Talk:Sherman Minton

NPOV dispute

The statement that, "While a senator, Minton attempted to circumvent the Constitution" sounds more like opinion than fact. Kyleandrew1 (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Could rephrase as a broadening of legislative power. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 21:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The comments about Minton voting, “in favor of order at the cost of liberty,” and being “unsympathetic” to challenges asserting violations of individual liberties, appeared to be too opinionated for Wikipedia. I deleted those statements. Kyleandrew1 (talk) 03:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

That removes important information about Minton's philosophy. Re-added with some more detail. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 04:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

War Department Clemency Board

We don't have an article on the War Department Clemency Board. I changed the article from Military tribunals to Courts-martial. Here is an article on the Clemency Board which was then being run by retired Justice Roberts from the Milwaukee Journal. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC) Stan

Copied from archived FAC page

If I've a criticism about the article as a whole (rather than these resolvable nitpicks), it's that it is to a certain extent missing the man behind the career. It comes as a genuine surprise to read in "Regular dissenter", for example, that Minton was "gregarious, backslapping [and] popular among his colleagues". It's the first time we've come across this kind of description of Minton; we're only finding out about the personal this late in the article? (And as an aside, this looks especially odd after we're told that Minton did not enjoy his later time on the Court, and that he found himself with little support in many of his opinions.) I suppose it's unavoidable if this is all the sources cover about the man, but it is a shame. Steve ^T • C

The sources I have go into a little more information on his personal life than in is the article. He was essentially a friend to friends, and an enemy to his enemies; he had many of both. I have tried to include interesting events to explain this somewhat, explaining his extreme partisanship, his troubled youth, disdain for religion, close friendships with likeminded people like Truman and Earl Major, but complete dislike for people like Eisenhower and Hugo Black. The sources I have though are wrote by people who did not know him personally and their works are based mostly off his writings and personal letters, so their summations are largely caricatures rather than detailed personality descriptions. —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Understood, and with that explanation it's probably best to leave the bulk of their speculations out of the article. As for the "Regular dissenter" section, I think there's still an issue over the contrast between the paragraph's beginning with Minton's not enjoying his role in the later years of his Court tenure, and the description of his being "gregarious, backslapping [and] popular among his colleagues". The statement just seems misplaced there. I think the effect can be lessened by moving it; where to depends on which period it describes:

Truman's other appointees to the Court provided consistent conservative votes, and during Minton's first years on the Court it was returned to the conservatism of the William Howard Taft era. While on the Court, Minton transformed from a New Deal senator into an almost reactionary judge as an ally of Justice Felix Frankfurter. Empirical coding of votes shows that Minton was the most conservative justice on the Court during his first year, and remained in the conservative half of the court for the duration of his career. The gregarious, backslapping Minton was popular among his colleagues on the Court; he proved a soothing presence during a period marked by bitter personal feuds between strong personalities such as William O. Douglas and Felix Frankfurter.

Minton did not enjoy his judicial role on the Supreme Court in the later years of his term; he found himself more frequently in the minority following the deaths of Justices Frank Murphy and Wiley B. Rutledge and their replacement by President Eisenhower's appointees. After the death of Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, Minton found himself with little support in many of his opinions. Minton informed Eisenhower of his intention to retire in a letter on September 7, 1956, in which he dryly stated his retirement was authorized by law. Eisenhower responded with a brief note wishing him a happy retirement. Although he did not tell the president, Minton informed the members of the Court that his duties were too taxing on his health. His anemia had steadily worsened, slowing him physically and mentally. Minton served as a Justice until October 15, 1956, retiring after 7 years and 3 days of service. He was succeeded by William J. Brennan, Jr.

Does that work better for you? O. Douglas was a Roosevelt appointee, so I think that preserves the narrative flow. Best, Steve ^T • C 08:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Where I was trying to go was something like this, "He disliked being in the minority and did not enjoy his lack of influence in decision making, which contributed to his desire to retire. This shift came in his last two years of his term. He was however very friendly to the other justices and worked to help them overcome their personal disagreements and maintain a degree of harmony on the court." I've integrated that thought into the section better by better explaining the nature of the feuding, Minton's reluctance to get involved, and his desire to maintain harmony. —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 12:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Nice work; I think your change conveys the intended meaning a lot better than it did before. Best, Steve ^T • C 12:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

