Wikipedia:Teahouse

Sdkb, a Teahouse host

Welcome to the Teahouse!
Your go-to place for friendly help with using and editing Wikipedia.

Ask a question

Question forumMeet your hostsArticles to improveBecome a host

New to Wikipedia? See our tutorial for new editors or introduction to contributing page.
Note: Newer questions appear at the bottom of the Teahouse. Completed questions are archived within 2–3 days.

Help Wikipedia

Translation in other languages

Hello dear ladies and gentlemen, my name is Sayyid Mir Israfil and am contributing to the following pages:

• Hazrat Ishaan
• Moinuddin Hadi Naqshband
• Sayyid Mir Jan
• Sayyid Mahmud Agha

I will be grateful, when you could add the translation of these articles from english into other languages, like: Arabic, Bahasa, Turkish, Russian, Urdu, Farsi etc. etc.

I am looking forward with thanks.

For easement you can also reach me per WhatsApp: +491753412923

Thank you very much.

Sayyid Mir Israfil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayyid Mir Israfil (talk • contribs) 08:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Article flagged for deletion. Where to start?

{{subst:trim|1= Hello, new here, looking for guidance...My BLP article is being considered fo deletion. Onganymede (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Can someone direct me to addressing this? Via what venue? Addressed to whom? Thank you much.Onganymede (talk) 22:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Courtesy: J. Jaye Gold. You can comment at the Deletion discussion and you can also attempt to address the criticism by improving the article. Clock is ticking. David notMD (talk) 22:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Onganymede. You can contribute to the discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/J. Jaye Gold. But given, as the comments say, that it is a promotional piece sourced only to his work, there is little hope of saving it. If you want Wikipedia to have an article about Gold, you should let it be deleted, and start again with a draft, remembering that Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves, but only in what people wholly unconnected with the subject, and not prompted or fed information on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish about them in reliable sources. I suggest that you start by reading your first article carefully; and, if you have any connection with Gold yourself, also reading conflict of interest/ --ColinFine (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Apologies, how can I reply to either of you who have responded to me here?Onganymede (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Onganymede (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello again Onganymede. I have moved your reply to the correct section: you put it on the end of the page, which meant it was appended to a different question. So that's the answer: edit the specific section of the page. You can ping another user by going {{U|username}}, so I went {{U|Onganymede}}. --ColinFine (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks ColinFine for the navigation tip and fixing my placement! I've cut out everything I once held dear [kidding], addressed COI on my talk page, and added new refs. Would you mind taking another quick look and offering direction? Onganymede (talk) 05:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Onganymede. Glancing at your new sources, I notice that nine of them are blog posts (which are not "reliable sources") and one is an interview with Gold (which is not independent of him). —teb728 t c 07:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC) BTW the reason you were not able to save links to the Thrive Global blog posts is that the website is on the spam blacklist. —teb728 t c 10:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks ColinFine for looking again. A few questions, if you would... 1] You are saying that Arianna Huffington's publication Thrive Global, which Wikipedia describes as "an American company that provides behavior change technology etc.," is an unacceptable source? Is this accurate? Can this be changed? Can I prove these articles are not spam? 2] Re: the NPR "interview,"I am referencing the interviewer's comments, not Gold's... The interviewer herself is a secondary source, no? She appears to already have known the info about Gold that I am referencing. It was not revealed in/by the interview. Is this incorrect reasoning? I have found several other interviews by people who know him and say things about him. This is all inadmissible? Are you saying my sources must be tertiary? 3] re: FortWorth news link, I don't have the archived link yet. I have seen a xeroxed clipping, but may not be able to get online version. What to do? Delete? 4] Books, unfortunately, it seems to me, are on their way out of our lives. How will one reference secondary sources if not partially via online media...interviews, youtube videos, and so forth? 5] I've spent hours and hours comparing other BLPs... I see that the rules are often stretched. Just came across one with 11 of the 15 reference from subject's web page, and 2 identical from encyclopedia.com. If somebody writes Gold into an online encyclopedia tomorrow, can I use that as a source? You understand my frustration no doubt. Should I take out Bio, or nonprofit, or teaching sections?... just leave books? I appreciate your time and attention. Can/Should I paste to others on the Afd page? Is that a place I can ask about my issues, or just for the administrators/voters? Onganymede (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

pinging teb728, whose comments you are responding to. --ColinFine (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ColinFine Thanks! I see/understand now that the comments were from teb728! Can you address any of my other questions? The interviewer's prior knowledge as ref, the off line news archives, would YOU allow the Thrive articles? Onganymede (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC) teb728 Hi, appreciate the explanation of the Thrive linking problem. The Wiki article about Thrive says all good things..no indication that it is not trustworthy. But Wiki blocks a Thrive article as spam? Seems anomalous, or am I missing some bigger picture? Am I to understand that I must delete any references I found there? Thank you Onganymede (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC) Hi again ColinFine, I have restructured, rewritten, new-sourced, and I believe addressed every issue that has been brought to my attention. Will you check it out? Onganymede (talk) 20:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

OK, Onganymede, think about it this way: What would make Gold significant enough to be the subject of an article in an encyclopedia? Most people are not that important. Does he meet any of the notability criteria for authors? If not does he meet the basic notability criteria? Blog posts by his students do not show notability: anybody can write a blog post. When I looked at your sources on 2 November, the only one that looked like a independent reliable source was the Los Angeles Times article, and that was pretty underwhelming: it says his book was not good but his book tour was entertaining. —teb728 t c 06:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

HELP ME !!!

hello, I think one of user have aggression to me, he put GNG template to may articles, seriously all of articles, some of them he put PROD or AfD. What can I do or who can i say....i create referee articles, that user write that articles are not pass notability, but there are more more more articles that same as me, which he put PROD, Afd or GNG....please help me...i dont know what he want from me??? Almgerdeu (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Well, based on the messages on your talkpage, I think they want you to not create articles unless they clearly meet WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@Almgerdeu: The problem, as I see it, is that you do not have much understanding of our notability criteria and the sources that you need to find and to put into an article in orer to demonstrate a person is Notable enough for a page to remain in this encyclopaedia. See WP:SPORTBASIC for a bit of specific guidance on sport-people. OK, so you are clearly fascinated by football referees, and so are the main types of website you cite in your rapidly-created pages: worldreferee.com ; eu-football.info ; thecelticwiki.com. Unfortunately, they all seem to be insider summary pages, with nothing to suggest real notability, just the jobs they've done. I am not aware that WP:NSPORTS has a criterion for notability of referees taking part in major tournaments. There seems to be no citations in your hastily made pages to published books, biographies or national media outlets - that talks about their participation and contribution to major sporting events, such as they refereed in the 1996 World Cup, followed by lots of indepth coverage of them as a person. That's what notability means. So, if you're going to carry on in this way, you must be prepared for a lot more PRODS and AFDs on notability grounds. The way to avoid that is to slow down, and spend real, quality time finding sources about these seemingly non-notable people. If you can't, then maybe it's best not to waste everyone's time - including your own - trying. That, to me, seems to be the bottom line, and I would encourage Spiderone to continue assessing your well-meant contributions - and perhaps offer you a bit of guidance and instruction along the way. I hope both of you will proceed with care. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC).  

