Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for improvement

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WPchanger2011 (talk | contribs) at 21:33, 13 February 2023 (→‎FK Mladá Boleslav). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts

This page is for nominating articles to be listed as articles for improvement, from which the weekly collaborations are pulled. Any article or list on Wikipedia can be nominated, although articles that do not meet the suggested criteria are unlikely to gain consensus.


Instructions

Suggested criteria

Though there are no firm criteria, in general, ideal AFI articles are:

  • Highly important topics. Anything that has top or high importance to a WikiProject is likely highly important.
  • Interesting to the general public. This can be evidenced by page views. Nominations with less than 200 views per day rarely succeed.
  • Needing of improvement, with expansion opportunity. Stubs; start-class, and short C-class articles are the most ideal for improvement. Give due consideration before nominating higher-quality articles.
  • Not targets of controversy. Keep in mind that controversial articles (articles that are the subject of heated discussion, edit warring, or questioned notability) can be very difficult to improve within a week.

Review process

  • Any user may vote on the suitability of nominations to be listed at AFI.
  • Please use the code #'''Support''' or #'''Oppose''', add your reasoning, and sign with ~~~~. You may also add comments. Improperly formatted votes may be missed by the bot.
  • MusikBot will mark nominations with at least 3 net support votes (3 more support votes than oppose votes) as approved and those with at least 3 net oppose votes as unapproved. The bot will automatically list successful nominations and archive all closed nominations.
  • Registered members of the project may choose to override the bot at their discretion in instances where straight vote totals do not appear to reflect community consensus.

Nominating an article

  1. Check that the article you want to nominate isn't already listed.
  2. Post the nomination at the top of the list in the appropriate category, using this code: 
    ===(Article title)===
{{AFI nom|article=(Article title)|class=unknown|hits=(Number of daily hits)}}
*(Nomination text) ~~~~
  3. Fill out the parts in parentheses. You can find an article's class on its talk page and its approximate daily hits using this tool.
  4. Please do not support your own nominations.

Nominations

Applied sciences and technology

Electroencephalography

Electroencephalography – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 988 daily hits

  • One of the most widely used and recognizable neuroscience techniques, yet the article is full of WP:PRIMARY and WP:TECHNICAL issues. I made a start on some but a lot of effort will be needed to make this article good! plenty of available, accessible information. EvilxFish (talk) 07:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support A long article, important that needs fine tuning. --Wil540 art (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per above. SVcode(Talk) 14:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom. BorgQueen (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Color calibration

Color calibration – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 32 daily hits

  • This topic is no doubt crucial, yet is rated Start-class, meaning it should be an AFI in spite of being not so popular among Wikipedia readers. --RekishiEJ (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support An under-attended and understood topic. --Wil540 art (talk) 17:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, Important topic in need of improvement. SVcode(Talk) 14:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Color management

Color management – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 77 daily hits

  • Although not quite widely read on the Internet, it still should be an AFI since it is more and more crucial as wide colour gamut displays are now more and more popular worldwide, and the article is rated Start-class. --RekishiEJ (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Color management is an important part of visual language most of us take for granted. --Wil540 art (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, Also an important article. SVcode(Talk) 14:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Portable Network Graphics

Portable Network Graphics – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,035 daily hits

  • Because the article is problematic (lacking comparison of PNG with AVIF and WebP), it is no doubt vital (regarded vital at level 5, and very frequently used on the WWW nowadays), and being widely read on the Internet, it should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC) added a statement 10:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Article has been tagged needing an update since 2021. Could benefit greatly from an AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per AFI. SVcode(Talk) 14:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar eclipse

Lunar eclipse – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2806 daily hits

  • It's a vital article, yet it is neglected. It is so terrible that I had mistaken it to being a page from a nutjob site. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, could do with more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 00:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Wil540 art (talk) 17:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support BorgQueen (talk) 17:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Approved SVcode(Talk) 14:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HDR10

HDR10 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 234 daily hits

  • Because it is the most widespread of the HDR formats, and the article is Start-rated, it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, has enough hits and needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technology

Technology – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3,402 daily hits