References

Sherman Minton and judicial review

This article by a Supreme Court Correspondent, of The New York Times ""Because We Are Final" Judicial Review Two Hundred Years After Marbury" (PDF). 148 (1). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. March, 2004: 38. {{cite journal}}: |first1= missing |last1= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing pipe in: |first1= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) is a good article on judicial review. And this was before some of the more recent and more colorful handiwork of the court. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC) |

Find a Grave external link

Sherman Minton at Find a Grave The reason I want this in (and I thought it was in when I self reverted) was that it has the close up of the headstone. I would be the first to agree that other than that, there is no content in Find a Grave (except for the article on the cemetery) that has any import concerning Sherman Minton. There is no rule that bars external links to Find a Grave, especially if they have unique content. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Minton-Capehart Federal Building

Could actually use a wiki link and an article. It has recently been renovated, outdoors upgraded and it is now Energy Star compliant. Lots of stuff in google on this building. The two mentions in the article might be put in one place, rather than two. Just a thought. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I have some photos of it from a recent expedition to the American Legion headquarters, which is the next block down. I might have already uploaded them on commons, don't recall.. —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 18:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Note regarding a recent edit

 Please check the last few edits.  In particular, one edit.  I was trying to get it to go to a subsection of See Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States.  It doesn't link right.  Thanks.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

No need for indicating both the section and subsection. Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States#Roman Catholic justices will do. bd2412 T 13:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Also note that you missed the "s" off the end of "Roman Catholic justices." I'll leave the "helpme" in case anyone wants to check your other edits. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Resignation intent letter

Does Wikisource or the National Archives have a copy of the letter up on the web where Minton informed Eisenhower of his intent to retire? It sounds very interesting and something we should link to if possible. But even if not, I would be interested in reading it without taking a trip down to the nearest law library. NW (Talk) 17:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Law school attendance

Sherman Minton attended law school at Indiana University, he graduated in 1915. His alma matter is now known as the "Maurer School of Law." As evidence, his Congressional biography indicates this, and the Maurer School's website indicates this. http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=m000800; http://law.indiana.edu/students/competitions/mootcourt/minton.shtml

Somebody has been editing Wikipedia to indicate that Sherman Minton attended a different law school, a school now known as the McKinney Law School in Indianapolis. This is incorrect. McKinney itself does not claim Sherman Minton as a graduate. Of note is that while the McKinney school is currently affiliated with Indiana University, this affiliation did not begin until 1944. http://indylaw.indiana.edu/admissions/about.htm.

Whoever is editing Wikipedia with the incorrect information regularly cites, as authority, "Gugin (1997), p. 51." I looked that book up, and checked it out from the library. That page from that book includes the following sentences: "One day when a flash flood swelled the normal trickle of the Jordan River, actually a creek that winds through the Bloomington campus, Minton plunged into the churning water and was swept away. With great effort he managed to pull himself to safety after grabbing hold of a bush." That exact same page also includes a story about him building scaffolding outside of Assembly Hall, which is on the campus at Bloomington, "to see an all-girl show." The scaffolding collapsed, and he was injured. It is absolutely and abundantly clear that Sherman Minton attended law school in Bloomington, at what is now the Maurer School of Law. Musskel (talk) 14:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

First off, let me be clear: I am NOT the Wikipedia editor who "has been editing Wikipedia to indicate that Sherman Minton attended a different law school" as mentioned above. I am, however, a Wikipedia editor who has ties both to the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law and to the Indiana University Maurer School of Law.

The history of Sherman Minton's legal education is not as well-documented as Musskel suggests. True, it has been well-documented that Shermin Minton began his academic career at Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana. I don't at the moment have references in front of me that discuss this, but it has also been well-documented that Minton fell upon hard economic times when he was a student in Bloomington. And it has been documented that, prior to graduating with a law degree in 1915, Minton moved to Indianapolis, where he obtained a job as a law librarian at the Benjamin Harrison Law School, which is a predecessor of the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.

Based on what I have read, the details of how and where Justice Minton completed his law degree remain unclear. It may be that Minton returned to Bloomington to complete his degree after working in Indianapolis. It may be that Minton enrolled in courses, or otherwise studied at, the Benjamin Harrison Law School and in some way relied his studies in Indianapolis to obtain his degree from Indiana University in Bloomington. Or it may be that Minton relied on his prior work at Indiana University in Bloomington to obtain a law degree from the Benjamin Harrison Law School in Indianapolis. So to reiterate, the details of how and where Justice Minton completed his law degree remain unclear.

