User contributions for Griswaldo
A user with 8,499 edits. Account created on 27 January 2010.
25 June 2015
- 17:1317:13, 25 June 2015 diff hist +28 Jim West (biblical scholar) Tagging article because subject appears not to be notable -- sources here are mostly primary
22 May 2012
- 02:3502:35, 22 May 2012 diff hist +445 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Proposed probation on BruceGrubb: Let'
18 May 2012
- 10:2610:26, 18 May 2012 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Clear veteran user now trolling for a block
- 10:2510:25, 18 May 2012 diff hist +112 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Clear veteran user now trolling for a block: You are all being trolled
- 01:1801:18, 18 May 2012 diff hist +229 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Clear veteran user now trolling for a block: How does one quantify an odor?
17 May 2012
- 20:2420:24, 17 May 2012 diff hist +214 User talk:Anthonyhcole →FYI: new section
- 20:2220:22, 17 May 2012 diff hist +390 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Response: Someone just ban him already since that's clearly what he's aiming for
13 May 2012
- 08:5708:57, 13 May 2012 diff hist −221 User talk:Griswaldo Undid revision 492329638 by Brendon111 (talk) listen to Anthony you are a troll go away
1 May 2012
- 16:2316:23, 1 May 2012 diff hist −867 User talk:Griswaldo Consider not trolling ... I'm done with Wikipedia for a while so find another source of amusement. Cheers.
30 April 2012
- 11:1611:16, 30 April 2012 diff hist −18 Rover's Morning Glory →Anti-gay comment: remove weasel wording ... this has been all over the media
23 April 2012
- 11:2111:21, 23 April 2012 diff hist +531 User talk:Griswaldo →Issue with Brendon (for Balloonman too): replies
22 April 2012
- 15:2115:21, 22 April 2012 diff hist +422 User talk:Griswaldo →Issue with Brendon (for Balloonman too): r
- 14:3614:36, 22 April 2012 diff hist 0 User talk:Griswaldo →Issue with Brendon (for Balloonman too)
- 14:3514:35, 22 April 2012 diff hist +795 User talk:Griswaldo →Issue with Brendon (for Balloonman too): its just not worth it ... I'm going back to happiness ... which means leaving this place alone
- 01:2901:29, 22 April 2012 diff hist −1,133 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images Undid revision 488577788 by Alanscottwalker (talk) see Brandmeister's user page
21 April 2012
- 22:4622:46, 21 April 2012 diff hist −1,133 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images Undid revision 488561694 by Alanscottwalker (talk) please inform yourself the person who added this said it was a
- 12:0312:03, 21 April 2012 diff hist +412 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 12:0112:01, 21 April 2012 diff hist +599 User talk:Brandmeister →Muhammad RfC: there was no malice in the deletion ... just an enforcement of the rules ... I'm sure you can understand that
- 11:5711:57, 21 April 2012 diff hist +3 User talk:Anthonyhcole →RfC
- 11:5611:56, 21 April 2012 diff hist +481 User talk:Anthonyhcole →RfC: yes I did revert and here's why
- 11:5211:52, 21 April 2012 diff hist −176 User talk:Nomoskedasticity Undid revision 488478099 by Griswaldo (talk) like this for example
- 11:5211:52, 21 April 2012 diff hist +176 User talk:Nomoskedasticity →Please refrain from reopening a closed community discussion
- 10:5810:58, 21 April 2012 diff hist +538 User talk:Nomoskedasticity →Please refrain from reopening a closed community discussion: new section
- 10:5610:56, 21 April 2012 diff hist +724 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →This is not the place: Again you chastize those who are trolled and not the troll
- 10:5110:51, 21 April 2012 diff hist −1,133 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images Undid revision 488451519 by Nomoskedasticity (talk) It is up to the community to enforce its own rules ... please stop being disruptive
20 April 2012
- 18:4718:47, 20 April 2012 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Brendon's answers
- 18:4618:46, 20 April 2012 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Brendon's answers
- 18:4618:46, 20 April 2012 diff hist +634 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Brendon's answers: r
- 16:2116:21, 20 April 2012 diff hist +533 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Brendon's answers: so that it is clear that you reacted differently at first
- 16:1516:15, 20 April 2012 diff hist +199 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Brendon's answers: Really ... it took you that long, and after responding once already, to be outraged by the "lie" comment ... doubtful
- 12:1412:14, 20 April 2012 diff hist +176 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →This is not the place: r
- 12:1212:12, 20 April 2012 diff hist +879 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Brendon's answers: not likely
- 11:5011:50, 20 April 2012 diff hist +843 User talk:ChrisGualtieri →I liked your comment and need your opinion: Nice try brendon, horrible execution though
- 10:1210:12, 20 April 2012 diff hist +242 User talk:Balloonman →I'd like to be kept abreast if you file a case against me.
- 03:2503:25, 20 April 2012 diff hist +323 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 03:1503:15, 20 April 2012 diff hist +1,441 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →To the closing admins: new section
- 02:3202:32, 20 April 2012 diff hist +1,051 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: replies
19 April 2012
- 23:2923:29, 19 April 2012 diff hist −45 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Am I the only one: correcting ... its about *images of* Muhammed ... also removing the comment Tarc made about others in the summary (I love irony as much as the next guy but come one)
- 19:1719:17, 19 April 2012 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Please refrain from deleting comments made by others at RfC
- 19:1619:16, 19 April 2012 diff hist +402 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Please refrain from deleting comments made by others at RfC: no ... but if you want to prove me wrong then link to the policy
- 18:4918:49, 19 April 2012 diff hist +364 User talk:Balloonman →More regarding your RfC comment: new section
- 18:4618:46, 19 April 2012 diff hist +156 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Am I the only one: No you are not alone ... follow the crumbs
- 16:2016:20, 19 April 2012 diff hist +268 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →This is not the place: Except I'm merely defending myself
- 11:5311:53, 19 April 2012 diff hist +520 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations: r
- 11:3011:30, 19 April 2012 diff hist +673 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations: r
- 11:2111:21, 19 April 2012 diff hist +785 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations: on the contrary
- 11:0011:00, 19 April 2012 diff hist +59 m Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations
- 10:5510:55, 19 April 2012 diff hist +464 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations: r
- 10:4610:46, 19 April 2012 diff hist −26 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations
- 10:2910:29, 19 April 2012 diff hist −3 m Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Reply from Griswaldo
- 10:2810:28, 19 April 2012 diff hist +202 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →One small request from Brendon: yes please do ... because it proves the point even more
- 10:2710:27, 19 April 2012 diff hist +376 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations: question for brendon about formatting
- 10:2410:24, 19 April 2012 diff hist +255 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Reply from Griswaldo: add
- 10:2210:22, 19 April 2012 diff hist −86 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Reply from Griswaldo
- 10:2110:21, 19 April 2012 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Reply from Griswaldo
- 10:2110:21, 19 April 2012 diff hist +1,443 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Reply from Griswaldo: r
- 10:1010:10, 19 April 2012 diff hist +4,541 Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance →Disagreement (mostly) based on recriminatory Bad-Faith accusations: reply for now ... more to come
18 April 2012
- 17:2217:22, 18 April 2012 diff hist +627 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: stop trolling with this account is all I ask
- 17:1917:19, 18 April 2012 diff hist +187 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 16:5816:58, 18 April 2012 diff hist +18 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon
- 16:5816:58, 18 April 2012 diff hist +308 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 16:5216:52, 18 April 2012 diff hist +745 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r number 2
- 16:4716:47, 18 April 2012 diff hist +2,058 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: Well Brendon here it is ...
