User talk:TheEpistle

Welcome!

Hello TheEpistle! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 03:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Thank you. I'm happy to be here. TheEpistle (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of churches in Nigeria has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of churches in Nigeria was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://believersportal.com/history-of-assemblies-of-god-church-nigeria/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Dennis Burton, from its old location at User:TheEpistle/sandbox/Dennis Burton. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Burton has been accepted

Dennis Burton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Please help me with... Help me review the article Bishnu Adhikari TheEpistle (talk) 10:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... My new article on a Tollywood star from a movie I watched needs review and constructive criticism. Thank you. TheEpistle (talk) 10:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This does not specifically require an administrator, so I have deactivated that and your duplicate help tag above. 331dot (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as you asked for help on the draft itself, I am closing this request; please only use one method of seeking assistance, in order to not waste other editors' time. Thanks 331dot (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron D. Lewis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aaron D. Lewis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello TheEpistle. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TheEpistle. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheEpistle|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Praxidicae (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User: Praxidacae, Praxidicae Thank you very much, I love criticism, because it brings out the best in us, so this is what I am looking for. Firstly, I have no association with Dennis Burton, Aaron D. Lewis or Bishnu Adhikar. These creation were simply made randomly. Dennis is a scientist who I found out while going through the Wikipedia:Requested Article pagee. Aaron is a Humanitarian who's work is important to Africans and Blacks. Bishnu is an actor whose movie I recently watched - I saw he didn't have a page and decided to create one. Instead of deletion, suggest you tell me where and what to remove and add to the article and I will be much willing to do that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEpistle (talk • contribs) 15:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bishnu Adhikari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bishnu Adhikari, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chidi Okoroafor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Chidi Okoroafor, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ——SN 54129 16:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dennis Burton.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Dennis Burton.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. creffett (talk) 18:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

This edit seems to explain some of the problems I'm seeing on this page. Would you like to come to Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians to discuss what you're trying to do and how we can help you? Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aaron D. Lewis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaron D. Lewis. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, correction noted and implemented. TheEpistle (talk) 13:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Notability and neutrality are separate, largely unconnected issues. It is possible for a subject to be notable, but their article to be promotional in tone. Contrariwise, it's possible for an article to be neutrally-written but unable to prove notability. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 21:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Jéské Couriano A little blue Bori for the thoughtful note. Which of them do you think I may have faulted.

It's mainly with this edit summary. I looked over the article and removed some puffery and did some light copyediting after. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 22:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! User:Jéské Couriano A little blue Bori, many thanks! I acknowledge the puffery, may be unknowingly, nevertheless, true. Thanks for the lesson. TheEpistle (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adrian Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Spence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron D. Lewis (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is over-personal., essentially a promotional press release

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron D. Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron D. Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron D. Lewis (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron D. Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron D. Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheEpistle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aaron D. Lewis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaron D. Lewis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a reviewer. I dabble at answering questions at Teahouse. David notMD (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you .David notMD (talk) TheEpistle (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have resubmitted, so in time a reviewer will act. Could be days, or weeks, or even months. There are more than 1,500 drafts waiting for a reviewer. David notMD (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aaron D. Lewis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaron D. Lewis. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:01, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheEpistle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Continuous Article Decline Inquiry, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintessa Swindell (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quintessa Swindell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quintessa Swindell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archistar (Artificial Intelligence) (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Archistar (Artificial Intelligence) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Archistar (Artificial Intelligence), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bonnie Carroll (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

Thanks for creating this draft. Please edit the education section - it should be in a paragraph, not bullet points - and re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bonnie Carroll and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bonnie Carroll, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Don Moen. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 20:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru Alright, thank you for the thoughtful note, will make amendments accordingly. TheEpistle (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have just done the exact same thing here. Please consider this a warning that using references you know to be fake is highly disruptive. Kuru (talk) 05:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies please, Kuru (talk). It was honestly an oversight, I was still editing, I have just now finished and gone back to correct the issue. I would probably blacklist people pill from my browser, to prevent a re-occurrence. No disruptive editing was intended, sincere apologies. Thank you! TheEpistle (talk) 06:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bonnie Carroll has been accepted

Bonnie Carroll, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ikorodu Bois has been accepted

Ikorodu Bois, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States School Garden Army has been accepted

United States School Garden Army, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheEpistle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Clarity, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron D. Lewis (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hellknowz was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I moved the page back from mainspace to draft per WP:GNG concerns and per AfC process not being followed. The sourcing does not show notability. Reviewing sourcin: First lp.org is written by the subject. Second lp.org is passing news mention and not in-depth coverage. books.google.com is subject's book. manchestercc.edu is press release. harvard.edu is not about the subject. I'm unable to access newsbreak.com, but the short blurb does not suggest it's focused on the subject. wtnh.com only has a tiny quote by the subject. courant.com is very brief and mostly relies on subject's own words.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron D. Lewis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron D. Lewis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintessa Swindell (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hellknowz was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I moved the page back from mainspace to draft per WP:GNG concerns and per AfC process not being followed. The sourcing is very marginal to satisfy notability and I don't think it passes the bar or would survive and AfD. fandom.com is a user-edited wiki and not an acceptable source. thefutoncritic.com has nothing about the subject. hollywoodreporter.com is tiny mention. nytimes.com has no real mention. polygon.com is not in-depth, it's a brief mention followed by series' production info. deadline.com, broadwayworld.com are new announcements with no substantial content about the subject. refinery29.com is briefish and partly subject's own words, although it looks usable to supplement GNG. them.us is very brief and partly subject's own words. glaad.org is an interview and pretty much all primary. teenvogue.com has no real content about the subject. bustle.com, monstersandcritics.com and vmagazine.com are all similar -- they aren't really in-depth and use a lot of content from the subject themselves; discounting content padding, the actual content about the subject is barely few paragraphs, so I don't believe this is significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quintessa Swindell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quintessa Swindell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm CrazyBoy826. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CrazyBoy826 (talk | contribs) 02:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you CrazyBoy826, the edit was indeed non-constructive as I uniwittingly did blank the page, apologies. Here was my intention I created a draft for Draft: Geooffrey Kwok, so I wanted to move this draft to article page, so it could be reviwed and go into mainspace, however, I noticed there was a redirect to Geoffrey's father, Walter Kwok's page. If you understand my intentions, you may proceed to help me out, that would be appreciated. Many thanks! TheEpistle (talk) 19:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]