Musskel cites two sources in support of the proposition that Minton graduated from the IU Maurer School of Law. One of those references is an IU Maurer webpage and the other is a found at the congress.gov website. With regard to the IU Maurer webpage, it is beyond argument that any law school would be pleased to claim a Supreme Court Justice as an alumnus. So the objectivity of that page should be questioned. As for the webpage found at the congress.gov website, I would be curious to learn when that page was created and upon what references it relies.

In view of the above, interested Wikipedia editors, including me, should confirm the details of how and where Justice Minton completed his law degrees. Lexalt (talk) 08:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

I vote for Bloomington. It appears that the bulk of Minton's papers (that Mrs. Minton didn't get rid of) are there. Federal Judicial Center. ("Sherman Minton". Retrieved March 3, 2011. It would be strange indeed for that deposit to be made there, unless he had graduated from that school. I recognize that this is not direct evidence, but it is persuasive circumstantial evidence, like footprints in the snow. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Sherman Minton, Supreme Court Historical Society says he graduated from Indiana University in 1915. That would mean Bloomington, wouldn't it? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

The newly renamed law school has a moot court competition named after Minton. Dick, Gerry (10/18/2012). "Law School to be Officially Dedicated". Inside Indiana. Retrieved October 18, 2012. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Actually, no. Re-read your link. It says that the donor's "previous gifts to IU include the Robert H. McKinney Law Professorship and the Bose McKinney & Evans Sherman Minton Moot Court Competition, and contributions to the V. Sue Shields Scholarship, all in the IU Maurer School of Law in Bloomington." Musskel (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

For instance, here is the "Robert H. McKinney Law Professor" at the Maurer School of Law: http://info.law.indiana.edu/sb/page/normal/441.html. Musskel (talk) 00:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

As I wrote before, the history of Sherman Minton's legal education is not well-documented, and so this isn't really a question that can simply be put to a "vote" to determine the correct answer. Rather, additional primary references should be consulted to confirm/clarify the history. But just to reiterate: No one doubts that Minton studied law in Bloomington. Rather, as I wrote before, although I don't have the reference handy, I recall reading that Minton moved to Indianapolis before 1915, where he worked as a librarian at a law school. So one open question relates to whether, in addition to studying in Bloomington, Minton also studied law in Indianapolis before 1915, which is the date that Minton is said to have earned his degree. And if Minton did study law in Indianapolis before 1915, another question relates to whether Minton truly obtained a degree from Indiana University in Bloomington or whether he actually earned his degree from a law school in Indianapolis. (I suspect that he earned his degree was from Indiana University in 1915, but I recall reading another account that suggests otherwise.) I'll try to look into this at the Indiana Historical Society and elsewhere. I invite others interested in this topic to consult additional primary sources. Lexalt (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

I understand that he either graduated from Indian University in Bloomington or he didn't. We have good secondary sources that say he did, and a lot of corroborative circumstantial evidence. Whether you like it or not, these are good WP:RS. The burden of proving to the contrary is on those making the assertion. Consult additional primary sources. But the ball is in your court, and the burden is on those making the claim. Good luck in your quest, Don Quixote. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Why the vitriol? Did you not read that "I suspect that [Minton] earned his degree was from Indiana University in 1915" as I stated in my most recent post? As for your statement that "[t]he burden of proving to the contrary is on those making the assertion," have I suggested otherwise? No, I have not. Or have I edited the article to suggest that Minton did not graduate graduate from Indiana University in Bloomington? No, I have not. Rather, I simply pointed out here, in the "talk" page, that "[t]he history of Sherman Minton's legal education is not as well-documented as Musskel suggests" and offered to look into this topic at the Indiana Historical Society and elsewhere. I also invited "others interested in this topic to consult additional primary sources." Apparently, you have no such interest. So feel free to excuse yourself from further discussion. Lexalt (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

For my part, I welcome the examination of primary sources. Something for you to consider, Lexalt, as you bulid your research plan: The connection between "Indiana University" and what is now the "McKinney" School of Law did not begin until 1944. That is, the research should explain why/how Minton claimed to have graduated from the law school at "Indiana University" and not some entirely different law school in Indianapolis that was unaffiliated with Indiana University, and would remain unaffiliated for another 30 years.

Finally, I don't think there was anything in 7&6=thirteen's response that seemed vitriolic, and I do think the burden should be on people trying to reverse what is a common historical understanding. (The two sources you acknowledge, plus the book that was cited as proof that Minton attended law school at Indiana University-Indianapolis, but which very clearly did not state or prove that). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musskel (talk • contribs) 00:16, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Musskel, thanks for your response, and I appreciate your civility.