  • This is a Vital level 1 article, which means that it is very important to improve. We would need to add references and maybe expand information so this article could get at least to B-class. We would have to expand its length and possibly add images. With hard work from the community I do believe that we can get this article to B-class. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 ⋅𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔⋅ 04:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, it has high hits but I'm not sure if AFI is a place to improve okay articles to B-class and above. SVcode(Talk) 23:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral, important but in a decent state as it is. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - In my opinion the article could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Role-playing game system

Role-playing game system – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 42 daily hits

  • This Article is of High importance to the lone WikiProject it is in and only has a lone source to go with it. We can definitely improve the article. Danubeball (talk) 03:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, Even though article doesn't have high hits and is not vital article, it does seem important. SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support – Important topic not just for analog gaming but later video game design and programming. Lots of cultural resonance too. — LumonRedacts 14:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral as per SVcode. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support as per LumonRedacts. Wil540 art (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arts

Classificatory disputes about art

Classificatory disputes about art – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 86 daily hits

  • This article is interesting and crucial, yet is start-rated, thus should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Very interesting subject matter. Article is long but thin in very important areas. --Wil540 art (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral, Doesn't seem popular but is in need of help. SVcode(Talk) 14:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Hollinghurst

Alan Hollinghurst – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 91 daily hits

  • Vital article in People, Writers.
  • Some references but very stubby BLP. Practically nothing on his writing.
  • Established writer, with a publication history going back to the 1970s, fiction since the 1980s and articles for all his novels.
  • Even pipped future poet laureate Andrew Motion to the Newdigate Prize. Other awards, including lifetime achievement, from 1974 onwards.
  • A Booker Prize winner, so obviously important.
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature - obviously this is very important.
  • External links might offer options for expansion, particularly the article from The Paris Review.
  • X00y (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, vital article in need of expanion. SVcode(Talk) 23:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, low number of page views and not clear how he is vital (but I acknowledge that might be an issue with the article). Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everyday life

Songhai people

Songhai people – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 161 daily hits

  • This topic is rated as Top Importance by WikiProject Africa, but it's unfortunately in a miserable shape. The formatting of this article is incomprehensible with random bullet points at the end of sections containing bolded titles followed by no text, the grammar is very inconsistent, there are many paragraphs with no sources, etc. It's very unfortunate to see such an important article in such a desperate need of improvements.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 20:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chechen cuisine

Chechen cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 162 daily hits

  • This article, though being important ([1], [2] and [3] mention Chechen dishes, meaning this cuisine is no doubt appealing), is a mere stub, meaning it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support BorgQueen (talk) 17:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ossetian cuisine

Ossetian cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 18 daily hits

  • As Ossetian pies are now all the rage in the entire Russia (cf. [4] & [5]), this cuisine is no doubt crucial, however the article is now a mere stub, which is a shame. --RekishiEJ (talk) 03:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, hits too low.SVcode(Talk) 00:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @SVcode: Comment This article is not widely read, yet it is an invalid reason to oppose my proposal since the unpopularity of this article is probably because it is a stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Well,The issue is that the article, while it does pass Non-Controversial and Stubby, It doesn’t jump over hits,and for Importance..It’s at a ??? but it doesn’t seem Top or High. As a result,that’s a. 2.5/4. That’s not enough for me to go support,but it isn’t enough for me to go Oppose. Danubeball (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral per my comment. Danubeball (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a current fad/trend and long-term vitalness is unclear, especially with the low number of page hits. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saucer

Saucer – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 149 daily hits

  • Tagged for a decade. Mentions the Middle Ages, so is certainly not a recent invention. And what does it say that flying saucer (which is linked at the top) is in a better state than the common static saucer? Gaois (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, even though the article is tagged for a decade, the hits isn't high enough. SVcode(Talk) 22:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose as per SVcode. Wil540 art (talk) 17:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geography

Pah-Ute County

Pah-Ute County, Arizona Territory – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 240 daily hits

  • High Importance within WP:Nevada, Slides over the 200 rule,start class (Barely even 3 paragraphs.) And most likely non-controversial based off of the No-IP block. Danubeball (talk) 04:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, high enough hits plus article needs expansionn. SVcode(Talk) 21:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History and politics