@Almgerdeu: there is no aggression here. A number of users, not just me, have left messages on your talk page suggesting how articles could be improved. I have personally suggested that you try to use WP:DRAFT and WP:AFC to help you to understand what sort of articles are accepted and which ones are not. Unfortunately, not everyone is notable. I can tell that you have put a good chunk of time into a lot of these articles but, honestly, a lot of these people just do not meet WP:GNG. If a person cannot be sourced to anything more than World Referees or similar database websites then that person isn't notable. Me placing a GNG template on an article is not a personal attack but simply a reminder that the article makes no demonstration of how the subject is notable. I could go straight to PROD or AfD in almost all of these cases but I think it's important that you spend time trying to find sources that explore the referees in depth and, if they don't exist, then try to use self-control and not create the article. The only one that stands out to me as being hugely notable is Arturo Yamasaki. Honestly, the overwhelming majority of the others don't seem to have anything more than routine and passing mentions. Spiderone 22:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Almgerdeu has created close to 100 stub-length articles on football referees. Many of these get Prod, then contested by Almgerdeu, then nominated to AfD, and then deleted. Is there a way to stop this insistence on creating articles which do not, and can not, meet Wikipedia's criteria for GNG? David notMD (talk) 04:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Since Almgerdeu is clearly acting in good faith, I'm not sure. If it were deliberately disruptive behaviour, I would go down the route of ANI and suggesting a topic ban but I don't think that's appropriate in this particular circumstance. Spiderone 09:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Additionally, they all seem to not be in written in a neutral point of view. The summaries are also all in past tense for some reason. Le Panini ^Talk 23:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Profanity/curse words

If I find statement in a page that contains a cuss word, profanity or any from the Seven dirty words, how do I determine if its unencyclopedic or not? Because curse words seem informal, I'm more inclined to remove them. But I wanted to ask first here. Thanks. HotTomatoe (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC) HotTomatoe (talk) 10:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

HotTomatoe Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Since Wikipedia is not censored for any reason, if the statement is a direct quote that you intend to use in an article, you don't need to do anything about it. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@331dot: Thanks for that piece of info. I was actually contemplating whether to remove this curse word or not in this article I was skimming through. But it was from a direct quote so it made me think twice. As you have mentioned, there's probably no need to do something bout it. That's why I resorted to asking first here. Thanks again. HotTomatoe (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

HotTomatoe Rather than merely contemplating it, you actually did remove it here [1], but I reverted your edit. Theroadislong (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia access

How can i get Wikipedia on the net. Christophermusenzejr (talk) 11:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Aren't you on the net right now? Le Panini (^{Talk to}_me?) 12:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes! @Christophermusenzejr: you're looking at it on the Net right now. Did you actually mean to ask that?

On an unrelated note, this is the first time I've seen a veteran Wikipedian forget to sign their post. Nudge nudge. Le Panini (^{Talk to}_me?) 12:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Duly nudged. It was the edit conflict with you that got me, Le Panini. (well, that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it until all the votes are counted) Nick Moyes (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Nick Moyes, Yeah yeah. Nick Moyes is acting kinda sus. Le Panini ^Talk 01:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

It is true, Le Panini, that what I have is a very particular set of skills; skills I have gained over a long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for editors like you. If you let me edit now, that will be the end of it. I will not WP:CU you, I will not block you. But I will move, unseen, among you. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for bothering again

Sorry for bothering again, but I want to ask that are all these books considered trustworthy on Wikipedia:-

1.Rajput Clans: Nanda, Tribes and Clans of the Pothohar Plateau, Janjua Rajput, Khokhar, Tomara Dynasty, Kachwaha, Minhas, Bhati, Johiya, Mers [2]

2.Rajput Clans of Uttar Pradesh: Tomara Dynasty, Kachwaha, Chandela, Solanki, Paramara, Bhaduria, Rathore, Pundir, Sisodia, Sikarwar, Bundela [3]

3. Handbooks on Rajputs [4] Sumit banaphar (talk) 13:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

The third one might be, Sumit banaphar; but despite the cover date of 2006, it is a reprint of a book from 1899, and may not be reliable for c that reason. I would regard as suspect any book that says in the opening paragraph "the other a dark-complexioned race of lower type". This was no doubt acceptable in 1899, but today it is appalling racism, and casts all its contents into doubt. The other two both say, in their Google Books entry: "Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online", so citing them is the same as citing Wikipedia. See WP:CIRCULAR. --ColinFine (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

I think we can summarize ColinFine's informative and constructive comment as "No". If you, Sumit banaphar, would like to ask about the likely value of any other source for India, then the best place to do so is probably Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. -- Hoary (talk) 13:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

On the third one, WP:RAJ may apply. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång:- But the third one is published in 1996 so how it is in WP:RAJ.

@Hoary:- I have no problem but can you help me to how to write a proper notice in Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumit banaphar (talk • contribs) 13:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

ColinFine has already explained that the third book was published in 1899 and is blatantly racist. That it was reprinted in 2006 is by the way. WP:RAJ applies. You can post a question to Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics in the same way that you post a question here -- but please, wherever you're thinking of posting a question, only post it if you intend to read and digest the responses. -- Hoary (talk) 13:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

That. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Someohow I suspect that is never going to happen. Sumit is interested in just one thing - to prove that Banafar (his clan), and the two legendary heroes of Banafars (Udal of Mahoba and Alha), are pure-bred warrior-race, and has no mix of lowly Ahir race. Is entire presence on Wikipedia is dedicated to that endeavor. He also is interested in reading just one word in a book - "Banafar" - no matter what else is written in the sentence. Aditya^{(✉ • ⚒)} 07:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Aditya:-I agree what your saying that I'm here just to edit those three pages but I do not agree with when you say that I'm interested in just one word no matter what is written in it.

