Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 26

< August 25	August 27 >

August 26

Template:Hugrev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hugrev (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Undocumented and unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Prisencolin (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ibookdb author

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ibookdb author (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use external link template. Target site is dead. No other links to the target site. Includes link to article which has been redirected to a generic page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Omni Flames: Why relist? This has already had a week for anyone to raise objections. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pigsonthewing: I'm fully aware of WP:NOQUORUM, but I think in this case we should wait for another week or so and if no one raises objections then, then this template should be deleted. Omni Flames (talk) 21:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Omni Flames: I appreciate the caution. Many items in this mass-listing of all low-use EL templates are actually single-source citation templates and other things that should be kept, sometimes after some minimal cleanup. (Many are also trash that need to be taken out, like this particular one.) One week isn't really enough time to examine all of these, since most of us have lives and jobs, and going through all this is a slow and tedious process. The review of the templates needs to be done, but not rushed. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 03:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Even if there were not already enough reason to delete the template (and there is), we can wait another week without the need to relist. WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY applies. So does WP:SNOWBALL Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since no longer functional. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 03:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bakersfield Jam current roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bakersfield Jam current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This NBA Development League team has moved and been renamed the "Northern Arizona Suns." A template for that teams current roster has been created. Since the franchise no longer exists, there is no Bakersfield Jam "current roster". Rikster2 (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Australian university groups templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian Technology Network (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Group of Eight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Innovative Research Universities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Regional Universities Network (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant and unused, replaced by combined {{Australian university groups}}. Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:42, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obsolete. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 03:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semiotics associations and journals external links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semiotics associations and journals external links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hard coded set of 23 (!) externals links, used on five articles. At least one of those articles is already tagged for breach of WP:EL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kill it with fire. This is not how we do "External links" sections. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 03:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UTC with local time link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 September 3. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UTC with local time link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USCA-coop-link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USCA-coop-link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use. Target site appears defunct. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-functional. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:VNUM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VNUM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use. Marked as deprecated. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We really need to speed up the process of dealing with templates marked "deprecated", which people seem to think means "continue using it until forced to stop". — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Virb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Virb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:43, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-functional. This used to be a specific-source citation/link template, but the domain name it goes to now belongs to a website development company. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RC-bishop-AICA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RC-bishop-AICA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template. Created 2006. Only two other links to the target site. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is too narrow a thing (profiles of Argentine bishops – only Argentine, and only bishops) to need a single-source citation/link template. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Runeberg.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Runeberg.org (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 36 transclusions
Template:Runeberg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) - 5 transclusions

Propose merging Template:Runeberg.org with Template:Runeberg.

Same purpose. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the shorter name, without the decorative icon, per MOS:ICONS, then convert to a {{Cite web}} wrapper. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:09, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rosario patrimonial value

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rosario patrimonial value (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used to place content, including an external link, not specific to the subject, in the bodies of articles (for example, see Teatro El Círculo). 14 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:EL and WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE. While we could certainly have a template like this at the national level, that linked to an article on official "patrimonial value" sites, if this were comparable to things like the US Register of Historic Places, etc., there's no encyclopedic value in what some local municipality is labeling this way. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Do Not Adjust Your Set

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Do Not Adjust Your Set (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No cast in navbox per longstanding consensus. Previously deleted a long time ago at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_October_22#Template:DoNotAdjust. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per precedent/prior consensus. anemone projectors 21:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Twice a Fortnight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Twice a Fortnight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No cast in navboxes per longstanding consensus. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per precedent/prior consensus. anemone projectors 21:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FencingAt2015EuropeanGames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FencingAt2015EuropeanGames (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links just got PRODed (the pages were empty). Was included in one page (now zero) and not useful there. David Gerard (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since it's all redlinks now. Wise move, too. Individual players might be notable, but one-off teams they form for a regional competition cannot be (absent something really unusual, like a whole team being electrocuted in a swimming pool or whatever, and becoming notable for something other than being a one-off regional competition sports team). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RSS2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RSS2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as malfunctional. Someone's trying to append URL parameters (which would only work for a specific site's URLs anyway) and doing it wrong. WP doesn't need bloggy RSS (or "Share on Facebook", etc.) buttons anyway; WP:NOTSOCIAL. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RSS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use (I recently removed a small number of inappropriate uses, in external links sections). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP doesn't need bloggy RSS (or "Share on Facebook", etc.) buttons; WP:NOTSOCIAL. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rss (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two transclusions, in the creator's user-space. That user only ever made 14 edits, and last edited in 2013. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP doesn't need bloggy RSS (or "Share on Facebook", etc.) buttons; WP:NOTSOCIAL. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Great Britain at the Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Great Britain at the Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox Olympics Great Britain}}. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 20#Template:United States at the Olympics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BaldBoris (talk • contribs) 15:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- That discussion ended as no consensus. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, it was rather a strange close, wasn't it? Thincat (talk) 22:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and fix the infoboxes. The earlier TfD cited (which was clearly a keep, no matter what the closer said) is correct: It's the infoboxes that are inappropriately trying to act as navboxes, not the other way around. We would never, ever tolerate that level of piled up nav material in an infobox anywhere else, so it shouldn't be done for Olympics articles, either. The nav content in the infoboxes needs to move to navboxes modeled on this one and the US one in the earlier TfD. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PetScan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PetScan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Catscan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:PetScan with Template:Catscan.
Similar templates both linking to PetScan queries (PetScan previously known as CatScan). WP:IAR / WP:NOTBUREAU relisting of Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_13#Template:Catscan2. - Evad37 [talk] 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be super-clear, the comments here are from this TFD, where Template:PetScan was the only template nominated. That TFD was a relisting of this TFD, which again only had the single template nominated (as Template:Catscan2, before this move to Template:PetScan to match the updated tool's name). - Evad37 [talk] 23:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Only five non-article uses outside of archive pages, and apparently non-functional. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Keep. I made it functional again by changing the url to use https://petscan.wmflabs.org/ - Evad37 [talk] 07:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I moved the template to {{PetScan}} to match the updated tool's name - Evad37 [talk] 07:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - ~~Thank you. There are still only five instances, though. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The template still serves a purpose in making it much easier to link to PetScan queries. Formatting links with this template means that if the tool changes location or format, the queries can be updated just by updating this template (like I did just a few days ago!). Additionally, the template doesn't violate any of the WP:TG guidelines, nor does it meet any of WP:TFD#REASONS (current low-usage is not unused, and not an indication of potential future uses), so I don't see any reason to delete, or benefit from deleting, this now functional template. - Evad37 [talk] 02:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a similar template {{Catscan}}, so I'm changing my !vote to merge that template into {{PetScan}} (which will result in about 35 transclusions) - Evad37 [talk] 10:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

merge, but reopen as a merge discussion. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, merging is probably best, but also best to properly tag both templates, as Frietjes says —PC-XT+ 16:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: WP:IAR / WP:NOTBUREAU relisting TfD as TfM
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 00:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging original nominator @Pigsonthewing: - Evad37 [talk] 00:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge sounds fine to me :) -- Ned Scott 08:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural close due to misrepresentation. I think it's absolutely outrageous that you've copied my comments (now struck) to here, under a different proposal to the one where I made them. Do that again and you'll find yourself at WP:ANI. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry. I absolutely in no way intended to misrepresent your comments, which I copied verbatim from the Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_13#Template:Catscan2 as noted. Just to make the whole thing super clear, I've now wrapped the previous TFD comments in a box with a big note at the top. - Evad37 [talk] 23:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to {{PetScan}}. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 04:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).