I also agree that, in the words of 7&6=thirteen, “[t]he burden of proving to the contrary is on those making the assertion.” So let’s look at what was included as a part of a much earlier version of this article, and then determine whether subsequent edits have met this burden.

On 2 January 2010, Charles Edward, citing Gugin, edited the article to include the following information: “[Minton] then returned to Indiana and enrolled in Indiana University in September 1911… He completed graduate school at the top of his class in 1913 and moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law.” See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sherman_Minton&oldid=335408132 For clarity, I’ll just note that, through a series of mergers and name changes, the Benjamin Harrison Law School (located in Indianapolis) eventually became known as the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law (also located in Indianapolis).

To your credit, you mentioned in the first post of this thread that you reviewed page 51 from the cited Gugin reference. And based on your review of that page, you concluded that Sherman Minton did, in fact, attend school in Bloomington. Such a finding is consistent with Charles Edward’s claim that Minton “enrolled in Indiana University.” However, your finding does not refute Charles Edward’s contention that, according to Gugin, Minton “moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law” from Indiana University.

Did you, or did you not, review Gugin to determine whether, as Charles Edward contends, the reference teaches that Minton “moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law” from Indiana University?

Rather than address whether Gugin teaches that Minton “moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law” from Indiana University, you instead elected to replace the Gugin reference with references that better reflect what seems to be your preferred view of history. But please note that, as I mention below in reply to Newyorkbrad, the Congressional Biographical Directory entry, a reference on which you now rely, cites Gugin. If Gugin conflicts with Minton’s entry in the Congressional Biographical Directory, don’t you see a dilemma?

Now, having said all the above, let me once again state that I suspect that Minton actually did earn his LL.B. from Bloomington. I don’t have a dog in this fight, so I’m not going devote much more time or effort to this issue. But given that you went to all the trouble to locate the Gugin reference, this issue seems to be somewhat important to you. And I guess that it is important to the person who "has been editing Wikipedia to indicate that Sherman Minton attended a different law school." So why don’t you at least do a little more research to confirm or refute whether, as Charles Edward contends, the Gugin reference teaches that Minton “moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law” from Indiana University? Lexalt (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your question has a very simple answer: Yes. I did review the cited portions of Gugin to determine whether the book (a secondary source, of course) indicated in any way that Minton had moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law. This inquiry also had a simple answer: No. The cited portions of Gugin did not indicate anything of that sort whatsoever.

The citation was very specific: p. 51 of the 1997 printing of the book. I tracked down that version of the book. I read for probably five pages on either side of the citation. The pages indicated that Minton had gone on to Yale. Otherwise, Gugin was fully supportive of the position adopted by the Maurer School, by the Congressional Record, by the Supreme Court archives, and all the other secondary sources that have been raised and re-raised in this comment section.

I appreciate you reiterating your suspicion that Minton did graduate from Bloomington. That suspicion seems well-grounded in the evidence. To the degree that wish to continue to raise questions in the alternative, however, I urge you to find some evidence that supports that effort. Otherwise, I agree with 7&6=thirteen: We waste our time probing the question if the only person asking the question suspects that the answer is already understood. At no point anywhere on Wikipedia--in this talk section, or before it--has anybody offered any evidence that Sherman Minton graduated law school from anywhere but Bloomington. Offer some evidence, or please accept what otherwise seems obvious. Musskel (talk) 21:23, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

I guess I have a very specific question for you, Lexalt, and offered in the spirit which you offered your question to me: Do you have any evidence that the McKinney school has ever claimed Sherman Minton as a graduate, or even an attendee? (I'm going to treat "McKinney" as the school throughout its history, including those times when it was called "Benjamin Harrison," etc.).

Your first post on this talk page suggested that Bloomington's claim to Sherman Minton was dubious, because "it is beyond argument that any law school would be pleased to claim a Supreme Court Justice as an alumnus." Let's flip your logic: If any school would be pleased to claim Minton, but one school makes no claim whatsoever, then the absence of a claim is persuasive evidence that the justice did not attend that school. Forgetting the Supreme Court records, the Congressional records, the Minton biography, and whatever else exists, we don't even have a controversy here with competing claims. All we have is some random unsupported Wikipedia edits, and the oblique questions you raise, even as you admit that you suspect the question's answer is already known. We need more. Musskel (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

As noted at the top of the thread, the Congressional Biographical Directory's entry on Minton reports that Minton "graduated from the law department of Indiana University at Bloomington in 1915, and from Yale University in 1916." The Guide has been published for decades, and this entry is probably based on information that Minton's office would have provided while he was in the Senate, although someone can look up the contemporaneous hard-copy version to try to be sure.