- 16:0416:04, 18 April 2012 diff hist +695 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 15:2915:29, 18 April 2012 diff hist +1 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence
- 15:2815:28, 18 April 2012 diff hist +191 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence: more expert newbies ... go figure
- 15:2015:20, 18 April 2012 diff hist +713 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 15:0015:00, 18 April 2012 diff hist +361 User talk:Griswaldo →Comments from you about Brendon: r
- 14:5914:59, 18 April 2012 diff hist +230 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence: not mockery
- 14:5414:54, 18 April 2012 diff hist −1 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence
- 14:5314:53, 18 April 2012 diff hist +985 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence: why don't you just come clean
- 14:4714:47, 18 April 2012 diff hist +670 User talk:Belorn →You're wrong: new section
- 14:4314:43, 18 April 2012 diff hist +686 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Permissibility of Images of Muhammad in Islam: r
- 10:5610:56, 18 April 2012 diff hist +20 m User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence
- 10:5410:54, 18 April 2012 diff hist +795 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence: this conversation was not started elsewhere
- 04:4804:48, 18 April 2012 diff hist −1,923 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images Undid revision 487949822 by Griswaldo (talk) beginning to think I'm being trolled. Better revisit this with a clear head
- 04:3604:36, 18 April 2012 diff hist +525 User talk:Brendon111 →Strange coincidence: new section
- 04:2304:23, 18 April 2012 diff hist +1,923 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Permissibility of Images of Muhammad in Islam: If you refuse to temper your commentary then I'll just treat you in kind
- 02:0102:01, 18 April 2012 diff hist +1,420 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Permissibility of Images of Muhammad in Islam: you have that completely backwards, upside down, inside out or whatever it is
- 01:4401:44, 18 April 2012 diff hist +702 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Blocked: fair enough
17 April 2012
- 20:3020:30, 17 April 2012 diff hist +1,165 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Permissibility of Images of Muhammad in Islam: Completely irrelevant to the conversation
- 20:2220:22, 17 April 2012 diff hist +757 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox: for the last time
- 19:2519:25, 17 April 2012 diff hist +457 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox: r
- 17:2217:22, 17 April 2012 diff hist +383 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Blocked: That's an admonishment by example right?
- 14:5914:59, 17 April 2012 diff hist +644 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox: I think you missed the point
- 14:2714:27, 17 April 2012 diff hist +595 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox: everything is subjective ... please try again
- 03:2403:24, 17 April 2012 diff hist +26 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox
- 03:2203:22, 17 April 2012 diff hist −16 m Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox
- 03:2003:20, 17 April 2012 diff hist +1,115 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Note on NOTCENSORED/AGF paradox: rampant cultural imperialism that is
- 03:0903:09, 17 April 2012 diff hist +133 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Global perspectives on this issue: Please be civil Brendon
- 03:0603:06, 17 April 2012 diff hist +564 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Please refrain from deleting comments made by others at RfC: for the last time
16 April 2012
- 13:2213:22, 16 April 2012 diff hist +581 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Please refrain from deleting comments made by others at RfC: his word is enough ... if you are so concerned email her yourself
- 01:1601:16, 16 April 2012 diff hist +499 User talk:Jayen466 →The Muhammed images RfC: new section
- 01:1301:13, 16 April 2012 diff hist +601 User talk:Schwalker →Please refrain from deleting comments made by others at RfC: new section
- 01:1001:10, 16 April 2012 diff hist −174 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Some further comments from Christiane: restored email ... do not edit Jayen's comments ... if he says she is OK with this then this is on him. You are perfectly able to ask her yourself if you are concerned.
15 April 2012
- 20:5820:58, 15 April 2012 diff hist +496 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →Calligraphy: Support ... and resist cultural imperialism.
- 20:5420:54, 15 April 2012 diff hist +285 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →No (for the following reasons):: no
- 20:5020:50, 15 April 2012 diff hist +343 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →g) Where an appropriate depiction illustrates an event in the text: move to correct place and fix layout
- 20:4820:48, 15 April 2012 diff hist −354 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →m) Anywhere but the top: confusing layout ... remove
- 20:4620:46, 15 April 2012 diff hist +354 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →g) Where an appropriate depiction illustrates an event in the text: oppose
- 20:4320:43, 15 April 2012 diff hist +616 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →f) In the "Depictions of Muhammad" section: Support and reply to Johnbod's point.
- 20:3820:38, 15 April 2012 diff hist +120 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →e) Within the fourth section of the body: "Life" - as currently: oppose
- 20:3520:35, 15 April 2012 diff hist +118 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →d) Within the third section of the body: "Pre-Islamic Arabia": oppose
- 20:3520:35, 15 April 2012 diff hist +116 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →c) Within the second section of the body, "Sources for Muhammad's life": oppose
- 20:2020:20, 15 April 2012 diff hist +504 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →a) Within the lead: oppose
- 20:0620:06, 15 April 2012 diff hist +256 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →c) Calligraphy: support - a nobrainer
- 20:0020:00, 15 April 2012 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →a) Unveiled
- 19:5919:59, 15 April 2012 diff hist +378 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images →a) Unveiled: oppose --- this puts UNDUE weight on something that isn't common
- 14:0514:05, 15 April 2012 diff hist +603 Talk:Atheism →templeton foundation: well its not nonsense or pseudoscience, but I agree that it might not belong in the lede
- 10:0410:04, 15 April 2012 diff hist −568 User talk:Griswaldo Undid revision 487474304 by 90.192.121.150 (talk) undo sock puppet
14 April 2012
- 22:2822:28, 14 April 2012 diff hist −424 User talk:Hans Adler Revert myself ... forget about it. I'm looking at your talk page archive now ... been mostly gone for some time and didn't know you were staying away. Hope you're well, but don't worry about this of all things.
- 22:1422:14, 14 April 2012 diff hist +424 User talk:Hans Adler →ANI discussion that might interest you: new section
- 22:0922:09, 14 April 2012 diff hist +321 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Ronz behaviour: r
- 22:0622:06, 14 April 2012 diff hist −995 m Talk:Atheism Reverted 1 edit by 90.200.108.6 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Griswaldo. (TW)
- 21:2721:27, 14 April 2012 diff hist +412 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Ronz behaviour: about that banner
- 11:2311:23, 14 April 2012 diff hist +601 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Ronz behaviour: Mathsci are you truly ignorant of Ronz' behavior when he is in conflict with others?
- 11:1411:14, 14 April 2012 diff hist +484 Talk:Atheism →Demographics: r
- 00:0000:00, 14 April 2012 diff hist +477 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Ronz behaviour
13 April 2012
- 16:2016:20, 13 April 2012 diff hist +109 Talk:Atheism →templeton foundation: r
- 15:5515:55, 13 April 2012 diff hist +453 Talk:Atheism →templeton foundation: r
- 15:0415:04, 13 April 2012 diff hist +270 Talk:Atheism →templeton foundation: more
- 14:5914:59, 13 April 2012 diff hist +122 User talk:Lee McLoughlin Leicester →Griswaldo: I was reverting vandalism
- 14:5414:54, 13 April 2012 diff hist +747 Talk:Atheism →templeton foundation: they are well respected, but ...
