User talk:Muboshgu: Difference between revisions
→Women's history: Replying to Missvain (using reply-link) |
→Removal of DOJ Information from Steele Dossier: new section |
||
Line 288: | Line 288: | ||
:{{u|Missvain}}, okay. I'll self revert. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
:{{u|Missvain}}, okay. I'll self revert. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
:{{u|Missvain}}, on further thought, is being the first woman to represent that district in Congress ''really'' historic? That seems like a stretch. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
:{{u|Missvain}}, on further thought, is being the first woman to represent that district in Congress ''really'' historic? That seems like a stretch. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Removal of DOJ Information from Steele Dossier == |
|||
Hi, your user page says you're interested in truth but you are quick to remove it from the Steele Dossier page. Do you dispute the Department of Justice findings? Does the DOJ not meet your threshold as a source? |
|||
As posted: |
|||
The above paragraph, and assertion of conspiracy theory, is directly contradicted by the [https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf Department of Justice's Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation] report published in December 2019. Among the findings from the DOJ, "the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, just days after its receipt of information from a FFG reporting that, in May 2016, during a meeting with the FFG, then-Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos 'suggested the Trump team had received some kind of suggestion from Russia that it could assist this process with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Mrs. Clinton (and President Obama)... We did not find information in FBI or Department ECs, emails or other documents, or through witness testimony, indicating that any information other than the FFG information was relied upon to predicate the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation." |
Revision as of 19:31, 23 November 2020
This is Muboshgu's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
|
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Reggie Bagala
Hello, I noticed that you helped to edit Bob Glanzer and Isaac Robinson's pages after they died from coronavirus. I am wondering if you would like to also help with Reggie Bagala who has also recently died from it. - Jon698 talk 2:41 10 April 2020
You posted that my recent editing history at Kimberly Klacik shows that I am currently engaged in an edit war
Thanks
… for this. Would have responded at ITN but I'm sure there would have been about 5 ECs before I could get it in. I must have been trying to post my comment at ITN while you removed the "legal challenges" language. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Whether Shanahan and Ratcliffe constitute "Unsuccessful nominations to the Cabinet of the United States"
Dear Muboshgu, I was wondering if you'd seen my response to you on the talk page of Unsuccessful nominations to the Cabinet of the United States. I recognise that your message was a long time ago. (And it's entirely understandable if you've forgotten it!) I was wondering if it would be okay to put Shanahan and Ratcliffe back in the page, as they seem to fulfil the criteria set forth in the article.
Sdrqaz (talk) 17:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sdrqaz, hi. I must have missed the ping in the craziness that was the last week. I'll take a look at your message in a little bit and respond there. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: Thanks, that'll be greatly appreciated. Hectic times we live in!
- Sdrqaz (talk) 19:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Font size infoboxes at US Congresses articles.
Howdy. If I agree to go with regular size font, even though it would crowd up (see 93rd United States Congress) the names? Will you agree not to add the brackets, which only crowds up the names more? GoodDay (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- GoodDay, no brackets is fine. But MOS:SMALLFONT is otherwise non-negotiable. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Fine, even though it makes the print messy & crowded. GoodDay (talk) 23:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- PS- I'm adding spacing as well. Will make infoboxes slightly longer, but less crowded with the larger font for the service dates. GoodDay (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- GoodDay, sounds good. Smaller font is inaccessible for many. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Got implemented, in all the US Congress articles, where required. GoodDay (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- GoodDay, sounds good. Smaller font is inaccessible for many. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- PS- I'm adding spacing as well. Will make infoboxes slightly longer, but less crowded with the larger font for the service dates. GoodDay (talk) 23:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Only way around spacing, would've been 'blue' colouring for the service dates. But, I don't know how to do that. GoodDay (talk) 00:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Howdy. Just in case you missed the ping. A new editor has joined the discussion on this topic, over at 117th United States Congress article. GoodDay (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Kamala Harris edit
You closed the issue I submitted saying to check the FAQs. What am I supposed to be looking for in the FAQ specifically???? FactsRFun2020 (talk) 21:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Josh Tobias for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Tobias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Tobias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dmoore5556 (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Molly Gray
Hello! Your submission of Molly Gray at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Grady Fuson
On 19 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grady Fuson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Moneyball depicted Grady Fuson being fired by the Oakland Athletics, though in reality he left voluntarily? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grady Fuson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Grady Fuson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Please made a move protection on the page of Narendra Modi
Honourable, Muboshgu I 969 Movement 2 (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC) request you to made the page of current Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi move protected. Thaking you
2020 US Senate races in Georgia
I wasn't able to undo the reverses I made. PS - Hopefully, somebody will open another RM, with a better result and/or better reading of that result. GoodDay (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- GoodDay, I see. You can start another RM if you wish, but that one was just closed three days ago. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'll wait. Hopefully, after a few months in 2021. Commonsense will prevail & those articles will be moved back to their correct/accurate titles. GoodDay (talk) 17:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Mark Robinson (American politician)
On 22 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark Robinson (American politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that that when he is sworn in next year, Mark Robinson will become the first Black lieutenant governor of North Carolina? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Robinson (American politician). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mark Robinson (American politician)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 00:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Women's history
Hi. Thanks for all your amazing contributions! Just a quick note to share that Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's History includes contemporary women who have made history or are groundbreaking in their roles in the world. Lauren Boebert is the first woman to represent her district, that is historically significant in her community and in her district. Therefore, she qualifies for inclusion in the project. Feel free to also add Wikipedia:WikiProject Women if you'd like. As a participant in Wikipedia:Women in Red, we often add one or the other to a biography, but there is no rule saying we can't have both, too. Cheers! Missvain (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Missvain, okay. I'll self revert. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- Missvain, on further thought, is being the first woman to represent that district in Congress really historic? That seems like a stretch. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Removal of DOJ Information from Steele Dossier
Hi, your user page says you're interested in truth but you are quick to remove it from the Steele Dossier page. Do you dispute the Department of Justice findings? Does the DOJ not meet your threshold as a source?
As posted:
The above paragraph, and assertion of conspiracy theory, is directly contradicted by the Department of Justice's Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation report published in December 2019. Among the findings from the DOJ, "the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, just days after its receipt of information from a FFG reporting that, in May 2016, during a meeting with the FFG, then-Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos 'suggested the Trump team had received some kind of suggestion from Russia that it could assist this process with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Mrs. Clinton (and President Obama)... We did not find information in FBI or Department ECs, emails or other documents, or through witness testimony, indicating that any information other than the FFG information was relied upon to predicate the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation."