Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anarchyte (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 27 July 2022 (Wuhan flu: Semi-protected until 2024 (using responseHelper)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – As you can see I don't know where to even restore or revert from. Page have been extensively vandalized that restoration and undo can't even find an unvandalized Version. Someone please go through my edits to ensure I didn't make a mistake and also protect page cheers. Uricdivine (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLPvio started up 8 days after last protection expired. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance, about 3 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ip's still adding unconfirmed cancellation of show without valid sources. Extended production maybe needed. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 01:44, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Considering there have been many new additions and reversions by numerous editors and being as he's been in the headlines recently regarding lawsuits over the abortion debate, semi-protection is requested until focus abates. Snickers2686 (talk) 01:58, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very persistent vandalism by several accounts and IP over months to the point it could be count as a very long and slow but persistent edit war. IPs and accounts did not respond to any discussion attempt, insisting the new airport name was not approved (despite sourced statements in the article) and removed any referenced mentions of new name proposals, while providing no source of their own. Nyanardsan (talk) 02:27, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of socks Zellers accounts added and will add again (they mentioned it at the talk page) wrong informations about Zellers comeback CJMS TV BOX (talk) 04:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption and socking with different IP addresses and WP:SPAs. - SUN EYE 1 06:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This revert by Popcornfud is.... dubious, to put it politely. If you're going to cite WP:STATUSQUO here, the status quo version is here not here. None of the editors deleting this content have responded to the talk page discussion on this question. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't think this is necessary. The disputed content has been removed, the reverts have stopped and there is a discussion happening. Popcornfud (talk) 13:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You would say that, wouldn’t you? Your preferred version was kept as if it was the “status quo”, rather than the version before the edit warring started. Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The content was removed by 3 separate users, with relevant edit summaries, but you're the one fighting to keep it. Content disputes happen, but requesting page protection feels unnecessary here. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing dubious about that edit. To me that looks like they just reverted the wrong edit as they immediately followed it up in less than a moment's time to revert the content they meant to. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. No great disruption since 2 days. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 00:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – diff, diff & diff. P&t (talk) 03:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP-vandalism. Set of socks. Jingiby (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced information, changing of sourced information despite references saying otherwise. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)09:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. gnu57 18:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 18:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs changing DOB without providing a source or discussion. DonIago (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 18:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why are you reverting "North Macedonia"? I realize that was not the name of the country when she was born, but it's the current name of the country where her university position is. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined OP, please be so kind to as to give some more information why these edits should be vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Please, check again the case of persistent edit-warring, disruptive editing, etc. At first I am not reverting North Macedonia, but North Macedonian academic, author and philosopher of Bulgarian origin. These are malicious insults sent by a network of nationalist-minded IPs located in North Macedonia. This woman is a scientist who expresses positions to improve the relations between Bulgaria and North Macedonia, and because of that she has being viciously attacked. Both "North Macedonian" and "Bulgarian" have been considered offensive terms there. The national identity of the population there is formed on this basis. That's why they change the text repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 10:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This can't be solved via page-protection, especially as at least another autoconfirmed user has reverted to a version which includes "..of Bulgarian origin...". Therefore, semi-protection would be of no effect, and full protection is not called for yet. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/addition of unsourced content. Perfect4th (talk) 19:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 19:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Patachonica (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is currently a controversy surrounding a false allegation that the Biden administration changed the definition of a recession in anticipation that a Thursday GDP report might show a recession has begun, and we're seeing IP editors pushing this false narrative. soibangla (talk) 22:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. NytharT.C 23:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 00:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by indeffed account, came back as two Italian IPs from Vodafone. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it alone from now on, I still believe I wasn't blocked and that the PROD is technically off, this message is still block evasion, so WP:DENY applies.
Well, well, well, what's the probability that two Italians who aren't WP:MEAT are awake in the same night at the same obscure article, both removing the PROD? tgeorgescu (talk) 03:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
First PROD removal, second PROD removal. Guess you can find my first block here. That's really hard detective work to find out I was block evading the second time. I have no idea who you though I was the first time or why you aren't reverting obvious block evasions like this one as fast as the first supposed one, but I'll leave the Dietary acid load article alone, so there is, I believe, no need to protect it, at least not because of these two IP edits by me or for fear of other edits by my now block evading personas. 109.119.212.245 (talk) 04:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple account vandalism. I don't see an SPI open for the suspected master, but it can be checked by CU if needed. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Repeated COI copyvio. 4th request for copyvio revdel, Page had been semi protected before but similar edit restarted after protection has been lifted. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 04:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 45 of the last 100 edits have been reverted. Keeping this page clean is a timesink. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of until 2024, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I think this types of list article are need to be protected from promotional edit vandalism. There is a huge chance to add their websites by media agencies to promote or brand their website. I have removed some from here. IPs are also coming to do this. Please make it semi-protected or ECP if possible. Onmyway22 talk 07:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent business. 2001:448A:6000:1FE9:64CF:7140:98D0:1D61 (talk) 07:58, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Consensus at AfD was to redirect. It said nothing about protection. Favonian (talk) 10:39, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 7szz (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: hi they are keep changing page or spamming or ruin something with changing some parts to regular words then people with no knowledge try to fix it and destroy what i did i want to be admin of this page if its possible and the page get protect thanks Purekaf (talk) 10:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced birth date and birth place, apart from large disruptions that can be seen in the history of the article [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated, per consensus at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_13#Template:Apple display specs. 2001:448A:6000:1FE9:59D7:3CBC:14EC:242D (talk) 12:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (talk) 13:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP and new user spam for santactical.com, not worth blacklisting the URL as it's only this one article. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blacklisted site. Anarchyte (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained and unnecessary removal of content by some IP vandalas. It's going on from last week due to political unrest in Punjab province in which this politician is involved. Therefore a temporary semi protection or any other if required. USaamo (t@lk) 13:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Recent addition of a new common name has made the topic popular, but editors are move-warring the page while ignoring the talk page. Asian giant hornet is the correct current target unless consensus emerges otherwise. KoA (talk) 13:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 13:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]