- 12:4312:43, 13 April 2012 diff hist +98 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975: thanks
- 12:2512:25, 13 April 2012 diff hist +291 Template talk:Atheism sidebar →Agnosticism is not part of atheism: new section
- 12:2412:24, 13 April 2012 diff hist +539 Talk:Agnosticism →Sidebar: new section
- 12:2212:22, 13 April 2012 diff hist −2 Agnosticism Undid revision 487162599 by Lee McLoughlin Leicester (talk) please stop. use the talk page.
- 12:2112:21, 13 April 2012 diff hist +198 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975: and he has yet another account ...
- 12:2012:20, 13 April 2012 diff hist +177 Template:Atheism sidebar Undid revision 487163095 by Lee McLoughlin Leicester (talk) Stop and discuss first.
- 12:1912:19, 13 April 2012 diff hist +469 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975: r
- 12:1712:17, 13 April 2012 diff hist −1,219 Atheism Undid revision 487161122 by Lee McLoughlin Leicester (talk) I'm not religious but that's besides the point. Stop adding false information to the article.
- 11:3811:38, 13 April 2012 diff hist +333 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975: is an SPI really needed for this?
- 11:2811:28, 13 April 2012 diff hist +280 User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975 →Please stop: I've reported your behavior to ANI
- 11:2511:25, 13 April 2012 diff hist +834 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975: new section
- 11:1711:17, 13 April 2012 diff hist +484 User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975 →Please stop: new section
- 11:1411:14, 13 April 2012 diff hist +177 Template:Atheism sidebar Undid revision 487155156 by James Dover 2009 (talk) Discuss on talk ... brand new user accounts that make edits like smell awfully fishy
- 11:1311:13, 13 April 2012 diff hist −1,219 Atheism Undid revision 487154626 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) Most people who do ARE NOT ATHEISTS ... you are being disruptive. Discuss on talk and stop reverting.
- 10:4710:47, 13 April 2012 diff hist −809 Atheism Deleting duplicate reference
12 April 2012
- 23:1323:13, 12 April 2012 diff hist +468 Talk:Atheism →Demographics: why i reverted
- 22:5722:57, 12 April 2012 diff hist +485 User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975 →WP:BRD: new section
- 22:5322:53, 12 April 2012 diff hist −2 Agnosticism Undid revision 487075317 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) please stop. you're being disruptive now. Discuss this on the talk page because your change has been reverted
- 22:5222:52, 12 April 2012 diff hist +177 Template:Atheism sidebar Undid revision 487074877 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) STOP. you need to discuss changes like this when you've been reverted
- 22:5222:52, 12 April 2012 diff hist −410 Atheism Undid revision 487073958 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) People who believe in a spirit or life-force ARE NOT ATHEISTS ... stop edit warring false information
- 22:5022:50, 12 April 2012 diff hist +90 User talk:Griswaldo →Atheism - Eurobarometer Poll 2005
- 22:5022:50, 12 April 2012 diff hist +358 User talk:Griswaldo →Atheism - Eurobarometer Poll 2005: that's an absurd definition of atheism
- 20:1820:18, 12 April 2012 diff hist +177 Template:Atheism sidebar Undid revision 486992398 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) please discuss this change before making it
- 20:1220:12, 12 April 2012 diff hist +290 User talk:LeeMcLoughlin1975 →April 2012: it's also the wrong sidebar
- 20:1020:10, 12 April 2012 diff hist −362 Atheism Stop adding this ... it's flat out wrong. I looked at the Eurobaromoter and the figures for not believing in God are much lower. I have no idea where you're getting these.
- 20:0820:08, 12 April 2012 diff hist −2 Agnosticism Undid revision 487038117 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) stop edit warring and not using appropriate edit summaries ... this is the right sidebar for agnosticism
- 11:3711:37, 12 April 2012 diff hist −363 Atheism undo change to lead - 1) the lede summarizes the article 2) the Eurobarometer figures don't verify in the actual source 3) the Gallop poll wasn't specifically about atheism
- 11:2411:24, 12 April 2012 diff hist −2 Agnosticism Undid revision 486966037 by LeeMcLoughlin1975 (talk) No. Agnosticism topics are organized under the original sidebar
5 April 2012
- 01:4301:43, 5 April 2012 diff hist +342 User talk:Nathanielfirst →Links: ditto
- 01:3801:38, 5 April 2012 diff hist −16 Accursed Mountains Reverted 1 edit by Nathanielfirst (talk): What does this have to do with damnation? . (TW)
4 April 2012
- 02:1502:15, 4 April 2012 diff hist −11 Christian deism Undid revision 485436802 by Nathanielfirst (talk) already prominently linked in the article
- 01:5501:55, 4 April 2012 diff hist +624 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Is the Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology a primary source?: a note about "primary sources"
3 April 2012
- 01:3101:31, 3 April 2012 diff hist −187 Developmental coordination disorder →Notable dyspraxics: delete unreferenced and not noteworthy
22 March 2012
- 22:4122:41, 22 March 2012 diff hist +22 Christian Smith (sociologist) →Theoretical Contributions
17 March 2012
- 01:2201:22, 17 March 2012 diff hist −280 Jason Russell →Biography: remove names of wife and children (especially the children) as they have nothing to do with his notability
4 March 2012
- 21:1921:19, 4 March 2012 diff hist −360 Anders Wendin accusations of sexual harassment in a BLP cannot be sourced to primary sources
12 January 2012
- 19:1219:12, 12 January 2012 diff hist +1,114 Talk:New Atheism →How can there not be a criticism section?: maybe a controversy section ... or something like that
- 19:0119:01, 12 January 2012 diff hist +720 Talk:Atheism →Religious Diversity among Atheists: entry is about atheism not atheists
28 November 2011
- 14:4414:44, 28 November 2011 diff hist +634 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →HiLo and Pregnancy Ban Proposal: r to Hipocrite
- 13:3713:37, 28 November 2011 diff hist +326 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →HiLo and Pregnancy Ban Proposal: Jimbo closed an RfC ... so what? Leave it alone.
15 November 2011
- 21:0921:09, 15 November 2011 diff hist +289 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Wasn't the RfC set to be closed on the 10th?: new section
- 02:4002:40, 15 November 2011 diff hist +434 User talk:Griswaldo →Leeming: r
14 November 2011
- 13:0913:09, 14 November 2011 diff hist +430 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →Bibliography section: PiCo please explain what you mean when you say that Leeming is not reliable
- 02:2502:25, 14 November 2011 diff hist +60 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Mass killings under Communist regimes
- 02:2002:20, 14 November 2011 diff hist +960 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Mass killings under Communist regimes: r
13 November 2011
- 23:3823:38, 13 November 2011 diff hist +809 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard →topic ban?: no Hobit it is still plagiarism
- 17:1017:10, 13 November 2011 diff hist +403 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Mass killings under Communist regimes: suit yourself. I was trying to help but clearly you're not ready for any. good luck
- 14:3114:31, 13 November 2011 diff hist +1,090 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Mass killings under Communist regimes: start over if you want productive discussion of anything
12 November 2011
- 19:5219:52, 12 November 2011 diff hist +1 User talk:Jimbo Wales →A brief summary
- 19:5119:51, 12 November 2011 diff hist +1,889 User talk:Jimbo Wales →A brief summary: Reply to GoodDay and others
- 16:1116:11, 12 November 2011 diff hist +432 User talk:Jimbo Wales →A brief summary: not censored ohm, not censored ohm
- 02:2102:21, 12 November 2011 diff hist +217 Talk:Muhammad/images →Image deletion nomination: perhaps that wasn't the point
11 November 2011
- 20:2420:24, 11 November 2011 diff hist +1,396 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →But everyone else is doing it, so why not us?: this is not a black and white issue so please do not treat it that way
- 20:1520:15, 11 November 2011 diff hist +325 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →But everyone else is doing it, so why not us?: point of fact "story" is the most common
- 15:3815:38, 11 November 2011 diff hist +35 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →But everyone else is doing it, so why not us?