It is simple as that for ex:- when someone write your name incorrect so there is two options first you can correct yourself or second tell him kindly that it's incorrect please correct it.Sumit banaphar (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

How an author may remove image from talk page free image

I guess the image I uploaded possibly should be limited
in license as it contains non-public photo of me and family.
What do I need to do for speedy deletion of this image:

File:Henry-moore-flathead-v8.002.commons.jpg

regards,
 Mawcowboybillsbrick7 (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Mawcowboybillsbrick7: If you uploaded it and you hold the copyright, then I think that the license cannot be revoked. But, to be sure, ask at Commons:Help_desk or maybe Commons:Village_pump/Copyright. Since the image is hosted on Commons.RudolfRed (talk) 02:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

I have been blocked from asking questions at Commons. I do not wish this image to be used to harass people including myself and other living family members. Mawcowboybillsbrick7 (talk) 13:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

You might want to remove it from here User:Mawcowboybillsbrick7/Personal Biography Information? Theroadislong (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Can't you post to your user talk page at Commons even though you are blocked? I have nominated the image for deletion, linking to your request here, but in general you'll have much better luck asking about Commons related issues over at Commons. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 14:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Connection with subject

How can I avoid a personal connection when I am providing a history of a Pirate Station on which I was the operator, it is defunct so there is no current connection or COI. As the operator I am the only person who can detail the history, others have made websites about the station but I was there throughout the life of the station so I have more knowledge about it and have collected the articles and technical information, therefore I have expert knowledge is there a way to avoid the draft being rejected, and if it is will I have to abandon the article? I note the other stations in the category Pirate Radio Stations in the UK list have little more than stubs, and many have broken links to defunct sites. Comments appreciated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Skyport_Radio

Mark King (talk) 01:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC) Mark King (talk) 01:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Mark-King-SkyportRadio Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. We cannot accept personal knowledge as a source. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources that can be verified say about article subjects. If no independent reliable sources have written about your station, it would not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 01:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

331dot (talk) Thanks for the helpful comment, I have cited various sources including books, magazines and websites, are you saying I can only create the article with those and not use any personal knowledge Mark King (talk) 02:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Mark-King-SkyportRadio Yes; you can only use published reliable sources that can be verified to write a Wikipedia article. See Your First Article for more information. If you just want to tell the world about your personal knowledge, you should use social media or perhaps some other alternative outlet where doing that is permitted. 331dot (talk) 02:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

331dot (talk) thank you for help, I don't think I can write it using the reliable sources then, as I would still have the connection, I have published websites, where I have detailed the history, so if some unconnected historian or author were to use those and the books and magazines I've cited to create an article I guess that would be the answer. my article clearly won't be approved so I will save it for my reference and close the account, do you think it is even worth bothering to submit the draft or will I just be creating work for someone?Mark King (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Drafts are hard to find unless someone knows of their existence already. so writing a draft and leaving it for others would have a low probability of success. I don't know how much you have, but if you have at least three independent sources with significant coverage, you might have enough for a short article and that would be worth submitting through Articles for Creation.

Regarding closing accounts; there is no way to delete or close an account; if you no longer wish to use it, just abandon the account. Some people mark their accounts as "retired", but that's not required. If you would like to remove your name from your username, you can request a courtesy vanishing. 331dot (talk) 02:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Abandoned drafts are deleted after six months. David notMD (talk) 08:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Why do my pages keep getting a warning for speedy deletion? NonPopularPerson (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello NonPopularPerson. It is because you are not complying well enough with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please read, study and follow them. Please also read Your first article and follow its excellent advice. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

NonPopularPerson. In particular, the two articles were speedily deleted because they did not indicate why the subject were significant enough to have encyclopedia articles, and your user page was deleted for being promotional. —teb728 t c 18:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Cars in Cuba

hello, is anybody working on an article about American cars manufactured in the 1960s at bar now a part of the Cuban culture and economy? "wesselm3" (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)>

Hello "wesselm3". Take a look at Transport in Cuba, which has a section called Old American cars in Cuba. This is a fascinating and well-documented topic that deserves a well-written article. These are mostly 1950s era cars. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Acceptable writing format

Hello, I'm trying to improve my writing skills and I am experimenting with different styles. I'm very interested in learning about how to write in a format that could be accepted at wikipedia. I'm open to learning from anyone that can help and appreciate new things. Thanks and be safe Dicktion (talk) 06:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Dicktion, if you haven't found Wikipedia:Manual of Style, it may have some of what you want. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Publishing Articles

Hi. I am new here. I want to publish articles. But it is impossible. Will it take time? I can only publish something on my page and also edit some posts that are not protected. But until now I cannot publish articles . I have heard that it can take a while . First we should be active and then Wikipedia gives this opportunity. Is it true? Thanks in advance. Narmin Nermin (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

You have created article-like content at your User page. The correct place is your Sandbox. You should cut-paste the content to there. Your User page is a place for descriptions of your intents and achievements as a Wikipedia editor. General advice is learn more about Wikipedia by editing existing articles before attempting to create a new article. David notMD (talk) 09:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Early Miscarriage Awareness Day 9th November NOTABLE?

Hello, I am new and would like to write about Early Miscarriage Awareness Day which is on 9th November. Early gestation losses are still brushed under the carpet however cause huge emotional distress to those going through this heartache but in recent years since the awareness day launched I have seen gradual changes in the right direction which shows the awareness day is working! Before I started to write I was hoping if someone could offer advice if it is a “notable” subject as I didn’t want to start if it may get deleted x MrsMintyMum (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, MrsMintyMum and welcome to the Teahouse. Thank you for asking your question. I appreciate this is a sensitive and emotional subject for many people (and I have some close person experience of the subject). However, this encyclopaedia is not a platform for promoting the myriad of 'XXX-Awareness Day' events that happen around the world, unless they have genuinely grown to become notable events in their own right, and have been written about in detail and in depth by many independent sources, especially mainstream media. Here, mere mentions are not sufficient - we know many things exist - Wikipedia just collates existing reliable sources that show a thing is 'Notable', and present that information back to its users. Simply Googling "Early Miscarriage Awareness Day" - and especially by going to the News section, I can see there simply aren't enough sources currently to make this a noteworthy article here in its own right. My genuine advice is that, as laudable as it may seem, going to that effort at this time would not produce the results you might have hoped for. Your previous edit is probably about as far on that topic as you ought to proceed. That said, if you find existing articles which are incomplete or poorly sourced, once you get a bit more practice, there is no reason why you should be able to added content and better references to them. I have left an introductory welcome for you on you talk page with some helpful links to get you started. I'm sorry I can't be more encouraging on this specific matter. Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

External Links

Can we add the blogs of a sales website? Neerajberi (talk) 08:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

No, we may not, Neerajberi. I have deleted the one that concerned you at Parvati. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

But there are many as such — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neerajberi (talk • contribs) 09:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

All should be deleted. Because stuff exists contrary to Wikipedia good practices does not mean do more of it. David notMD (talk) 09:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Neerajberi: It is a common trick for a commercial website to write a short, encyclopaedic piece about a topic and then try to place a link to it to draw traffic to the sales side of its website. It is also a common mistake that other editors might think it's OK to do so. But it is not. If you would like to look through all 6,185,748 Wikipedia articles and let us know which ones have commercially-orientated links in them, we will gladly remove them all. But we can only remove the ones we become aware of. You have already been warned by one administrator not to add such links to articles here. This administrator is now repeating that advice. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the insights. Now i understand about it @nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neerajberi (talk • contribs) 13:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Company Logo

Hi there,

Really hope someone can help me. I work at Waingels College and we are fortunate enough to have a wikipedia page. Unfortunately displayed on our page is our old school logo and I would really like to change this. I have been trying to do so but unfortunately due to copyright, I am unable to do so. Please can someone advise me on this?

