Jump to content

User talk:JJNito197: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 152: Line 152:
</table>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=990308610 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=990308610 -->

{{uw-vandalism4im}} [[User:Oshwah|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 17:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:32, 24 November 2020

Red Hair

Hi. I've reverted your edits to Red Hair. I've nothing specific against a lot of what you did, but unfortunately you used as a source a "BritainsDNA" document stored under "guff documents" at the University College London. See discussion here regarding what the genetic scientists there think about this company. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Thank you for correcting, have removed false source that you have stated also. My fault for not proof reading, Regards JJNito197 (talk) 10:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC) JJNito197[reply]

Hi. Repeatedly removing cited material in an article because you don't care for it, without any discussion, is disruptive and may cause you to be blocked from editing. If you want to discuss your edit, the proper place to do it in on the talk page, not through reverting edit summaries. Please try and reach consensus on things, rather than tit-for-tat edits. Also, please don't take images from other websites, then upload them saying you own them. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously.

If you'd care to undo your last revert, or implement the improvement suggested, we can get discuss things. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 19:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scottish Lowlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selkirk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello JJNito197, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Scottish Lowlands have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cameron (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Za'atar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanese genetics

The wording that was previously used regarding the study of Behar et al of 2010 is the correct one. If you use the wording you have changed it to, its interpreted as if the Druze cluster closer to the Lebanese than the Jews, which is not the case. The previous wording "Lebanese cluster the closest to Jews of any Arab population except the Druze" clearly expresses the point the study is trying to make, which is that the Druze cluster closer to the Jews, with the Lebanese coming in 2nd.

Regarding the Canaanite origin corroboration part, I do agree its a bit fuzzy depending on how its interpreted. I think what its being tried to be said there is that the fact that the Jews cluster the closest to the Lebanese out of all the Levantine/Arab populations, its a indicator that the Jews where originally of Canaanite stock or assimilated to the Canaanite population thus springing out of it after mixing with it first. I dont think its trying to affirm that there has been doubt about whether the Lebanese were of Canaanite stock and that this study finally confirms it due to the genetic similarities of the Lebanese with the Jews, but the other way around, since there are or were debates in the past as to whether Jews were of Mesopotamian or Canaanite stock originally.Marc Frier (talk) 14:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Clan Hall. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hummus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lebanese cuisine

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lebanese cuisine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lebanese cuisine

The article Lebanese cuisine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lebanese cuisine for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 --Shrike (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lebanese cuisine

The article Lebanese cuisine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lebanese cuisine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanese Cuisine Effort

GA Award
For your efforts on Lebanese cuisine, always improving this page, you deserve this medal. Editoneer (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated! Thanks for your helpful input regarding that article. Regards JJNito197 (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Great work JJ. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Onceinawhile, I appreciate that. JJNito197 (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lebanese cuisine

On 6 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lebanese cuisine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many dishes in Lebanese cuisine can be traced back thousands of years to eras of Roman, Greek, Persian, Byzantine, Arab, Egyptian, and Phoenician rule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lebanese cuisine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lebanese cuisine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lebanese cuisine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Akka and Nabulsi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PHO

You are invited to join WikiProject Phoenicia

You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining WikiProject Phoenicia. Please accept this friendly invitation from a member of the project.
I can't wait for us to work together! ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Let's go!

Hello talkallam, thanks for inviting me I would be glad to join and help out! JJNito197 (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]