- 15:3715:37, 11 November 2011 diff hist +2,336 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →Rename article to Genesis creation myth: why comparison between traditions is an inherent problem
- 02:5502:55, 11 November 2011 diff hist +485 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →Rename article to Genesis creation myth: no please not this again
- 02:5102:51, 11 November 2011 diff hist +14 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Section break
- 02:4902:49, 11 November 2011 diff hist +635 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Section break: add
- 02:4602:46, 11 November 2011 diff hist +1,497 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Section break: comment
8 November 2011
- 21:2421:24, 8 November 2011 diff hist +451 Talk:Muhammad/images →Black stone in comparable works: more
- 21:1621:16, 8 November 2011 diff hist +466 Talk:Muhammad/images →Black stone in comparable works: three other reference sources
- 20:5020:50, 8 November 2011 diff hist +678 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: of course there is
- 20:3220:32, 8 November 2011 diff hist +1,656 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?: r ... either present a hypothetical or a real situation don't twist the real
- 16:1216:12, 8 November 2011 diff hist +81 m Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?
- 16:0916:09, 8 November 2011 diff hist +994 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?: that;s false Nom ... completely false. read again
- 16:0416:04, 8 November 2011 diff hist 0 m Talk:Muhammad/images →Black stone image
- 16:0316:03, 8 November 2011 diff hist +345 Talk:Muhammad/images →Black stone image: waiting is fine but please remember that policies trump essays
- 11:5511:55, 8 November 2011 diff hist +427 Talk:Muhammad/images →Black stone image: images that do not depict anything from the entry clearly have no value here, just the possibility of offense
- 11:5011:50, 8 November 2011 diff hist +692 Talk:Muhammad/images →Muhammad#European and Western views: we have an example to go by here
- 11:4411:44, 8 November 2011 diff hist +1,557 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?: r ... if your position is that ideologically calcified I fail to understand what you are trying to discuss
- 03:0403:04, 8 November 2011 diff hist +271 Talk:Pregnancy →Getting a Decision: sure there has
- 02:5602:56, 8 November 2011 diff hist +593 Talk:Pregnancy →Getting a Decision: r
- 02:5202:52, 8 November 2011 diff hist +1,113 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?: r
7 November 2011
- 22:0722:07, 7 November 2011 diff hist +475 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: r
- 21:3921:39, 7 November 2011 diff hist +846 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: that's a false proposition Rob
- 19:2319:23, 7 November 2011 diff hist +345 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: r
- 16:1316:13, 7 November 2011 diff hist +1,154 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: r
- 15:5915:59, 7 November 2011 diff hist +274 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: no on the first two ... and I missed that last ... let me have a read
- 15:1515:15, 7 November 2011 diff hist −276 Genesis creation narrative reinstating other changes (other than the lead) that might have been lost when I reverted ... please fix those individually if you don't agree with them and do not revert on that basis
- 15:1215:12, 7 November 2011 diff hist +272 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →RfC: Genesis creation narrative: link to creation myth, yes or no?: r
- 15:1115:11, 7 November 2011 diff hist +1,090 Genesis creation narrative then lets go back to the pre-Jesanj version
- 15:0515:05, 7 November 2011 diff hist −14 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →RfC: Genesis creation narrative: link to creation myth, yes or no?
- 15:0415:04, 7 November 2011 diff hist +646 Talk:Genesis creation narrative →RfC: Genesis creation narrative: link to creation myth, yes or no?: of course yes
- 14:5714:57, 7 November 2011 diff hist +937 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: r
- 14:4914:49, 7 November 2011 diff hist +249 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: that's just your speculation, and in my opinion it's off the mark ... either way you have no evidence that it is true
- 14:4514:45, 7 November 2011 diff hist +31 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: link to the film
- 14:1414:14, 7 November 2011 diff hist +75 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: another one of the images
- 14:0514:05, 7 November 2011 diff hist +46 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: tracked down another one of the images
- 14:0014:00, 7 November 2011 diff hist +55 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: link to image
- 13:4013:40, 7 November 2011 diff hist +2,050 Talk:Muhammad/images →What appears in other reference works?: had a look at the Cambridge book
- 13:2113:21, 7 November 2011 diff hist −1 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?
- 13:2113:21, 7 November 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?
- 13:2013:20, 7 November 2011 diff hist +1,727 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?: r
- 12:1612:16, 7 November 2011 diff hist +11 m Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?
- 12:1512:15, 7 November 2011 diff hist +1,695 Talk:Muhammad/images →"Offending"?: oh really you say there is no scholarly objection based on what exactly?
5 November 2011
- 23:2123:21, 5 November 2011 diff hist +567 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: r to Maunus
- 22:3422:34, 5 November 2011 diff hist +282 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism
- 22:3322:33, 5 November 2011 diff hist +544 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: add
- 22:2522:25, 5 November 2011 diff hist +749 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: second reply
- 22:2122:21, 5 November 2011 diff hist +932 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: first reply after ec
- 22:1122:11, 5 November 2011 diff hist +278 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: fringe has nothing to do with offense
- 22:0322:03, 5 November 2011 diff hist +130 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: add
- 22:0222:02, 5 November 2011 diff hist +217 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: don't forget Persian culture
- 21:5521:55, 5 November 2011 diff hist +455 Talk:Aniconism in Islam →Original research: r
- 21:5221:52, 5 November 2011 diff hist +771 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: r to John
- 21:3421:34, 5 November 2011 diff hist +493 Talk:Aniconism in Islam →Original research: new section
- 21:3221:32, 5 November 2011 diff hist +12 Aniconism in Islam Undid revision 459198490 by Johnbod (talk) do not remove this ... section contains editor summaries followed by primary source evidence ... that's OR cut and dried ... use the talk page
- 21:2721:27, 5 November 2011 diff hist +340 User talk:Griswaldo →Aniconism: r
- 21:2621:26, 5 November 2011 diff hist +517 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: also you did not write most of it from what I see
- 21:1021:10, 5 November 2011 diff hist +34 Aniconism in Islam main entry tags ... please do not remove as editors who are capable of fixing the problems may not get far enough down to spot the section tags ... cheers
- 21:0321:03, 5 November 2011 diff hist +203 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: John the article you wrote is filled with OR and unreferenced text ...