Thank you Melissa Communications Officer Waingels Yiamyn (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Yiamyn, and welcome to the Teahouse! Check the guidance here :WP:LOGOS, and then move on to Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. It's possible that you can find editors who have done this before and are willing to help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Help to making my business article fit Wikipedia

Hi all, I need some help to make this article better fit wikipedia purpose, I want to inform about what we do with this company and what is the purpose and some of the history of the company and at the same time respecting Wikipedia's objective.

This is the article: Draft:Vert_run

What's wrong and how can I improve it?

Thanks so much Moises.jleon (talk) 09:54, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Moises.jleon, read WP:COMPANY carefully. Do you see the (big) problem? If WP:COI applies, follow the guidance there. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Moises.jleon: Welcome to the Teahouse. I'm afraid it looks like you are simply trying to use Wikipedia as a means of WP:PROMOTION for your business. There are millions of businesses in the world - this encyclopaedia can only accept articles about Notable ones that independent sources have written about in detail and in depth. I have fixed the Conflict of Interest template on your userppage so that it functions properly, but I fear you have no chance of getting your business advertised here. As a business owner, you are actually receiving income from editing here, and so should not edit any article about your company directly. If and when it becomes notable by Wikipedia's criteria, another editor will surely want to pick up on it and write about it. Maybe is is simply WP:TOOSOON. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes:

Thanks for your reply, so I disagree with you on WP:TOOSOON and Notable ones... this is not advertising, it's an informative page article about a business, yes a small one but you don't need to be Nike to have an informative article about it... so Maybe it's simply the moment. There are thousands of business smaller than Vert, even in the encyclopedia so I don't get the argument.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moises.jleon (talk • contribs)

Moises.jleon What you call "an informative page" is considered promotional on Wikipedia. You don't need to be soliciting customers or selling something. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. This is an encyclopedia, and as an encyclopedia, articles (not mere "pages") must do more than merely tell about the subject. They must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about (in this case) a company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself, only in what others completely unconnected with the company have chosen to say about it. Because of this, not every company merits a Wikipedia article, even within the same field. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

I agree with the proposed Speedy deletion. Promotional. Plus, two of the 'refs' are to the company website, and a third confirms that Kristen is a photographer, but has no information about the company. David notMD (talk) 11:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Birth and age info

Hi - just wondering - is listing the birth date or age of the subject mandatory? Octopus69 (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Octopus69, absolutely not, and unless you can cite it to an acceptable source, see WP:DOB, don't (that's for WP:BLPs). Sometimes a good source gives you a "middleground", see for example Dede Wilson (baker). Or Osman I. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Question

please how can i edit an article Muhbel (talk) 14:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Muhbel! Try Help:Introduction and/or WP:ADVENTURE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

User page

Hello, i have been a member of Wikipedia for 14 months, but i hadnt used the site very much as an editor until today. Today i read through the Wikipedia introduction and i think i have a decent understanding of the site. I am trying to set up my user page, and i was wondering if anyone had any tips on what to add? Thanks in advance! TheRealGrantma (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

TheRealGrantma, Check out the User page design center. Alternatively, you can look at other pages (such as mine) for inspiration, and to borrow templates^{(There's no shame in borrowing code)}. Le Panini ^Talk 15:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Helps a lot. TheRealGrantma (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

How do you change to the Visual editor?

I want to add things to Wikipedia's unusual articles. How do you change the editor to the visual editor? Eridian314 (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Eridian314: In general, I reccomend that you change your preferences. Two things in "Editing":

• Uncheck the checkbox "Temporerely disable the visual editor while it is in beta"
• Under "editing mode" make sure that the dropdown is set to "show me both tabs".

This will add a second edit link to the toolbar, next to the usual, which activates the visual editor. You can always switch from visual editor to source by using the pencil icon in the visual editor toolbar, or the other way round by clicking the same link you would click to start editing with the visual editor. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

My article doesn't appear in search

Hello,

I have recently posted an article "Albrecht Conzo" on your website, but it appeared to be only a draft. At the very beginning, I clicked on the "Create a new article" button, and something probably went wrong. I would like to ask for your help, as this article is a very important part of the task I have to finish.

Regards, Socio181101 Socio181101 (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Answered at the Help Desk, please only use one method at a time of seeking assistance, to avoid duplication of effort. 331dot (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

How To Be An Expact On wikipedia!!!

Please!!! Who can guide me how to use Wikipedia and be an expact on it??? Al Madaniy (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Do you mean "expert"? 331dot (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Teahouse Al Madaniy A good place to start is the "Wikipedia Adventure" to familiarise yourself with how things work. Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Al Madaniy If you mean an expert in the sense of a person recognized for special knowledge of subject matter, we don't have them on Wikipedia. Wikipedia editors summarize what is published in reliable sources; they are not allowed to express their personal (unpublished) knowledge. —teb728 t c 21:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

If by expert, you mean an editor who understands the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia, and makes valuable contributions, we all try - sometimes we succeed. David notMD (talk) 21:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

If you mean expert as in being a pro compared to newcomers, and being known all over the website as a hero, well, wait 10 years. Le Panini ^Talk 22:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Question

How do I create a television show article?  GreenSuiteMan ^talk 17:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, GreenSuiteMan, and welcome to the Teahouse. You create an encyclopaedia article about a TV show the same way as you create an encyclopaedia article about anything else:

If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not you or something you are connected to, here are the steps you should follow:

1) Choose a topic whose notability is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.

2) Gather as many professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources you can find. Google Books is a good resource for this. Also, while search engine results are not sources, they are where you can find sources. Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.

3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.

4) Summarize those sources left after step 3, adding citations at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice Writer. Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even someone who hates the subject can agree with.

5) Combine overlapping summaries where possible (without arriving at new statements that no individual source supports), repeating citations as needed.

6) Paraphrase the whole thing just to be extra sure you've avoided any copyright violations or plagiarism.

7) Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.

8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 3 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of that).

Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.

If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:

0) If the subject really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that articles are owned by the Wikipedia community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author. If you do not want other people to write about you, then starting an article about yourself is a bad idea.

8a) If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make edit requests on the article's talk page.

