Jump to content

Talk:George Herriman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 173.15.96.125 (talk) at 17:55, 4 March 2021 (→Is "mulatto" Black?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articleGeorge Herriman is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 28, 2013.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
March 1, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
April 14, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Herriman's ancestry

To the anon editing from 70.22.210.31, what is the source of your information? Your change of Herriman's ancestry to being the son of "a French father and African-American mother" seems contradicted by census information listing both parents as "colored" or "mulatto". Wondering, -- Infrogmation 20:32, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know if this is showing up right...

My source of information about Herriman's parents is reading on other Web sites; unfortunately I can't cite them right now. They said that his father was a French chef and his mother an African American. The reason I removed the item about his being "Creole" is that Wikipedia's own page on Creole (Louisiana) indicates that in the Louisiana/New Orleans context, "Creole" has nothing to do with race.

Furthermore... I really don't care how Herriman's racial identity is described, but before you go immediately undoing all of my edits, why don't you check the page on Lousiana Creoles for yourself? The way you wrote this makes Wikipedia internally contradictory. User:70.22.210.31

Thanks for the reply. I think the recent edits are okay; note the census designation of his family as "mulatto". The part of town he grew up in was predominently Creole at the time, and I'm not away of anything contradictary with the info in the Louisiana section of the Creole article. Yes, "Creole" was cultural, the desination "of Color" is the racial part, to use terms of the era. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 00:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's also possible that "French chef" didn't mean that he was from France, but rather that he was a specialist in French cuisine. --Jfruh 03:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor points

I'm not going to bother editing this page anymore, since all my previous attempts were immediately undone. I will make a few minor points, however:

The second sentence currently reads: "George Herriman was born in a light-skinned Creole of Color family in New Orleans, Louisiana, both of his parents were listed as "mulatto" in the 1880 census."

That's a run-on sentence.

Also, since Herriman is primarily remembered (for most people, I'd say only remembered) for his creation of Krazy Kat (which I personally believe to be the greatest cartoon strip ever)... wouldn't it make more sense to somehow introduce Krazy Kat much earlier in the article? Right now it's basically chronological, which throws the first mention of Krazy Kat quite far down. Wouldn't it make more sense to put that mention right in the first sentence somehow?

Another point: I think the discussion of racial identity in Krazy Kat is fine, but it might leave a reader with the misimpression that that's primarily what the strip was about. Actually, the racial theme was only one of many in the strip; I believe that the majority of the strips had nothing to do with race.

Also, there's no mention in the article that many people consider Krazy Kat to be the greatest (or one of the greatest) strips ever done, and no explanation of what made the strip so great. Perhaps this would be too 'point of view' for an encyclopedia, but it seems that without this, why should most people (not very familiar with Krazy Kat) even care about Herriman or realize why he's so special? User:70.22.208.84

How was he able to pass as white? he's clearly part black. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.7.249.68 (talk • contribs)

"Clearly" to who? Many who knew him at the time didn't know. -- Infrogmation 16:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay, I guess I can see how people thought he was Greek but he looks very black. He looks like a fair-skinned black man.198.7.249.68 05:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

last strip

The article currently reads: "On June 25, 1944, two months after Herriman's death, the last of his Krazy Kat strips was printed; An un-inked penciling of a Sunday page found on his drawing board at the time of his death."

What does this mean? It makes no sense. It should be either "On June 25, 1944, two months after Herriman's death, the last of his Krazy Kat strips was printed: an un-inked penciling of a Sunday page found on his drawing board at the time of his death." or "On June 25, 1944, two months after Herriman's death, the last of his Krazy Kat strips was printed. An un-inked penciling of a Sunday page was found on his drawing board at the time of his death."

In other words, was the un-inked Sunday page the last strip printed, or was it left unprinted on his drawing table?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.236.220 (talk • contribs)

I interpret it as the first, otherwise it would be illogical to mention this following a "two months later"-piece of information (but accidents may happen during editing). You may be right in that a colon is the better choice to relate this. A source ought to be at hand to remove the doubt.. MURGH disc. 10:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The (partly) uninked item found on Herriman's drawing board was actually a sequence of six dailies, as verified in McDonnell's _Krazy Kat: The Comic Art of George Herriman_ (1985, reprinted 1999). The incomplete dailies themselves were reprinted in _McSweeney's Quarterly Concern_ issue 13, a hardback literary journal that focuse on comics in that issue.
Murgh, with all due respect I'll make the change to your sentence about the final strip(s), as it's still ungrammatical and a bit confusing for the reasons cited. Ramapith 16:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your concern. I actually hadn't edited it in the hope that someone informed would make the appropriate fixes. Looks good, I'll just restore the MoS-T italics for the strip title ;^) MURGH disc. 23:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is "mulatto" Black?

Maybe I just don't understand racial profiling deeply enough, but given that Herriman's parents were both mulatto, that would make Herriman a mulatto, too, wouldn't it? A mulatto is, by definition, someone who is mixed-race, right? So is it really appropriate to have him placed in the "African-American comics creators" category? Wouldn't that be like saying he was all black? CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 05:08, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The traditional view in most of the U.S. is in one-drop rule, but things were more complicated in New Orleans... AnonMoos (talk) 01:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well he had african ancestry, and he was american. You do the math.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:George Herriman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 20:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