- 20:5820:58, 5 November 2011 diff hist +12 Aniconism in Islam →Hadith and exegesis examples: section appears to be original research ... we don't use primary sources like this with our own summaries of what they mean to the tradition
- 20:5520:55, 5 November 2011 diff hist +36 Aniconism in Islam lower cases and other edits
- 20:5120:51, 5 November 2011 diff hist +21 Aniconism in Islam →Comparison with Judaism and Christianity: ditto here
- 20:5020:50, 5 November 2011 diff hist +21 Aniconism in Islam →Religious core: no references here either
- 20:4920:49, 5 November 2011 diff hist +22 Aniconism in Islam →Theological views: section has no sources
- 13:1513:15, 5 November 2011 diff hist +550 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: can an uninvolved admin please close this
- 13:0813:08, 5 November 2011 diff hist +49 m User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality
- 13:0613:06, 5 November 2011 diff hist +941 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: agree
- 12:4212:42, 5 November 2011 diff hist +42 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: more accurate
- 12:3812:38, 5 November 2011 diff hist +1,412 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: Tarc your comment is almost absurd, but certainly wrong
4 November 2011
- 22:4322:43, 4 November 2011 diff hist +1,270 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Support
- 21:1321:13, 4 November 2011 diff hist +1,316 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: well apparently you don't know what the history of religion covers
- 19:0019:00, 4 November 2011 diff hist +1,087 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: r to John
- 18:4918:49, 4 November 2011 diff hist −1 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →NOTCENSORED does not protect incidental material
- 18:4818:48, 4 November 2011 diff hist +340 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →NOTCENSORED does not protect incidental material: support
- 18:3718:37, 4 November 2011 diff hist +594 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: r to robert ... i stand by my comment
- 18:3218:32, 4 November 2011 diff hist +870 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam cross posted from Wikiproject religion
- 18:3118:31, 4 November 2011 diff hist −870 Talk:Islam Undid revision 459010581 by Griswaldo (talk) oops meant to post this on the Wikiproject page not this one
- 18:3118:31, 4 November 2011 diff hist +870 Talk:Islam cross posted from Wikiproject religion
- 18:2818:28, 4 November 2011 diff hist −30 m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion →Muhammad, visual depictions and the sore need for expert commentary
- 18:2818:28, 4 November 2011 diff hist +900 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion →Muhammad, visual depictions and the sore need for expert commentary: new section
- 18:1818:18, 4 November 2011 diff hist +907 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: of course this is a religion topic
- 17:2617:26, 4 November 2011 diff hist −81 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Undid revision 459001305 by Griswaldo (talk) not worth it ... the point is made without this ... but he's clearly an art historian and not a historian of religion ... big difference here
- 17:2417:24, 4 November 2011 diff hist +81 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: add ... from what I can tell
- 17:1917:19, 4 November 2011 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal
- 17:1817:18, 4 November 2011 diff hist +581 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: r regarding expertise
- 12:3812:38, 4 November 2011 diff hist +14 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: add link
- 12:3712:37, 4 November 2011 diff hist 0 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality
- 12:3612:36, 4 November 2011 diff hist +314 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: in my view, Tarc you are precluded from making these types of demands
- 12:3412:34, 4 November 2011 diff hist +642 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: edit conflict
- 12:2812:28, 4 November 2011 diff hist +1,641 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Topic Ban Proposal: strongest oppose ever
- 11:5811:58, 4 November 2011 diff hist +65 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality
- 11:5611:56, 4 November 2011 diff hist +607 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: r to Will
- 00:0400:04, 4 November 2011 diff hist +946 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: r to Resolute ... your inference is wrong
3 November 2011
- 23:5623:56, 3 November 2011 diff hist +729 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: except there is no rub there Resolute ... no rub at all
- 21:3421:34, 3 November 2011 diff hist −3 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality
- 21:3421:34, 3 November 2011 diff hist +511 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: also more educational
- 21:2721:27, 3 November 2011 diff hist +481 User talk:Jimbo Wales →Religious neutrality: Seb that you have that backwards
- 14:3414:34, 3 November 2011 diff hist +28 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Jimbo's argument: clarify
- 13:4613:46, 3 November 2011 diff hist +235 Talk:Pregnancy →Other suggestions: @LtPowers
- 11:2111:21, 3 November 2011 diff hist +2,595 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Jimbo's argument: reply to Slr
2 November 2011
- 19:5519:55, 2 November 2011 diff hist +175 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →A compromise suggestion that may satisfy all sides in the debate
- 18:4518:45, 2 November 2011 diff hist +88 User talk:Tryptofish →Oops
- 18:4418:44, 2 November 2011 diff hist +85 User talk:Tryptofish →Oops: +
- 13:3913:39, 2 November 2011 diff hist +1 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Continued attempts to discredit the RfC before it finishes need to stop
- 13:3613:36, 2 November 2011 diff hist +389 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →A compromise suggestion that may satisfy all sides in the debate: r to A Quest ... sorry
- 13:3313:33, 2 November 2011 diff hist +1,227 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Continued attempts to discredit the RfC before it finishes need to stop: new section
- 13:2413:24, 2 November 2011 diff hist +565 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →A compromise suggestion that may satisfy all sides in the debate: A Quest you are off by 3% ... please don't misrepresent the figures to your advantage
- 13:1813:18, 2 November 2011 diff hist +613 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →A compromise suggestion that may satisfy all sides in the debate: reply to Viriditas
1 November 2011
- 21:2321:23, 1 November 2011 diff hist +374 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/WP:V RFC →Why is this considered acceptable?: whatever
- 21:1921:19, 1 November 2011 diff hist +1,377 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Jimbo's argument: r to Slr
- 21:0521:05, 1 November 2011 diff hist +3 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/WP:V RFC →Why is this considered acceptable?
- 21:0121:01, 1 November 2011 diff hist +88 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/WP:V RFC →Why is this considered acceptable?: Leaky Caldron if you can't be bothered to understand the situation then don't comment. it's that simple
- 21:0121:01, 1 November 2011 diff hist +575 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/WP:V RFC →Why is this considered acceptable?: Leaky Caldron if you can't be bothered to understand the situation then don't comment. it's that simple
- 18:1118:11, 1 November 2011 diff hist 0 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias
- 18:0818:08, 1 November 2011 diff hist +83 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias
- 18:0718:07, 1 November 2011 diff hist +261 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias: again you fail to see the actual trend
- 16:0316:03, 1 November 2011 diff hist +434 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias: r to Pmanderson ... check again ... you appear to be wrong
- 14:2614:26, 1 November 2011 diff hist +1,425 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Jimbo's argument: comment
- 14:1714:17, 1 November 2011 diff hist +337 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Oppose: no that was not clear at all Asav
- 14:0314:03, 1 November 2011 diff hist +182 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias
- 14:0214:02, 1 November 2011 diff hist +347 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias
- 13:1813:18, 1 November 2011 diff hist +967 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias: inferences are meaningless ... but that said this is how it is ALWAYS done when the sections are split
- 12:2512:25, 1 November 2011 diff hist −107 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Proposed topic ban: not needed
- 12:1412:14, 1 November 2011 diff hist +871 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Proposed topic ban: comment
- 12:0812:08, 1 November 2011 diff hist +304 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Separate sections for support and oppose leads to bias: how did you arrive at that conclusion?
31 October 2011
- 14:3014:30, 31 October 2011 diff hist +1,231 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Implications to WP:FRINGE: new section
- 13:0313:03, 31 October 2011 diff hist +698 Talk:Atheism →Last section incomplete?: this is really a title issue
- 12:5412:54, 31 October 2011 diff hist +1,430 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Why is this considered acceptable?: reply to NW ... yes something can be done
- 02:1102:11, 31 October 2011 diff hist −6 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes consensus?