8b) If the article is rejected, there will be a reason given. Read it carefully and closely. If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages. --ColinFine (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@GreenSuiteMan: who is "we"? The steps are not that far away from those for every other article, though I am not an expert at Wikipedia:NTELEVISION. You may look in Wikipedia:Good articles/Media and drama if there is something useable as a template. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Help with Sandbox

Good afternoon, Currently in my sandbox is a redirect to an article I created, Charles S. Fuchs. I would like to use the sandbox to work on creating a new article - can I delete the redirect that us currently there or will doing that change something with the existing article? Thank you for any help! Jcollinsycc (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey @User:Jcollinsycc, yes, if it is in your own userspace, you can remove the redirect. To do that, just blank all the text on the page and then write whatever you want. Hope this helps! Ghinga7 (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Honest Mistake in actresses in the movie Titanic Vs Avatar

Hello

Uhhhh ... Kate Winslet was not featured in James's Cameron's Avatar, she was featured in Titanic, but in the credit section in film section of James's Cameron, it is listed Kate Winslet was featured in Avatar -- KATE WINSLET WAS NOT IN AVATAR -- IT WAS ZOEY FROM STAR TREK -- the actress Zoey played one of the Avatars! 174.95.22.214 (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello IP editor. Thank you for spotting this probable error. Please would you repeat your concerns on the Talk Page of the relevant article, please? Editors with an interest in that subject will no doubt check and make corrections, as appropriate. As an aside, I did spot that Kate Winslet is appearing in the forthcoming Avatar2 (see here), so that might be where any error came from. Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 23:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism

Neil_Cross_(cricketer) is repeatedly being vandalized by 2 anonymous users. What should I do to report this? The last legitimate edit was [5]. I'm going to stop frivolously reverting edits, the page will just stay vandilized until the user is blocked or the page is locked. Fwaff (talk) 23:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Fwaff: You can request at WP:RFPP for the page to be protected against IP user edits (called semi-protection) RudolfRed (talk) 00:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Fwaff: Since all the recent vandalism occurred yesterday, I've protected the article for only a week. If the problem reoccurs after that, leave a message on my talk page, and I'll reprotect. Deor (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

How should I begin editing?

Hello Wikipedians,

I've read through many of the polices, guidelines, and I've familiarised myself with the WikiPedia site. However, I don't really know now where to go or how to start. What would be a good way to start editing without getting too overwhelmed? Thanks. FireisBlue (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@FireisBlue: Welcome. A good place to start is the interactive learning game WP:ADVENTURE and the WP:TUTORIAL. If you're just looking for some simple tasks to do, check out WP:TYPO and there are also links there to other projects helping Wikipedia. RudolfRed (talk) 02:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

FireisBlue, join WikiProjects, all of them have to-do lists. If you are looking for more general tasks, See WP:Community portal for a list of tasks you can do. Enjoy you stay at the teahouse! Heart ^(talk) 05:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Missing SD towns

I've noticed there are lots of missing towns in the South Dakota list of towns. All of them in Tripp County have been left out. How do I add them? On this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_towns_in_South_Dakota Sorry but I'm not sure what working in mobile view or VisualEditor refers to. Brenda AKA Cowgirl8664 Cowgirl8664 (talk) 03:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Cowgirl8664: There are many listed at List_of_townships_in_South_Dakota and a few more at List_of_cities_in_South_Dakota. Does that cover the ones you are thinking of? RudolfRed (talk) 03:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

VPN IP Block Exemption Userbox

Hello, I have recently acquired an VPN IP block exemption. Is there a userbox for this, I haven’t been able to find one. If so would someone please make one? I will invest my time for the next day after the custom box is made and I will invest it in editing a topic or article the person chooses if they make me a custom userbox.🙂 SmileyTrek (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

SmileyTrek, unfortunately, there is not. Feel free to create one though! Enjoy your stay at the teahouse! Heart ^(talk) 05:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@SmileyTrek: At Wikipedia:Userboxes there is a list of users who will create a userbox if you ask. RudolfRed (talk) 05:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@HeartGlow30797 and RudolfRed: Thank you to both of you (Sorry for two pings I accidentally forgot to log in so I erased my IP signature)! SmileyTrek (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

SmileyTrek, you might want to consider suppression so nobody can identify you... edit history is still a thing! Heart ^(talk) 04:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Creating a new category

Hi. How does one create a new category? Please, just a simple, user-friendly, short "how to", as I'm not technically very well-versed. Thank you very much, Arminden (talk) 05:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Arminden, there are multiple ways, however, I think the simplest way is to go to your URL and type "en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:" and after "Category:", type in the title of the category and click go. Alternatively, create a red-link by typing [[:Category:]] in a sandbox, and after ":Category:", type in the title of the category and publish. Click the red-link. Both will get you to a page, click "Create" and you can create a category. If you instead need help assembling a category, please let me know! Enjoy your stay at the teahouse! Heart ^(talk) 05:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

HeartGlow30797, thanks again! Your advice was as useful as it was prompt. The first option worked like clockwork. Have a great day, Arminden (talk) 06:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Arminden I'm afraid HeartGlow30797 forgot one absolutely critical bit of advice. All categories must have at least one parent category. I have added to the category you created, Category:Architects in Ottoman Palestine the parent category Category:Architects of the Ottoman Empire. You will notice there that your new category is the only one that subdivides Ottoman architects by the various countries/regions of the empire, which is a somewhat lopsided situation. Given the fairly small number of Ottoman architect articles we currently have I'm not sure such subcategorisation is really needed. The question "how to create a category" only covers one part of the issue, one must also consider whether creating a particular category is really justified or neccessary. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Dodger67, thank you. I've been editing for quite a while, just haven't bothered much about the more technical aspects. I think I can quite easily deal with the question of "whether creating a particular category is really justified/neccessary". Israel has the issue of a) being a very young country, with lots of buildings dating back to a time when the State of Israel didn't exist yet, and b) of being a very much contested piece of real estate, with many militant editors keeping an eager eye out on real or alleged errors of "political correctness", even where one would least expect it, so... Arminden (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Gravity acceleration. Question: What readings would be obtained if a gravimeter is theoretically placed 2000 km below the earth surface? Will the mass above it affect the reading?

Gravity acceleration, Will the mass above a gravimeter theoretically placed at 2000 km below the earth surface affect the generally accepted reasoning of a vertical vector acting from that position to the centre of the earth? 197.91.242.132 (talk) 06:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi IP 197.91.242.132. While your question sounds interesting, the Teahouse is really a place for asking questions about about Wikipedia editing or other things related to Wikipedia. Try asking your question at Wikipedia:Reference desk and perhaps someone will be able to help you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Stopping a red link going to a disambiguation page

If I write [[author name]] and the author does not exist, it goes to the create an new page. However, if the [[author name]] is not unique, it goes to a disambiguation page. I don't want to add the new name to the disambiguation page - no red links. If I Leave the link disambiguating, a kindly bot writes on my talk page. How do I stop a red link that needs disambiguating, diambiguating? What is the best practice here? Sciencefish (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sciencefish, welcome to the Teahouse. You could pipe the link to a target other than the dab page. Example: [[Name of person (author)|Name of person]]. Regards, Zindor (talk) 10:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia images

I have an issue with wikipedia the website feels out of date and old to be precise - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SmashingPumpkins-SiameseDream.jpg - this image is from 2007 - i think it should be updated to a much bigger one and as i am not allowed to edit that page - i guess the right person at wikipedia needs to be notified of such an issue i'm sure in 2007 it was a bandwidth issue to have such a small image - but in 2020?

i have noticed this with a lot of images on wikipedia - but this one made me want to do this
so if you can tell your boss to get it sorted that would be swell
it's kind of embarrassing to see a major historical website have such poor image quality frankly 62.228.224.203 (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@62.228.224.203: There is no "boss" here. Wikipedia articles are created, edited and updated by thousands of volunteer editors each day. If something is out of date, it probbably means that nobody came to update it yet or that there exist no reliable sources for a change. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The default image size is small for people reading Wikipedia on phones and other small screen devices. If you don't like the default image size, you can create an account and alter the image sizes that you see in "Preferences" "Appearance" - Arjayay (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

With respect to the specific image you are referring to, that is a copyright image, used under a claim of "fair-use" which means we cannot, legally, use a larger px size, as that would be a copyright violation - Arjayay (talk) 14:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

(edit conflict) When it's about images, there's an even bigger problem: copyright. Most images on the net, or published anywhere, are copyright in ways that Wikipedia cannot use them consistently with its policies. Because this limits the available images, there are certain exceptions whether images are used under "fair use": typically for logos, album and book covers, and posters. One of these conditions (3b in WP:NFCC) is that they should be small and low resolution copies where possible. So where appropriate an image could be replaced by a newer one; but replacing it by a larger or higher-resolution image would be contrary to Wikipedia's policies, and risk infringing somebody's copyright. Sorry. --ColinFine (talk) 14:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Bias

Could you possibly be any more biased towards the left? 40.137.48.226 (talk) 15:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Wikipedia does not claim to be free of bias. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. Any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia; this is why the sources are presented to readers so they can examine and judge them for themselves. If you are willing to collaborate with others regardless of political viewpoint, and have independent reliable sources to support information you feel is needed, you are welcome to offer your suggestions on article talk pages. 331dot (talk) 16:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes. But Earth's inner core obviously needs a more anti-left perspective. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm sure we could. There's far too much right wing propaganda in the corners of Wikipedia than there should be. Unfortunately, we live in a world right now, at least in the U.S., where correct, empirical facts are considered leftist pinko commie propaganda by many people living in a Fox News-Rush Limbaugh echo chamber, and the mainstream media (the most unbiased, just-the-facts corners of it), are branded leftist because they report reality. Actually they too have been compromised by the conservative movement into at least sipping the Kool-Aid, too scared to call out alternative facts as lies when they butt up against reality, and who think being unbiased is trotting out the kooksiest lunatic fringe to give their opinion on reality, on science; uggg, it makes me sick.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

I am completely baffled regarding how to leave a comment on an article

I am trying to comment on the articles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Industrial_Revolution I go to the talk page and then click on edit and I go the bottom and i see a line saying "

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate "

I cannot work out where to make my comment. Basically my comment is to say that the article is mostly quite good except that the para above the heading "German strategy" is totally dire and needs rewriting completely.

Thanks for all help

JontheDuke (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC) JontheDuke (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@JontheDuke: Just insert a blank line and type your section heading and comment beneath the last line of the talk page. That "The discussion above is closed" line refers to the move discussion that's currently the last section on the page. Deor (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

And, JontheDuke, thank you for wanting to help us improve it. Unfortunately, a comment like "XXX paragraph needs rewriting completely" probably won't have much effect, as we're all volunteers, and people work on what interests them. We have six million articles, and probably at least half a million of them have portions which need rewriting completely. If you have an idea for improving the paragraph, how about rewriting it yourself? Or if you're not confident to do that, suggest specific improvements to it on the talk page. --ColinFine (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Lester J. Brown

How do I write the reference and then publish? Rochellacooper (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Rochellacooper. (Just for your information: you managed to remove a lot of questions on this page with your first edit; so somebody reverted your edit, and I then added back your question. Nobody will hold this against you, but you should know that this happened). Looking at Draft:Lester J. Brown, I'm afraid you have made a number of classic beginner's mistakes. (Again, don't worry: we all make them). One is trying to plunge in and create a new article, possibly the most difficult task there is in editing Wikipedia, without having spent some time learning how Wikipedia works. The second is writing an article from what you know: Wikipedia isn't interested in what you know (or what I know, or what any random person on the internet knows). It is also not interested in what the subject of an article says or wants to say about themselves. It is only interested in what people who have no connection to the subject of the article, and have not been prompted or fed information by or on behalf of the subject, have chosen to publish in WP:reliable sources. It follows that the first task in creating an article, before creating a draft or writing a word, is to find such reliably-published independent sources which discuss the subject at some length; because if you can't find such sources, then it is not going to be possible to write an acceptable article, and it is a waste of everyone's effort going any further. (The Wikipedia jargon for this is whether or not the subject is notable). Please have a look at your first article; and for references specifically, look at CITE. --ColinFine (talk) 17:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Setting up a personal page

Could you please follow through and set this up as a personal page. Julie Dee Bell (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Dr Julie Dee Bell Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Wikipedia does not have "personal pages". It has articles, as this is an encyclopedia. Your user page is not article space, but a place for you to tell the Wikipedia community about yourself as a Wikipedia editor or user. It is not a place for you to tell anything and everything about yourself. People merit a Wikipedia article if they receive significant coverage in independent reliable sources that have chosen on their own to offer it, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person, or in your case, a a notable academic. Autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged under the autobiography policy, as people naturally write favorably about themselves. Wikipedia is primarily interested in what others say about a person, not what the person says about themselves.

If you truly feel you can write about yourself in such a manner, you should first review Your First Article, then visit Articles for Creation to create and submit a draft article for review by an independent editor. 331dot (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

My first work

Hello, My first work was observed by Nathan2055. And it couldn't be accepted because of the language. I'd like to ask how can I transfer my article " Ծրագրակազմի Ճարտարագիտություն" from the English Wikipedia into Armenian Wikipedia ? GJ-artist (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

There is no such thing as Armenian Wikipedia. However, you can have your article translated to English by a professional. Put {{Not English|language|article or section|listed=yes/no}} at the top of the talk page, and fill out the sample text to notify the article needs translation. Le Panini ^Talk 18:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

What? Of course there is an Armenian Wikipedia – what made you think there wasn't? It is here. --bonadea contributions talk 18:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Wait, hold up. Did not know this existed. Sorry about that.