Abdalá Bucaram

Abdalá Bucaram – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 54 daily hits

  • This is a level 5 vital article and has needed significant attention since 2009. I've tried to do some work on it, but it needs a team effort to become good. The subject has also been in the news in the last six months. -Jmjosh90 22:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abolitionism

Abolitionism – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~900 daily hits

  • A subject of monumental importance to world history, politics, humanity's social evolution and the history of the struggle for racial equality and human rights. The page is currently in a poor state of verification, with numerous unsourced parts. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currency of Spain

Currency of Spain – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~224 daily hits

  • This 82-character* sub-stub is not only our only article on Spanish currency. It's also the only page available for History of Spanish currency which was obviously enormously important through the entire early modern period as Europe started gobbling up the world. (Let alone that you've also got Castilian, Leonese, Valencian, &c. medieval currencies.) There are a few (still bad) longer articles on specific coins but this obviously needs a dedicated overview and fleshing out. The only reason the page hits are so low for this is because the treatment is so bad most articles link elsewhere or don't even bother at the moment. There are obviously hundred of articles talking about this subject, from the price of Magellan's ships to the pay for tercios in the Spanish Netherlands to treaty agreements... leaving aside anyone interested in the currency of modern Spain, its administration, or its development prior to the euro or the Spanish-specific aspects of the euro.

    * For the curious, Currency of the United Kingdom and Currency of the United States link directly to pound sterling and United States dollar but there are five separate pages on the history of the English penny and History of the United States dollar is currently at 31797 characters. — LlywelynII 06:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Weaver

Warren Weaver – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~30 daily hits

  • The article on Warren Weaver has a lot of room for improvement. He is one of the most important people who came up with the principles for machine translation. I believe this could be a Level 4, maybe even a Level 3, article. I'm certainly not that great at editing, but I tried to make some of my own changes. Although, I made the reference to my source repeat too much. GoutComplex (talk) 02:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Achaemenid Empire

Achaemenid Empire – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~4670 daily hits

  • The article on the Achaemenid Empire, a.k.a. the Persian Empire, has some clear room for improvement - there are about 30 citation needed tags, and the importance of the article (level 3 vital article) is fairly beyond doubt. It would definitely be good to get some attention on this, and given the number of main articles links within sections, better sourcing should not be hard to find. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, needs more sourcing. SVcode(Talk) 23:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, Clearly in need of at least some aid. Danubeball (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K. R. Narayanan

K. R. Narayanan – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 941 daily hits

  • Article on former Indian President is presently assessed as B class and IMO there is scope to improve it to A class with little more effort. Bookku (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, Article looks fine. SVcode(Talk) 23:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Article looks good. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Romina Pourmokhtari

Romina Pourmokhtari – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1,340 daily hits

  • This article is definitely crucial, since Pourmokhtari is currently the Minister for the Environment in Sweden, and it is a mere stub and has a lot of daily hits, hence it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, has lots of hits but needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intangible cultural heritage

Intangible cultural heritage – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 288 daily hits

  • Article with greater than 200 hits that needs cleanup and expansion. SVcode(Talk) 00:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Language and literature

Alonso Quijano

Alonso Quijano – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 91 daily hits

  • Main Protagonist of Don Quixote, the first modern novel, and the first big hit of literature ever, it is one of the most translated books ever, and it is short and has no citations. Sportsfangnome (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, an important article that needs improvement.SVcode(Talk) 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics and computer science

Keygen

Keygen – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 123 daily hits

  • This article is absolutely crucial, since keygens illegitimately distributed may contain malware, and computer security is absolutely vital even for average PC users, yet it is currently a mere stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, Even though it seems important, it isn't vital article and doesn't have enough hits. SVcode(Talk) 00:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Per nom --Wil540 art (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Computer algebra system

Computer algebra system – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 144 daily hits

  • More expansion and cleanup needed. SVcode(Talk) 23:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3D computer graphics

3D computer graphics – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 528 daily hits

  • More citations and expansion plus other improvements. SVcode(Talk) 01:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Certainly enough importance and pageviews, lacks citations. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 00:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Highly relevant topic and a popular article that needs work. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Browser wars