In addition, note that the law school explicitly claims him as an alumnus, here.Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

With regard to the cited Maurer webpage, note that it claims that Minton “earned his J.D. from our Law School in 1915.” However, Indiana University didn’t even offer a J.D. degree in 1915, but instead offered an LL.B. degree in that year. So the cited reference doesn't seem to be well-researched.

With regard to the Congressional Biographical Directory's entry for Minton, that reference includes a “Bibliography” that cites many recent references, including the above mentioned Gugin reference that was published in 1997. So no, I rather doubt that the cited version of the Congressional Biographical Directory's is identical to whatever Minton's office provided while he was in the Senate..

With regard to the accuracy of other recent references, consider the following: According to the The Oxford Guide to the United States Government at page 413, Minton received his LL.B. from Indiana University in 1925, not 1915 as currently listed in the Wikipedia article. See http://books.google.com/books?id=9nYh3RocaG8C&pg=PA413&lpg=PA413&dq=sherman+minton+indiana+university+oxford+guide&source=bl&ots=h9MI16qK_R&sig=5BvU7SZ4-Z97yh282lkv80LrWa4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=f1yDUJW1DqTnyAGZk4CABg&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=sherman%20minton%20indiana%20university%20oxford%20guide&f=false Am I suggesting that the Oxford Guide is correct? No, I’m merely demonstrating the inconsistent information abounds on this topic. Lexalt (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

No vitriol or opprobrium was intended. If you construed it that way, I am sorry for my part in any misunderstanding. Nevertheless, Congress and the court historians all thought he graduated from Bloomington. This is consistent with his biography. He or his estate placed most of his papers there. If you can find proof to the contrary so be it. But you need real proof to the contrary, not mere Ipse dixit or assertion. It seems obvious that if you want to change the status quo you need persuasive evidence. Correction of the historical record is a good thing; but even your use of erstwhile primary sources (if they exist) will have to go beyond WP:OR and WP:Synth, and would need WP:RS. To be sure, one can argue about the pedigree of the two campuses of the Indiana University School of Law. But even assuming they are now 'under the same umbrella' (they now share the "Indiana University School of Law" name, but they have separate campus/school names, locations and administration), anachronistic historical revisionism cannot transmute 1915 attendance on one campus into constructive attendance at a school that was not affiliated until much later. In fact, this discussion is at this point hypothetical and moot. Until the sources are produced, this is just navel gazing. Good luck in your endeavor. I would use the word "quest" but you might misconstrue that. Parenthetically, this will acknowledge that the moot court competition named for Minton is at the Indianapolis campus, not in Bloomington. If the campuses are to be treated as two arms on the same body, perhaps we should merge all of the Indiana University School of Law articles into one article. That may not conform to the legalities of the relationships and would paper over broad gaps, but it would unify them for Wikipedia purposes. If and when that happens (this is hypothetical), then we could modify the links and clarify the history (but not historical revisionism, please). 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

I think you were speaking sarcastically, but I want to reiterate that the moot court competition at Indianapolis is NOT named after Minton. Instead, it is named after "Robert H. Straton." http://indylaw.indiana.edu/mootcourt/. Instead, it is the moot court competition in Bloomington that is named after Minton, as previous links have made clear, and as indicated in the "Inside Indiana" article linked above indicates. (Note that the original poster of the news article summarized its content in a way that was either ambiguous, as both schools are newly renamed, or incorrect). Thank you for your attention to this issue. Musskel (talk) 15:44, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

This had already been cited, but here is a more complete citation where the Indiana University School of Law/Maurer School of Law expressly states that Minton graduated from the school in 1915. "Sherman Minton Moot Court Competition" Who Was Sherman Minton?". Bloomington, Indiana: Maurer School of Law. 2012. Retrieved October 20, 2012. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

No sarcasm intended. Thanks for clarifying that.

We have lots of cites that directly clarify where and when Minton graduated. That the cooperating schools have eponymous moot court competitions is really beside the point.

Nor was I being sarcastic about treating the two law schools as one. They could share an article. The problem, of course, is that they have one 'brand name', but are administratively and fiscally separate. This is a bureaucratic 'camel' to say the least. One wonders if this would have happened this way in the private sector (although it did when Daimler bought Chrysler). In any event, I don't think that these amalgamated (if not fully merged) schools are going to change their path for Wikipedia. And we should work with what is a fact. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen, I’ve added a few comments above. Feel free jump in. And good to know that you didn’t intend to direct any vitriol toward me or sarcasm toward others.