I figured out why I assumed there was no Armenian language. For some reason, I looked at the front page and saw those ten languages and assumed those were the only ones available. I clearly know that there are others if you literally just look to the left sidebar, but for some reason I forgot those existed. Le Panini ^Talk 20:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, GJ-artist. I don't think there's a way of transferring an article directly: you'll need to create an article hy:Ծրագրակազմի Ճարտարագիտություն in whatever way hy-wiki allows you to create articles, and then paste the source into it. (If you "edit" your sandbox with the source editor, you can then copy the whole content of the edit box). --ColinFine (talk) 19:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

GJ-artist and ColinFine I think that m:Help:Transwiki may give the answer. —teb728 t c 23:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

GJ-artist. The transwiki method has the advantage of preserving page history as required by copyright. But I see that you are the sole author; so ColinFine's copy-and-paste method would be easier. —teb728 t c 00:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Civilization

what is first civilization in earth 88.230.195.39 (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The Teahouse is for asking questions about Wikipedia. Instead, go to the Wikipedia:Reference desk. Le Panini ^Talk 18:48, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Limited info in English

Please tell me how a user can edit or add an article if the information related to the subject of the article is limited. Can one use information from the other languages? Polito.tashkent (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Polito.tashkent! WP:RS not in English are ok, see WP:NOENG. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Trivia and pop culture sections on articles for everyday subjects

Hi. If anyone wants to take a look, a lot of our articles for numbers (ex. 20 (number)) are loaded with trivia sections pertaining to their usage in popular culture (like music, sports teams, and overall non-mathematic and irrelevant topics). Almost all of these are trivial things like a certain sports team containing a certain number of players (seriously?) or an album being named after a number. It's basically just an incorporation of the disambiguation page into the article, which is really redundant since we already link the disambig at the top of the article for readers to find different topics; we don't need repeats. Not helping is the fact that a majority of this information is unsourced.

There's also sections dedicated to certain privileges attainable at certain ages. Those might be helpful as we don't have certain articles for the ages (ex. "20 (age)", but then again there's nothing much to say about being a certain age and we already have separate articles denoting the various age spans from birth to old age), but they also suffer from the same problem of uncited statements, and we already mention these facts in the articles for the various stages of aging.

That said, is it really necessary to dedicate whole sections in number articles to its trivial details in culture? I think only stuff about the numbers' impact in mathematics and the history behind said numbers should be documented. Bearswitch (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Userbox Editor

How do I become a Userbox editor - meaning someone that can process requests into Userboxes? Charles Juvon (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC) Charles Juvon (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, Charles Juvon. Providing you already know how to create Userboxes, and genuinely want to help other users, you can add your name here. At a hasty glance, I didn't see you've made any of your own, yet, though I'm probably mistaken. They're not too difficult to master. In a fit of lockdown madness the other day, I made this for a bit of entertainment:

This user is bike-curious

Enjoy! Nick Moyes (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Nick, Thank you for that answer. I thought Userboxes were under some sort of "bureaucratic" control to prevent misuse. So, I will try to make one. Charles Juvon (talk) 23:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Charles Juvon: No. Within reason, you are free to create a userbox for your own, or others' use, although there are many that do exist already. Just avoid creating something that others may deem offensive, as that would almost certainly be deleted. Good luck. Let us know what you eventually create! Nick Moyes (talk) 00:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes: I don't see a tool for including an image from Commons. Charles Juvon (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

HostBot

I'm sorry about what happened, HostBot but i was trying to be a new member and trying to help Wikipedia. Pricegeorge212 (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Pricegeorge212, HostBot is a bot. They can't respond back. davidwr and ZimZalaBim are not, however. Le Panini ^Talk 20:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Infobox not working

Can someone tell me how to fix the infobox on Jermaine Johnson (basketball). He was elected to State Congress, but it's not showing up in the infobox. Please help. Thank you!  Pennsylvania2 (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed here, Pennsylvania2. You had embedded the template in another one, but only closed one of the two. I also fixed an error with a parameter. --ColinFine (talk) 20:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Pennsylvania2 (talk) 21:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

GOP

I made a change. See below.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Republican_Party_(United_States)

This is not correct " GOP losing the presidential election and lead to significant GOP losses in other races. In one of the largest upsets in American political history,[116][117][118][119] Trump went on to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election."

How is it possible that the GOP lost the presidential election and then go on to defeat Hillary Clinton?

I wrote a correction "GOP won the presidential election and lead to significant GOP winning in other races. In one of the largest upsets in American political history,[116][117][118][119] Trump went on to defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election." which is factual.

Why was it changed back? Gorrillawarfare changed it back an said it was not constructive. How is the truth not constructive? Suppressing the truth is censorship! Is that what Wikipedia stands for? 67.171.36.238 (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

You did not read the entire sentence – you changed a statement about Republicans being worried that their candidate would lose the election to say that they were worried that the candidate would win the election. (here is your edit). --bonadea contributions talk 21:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Someone put up an account in my name.

I found an account on here in my name "Fred Batt" but a lot of it was either just making a mockery of me or was wrong information so I altered the parts that were wrong or bad but they kept being changed back. I alyered it about 3 or 4 times.

I have just opened up another account in the same name but in capital letters, "FRED BATT" and altered the othe page,in my name "Fred Batt" to how it should be.

How can I make this permanent so nobody can just go on there and alter it.

I am the demonologist in the TV show Most Maunted so I probably get a lot of visitors on there. Hope someone can help.

Thanks

Fred FRED BATT (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

FRED BATT Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. So you have your terminology crossed a bit- someone created a Wikipedia article about you, not an account. You created an account for yourself. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that has articles. The vast majority of articles on this encyclopedia about people were created without involvement of the subjects(Donald Trump did not write the article about him). You should avoid directly editing the article about yourself per the autobiography policy, but if there are changes that you feel are needed and you can source them to a reliable source, please make a formal edit request(click for instructions) on the article talk page. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@FRED BATT: Hello from Derby - home of Richard Felix - who, I believe, also used to do some presenting on the Most Haunted TV show - though I've never watched it myself. (In fact, he used to pop in from time to time at our city's Museum where I worked for many years.) Hey, I'm sorry to hear you've encountered an article about yourself which you think needs correcting. However, the advice given above by 331dot is spot on. Obviously, if there is wholly malicious and uncited content about Fred Batt, you, like anyone else is free to simply delete it (explained at this page). We take very seriously anyone messing around with biographies of living people, just as we do if someone should choose a username of a famous person and use it to edit under. Please don't take it personally, but I feel I am obliged to give a 'SOFTBLOCK to your account - purely to protect the real Fred Batt. OK, that's probably you - but please understand that we have no way of knowing that, except that the message that will be left on your talk page will explain how you can send an email from a valid account to prove that the account is, well, legitimately you. Once that's done, your account will be unfrozen for you. You will be in good company - I did precisely the same thing to BBC TV news journalist, Mark Easton, a year or two ago (see here). He then simply sent in an email from the BBC to what we call our 'OTRS' Team to prove that, well, he was who he claimed he was. He wanted to remove cited content which gave a very biased picture of himself - which was probably quite justified. But we had no way of knowing without first blocking (and then unblocking) his named account. I hope you won't mind this inconvenience, which (honestly) is designed to protect you, and certainly not to not frustrate you. (See the third paragraph at WP:REALNAME for further explanation). Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)      

Cite error references missing key

Hi there, the article I am working on for a Wikipedia Education class - Commercial Radio Australia, has just received a notification of a "cite error" at the bottom of the page, saying that two references are not used in the content. I am confused as to how this is the case - as both references are used in the article. Could someone help me with how to address/eliminate these?