- 02:1002:10, 31 October 2011 diff hist +274 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes consensus?: try actual policy
- 02:0802:08, 31 October 2011 diff hist +274 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes consensus?
- 02:0202:02, 31 October 2011 diff hist +391 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →The kind of change I would like to see: r to Maunus
- 01:5901:59, 31 October 2011 diff hist +123 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Here's my motion (or whatever you call it)
30 October 2011
- 21:2721:27, 30 October 2011 diff hist −44 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes concensus?: edit
- 21:2221:22, 30 October 2011 diff hist +854 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes concensus?: replies
- 21:1721:17, 30 October 2011 diff hist +21 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes concensus?: clarify
- 21:0921:09, 30 October 2011 diff hist +376 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes concensus?: r to Gwen
- 21:0021:00, 30 October 2011 diff hist +533 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →What constitutes concensus?: 80% ... and what policy can I confirm that in?
- 20:1720:17, 30 October 2011 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Why is this considered acceptable?
- 20:1720:17, 30 October 2011 diff hist 0 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Why is this considered acceptable?
- 20:1620:16, 30 October 2011 diff hist +974 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Wikipedia:Verifiability: no impressed
- 20:0020:00, 30 October 2011 diff hist +969 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →The kind of change I would like to see: I've reviewed this history of this dicussion and those types of ideas appear to have been floated already ... why do you want people to go backwards?
- 15:5415:54, 30 October 2011 diff hist +976 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →I'm not happy...and nor should anyone be (Close and start afresh): r to Maunus
- 15:0615:06, 30 October 2011 diff hist +449 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →I'm not happy...and nor should anyone be (Close and start afresh): r to Slim
- 15:0015:00, 30 October 2011 diff hist +222 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Discussion about removing the word "compromise" from the title
- 14:5814:58, 30 October 2011 diff hist +712 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Discussion about removing the word "compromise" from the title: r to Slr
- 14:4914:49, 30 October 2011 diff hist +425 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →other edits to the Original RFC: r to Alan
- 13:0513:05, 30 October 2011 diff hist +609 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →So lets look at what has been done to this RFC in the last 2 days: North8000 has a very fair point
- 12:4912:49, 30 October 2011 diff hist +808 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC: r to Slr ... let's not start this Pomo mumbo jumbo ok?
- 12:0212:02, 30 October 2011 diff hist +569 User talk:SarekOfVulcan →For posterity: reply to Slr ... please don't continue to poke Sarek on this, especially when you're in the minority regarding that opinion in the first place
- 01:0801:08, 30 October 2011 diff hist +438 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability: do you read what you write? clearly not
- 00:5300:53, 30 October 2011 diff hist +88 m User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability
- 00:5200:52, 30 October 2011 diff hist +297 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability: r
- 00:4700:47, 30 October 2011 diff hist +6 m User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability
- 00:4600:46, 30 October 2011 diff hist +302 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability: well this part had nothing to do with that comment
- 00:1600:16, 30 October 2011 diff hist +695 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability: r
- 00:0800:08, 30 October 2011 diff hist +525 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC: about compromise
- 00:0400:04, 30 October 2011 diff hist +430 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Is this the appropriate time to close?: compromise would mean change ... you realize
29 October 2011
- 23:3723:37, 29 October 2011 diff hist +201 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Verifiability
- 23:3423:34, 29 October 2011 diff hist −2 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Please stop edit warring
- 23:3323:33, 29 October 2011 diff hist +326 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Please stop edit warring: r
- 23:2823:28, 29 October 2011 diff hist +213 Talk:Pregnancy →Compromise images: too bad
- 23:2623:26, 29 October 2011 diff hist +360 User talk:Dreadstar/UTDEHA3 →Please stop edit warring: new section
- 23:2323:23, 29 October 2011 diff hist +13 Wikipedia:Verifiability Undid revision 458045071 by Dreadstar (talk) no consensus for this ... please establish it before making changes
- 23:2223:22, 29 October 2011 diff hist +13 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability Undid revision 458044990 by Dreadstar (talk) no consensus for change please discuss and stop edit warring
- 23:0823:08, 29 October 2011 diff hist +470 Talk:Pregnancy →Compromise images: r
- 22:5922:59, 29 October 2011 diff hist +973 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC: reply
- 22:2822:28, 29 October 2011 diff hist +311 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences: r
- 22:1722:17, 29 October 2011 diff hist −1 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences
- 22:1722:17, 29 October 2011 diff hist +227 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences: r
- 21:5921:59, 29 October 2011 diff hist +621 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC: r
- 21:4621:46, 29 October 2011 diff hist +4 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC
- 21:4521:45, 29 October 2011 diff hist +88 m Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC
- 21:4521:45, 29 October 2011 diff hist +508 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →changing the name of the RfC: WTF. Slim, you changed the title two days ago, and now you are bullying the editor who restored it?
- 20:4220:42, 29 October 2011 diff hist +504 Talk:Pregnancy →Compromise images: r
- 19:4319:43, 29 October 2011 diff hist +358 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences: oh and "whoever that is?" ...
- 19:3519:35, 29 October 2011 diff hist +507 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences: r
- 19:3219:32, 29 October 2011 diff hist +813 Talk:Pregnancy →Compromise images: r
- 19:2119:21, 29 October 2011 diff hist +5 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences
- 19:2019:20, 29 October 2011 diff hist +539 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences: r
- 19:0919:09, 29 October 2011 diff hist +75 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences
- 19:0819:08, 29 October 2011 diff hist +112 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Gaming and consequences
- 19:0719:07, 29 October 2011 diff hist +728 Wikipedia talk:Verifiability →Temporarily close the RFC, give people the time to read and discuss and then re-open the RFC: clearly gaming going on ... and people should be held accountable
- 16:5716:57, 29 October 2011 diff hist +70 m User talk:SarekOfVulcan →For posterity
- 16:5616:56, 29 October 2011 diff hist +438 User talk:SarekOfVulcan →For posterity: I hope you didn't resign over Slim's accusation
- 16:3816:38, 29 October 2011 diff hist +195 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?: ok now lets move on
- 16:3716:37, 29 October 2011 diff hist +259 Talk:Pregnancy →Compromise images: looks good Becritical
- 15:5215:52, 29 October 2011 diff hist +524 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Wikipedia:Verifiability: as an outspoken critic of Sarek's I have to say I really don'
28 October 2011
- 02:0202:02, 28 October 2011 diff hist +672 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: replies
26 October 2011
- 20:4320:43, 26 October 2011 diff hist +376 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
- 20:3820:38, 26 October 2011 diff hist +145 Genesis creation narrative significant chances to lead are not "copy edits" ... please suggest such changes on talk first ... the lead has been very controversial in the past
- 19:5019:50, 26 October 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?
- 19:4819:48, 26 October 2011 diff hist +1 m Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?
- 19:4819:48, 26 October 2011 diff hist +22 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?
- 19:4719:47, 26 October 2011 diff hist +604 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?: replies
- 14:5814:58, 26 October 2011 diff hist +7 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?