Browser wars – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 217 daily hits

  • Article that needs more improvement with citations and cleanup. SVcode(Talk) 00:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose. A decent C-class article on a niche topic, and in an area that benefits from systemic bias. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support indeed, could need the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Article can be improved, but is also niche and can face bias Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per Sdkb. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Interesting topic but somewhat niche and historic at this point. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Building Information Modeling

Building Information Modeling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 816 daily hits

  • Article that is poorly sourced and could use some expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Music

Natural sciences

Jewish deli

Jewish deli – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 47 daily hits

  • Historically relevant topic as delicatessens are now seen all over the world. The article is a stub and very thin on information. --Wil540 art (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support An important stub.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon source

Carbon source – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 10 daily hits

  • Because molecules that an organism uses as its carbon source for generating biomass are referred to as "carbon sources" in biology. Highly relevant topic and an article that needs an update. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DCI-P3

DCI-P3 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 368 daily hits

  • Because this colour space is now used widely in video technology, and it has multiple issues (see its talk page), it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, vital article that needs to be updated. SVcode(Talk) 01:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support This article receives high traffic, attention would be worthwhile. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sRGB

SRGB – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 498 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and has been the most frequently used (though many visible colours are not included, even some that can be reproduced in the CMYK printing) RGB colour space, however it is now of Start-class, meaning that Wikipedians that are expert in color science should improve it a.s.a.p.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC) added some words 07:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, Important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe RGB color space

Adobe RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 86 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and a lot of art designers love it, yet it is of Start-class, having two inline templates ({{failed verification}} and {{dubious}}), thus it definitely should be an AFI, despite having a low daily-hit number.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, Vital article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wide-gamut RGB color space

Wide-gamut RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 38 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, yet it is a mere stub, meaning it should be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, Short article in need of major expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ProPhoto RGB color space

ProPhoto RGB color space – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 51 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, and is no doubt for art designers, yet it is a mere stub, meaning it should be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, important article in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

scRGB

ScRGB – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 24 daily hits

  • This article is now considered vital at level 5, yet it is a mere stub, meaning it should be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monorchism

Monorchism – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 136 daily hits

  • This article isn't unimportant and can be even crucial for many readers, and users can easily access it even if they haven't encountered this word before by viewing the hatnote of monarchism (my experience), yet its lead is too short, the section "Causes" lacks inline citations, and the sub-section "Due to testicular cancer" lacks adequate citations.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, article doesn't have enough hits even though it needs improvement. SVcode(Talk) 23:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manx cat

Manx cat – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 817 daily hits

  • Need more citations and expansion.SVcode(Talk) 22:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose Article is long, only 2-3 sections need improvement. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Article is long but still needs work. It's an interesting topic. I support it. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Natural resource

Natural resource – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1426 daily hits

  • Article is common for reference and is a popular page. It is about a subject many people want to learn the bare minimum about, so it only makes since to serve them with a quality and encyclopedic article. Fails to meet many quality standards, and sentences are unclear or meandering.Mebigrouxboy (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, it can do with more expansion but I think that about it. SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Relevant topic and could use a scientific tune up. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental impact of meat production

Environmental impact of meat production – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 157 daily hits

  • Although this article is seemingly detailed, in actuality it is not comprehensive enough, since the "Beneficial environmental effects" section requires expansion, and some statements are currently tagged with "citation needed", "failed verification" and "further explanation needed", meaning this article ought to be an AFI.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, I'm not sure if this should be in AFI because article seems good enough without the "citation needed", "failed verification", etc. SVcode(Talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Article can be improved with sources Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Long article, minority of sections need improvement. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per PerfectSoundWhatever. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Article is rather in-depth/comprehensive already. It needs a couple experts to come edit it, not AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intraventricular block

Intraventricular block – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 16 daily hits

  • This article needs more expansion and small overview about various types of intraventricular blocks which then lead to main articles YitzhakNat (talk) 14:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, this article doesn't have enough hits and isn't important. SVcode(Talk) 00:47, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support few hits but that can be improved by the help of the project. expansion possible.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Very low hits Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Low pageviews / vital-ness; technical subject. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Too specific --Wil540 art (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ipomoea alba

