Jump to content

User talk:Lvi56

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lvi56 (talk | contribs) at 03:46, 4 January 2011 (→‎Indianapolis Motor Speedway GAN: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

It is nice to meet you. I see that you are working on some articles. Let me know if you need help - whether it be with admin tasks, explanation about how things work around here, or mentoring for Good Articles. I'm not very active this time of the year - until local stock car racing gets done in early to mid October - then plan to see me a lot more. I like track chasing around Eastern Wisconsin. Dirt and asphalt tracks from April to Oct and ice racing in Jan/Feb. I recently uploaded pictures from the 2010 Nationwide race at Road America; they turned out very well [1]. I have hundreds of images to upload from recent trips in the Midwest. Royalbroil 03:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you too. I'm having a lot of fun delving deeper into editing and working on articles. I have been learning a lot about Good Articles and currently trying to get the Auto Club Speedway article up to GA status, I think I'm close. I plan on working on other track articles too. Lvi56 (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:350 West Mart Center/GA1

I have responded to your concerns at Talk:350 West Mart Center/GA1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more concerns and will be reviewing your changes and responses.Lvi56 (talk) 07:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please strike resolved issues.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had some time to respond to your concerns today.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010 WP:NASCAR News

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 00:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

DYK nomination of Diamond Valley Lake

Hello! Your submission of Diamond Valley Lake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smartse (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove this from the nomination page. It's a pity it doesn't meet the requirements as it's a good article and an interesting hook! Good luck with the GAN. Smartse (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond Valley Lake GAN

Hey! Are you finished with all the issues at Talk:Diamond Valley Lake/GA1? If so, give me a message here, on the review page or my talk page, and I'll have a look to see if it will pass. Thanks, Arsenikk (talk) 19:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed many of the issues and updated the talk page. let me know if there is anything else that needs to be done. thanks. Lvi56 (talk) 00:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (October)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 00:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]


Your GA nomination of Auto Club Speedway

The article Auto Club Speedway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Auto Club Speedway for things which need to be addressed. Aaron north (T/C) 19:25, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of Auto Club Speedway

The article Auto Club Speedway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Auto Club Speedway for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Aaron north (T/C) 21:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Lvi56 (talk) 03:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)Congradulations, I thought it wouldn't become a GA, but you showed me wrong. Also anothe thing that is impressive, it is the first Auto racing circuit / track to ever reach GA level Nascar1996 02:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, hopefully more will follow. Lvi56 (talk) 03:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix

Just to let you know, I repaired the logo for the race track: File:Phoenix International Raceway Logo.jpg. Nascar1996 02:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lvi56 (talk) 03:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Next time you may want to check out {{Non-free use rationale}}. Nascar1996 03:07, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in articles NASCAR should be capitalized because it is the initials of 'National Asscociation for Stock Car Auto Racing'. Nascar1996 20:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to (after PIR); how about Charlotte Motor Speedway, or Daytona, or possible get a peer review of Indianapolis Motor Speedway (which I think was close one other time). There just suggestions. :) Nascar1996 22:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly those three could reach GA. Not so sure PIR will make the cut. Good suggestions. Lvi56 (talk) 01:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why, cant find references? Not enough information? Nascar1996 01:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, re-read it and I think it can get there Lvi56 (talk) 00:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (November)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 12:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Charlotte

Hello, would you like some images of Charlotte Motor Speedway? I might even has a couple about the dirt track. Also, most of the big track pictures are from the infield. Nascar1996 23:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional pictures would be great. Lvi56 (talk) 23:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll probably will upload them soon. (they do have the date though) Nascar1996 23:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I added the best ones I had. 1 of Turn 2, 1 of the Dirt track from the road, 1 of the start/finish line. Nascar1996 01:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have a look at them, thanks. Lvi56 (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you can get everyone of List of NASCAR race tracks all GA, you could nominate it as a good topic. Nascar1996 04:27, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would that mean every single track on that page? Lots of the older/early dirt ovals would be very difficult to find info on.Lvi56 (talk) 05:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I forgot about that. Sorry. Nascar1996 05:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bristol Motor Speedway probably will be easier than some of the others because it has more information. Might not have a lot of sources though. Nascar1996 21:51, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's on my list to do Lvi56 (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pressure systems

The issues you pointed out should be fixed. Let me know if they're not. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:09, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Marcus G. Smith

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Brock Reservoir

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NASCAR Newsletter (December 2010)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject NASCAR at 01:07, 25 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Indianapolis Motor Speedway GAN

Hi there, I thought I'd give you a heads-up that I am reviewing your Good Article Nomination of Indianapolis Motor Speedway. It will probably take me a day or so to complete the review, but since you're taking a wikibreak I thought you'd appreciate some advance notice. If you don't have enough time at the moment, please let me know and I will alert WP:AOWR; I'm sure other editors will be able and willing to help out.--Midgrid(talk) 19:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now reviewed the article - unfortunately, I do not believe it meets GA standards, and that it would require too much work to achieve this for me to put the nomination on hold. I hope you are not discouraged; I have left some ideas for improvement in the review. Please let me know if you disagree with the conclusion I have reached. Best wishes,--Midgrid(talk) 17:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review! I agree with many of your points. Feel free to fail the article for now, lots of work to do. Thanks. Lvi56 (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lvi56&oldid=405819871"