With regard to your observations that the two schools are two arms on the same body and share one brand name, I’m afraid that neither observation is correct. Although the two schools both remain part of the same IU system, they are currently independent of one another, much like the UC Berkeley School of Law and the UC Davis School of Law are independent of one another. And also much like much like the UC Berkeley School of Law and the UC Davis School of Law, the two IU law schools market themselves under distinct brand names, namely McKinney and Maurer. So my feeling is that merging the articles would add to, not reduce, confusion. But for what it’s worth, a disambiguation page exists for Indiana University School of Law. And where I have been able to do so, I’ve done my best to assign alumni to the correct school. But in the case of Minton, because of the conflicting information, I’ve remained on the sidelines until now. Lexalt (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

In response to the discussion above concerning the Congressional Biographical Directory: as reflected in our article about the directory, hard-copy versions were published for decades before the current Internet version was created. One of those versions would have dated from when Minton was a senator, and the information about where he went to law school would have been obtained from the senator or his office. It would not have been obtained from the Gugin biography, published 30 years after Minton died. I think the directory is prima facie a highly reliable source on where Minton went to law school, particularly given that it's consistent with all of the other sources, and that there is nothing to be done here except in the unlikely event that some contrary information is found. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:02, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

As I explained above, on 2 January 2010, Charles Edward, citing Gugin, edited the article to include the following information: “[Minton] then returned to Indiana and enrolled in Indiana University in September 1911… He completed graduate school at the top of his class in 1913 and moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law.” See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sherman_Minton&oldid=335408132 Charles Edward’s interpretation of Gugin remained substantially unchallenged on Wikipedia for about two years. If Charles Edward’s interpretation of the Gugin reference is correct, “the unlikely event” to which you refer (a finding of information contrary to that recited in the Congressional Biographical Directory) has already occurred. Lexalt (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

As I also explained above, I reviewed the cited portions of Gugin to determine whether the book (a secondary source, of course) indicated in any way that Minton had moved on to Benjamin Harrison School of Law. This inquiry had a simple answer: No. The cited portions of Gugin did not indicate anything of that sort whatsoever. The citation was very specific: p. 51 of the 1997 printing of the book. I tracked down that version of the book. I read for probably five pages on either side of the citation. The pages indicated that Minton had gone on to Yale. Otherwise, Gugin was fully supportive of the position adopted by the Maurer School, by the Congressional Record, by the Supreme Court archives, and all the other secondary sources that have been raised and re-raised in this comment section. Musskel (talk) 22:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Here is yet more proof that Sherman Minton graduated from what is now the Maurer School of Law.

In 1965, Sherman Minton died. In 1965, Justice Tom Clark, then an associate justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, wrote an obituary in the Indiana Law Journal, which is published by the students at Indiana University-Bloomington (now IU Maurer). At the top of the obituary, the editors of the journal wrote this: "We respectfully dedicate this issue of the Indiana Law Journal to the memory of Sherman Minton, distinguished graduate of Indiana University School of Law and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States 1949-1956." At the bottom of the obituary, Justice Clark wrote this: "It is fitting that his law school which he honored so much now honors him with this dedicatory issue of the Indiana Law Journal." The article itself is here: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3617&context=ilj. Musskel (talk) 22:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Looks good. What took you so long?  ;-) Oh, here’s link to the Indiana University bulletin, Volume 12, Issue 14, which was published in 1915. The Bulletin at pages 10 and 36 lists Minton as a Law Library Assistant working in Bloomington. See http://books.google.com/books?id=f4TOAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=sherman+minton+indiana+university+bulletin&source=bl&ots=1naAaQQgxE&sig=cn92xaJJ_8Gv_7mJCu0nDTIFI6Q&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MnqEUMKoM-nOyQG4u4GQDw&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=sherman%20minton%20indiana%20university%20bulletin&f=false Lexalt (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Haha. Nice find. So we are agreed? Musskel (talk) 22:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Yep, I think so. And actually, we probably would have come to agreement much sooner but for interference from the peanut gallery. Lexalt (talk) 23:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sherman Minton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111004141833/http://www.wdrb.com/story/15429799/sherman-minton-bridge-shut-down to http://www.wdrb.com/story/15429799/sherman-minton-bridge-shut-down

