Jump to content

User talk:WikHead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bettymnz4 (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 8 February 2012 (→‎Thank you for your prompt help). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Thanks....

...for catching my error on Timeline of the presidency of John F. Kennedy and correcting it.--JayJasper (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lepeshka

I truly do want to flesh out the article on Lepeshka, as I believe I have pictures somewhere on my computer, and I can write a description as well. However, if you feel it should be deleted within the next few days if not fixed, I defer to your more senior position within the Wikipedia Community. If there is another place where the article can be moved, such as a place where the pages can be edited by members but less visible than it is right now, I would also approve of that. GreenGibbon (talk) 14:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think it would be wise to move the article into the incubator (sorry if the question/answer may be obvious, I'm still quite new to all of this)? GreenGibbon (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you very much. (I can see myself laughing heartily at my utter confusion in navigating Wikipedia's workings some 3 months from now, wondering how I could ever have been so baffled by such (probably very clear and precise) instructions). GreenGibbon (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

<font=3> Wishing you a
"Feliz Navidad and a Prospero Año Nuevo"
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year)
Tony the Marine (talk)
External audio
audio icon Jose Feliciano's "Feliz Navidad "

Hi, i added an ambiguous link to punk in the see also section because the DAB page provides various links that may be interesting for people interested in the subject. However you removed it… I intend to restore this link but am posting a note here first, and shall put it back unless you have anything serious against it. Cheers, benzband (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your swift reply —it helped a lot. Having already restored the link, i won't remove it, but i'll keep this in mind for further reference. Cheers :-) benzband (talk) 21:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing up Adam Smith (politician)

Thanks for fixing up this article. I found it was missing the references tag, then I saw all the cites were defective. But I was out of time and was going to fix it now. Imagine my pleasant surprise to see you took the care to really clean it up before I could get back to it. You deserve a serious pat on the back for this great work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arg342 (talkcontribs) 00:50, 06 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, if I am not mistaken you improved my article last year and this is a call for your kind help: I have entered references and categories. However, this was obviously not done in the proper wayt. Can you please add the necessary technical improvements? Thanks a lot, Khnassmacher (talk) 11:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind help. It was great to find help as I needed it! All the best for 2012, Khnassmacher (talk) 06:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For the clarification. I just edit these pages so often, and it would take more time looking for a particular year if there are no spaces. Anyway, thanks and regards. ShahidTalk2me 18:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikHead. You have new messages at [[User talk:KHS-Boab#[26th parallel south]|KHS-Boab's talk page]].
Message added 21:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello WikHead...

A message for you at the 26th parallel south

KHS-Boab (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As not familiar.

Relating:Birbal Jha

  • Hi,WikHead,I am sorry that I am not familiar to use the tools etc.I will try to follow you,what you changed in the reference,but I am not sure that I can do it perfectly.Hope your help will be there.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 19:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have learnt how to use url,followoing your editing to cite reference.Please take a look at,am I right or any error,may you help to clean-up.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • This time not for Birbal Jha, but well for Tahir Naqvi,in external links,websites references are too long,how to make them small,so that can be easily cited to content,those all are in Urdu,and reliable,can you please help me to make them shorter,I tried but failed.Justice007 (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes I have done that,thanks,time to rest and good night.Justice007 (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1. Good morning WikHead,both articles seen,constructive help,happy to look at,learning much. Three "External links" to Birbal Jha are dead,but those don't harm the Verifiability of the article.Other external links content is same which is already cited,I do not think many of those are needed,may be few I use,if there is some new content.Relating Tahir Naqvi,good help,actually in that is also similar text which has been cited,for more verifiability I will cite them anyhow.I am just helping to improve and expand the articles around that subject of area,as I am faimlair of that.I realy appreciate your kind assistance.I will come time to time on your talk page for your assistance.Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2. I had seen that,you perhaps did not take a look above mentioned my review.I have already check the external links sources content,there is nothing new that can be helpful to improve the article,but well as you suggested for more verifiability,I may cite couple of newspapers more. Yes you did a lot of work while I was sleeping and resting.So that is the wikipedia,some times work of days in one click is deleted.Pleaase do not regret it.Once again thanks for your kind assistance.Justice007 (talk) 16:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a matter of fact,yes we were discussing to improve articles,but we know Bold,cannot stop other editors to not edit.Of course I will ask your assistance retalting difficult issues.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 21:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit

Hi, may I request that you copy-edit these following articles:

Thank you (149.151.144.57 (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I am very grateful for your help. May I request one more article:- Khusro Khan to be copy-edited. Again thank you. (149.151.144.57 (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello thank you for your helpful hints on my first wiki article United States Army Reserve Legal Command. It is is a new Command in the United States Army based close to where i live in Washington D.C. Rajan2012 (talk) 13:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for welcome and help

Hello. Thanks for the welcome and the help with the references. I'm still getting the hang of how the references work so it's really helpful of you! Sorry not to have replied earlier, at first I assumed from your username that you were a bot.

Beth Holmes 1 (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! I should have seen that. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 19:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Rajputs

Greetings, I hope all is well. May I request you help me with the articles concerning the 'Clans of the Rajput people' (the template with all its clans). As you can observe from my edit history that I have copy-edited all the articles concerned. But if possible I need a second (and most importantly an experienced) user to look it over:

    • As mentioned I copy-edited all the articles listed on the template, but it would be great to have you look it over. I know there are large number of articles, but it will be a good challenge! Thank you (69.112.78.110 (talk) 06:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]
Thank you so much for the help. (69.112.78.110 (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Please error check what I have done.