- 14:5714:57, 26 October 2011 diff hist +427 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?: r to Binksternet
- 14:5314:53, 26 October 2011 diff hist +491 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: then file an SPI ... but it has no bearing on the conversation that the rest of us are having
- 14:4514:45, 26 October 2011 diff hist +268 Talk:Pregnancy →Support hatting
- 14:3914:39, 26 October 2011 diff hist +266 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?: here is what it would look like
- 14:3714:37, 26 October 2011 diff hist +20 Pregnancy Undid revision 457492844 by Griswaldo (talk)
- 14:3714:37, 26 October 2011 diff hist −20 Pregnancy test edit ... will undo immediately
- 14:3114:31, 26 October 2011 diff hist −18 m Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?
- 14:3114:31, 26 October 2011 diff hist +1,040 Talk:Pregnancy →What about this image?: new section
- 14:2514:25, 26 October 2011 diff hist +703 Talk:Pregnancy →Support hatting: r to Doc
- 14:1714:17, 26 October 2011 diff hist +108 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
- 14:1414:14, 26 October 2011 diff hist +761 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: not relevant and here's why
- 14:0514:05, 26 October 2011 diff hist +316 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: we have such an image in Commons already ... again here it is
- 13:2013:20, 26 October 2011 diff hist +936 Talk:Pregnancy →Support hatting: reply to Doc
- 13:1313:13, 26 October 2011 diff hist +308 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: I wouldn't be so sure of that Tigerboy
- 13:1013:10, 26 October 2011 diff hist +1,386 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: r to SilkTork
- 11:1211:12, 26 October 2011 diff hist +218 Talk:Pregnancy →Support hatting
- 01:4801:48, 26 October 2011 diff hist +732 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": you should take your own advice and respect the talk page guidelines
- 01:3601:36, 26 October 2011 diff hist +496 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Violates MOS:LEAD: don't violate MOS:LEAD
25 October 2011
- 22:3422:34, 25 October 2011 diff hist +286 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 22:3222:32, 25 October 2011 diff hist −29 Criticism of Judaism Undid revision 457380326 by Bus stop (talk) Undue ... this violates MOS:LEAD ... unless you can prove this with reliable sources we need to summarize the entry. Cheers.
- 19:1019:10, 25 October 2011 diff hist +1,069 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: r to SilkTork
- 14:1014:10, 25 October 2011 diff hist +110 m Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
- 14:0614:06, 25 October 2011 diff hist +563 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: SilkTork this is more supervote like argument ...
24 October 2011
- 22:5822:58, 24 October 2011 diff hist +452 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": last one
- 22:3622:36, 24 October 2011 diff hist +357 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": again
- 22:1422:14, 24 October 2011 diff hist +72 m Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise
- 22:1222:12, 24 October 2011 diff hist +273 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: add for clarity
- 22:0922:09, 24 October 2011 diff hist +971 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: r
- 21:5421:54, 24 October 2011 diff hist +1,021 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: some questions for Viriditas and others
- 19:2919:29, 24 October 2011 diff hist +593 User talk:Tryptofish →Kosher: sorry Tryptofish ... but let me respond to the analogy
- 12:1012:10, 24 October 2011 diff hist +486 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": r
- 04:0004:00, 24 October 2011 diff hist +196 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Off2riorob's comments at ANI: close this thread please
- 03:5803:58, 24 October 2011 diff hist +406 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": wrong thread Bus stop
- 03:3003:30, 24 October 2011 diff hist +1,199 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case →Statement by Becritical: Statement by Griswaldo
- 03:1703:17, 24 October 2011 diff hist +304 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": r
- 03:1203:12, 24 October 2011 diff hist +930 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: not medical contexts ... simply educational ones ... and very common educational ones at that.
- 02:5602:56, 24 October 2011 diff hist −42 Religions fixing very odd redirect ... plural should redirect to singular
- 02:5402:54, 24 October 2011 diff hist −29 Criticism of Judaism Undid revision 457085585 by Bus stop (talk) read our entry on religion which includes much more than theology, or Judaism which barely includes theology at all
- 02:5102:51, 24 October 2011 diff hist +1,195 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: r
- 02:4502:45, 24 October 2011 diff hist −29 Criticism of Judaism remove this again ... still no justification for this from any sources, hence convention and common sense apply
- 02:4302:43, 24 October 2011 diff hist +531 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Land ownership: disagree with addition
- 02:3602:36, 24 October 2011 diff hist −4,108 Criticism of Judaism Undid revision 457057470 by Aua (talk) Object to this on the basis that criticism of Zionism is not criticism of Judaism more generally.
- 02:3202:32, 24 October 2011 diff hist +846 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": Sorry when you behave as you have you don't get to lecture others on etiquette
- 02:2502:25, 24 October 2011 diff hist +879 Talk:Pregnancy →Principle of least surprise: 2 cents
22 October 2011
- 19:3919:39, 22 October 2011 diff hist +509 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →Jenna Rose: r
- 13:0213:02, 22 October 2011 diff hist +481 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →Jenna Rose: r
21 October 2011
- 18:1618:16, 21 October 2011 diff hist +447 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →Jenna Rose: overturn to no consensus
- 03:0403:04, 21 October 2011 diff hist +580 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 October 19 →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: overturn
- 02:5602:56, 21 October 2011 diff hist +404 User talk:SilkTork →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: IMO really bad idea making this close right before disappearing for days
20 October 2011
- 16:2416:24, 20 October 2011 diff hist −10 User talk:Tryptofish →Kosher
- 16:2316:23, 20 October 2011 diff hist +1,128 User talk:Tryptofish →Kosher: that's incorrect
19 October 2011
- 20:4620:46, 19 October 2011 diff hist +429 User talk:Colonel Warden →FYI: new section
- 20:4620:46, 19 October 2011 diff hist +429 User talk:ASCIIn2Bme →FYI: new section
- 18:1418:14, 19 October 2011 diff hist +246 User talk:Tryptofish →BTW: deleting that was as good idea
- 14:0514:05, 19 October 2011 diff hist +461 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"Chosen people": r to Biosketch
- 12:5212:52, 19 October 2011 diff hist −31 Criticism of Judaism see last edit ... placed specific banner in the appropriate section ... now removing this one which isn't really accurate anymore
- 12:5112:51, 19 October 2011 diff hist +18 Criticism of Judaism →Heretical views within Judaism: if this is the only section that isn't sourced it's better to be specific - ad banner here
- 12:2412:24, 19 October 2011 diff hist +51 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 12:2212:22, 19 October 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 12:2112:21, 19 October 2011 diff hist +2 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 12:2112:21, 19 October 2011 diff hist +1,817 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": r to Biosketch ... you are simply wrong in what you claim
- 03:4203:42, 19 October 2011 diff hist −8 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 03:4103:41, 19 October 2011 diff hist +822 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": r ... not playing your games Bus Stop
18 October 2011
- 18:2118:21, 18 October 2011 diff hist +517 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": how about Paul?