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherman Minton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.supremecourthistory.org/history/supremecourthistory_history_assoc_074minton.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherman Minton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018045604/http://www.amphilsoc.org/sites/default/files/480104.pdf to http://www.amphilsoc.org/sites/default/files/480104.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherman Minton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714223420/http://www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/justices/minton.htm to http://www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/justices/minton.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sherman Minton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1499&dat=19451228&id=9kUaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MCMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4558,4602232
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130124154903/http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/nnvcs1u4mrJdN8neGw9o3g to http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/nnvcs1u4mrJdN8neGw9o3g

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Sherman Minton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120928231528/https://www.law.indiana.edu/students/competitions/mootcourt/minton.shtml to http://www.law.indiana.edu/students/competitions/mootcourt/minton.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100530160538/http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/nGetMan?jid=1658 to http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/nGetMan?jid=1658
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100418041654/http://www.law.indiana.edu/students/competitions/mootcourt/index.shtml to http://law.indiana.edu/students/competitions/mootcourt/index.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717173338/http://www.urbantimesonline.com/2009/10/history-301-a-minority-opinion-%E2%80%93-i-%E2%99%A5-the-federal-building/ to http://www.urbantimesonline.com/2009/10/history-301-a-minority-opinion-%E2%80%93-i-%E2%99%A5-the-federal-building/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100620104601/http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-2-march-2009/index.aspx to http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-2-march-2009/index.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

FA concerns

It was suggested here that this FA could use a check for source-text integrity, so I'm going to do that below.

Caption text

Footnote no.	Article's claim	Cited source	Comments from EW	Checks out?
2	"Minton was born on October 20, 1890, to John Evan and Emma Livers Minton, in their Georgetown, Indiana, home."	Radcliff p. 7	Fine, although the fact that he was born at home is on p. 8	Y
11	"Minton's father married Sarah Montague on December 3, 1901"	Radcliff p. 10	Fine	Y
16	"Minton began dating Gertrude Gurtz in his senior year, and the two remained in regular correspondence after he left for college."	Gugin p. 47	This page says "Minton soon began a relationship with another classmate, Gertrude Gertz, that would last a lifetime", but there's nothing about senior year, leaving for college, etc.	N
30	"Taft said that Minton's post-graduate thesis was among the best he had ever read."	Gugin p. 52	The source says Taft reportedly said this, so I wouldn't be comfortable stating it as fact.	N
42/43	"The following year, Minton became a local commander of the American Legion. The group had a large and active membership in the state at the time, and he used his position to encourage support of the Democratic Party agenda. Paul McNutt was the national commander, and the two men became political allies."	Gugin p. 62 and Radcliff p. 33	The sources don't seem to say that he became a local commander "the following year" (i.e. 1931), nor am I seeing "he used his position to encourage support of the Democratic Party agenda"—only that it helped him connect with other Democratic political figures.	N
51	"Minton stopped using the slogan and explained his position again using new terms, but his opponents continued to dog him over the issue. The Republicans also faulted popular governor McNutt and his reorganization of the government, and McNutt became more personally involved in the election. With the state party's more direct involvement, Minton won the election with 52 percent of the vote."	Gugin p. 85	This page only supports "Minton won the election with 52 percent of the vote".	N
58	"When Renolds asked his manager, Dr. Glen Frank, to help him answer the questions, Minton and fellow Democratic senators began to shout Dr. Frank down. As he was saying that the money from the corporations was for advertising in the magazine, Minton beat his gavel and yelled, 'This committee doesn't intend to permit you to use this as a forum to air your Republican views.'"	Gugin p. 101	Minton did not say the "Republican views" line: the source says it was Lewis B. Schwellenbach (and nothing about a gavel). As an aside, "Maurive V. Renolds" and "Glen Frank" should be Maurice V. Reynolds and Glenn Frank, respectively.	N
70	"Minton delivered six radio addresses on behalf of his party in support of the bill, but public opinion could not be swayed in the Democrats' favor."	Gugin p. 109	I only see one radio address mentioned here, not six	N
79	"He advocated and supported expanding the American military and believed that American entry into the war was inevitable, but should be delayed as long as possible. He voted in favor of the Smith Act, which made it a crime to advocate the overthrow of the government, a law specifically targeted at communists and fascists in the United States."	Gugin p. 121	Some of this checks out, but I'm not seeing "believed that American entry into the war was inevitable" or "a law specifically targeted...".	N
91	"On May 7, 1941, Roosevelt announced Minton's nomination to the Chicago-based United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit"	Gugin p. 156	Checks out	Y
98	"Minton was described by William Radcliff as a 'faithful disciple of judicial restraint,' an unexpected development when compared to his overtly partisan political career."	Gugin p. 179	The "faithful disciple" quote is from Gugin & St. Clair, not Radcliff. I'm not seeing "unexpected development when compared to his overtly partisan political career" on this page, and "overtly" is probably a neutrality issue.	N
112	"Many liberals condemned the court at the time of the decision. The ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court in a 1946 appeal."	Radcliff p. 115	"upheld by the Supreme Court" checks out, but not "many liberals condemned the court at the time of the decision".	N
119	"After returning to work, he was forced to rest regularly due to gradually worsening anemia, and he sought to lessen his workload. To further complicate his health, on August 5, 1949, Minton tripped over a stone in his yard and broke his leg. The injury forced him to walk with a cane for the remainder of his life."	Radcliff p. 129	This page only supports "on August 5, 1949, Minton tripped over a stone in his yard and broke his leg."	N
128	"Minton responded to questions over his past support for the 1937 court packing scheme in the letter, declaring that as the Senate leader at the time of his scheme he had a right and duty to support the scheme, but as a federal judge his role had now changed to that of a referee rather than a player."	Glass (Politico)	Checks out	Y
139	"Minton's central judicial philosophy was to ascertain and uphold the original intent of legislation."	Gugin p. 161	This page says he was an "advocate of judicial restraint", but that's not the same as original intent	N
146/147	"According to William Radcliff, the majority opinion authored by Minton in the 1953 case Barrows v. Jackson was his most skillfully written opinion."	Radcliff p. 155 and the text of the decision	The source says it's "considered by some legal scholars to be one of the most skillful opinions Minton wrote"—I don't think it's fair to attribute that to Radcliff.	N
155/156	"Minton's position gradually shifted to allowing the loyalty tests to take place, and in Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New York he wrote the majority opinion allowing the tests and upholding New York's Feinberg Law."	Radcliff p. 147 and the text of the decision	Not seeing "Minton's position gradually shifted to allowing the loyalty tests to take place" on this page.	N
168	"Although he did not tell the president, Minton informed the members of the Court that his duties were too taxing on his health. His anemia had steadily worsened, slowing him physically and mentally."	Radcliff p. 174	Not seeing anything about anemia here, nor is there any reference to informing members of the Court (only talking to reporters).	N
173	"In England, [Minton] received an honorary doctorate from Oxford University in 1956."	Radcliff p. 183	Nope: the source says Truman received an honorary doctorate from Oxford	N
181	"A bronze bust of Minton was created and put on display in the Indiana Statehouse."	Gugin p. 287	Checks out	Y