I see you modified the page for the MV_Matanuska to clarify the citations. This is my first foray into adding citations to Wikipedia, and I have made further changes per my understanding of the Wikipedia style sheet I read. If you have a moment, I would appreciate it if you swung back by the Matanuska page and checked my work before I continue.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Name Omitted (talkcontribs) 21:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
I don't know if this is the right barnstar, but thank you for fixing my citation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_merge). Wabernat 20:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Power Hungry Censorship!

Rants of a disruptive, indef blocked sock
I'm extremely annoyed at the way my edits are being censored without merit whatsoever! I recently made revisions to "Helter Skelter (Manson scenario)" based on facts which can be verified. However, I'm continually being wrongly accused of "unconstructive" or "disruptive" edits which is NOT my intent at all! In addition, my edit has been reverted several times for no apparent legitimate reason! The only thing I can figure is perhaps certain individuals are afraid of any new revelations that just might derail everything they have been trained to believe. So, the only course of action is obviously to censor those who don't agree with sensationalistic garbage. Well, my plan is to appeal these wrongful actions against me and make certain as many people as possible are informed about this. I'm going to publicly reveal everything that has been done to me and let everyone know how "Wikipedia" censors people who truly haven't done anything wrong simply because they THINK they can!

ATWA WOLF — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATWA WOLF (talkcontribs) 18:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE To WikHead.
I got your response and I would like to clarify something. I did NOT blank out a whole page nor have I made ANY edit which could be considered as "disruptive" by ANY means! I simply made slight corrections to reflect facts which were not mentioned previously on the page in question. If any of you want to take this a step further, that's fine. I'll just post about it on my blog so everyone can be made aware of your unfair actions towards me. I haven't taken any action as of yet but I WILL if necessary! I don't think what you people are doing is fair and your power hungry censorship is unfounded! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATWA WOLF (talkcontribs) 19:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Helter Skelter (Manson scenario)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 4 February 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS for helping with the Segal page

I just wanted to say THANKS for helping me with the page about Eli J. Segal. It was my first article, and I appreciate your consideration! JR00576 (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Under the Heading Mercedes C215 there is not such animal. The car is classified as a CL or W215 but not C215. The C Class or W203 or C203 starts about a 30k and goes up from there where the base W215 starts and 93k and goes up to 160k. Also, the information about speed starting in 2003 with the new bi-turbo V12 5.5 litre 0-60 times are totally incorrect. The V-12 is the exact same speed from 0-60 as the AMG V8 Supercharged, both are 4.2 seconds. The Cl600 startng in 2003-2006 is actually faster at top speeds and has a much shorter 1/4 mile time at a much higher speed. Those are facts that can be found on any sight on the internet. Would you mind correcting this mis-information. You can also check this information with the MBZ websight. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Showcarcollector (talkcontribs) 01:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response.

I can edit the information and I only get my information from Mercedes Benz itself. I never use an outside source when I can get it straight from the websight. My conflict is I have no way of knowing how to change the heading from Mercedes C215 to Mercedes CL215 or W215. I would think that would only be limited to the websight and not just anyone. I will edit the content to reflect the MBZ sight but please if you would correct the heading for me. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Showcarcollector (talkcontribs) 05:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand

I also have the European Version of the book and it too is called the CL. I bought the CL EURO version from Germany by accident on Ebay and had to buy another American version. They differ slightly but the name didn't change. I don't know who or why anyone would be so ignorant esp. if they owned one. I happen to own a 2006 CL 600 with only a few miles in my museum and so I research all my cars to the letter before even beginning to assume anything I read. It must come from the source before I believe what I read, never second hand. Thank you again for redirecting it so that when you type in the W215 or Cl Class that it does direct to this article, wrong as it is. I now will have to go into the meat of the body and correct other inconsistency's and Ill get the citation for the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Showcarcollector (talkcontribs) 16:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new and I got a false positive

Would you assist me, please? I wrote changes for an article called Linea Pelle and it needed major cleanup in order to not look like an advertisement. So I deleted paragraphs of flashy language and slimmed the article down to more fact-based statements, and then a bot reverted my changes and gave me a warning. So I reported a false positive to the bot, but I don't know if I did it correctly. And my changes are still not showing on the [[Linea Pelle] article. Would you mind checking out what I did and seeing if you also agree that it was a false positive? I don't know what to do. Thanks, Wikhead! Bizzurp (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you and and I totally understand

Apperciate your time. Thank you. I know you have better things to do but if you look on the sight you will see what IM telling you is correct and how is it supposed to be label. I just didnt want any mis information posted. Again, Thank you and not to worry about responding you have much more important things to deal with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Showcarcollector (talkcontribs) 22:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Helter Skelter (Manson scenario), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, WGFinley (talk) 23:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

References

Hey I was the one who edited the Death section on the Yaki Kadafi article. If Youtube is not a valid source (although the video is clearly not false) how come other articles have used it including the article on the song Kim? That is what led me to find the original version on youtube because I didn't know before that there was one. Banan14kab (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WikHead wonder if you can take a look at this post on my talk page about widening the scope of Wikipedia Wiki Intra Document Navigation (WIDN) - Cheers! KHS-Boab 20:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Many thanks for your kind words! Regards, GiantSnowman 10:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

I noticed you've tidied up a couple of edits and citations I've made on some Merseyside-related articles. Cheers for that, I'm still figuring out what's what. It's the first time I've made anything beyond the odd grammatical correction - as you seem to have an interest in Liverpool articles, I wondered if you'd mind casting your eye over another related page I've started, Bradbury Fields? I know it needs expansion, but if you've got any particular suggestions for cleanup or style I'd find them most useful. Thanks again. Jonathandeamer (talk) 19:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt help

Thank you for fixing the cite error in the Widow's Peak article. I really appreciate your work! Bettymnz4 (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]