User talk:ScribeYearling

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
35		Michael Cooper (musician) (talk)	Add sources
31		Burma National Army (talk)	Add sources
1,885		Fashion (talk)	Add sources
22		Longacres (talk)	Add sources
60		I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (talk)	Add sources
1,079		Baseball rules (talk)	Add sources
11		Street dogs in Sofia (talk)	Cleanup
514		Gouache (talk)	Cleanup
7		Arab Thought Foundation (talk)	Cleanup
299		Stielhandgranate (talk)	Expand
308		Economy of Ukraine (talk)	Expand
41		1998–99 Football League (talk)	Expand
400		Compression garment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
48		Okinawa soba (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
61		Yelena Baturina (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2		Bay Area Coalition for Equitable Schools (talk)	Merge
752		Graduate school (talk)	Merge
285		Traditional Thai clothing (talk)	Merge
5		Gunsmoke (aerial gunnery competition) (talk)	Wikify
2		North Korean local elections, 1967 (talk)	Wikify
9		Minecraft: The Unlikely Tale of Markus "Notch" Persson and the Game that Changed Everything (talk)	Wikify
2		Baurzhan Baimukhanov (talk)	Orphan
3		Zhaksybek Kulekeyev (talk)	Orphan
2		McGill EMF Conference (talk)	Orphan
19		Farwaniya (talk)	Stub
2		Heywood Guides (talk)	Stub
8		Linhay (talk)	Stub
182		Concealer (talk)	Stub
2		Up for the Derby (talk)	Stub
124		Too Many People (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Removed PROD

Why'd you remove the PROD at Bays, WV? RES2773 (talk) 02:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Because it's just too early to consider it PRODable, as it was made within a few minutes ago. Also, the writer is new, and I really don't want to drive them away. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

I understand that. However this article doesn't appear to have anything to base upon. Not sure what the move is. RES2773 (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jjjjjjdddddd: Please re-read WP:PROD. Your opinion is out of step with policy. As a courtesy we try not to recommend deletion within hours of creation, but that's not an absolute rule. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

And @RES2773: Both of you need to read WP:GEOLAND and brush up on your professionalism. Don't edit in areas you don't understand. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't talking strictly about policy, I just think we generally shouldn't prod articles within a few minutes of their creation, unless they are obviously bad-faith. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:48, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: "Typically" does not always mean "definitely". There are some places that may just not be notable on the level to have a page. I doubt this article will reach a proper length without redundancies or orgininal research. But if there are more good sources out there, then I will let it be. RES2773 (talk) 13:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm just saying, we shouldn't jump on a page when it's just been written, unless it's obviously trash. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

@Chris troutman and RES2773: one of the very reasons (brought up in a discussion in 2010) why it can be beneficial to PROD an article very quickly, is because chances are the probable drive-by creator is still online. Unlike CSD which uses canned rationales, a PROD if worded reasonably, does not necessarily bite the new user. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC),

Okay everyone, I would like to apologize. I started something that really didn't need to happen, and have dragged people into this that weren't even involved in the first place. So, sorry everybody. I think I'll leave this be now. Thanks. RES2773 (talk) 00:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

It's alright, I can see why you would have prodded it, based on the looks of it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Test

A tag has been placed on Draft:Test requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This Draft is an exact copy-paste of Draft:Draft

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

will move to draftspace

Hi, why are you removing speedy deletion templates from articles and moving them to draftspace? Surely this defeats the whole point of the CSD's existence. Furthermore, Shelby Riffle does seem to me to be basically just nonsense. And even if it is reasonable to move to draftspace, I think this should be done before removing the speedy deletion template. — Smjg (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@Smjg:Wait, which articles? I know I have been doing that lately, but I'm not sure exactly which articles you are talking about. Also, I agree Shelby Riffle looks like nonsense, but I want to give them a chance. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

I was referring to the two on which you used that edit summary - Mario Nesich was the other one. We have a protocol for giving people a chance - the 10–15-minute courtesy window. Though I agree, it's poorly documented. Once that window has passed, pages meeting the CSD are fair game to being tagged as such. If we moved all such pages to the draft namespace instead, what would be the point of the CSDs existing? — Smjg (talk) 12:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I thought it was longer than that. Also, I don't want to be too WP:BITEy by immediately deleting pages, especially if they may have merit as en encyclopedic page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Reverting

• You are new, so I will not get upset about your reverting. Did I revert your edit?? NO. I just removed it in editing. Reversions are for VANDALS. P.S. Time and date does not belong in that spot. Happy editing! Pocketthis (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Did I revert that? Also, I should clarify from where I got the information. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Online Film and Television Association

Hello, Jjjjjjdddddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Online Film and Television Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
143		White separatism (talk)	Add sources
253		Iron (golf) (talk)	Add sources
35		Mineral alteration (talk)	Add sources
69		Austria–Prussia rivalry (talk)	Add sources
250		Civil township (talk)	Add sources
133		Garden furniture (talk)	Add sources
8		Felix Ermacora (talk)	Cleanup
488		Amorphous solid (talk)	Cleanup
240		White power music (talk)	Cleanup
468		Carol M. Swain (talk)	Expand
10		Greed Corp (talk)	Expand
656		Afghan Girl (talk)	Expand
242		Gamepad (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
129		Contemporary fantasy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,648		Fantasy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
149		Aluminium silicate (talk)	Merge
73		Forenoon (talk)	Merge
3,935		Alt-right (talk)	Merge
18		Litigation public relations (talk)	Wikify
10		William McKeen (talk)	Wikify
15		Mohammed Rafie (talk)	Wikify
8		Mineralizer (talk)	Orphan
2		Neyveli Vadapathy (talk)	Orphan
2		Grizzly College of Education (talk)	Orphan
18		Clark Martell (talk)	Stub
5		Vadamadurai, Chennai (talk)	Stub
7		Naruko, Miyagi (talk)	Stub
10		Pallipattu taluk (talk)	Stub
18		Tehran Eight (talk)	Stub
5		Ikaho, Gunma (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game

User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jjjjjjdddddd/.io game during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9 + 10 = 21 (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Roe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:9 + 10 = 21 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Joe (talk) 08:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Jjjjjjdddddd, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Joe (talk) 08:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lance Bulen: bands, Baton Rouge , Puzzle Gut and Kingbaby . In the 90's he recorded 3 full length albums; two with Baton Rouge on Atlantic and East West Records which broke Billboards top 200 and the 3rd with his band Puzzle Gut on Interscope Records.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lance Bulen: bands, Baton Rouge , Puzzle Gut and Kingbaby . In the 90's he recorded 3 full length albums; two with Baton Rouge on Atlantic and East West Records which broke Billboards top 200 and the 3rd with his band Puzzle Gut on Interscope Records., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

It should be noted that I, yesterday, nominated this page for deletion, to anyone reading this talk page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Ocarina of Time TIME Piece

Hi. I requested an article be userfied after I pointed out that the content in it was not featured in the topic page. This content was from TIME Magazine's site, but is locked by membership and now not available to read. Could you restore it long enough to save it to a pastebin or somewhere else public while I merge the usable content? Some content was referred to in a follow-up Time interview with Shigeru Miyamoto. Ally2good (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)