Will finish the rest of this later. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Okay. I've finished the table, which uses a more-or-less random sample of about 10% of the references. (If anyone wants to check my work, Gugin and Radcliff are both available for free via the Internet Archive.) Now, it's possible that the ones I looked at were outliers, but it does seem that there are some pretty big source-text integrity issues here, including really serious problems like misattributed quotes and factual mistakes. As it stands, I don't think I'd be comfortable keeping this as an FA unless a) all the above issues were fixed and b) someone was willing to check every single reference for similar problems. I'm going to list the article at WP:FARGIVEN; it may be taken to featured article review if there's no improvement in the next few weeks. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

.. Please do a better job. [1] You guys are not even being honest in your review of the sources on these articles... —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

That link says "'This committee doesn't intend to permit you to use this as a forum to air your Republican views,' Schwellenbach of Washington said", which contradicts the claim that "Minton beat his gavel and yelled, 'This committee...'". Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

This review is totally mistaken.. Are you sure you actually have the source book? —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

This makes me sad.. :( I guess go ahead and FAR it. I don't have time to update this article or go through all these citation. But I will say I strongly object and cannot believe the article nearly this deviated from the sources. Clearly the FA review process must have been seriously broken to have promoted these articles I wrote... I hope you will take steps to hold the reviewers accountable... I trust you will either clean it up or demote it as appropriate... —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 22:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Well, to be fair, lots of the things I marked above probably are in the source somewhere—they just aren't on the particular page that was cited. I don't really fault you or the reviewers for that: a lot of it has more to do with changing expectations for FAs than anything else, I think. And I certainly don't want to give the impression that I don't appreciate all the work you did on this article: as someone who's written a couple of Supreme Court FAs myself, I definitely know how much work goes into them, and I'm grateful for all the improvements you were able to make. It's just that citation requirements have become a lot stricter in the past decade or so, and unfortunately that means that articles like this one need some work to bring back up to standard. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)