are frustrated with aspects of MSM, and I hope that you can have a better experience on Wikipedia soon. SunnyBoi (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SeneGence International, Inc. has been accepted

SeneGence International, Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Caplice

Hello, SunnyBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Caplice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 17:04, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arbonne International has been accepted

Arbonne International, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 13:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi SunnyBoi! You created a thread called Trying to add to list but doesn't seem to stick? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


A page you started (Richard Vogt (herpetologist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Richard Vogt (herpetologist), SunnyBoi!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice one. Could make an interesting WP:DYK - one day left for submission of a new article.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi SunnyBoi! You created a thread called Help with a dab page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Your draft article, Draft:Sidney Cooke Limited

Hello, SunnyBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sidney Cooke Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 12:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Briony Kidd has been accepted

Briony Kidd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fishlove has been accepted

Fishlove, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JDoorjam JDiscourse 19:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]