I have also noticed that this Wikipedia page is flagged as having an "unclear citation style". This flag appeared before I cleaned up the notes and references sections. I have since polished the references to ensure there is a clear citation style - is there a way in which I can remove this template?

Thanks SM9237 (talk) 23:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

No, the references with those names are not used (i.e. there is nowhere in your article that contains the sequence <ref name="ACMA"/>). You have a similar reference (the same title, but a different URL) as reference 9. I haven't looked at the other one.

If you are happy that you have remedied the problem in the cleanup tag, you may remove it: simply find the template at the top of the source and remove it. --ColinFine (talk) 23:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

​@SM9237: As I previously advised you in Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1082#References appear in Notes section upon using "Cite" Tool, you should not just unilaterally change the citation style of an article to something you prefer per WP:CITEVAR. You should’ve at least try to discuss this on the article’s talk page first or tried to adopt the style already established in the article. This kind of thing can sometimes lead to problems between editors, particularly when one of them is a student editor who may not be ver familiar with Wikipedia. The reason I tagged the article with {{Unclear citation style}} was because you were formatting the citations you were adding using a citation style different from the one established by earlier contributors. — Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

help me for contribution

HI... Guys Can any of you help me make articles about tv series such as making a list of characters and main articles per season, if any of you can contribute, I will be happy to contribute properly and correctly. besides that I also need a mentor related to that.

Thus I thank you Natean12 (talk) 00:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Natean12 (talk) 00:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Is there a TV series you have in mind? In general, Teahouse hosts are question-answerers but not co-authors. David notMD (talk) 02:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

James Davidson, the Ornithologist

{{subst:trim|1= I have the proper picture of him as he is an ancestor of mine and I have a couple photos of him. The one I would recommend is part of a group photo of himself, his brother and sister and step sister, and father with his second wife. I think this Thumb link will work??

File:James Davidson -son.jpeg

/var/folders/nj/nc9vhss97td99m1_tf3wdgnr0000gn/T/com.apple.Preview/PreviewTemp-WrT8Dn/W4Y0m.jpeg

[[/var/folders/nj/nc9vhss97td99m1_tf3wdgnr0000gn/T/com.apple.Preview/PreviewTemp-WrT8Dn/W4Y0m.jpeg

}} 96.244.245.118 (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello IP, the file paths you've added look to be from locally on a Mac, i.e. only you can see them because they are stored on your computer, not anywhere on the internet. Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 02:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, IP editor. The article in question is James Davidson (ornithologist). Since he died in 1925, any photos you have are probably in the public domain. Please upload the photos to Wikimedia Commons. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Australia

Our town in Australia , NSW , Gwydir Shire Council 2402 have started to post council meeting recorded onto your site . claimed as being democratic . But the other day when I found them and listened to them , I reported some concerns with statements made during the meeting . Now this seems to have been removed and others can't hear the same comments , is this correct for them to remove sections and yet claim its being done to comply with the democratic ideal .

It's all new stuff here , but should they be able to remove information .

Thanks for any helpful information , its better we can at lest hear these parts .

Thanks David Goode 1.129.105.21 (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello IP editor "David Goode". I looked at the history of the Gwydir Shire article and do not see anything about council meeting records. There is no discussion at Talk: Gwydir Shire, which is the proper place to discuss changes to the article. Am I missing something? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Article Approval and Making it Encyclopedic

Hey there fellow editors, I had recently written an article on ELGi Equipments which got deleted for sounding to 'promotionalish' I wish to state that I do not have any connection to the company and I realized that I added too much citation by linking websites of the company and it's subsidiaries. I request you to help me out on this particular article in making it wiki friendly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Elgi_Equipments

Thanks and Regards Fibrointech (talk) 04:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Fibrointech. An acceptable Wikipedia article neutrally summarizes what independent, reliable sources say about a topic, and references to those sources should be included, so that readers can verify what is in the article. Your draft includes only one reference and there are many paragraphs that are entirely unreferenced. That won't fly. Please read Your first article and follow the advice you will find there. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

My article was not accepted

My article was not accepted so how can i ?? Madhav rabari 6464 (talk) 07:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

 Courtesy link: User:Madhav rabari 6464/sandbox

Welcome to the Teahouse, Madhav rabari 6464. You can't! First, your draft doesn't say anything at all about you. Also, instagram is not an acceptable source. And finally, Wikipedia is not the kind of website that welcomes a Wikipedia:Autobiography. —teb728 t c 08:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

British Columbia

(This is the first time I have used the teahouse.) Hi there, you dont know me and I dont know you, but I'm currently involved in an edit war on the article British Columbia, I put a fact on there about the capital of BC, so I wrote that Victoria is on Vancouver Island, which is completely true. An administrator rejects my contribution and reverts it. He also emails an administrator on his talkpage regarding another one of my problematic edits on Donald Trump, I put it back up there (the fact about Victoria) when I noticed what he had done, so i wrote it again, a different admin reverts it. I dont want to get banned for edit-warring, and I have no idea why two admins would revert my edits on BC. If any of you guys could help me with this problem I would be extremely grateful. Thanks

82.40.130.75 (talk) 08:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC) 82.40.130.75 (talk) 08:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse IP user. Just because something is true doesn't mean it needs to be said. If someone reverts your edit, do not reassert it. Instead discuss the change you want on the article talk page, Talk:British Columbia. —teb728 t c 08:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Pictures of notable people on Wiki articles that are not about those people

Is it appropriate to put a picture of a notable person (who has his own Wikipedia page) on other pages which are relevant to that person? For instance, in the case of Rodney Atkins, the country musician, I put a photo of him on two schools that he attended where his name is mentioned as a notable alumnus: Walters State Community College and Tennessee Technological University; plus on his hometown of Cumberland Gap, Tennessee; but another editor, AppalachianCentrist removed those pictures. Please tell me what the policy is for placing pictures in such cases, because I have seen many pages where notable alumni or people from a small town who became well-known, do have their photos on those related pages. Thanks. 64.90.222.203 (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)