- 18:1518:15, 18 October 2011 diff hist +111 m Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 18:0318:03, 18 October 2011 diff hist +693 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": i said nothing of the sort and this is simply odious
- 13:3713:37, 18 October 2011 diff hist +808 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Where is FAWC's criticism Judaism?: already answered too many times already
- 12:4812:48, 18 October 2011 diff hist +237 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article: r to Biosketch
- 12:4712:47, 18 October 2011 diff hist +5 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds"
- 12:4712:47, 18 October 2011 diff hist +644 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": r to Biosketch ... explain your revert please
- 02:4902:49, 18 October 2011 diff hist +293 Talk:Semitic neopaganism →Material recently removed: agree with Dominus
- 02:4702:47, 18 October 2011 diff hist +636 Talk:Semitic neopaganism →Material recently removed: Todd, you reverted me without addressing my concern ... indeed you dismissed it for very odd reasons
- 02:4202:42, 18 October 2011 diff hist −306 Semitic neopaganism Undid revision 456070015 by Toddst1 (talk) Excuse me, noteworthiness is 100% in question, and no sources establish why this group should be included at all, certainly not an SPS
17 October 2011
- 20:3020:30, 17 October 2011 diff hist +150 User talk:Tryptofish →BTW: new section
- 16:3216:32, 17 October 2011 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article
- 16:3116:31, 17 October 2011 diff hist −3 m Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article
- 14:0014:00, 17 October 2011 diff hist −28 Criticism of Judaism bold edit ... see talk. It makes no sense to restrict this to theology only, when Judaism is so much more than that
- 11:5211:52, 17 October 2011 diff hist +1,191 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →"on theological grounds": new section
- 11:3011:30, 17 October 2011 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article
- 11:3011:30, 17 October 2011 diff hist +15 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article
- 11:2811:28, 17 October 2011 diff hist +1,263 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article: r to Biosketch
- 11:1611:16, 17 October 2011 diff hist +85 m Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article
- 11:1311:13, 17 October 2011 diff hist +433 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article: Biosketch you got that wrong, Jay is indeed claiming the entire section is OR, and that is why I posted here
- 01:4201:42, 17 October 2011 diff hist −324 Semitic neopaganism Undid revision 455919586 by Kim Dent-Brown (talk) we need reliable sources to establish noteworthiness
16 October 2011
- 20:0020:00, 16 October 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:Hitler's Pope →Book's cover photograph
- 19:5919:59, 16 October 2011 diff hist +392 Talk:Hitler's Pope →Book's cover photograph: easy fix
- 19:5519:55, 16 October 2011 diff hist +38 Hitler's Pope →Criticism of Cornwell's work: this was already in here ... no reason not to say that Royal agrees
- 19:5119:51, 16 October 2011 diff hist +10 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Robert Royal (author) on John Cornwell (writer)
- 19:5119:51, 16 October 2011 diff hist +468 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Robert Royal (author) on John Cornwell (writer): wait ... this was and remains in the article already and is sourced to someone else
- 19:3119:31, 16 October 2011 diff hist +76 m Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Robert Royal (author) on John Cornwell (writer)
- 19:3119:31, 16 October 2011 diff hist +467 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Robert Royal (author) on John Cornwell (writer): also the thread title is misleading
- 19:2419:24, 16 October 2011 diff hist +737 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Robert Royal (author) on John Cornwell (writer): comment
- 18:4318:43, 16 October 2011 diff hist +880 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article: r to Judith
- 16:3616:36, 16 October 2011 diff hist +396 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Kosher slaughter: NOR/N discussion
- 16:3316:33, 16 October 2011 diff hist +936 Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard →Mentioning criticism of kosher slaughter in the Criticism of Judaism article: new section
- 16:2416:24, 16 October 2011 diff hist 0 m Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Original Research? Says who?
- 16:2316:23, 16 October 2011 diff hist +1 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Original Research? Says who?
- 16:2216:22, 16 October 2011 diff hist +9 m Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Original Research? Says who?
- 16:2216:22, 16 October 2011 diff hist +1,218 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Original Research? Says who?: r to jay
- 14:3914:39, 16 October 2011 diff hist +117 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of ancient astronauts →Timeline of ancient astronauts
- 13:3013:30, 16 October 2011 diff hist +127 User talk:Griswaldo →Insult: reply
- 13:1013:10, 16 October 2011 diff hist +535 Talk:Criticism of Judaism →Original Research? Says who?: no Jay ... but you continue I see
14 October 2011
- 20:0820:08, 14 October 2011 diff hist +411 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natib Qadish (2nd nomination) r to camocom
- 20:0520:05, 14 October 2011 diff hist +1 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Natib Qadish (2nd nomination) →Portal:Natib Qadish
- 20:0520:05, 14 October 2011 diff hist +88 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Natib Qadish (2nd nomination) →Portal:Natib Qadish
- 20:0520:05, 14 October 2011 diff hist +483 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Natib Qadish (2nd nomination) →Portal:Natib Qadish: r to Camocon
- 19:5919:59, 14 October 2011 diff hist +1,491 Talk:Creation myth →Moving forward: r to Phatius
- 14:4714:47, 14 October 2011 diff hist +1,069 Talk:Creation myth →Moving forward: apology ... sorry but I think he's being overdramatic and it isn't out concern quite frankly
- 13:2413:24, 14 October 2011 diff hist 0 Talk:Creation myth →Moving forward
- 13:2113:21, 14 October 2011 diff hist +2,620 Talk:Creation myth →Moving forward: replies
- 00:3200:32, 14 October 2011 diff hist +640 Talk:Creation myth →Moving forward: I reverted Phatius' change to the lead
- 00:2500:25, 14 October 2011 diff hist −868 Creation myth revert lead ... we cannot copy exact sentences from sources, that's plagiarism. We should maintain the facts presented by sources but write them in our own words
13 October 2011
- 12:1812:18, 13 October 2011 diff hist +258 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination) →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: and Quotefarm?
- 12:1312:13, 13 October 2011 diff hist +22 Creation myth Bold edit ... let's make this in line with the sources ... when sources do talk about literal interpretations they make them secondary
- 03:3503:35, 13 October 2011 diff hist +289 Talk:Creation myth →Break: edit conflict
- 03:3103:31, 13 October 2011 diff hist −1 m Talk:Ex-gay movement →Request for comment: List of people associated with the ex-gay movement.
- 03:3003:30, 13 October 2011 diff hist +426 Talk:Ex-gay movement →Request for comment: List of people associated with the ex-gay movement.: keep it open longer
- 02:5002:50, 13 October 2011 diff hist +88 Talk:Creation myth →Break
- 02:4902:49, 13 October 2011 diff hist +681 Talk:Creation myth →Break: last reply ... please stick to the issues instead of trying to prove that I'm a hypocrite
- 02:4502:45, 13 October 2011 diff hist +14 Talk:Creation myth →Symbolic narrative?: inserting a break
12 October 2011
- 18:0618:06, 12 October 2011 diff hist +533 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination) →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: a source is primary depending on context
- 12:2112:21, 12 October 2011 diff hist +294 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natib Qadish (2nd nomination) adding links to related portal and category deletion discussions
- 12:1612:16, 12 October 2011 diff hist +646 Talk:Creation myth →Symbolic narrative?: r to TAW
- 04:0004:00, 12 October 2011 diff hist −1 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination) oops
- 03:5803:58, 12 October 2011 diff hist +1,008 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (4th nomination) →List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming: you are comparing apples and oranges Pete ... also you're still not answering the question above
- 03:5103:51, 12 October 2011 diff hist +372 Talk:Creation myth →Symbolic narrative?: r
- 03:4803:48, 12 October 2011 diff hist +304 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Natib Qadish: r
- 02:5502:55, 12 October 2011 diff hist +75 Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion Adding Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Natib Qadish (2nd nomination). (TW)