  1. File:George Herriman and fans.jpg
  2. File:AugustineTreme14Jan2008AboveB.jpg
  3. File:George and Mabel Herriman - Wedding - 1902-07-07.jpg
  4. File:Musical Mose 1902-02-16 "Impussanates" a Scotchman, with Sad Results.jpg
  5. File:Daniel and Pansy 1909-12-04.jpg
  6. File:Krazy Kat 1918-09-07 panel 4.png
  7. File:Monument valley.jpg = this one could use standardization with information template.
    Done. Curly Turkey (gobble) 02:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. File:HMBeanieWalkerPubPhoto.jpg = fair use, rationale checks out on image page.
  9. File:1937 1107 kkat brick 500.jpg = looks like this should be uploaded in PNG format instead.
    I thought I'd try this, but then I read Wikipedia:How to reduce colors for saving a JPEG as PNG. I'm not sure I'm confident that I could do this right. Curly Turkey (gobble) 03:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Suggest you post a request for help at commons:Commons:Village pump, and hopefully someone will respond there. — Cirt (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. File:George Herriman and family - 1915.jpg
  11. File:Herriman 1902.png
  12. File:E. E. Cummings NYWTS.jpg
  13. File:Sollies Ville - Chris Ware - P1200285.jpg

Aside from above notes, all images check out okay.

Next, on to stability review. — Cirt (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stability review

  1. No ongoing conflict issues, upon inspection of Article edit history.
  2. Don't see any outstanding problems upon inspection of article talk page.

Next, on to rest of review, — Cirt (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 12, 2012, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing style is pretty good, certainly good enough for GA quality. I would suggest going for a peer review post GA review, and also soliciting help from the folks at WP:GOCE, for copyediting with regards to keeping in mind improving overall flow and succinctness.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, to well-formatted references.
3. Broad in coverage?: Indeed is thorough and comprehensive, coverall major aspects of the subject matter.
4. Neutral point of view?: Article is written in a neutral and matter-of-fact tone that is in line with site expectations of NPOV.
5. Article stability? Stability passes, see stability review, above.
6. Images?: Images are fine, see image review, above.
 If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 17:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Musical Mose illustration

Seems to be in article twice... AnonMoos (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You probably saw the article right in between edits. It's only there once now. Curly Turkey (gobble) 02:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Top Importance?

There's a discussion on which comic-related articles should be listed as "Top Importance" on the importance scale, and I feel this article should not be included. If any user disagrees or wishes to contribute, please do so there. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly interesting source

Paulson, Ronald (1990). Figure and abstraction in contemporary painting. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-1604-2. Retrieved 21 February 2013.

It looks like Ronald Paulson has interesting things to say about Herriman/Krazy Kat. Does anyone have access to this book? Curly Turkey (gobble) 23:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salary?

Article says he was paid $2/hour to do art for the paper. In 1897 that was a phenomenal income; Henry Ford in 1912 broke wage lines by paying $5/day to skilled workers. Should this perhaps be $2/day? Or is it $2/hour in 2013 money?

It may be that the source got the numbers wrong, but it would be a mistake to compare the wages of labourers and cartoonists. Especially at the time, cartoonists were in high demand and commanded a respectable income. Their duties at included all the illustrations of a newspaper that today would be handled by photographs—and in 1897 there were as yet few comic strips. Curly Turkey (gobble) 21:59, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can try to check the source myself, but if someone has it handier than I do, did the source itself cite a source? Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've got the source, but I've just started work for the day, so it'll be a while before I can get home and check it. Curly Turkey (gobble) 23:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
$2 per week, not $2 per hour. He was 17 or so, and it was 1897.
That notwithstanding, I just want to say that this is a fantastic article. A lot of main page featured articles strike me as a bit marginal, but this one sets a high standard. Fascinating and extremely educational, even to someone who had already read several books about Herriman and Krazy Kat. John M Baker (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If only Michael Tisserand could get around to getting his book published, the article could be even better. Tisserand went and dug up lots of information on the Herriman family in New Orleans, among other things. I wonder what's holding the book up? Curly Turkey (gobble) 01:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tisserand here. Never tried to write on wiki before. But wanted to let you know that HarperCollins is publishing my Herriman bio in fall 2016. Lots of family and New Orleans info indeed. 72.204.168.46 (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Michael Tisserand[reply]

"Personal history"

"Personal history" seems like an odd choice of term for the opening section. Should we change the title of the section to "Biography"? 850 C (talk) 18:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Tisserand's book provides earlier ancestry documentation - January 2017

Here's a link to a New York Times book review of Krazy: George Herriman, a Life in Black and White. The content in the review (12 January 2017), accessible online, can be used to update the page. -- Deborahjay (talk) 20:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have found one or more external links on George Herriman that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Curly Turkey: Remember you added {{Cbtalkonly}} to the page, that IABot is only leaving messages on the talk page for this page.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 12:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678: right, thanks a lot! I've been meaning to do a major update to the article ... sould get on that one of these days ... Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 13:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Curly Turkey: Have you considered removing those tags again? IABot’s formatting engine has improved since last we spoke.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cyberpower678: You're right! It even readded the whitespace that had been stripped out by another bot at I Never Liked You. Thanks a lot! Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 00:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have found one or more external links on George Herriman that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have found one or more external links on George Herriman that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have found one or more external links on George Herriman that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have found one or more external links on George Herriman that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have found one or more external links on George Herriman that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:

When you have finished making the appropriate changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This notice will only be made once for these URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

George Herriman III?

Because his grandfather was George Herriman Sr. and his father was George Herriman Jr., should the George Herriman of this article be referred to in some sections as George Herriman III? 172.250.44.165 (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. If his middle name was different from theirs, he technically wouldn't be the third. (Also, nearly all of the places we call him "George Herriman" are direct quotes. In the context of the article he's just "Herriman" .) -Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_Herriman&oldid=1010279257"