Ipomoea alba – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 248 daily hits

  • This article needs more citations and expanding. SVcode(Talk) 15:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support needs the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Article can be approved Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Low vital-ness / importance. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Article looks pretty good, what do you want from AFI on it? --Wil540 art (talk) 03:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Defibrillation

Defibrillation – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1347 daily hits

  • This article needs more citations. SVcode(Talk) 19:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support High page views, important article with plenty of room for improvement. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 19:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral. I wouldn't say "plenty of room for improvement"—seemingly every instance lacking refs to GA standard has been tagged, and the fact that that hasn't turned the page into a tag-bombed mess is an indicator of how well-developed it is. But it's an important topic; hopefully is this is the AFI of the week, editors will plug some of the remaining gaps. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - Would likely do better with expert attention due to the scrutiny those working on medical articles often face. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Article is important, but is decently developed Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Very light on ilc's. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Important article that could use informed Copy Editing and ILCs. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pitaya

Pitaya – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 3487 daily hits

  • This article has a lot of hits but needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 00:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Interesting and popular food article could use attention. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Egg

Egg – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 859 daily hits

One of the most common and important organisms and is used for a variety of things. The article has a lot of potential, since it is currently C-class, a level 4 vital article, and has a cleanup banner on the top for verification. MasterMatt12(talk) 02:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support Important article that could use an AF nom. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Using this script, I'd say about half of this shockingly short article is unreferenced. Some of the current citations that we do have are a mess, and the lead looks very strange. This article is definitely in need of work. Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People/Companies and organisations/Products

FastPass

FastPass – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2411 daily hits

  • High Improtance within Disney and Theme Parks, start class, has potential for expansion. The only issue maybe would be controversy, but even then, there’s no locks at all for editors. Danubeball (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gundam Evolution

Gundam Evolution – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 115 daily hits

  • This video game, although no vital, actually is still notable, not obscure and the article on it is a mere stub, meaning it requires expansion.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose only 115 daily hits, and a tag on the article is opposite of what you said saying, "This article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines." MasterMatt12💬 ● 📝 00:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Edge

Microsoft Edge – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 894 daily hits

  • This article, although being B-rated, should still be an AFI because it is now considered vital at level 5, its New Edge release history is outdated, and the infobox does not show the newest stable release version and date at all. --RekishiEJ (talk) 07:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC) added the statement that it is now considered vital 10:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Office 2021

Microsoft Office 2021 – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 724 daily hits

  • An article about a frequently used current office suite yet is a mere stub, meaning it definitely should be an AFI. --RekishiEJ (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, lots of hits, needs more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 21:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3dfx Interactive

3dfx Interactive – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 290 daily hits

  1. Support, important article in need of help. SVcode(Talk) 23:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Important article that could use informed editing. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Winamp

Winamp – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 585 daily hits

  • This article, though B-rated, is actually flawed because it requires updating and the new features of Winamp 5.9 is not sufficiently stated.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, even though it is B-class, it needs updating and expanding. SVcode(Talk) 23:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meta Platforms

Meta Platforms – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 7,322 daily hits

  • Article about Facebook parent company needing citation help.SVcode(Talk) 00:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose A substantial amount of the sourcing is primary, but nowhere near a majority. Don't think AFI will do much to fix the primaries. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Not right for AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook Files

Facebook Files – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 595 daily hits

  1. Neutral, has needs to be more expanded but is a recent event and the hits may go down eventually.SVcode(Talk) 00:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Wait to see if views go down Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Lacking pageviews / vital-ness. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, as per PerfectSoundWhatever. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose, as per PerfectSoundWhatever. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy and religion

Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors

Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - ~450 daily hits

  • This is a Level 4 article that needs improvement because of poor citation, a lack of elaboration, and the huge cultural importance and impact of the myths and figures involved. GoutComplex (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ethics

Ethics – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2,258 daily hits

  • This level 2 vital article is in a pretty grim state, with pretty patchy citation despite an abundance of child articles to refer to. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 20:40, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, could use AFI / highly informed editing. It is a huge article. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philosopher

Philosopher – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 654 daily hits

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 22:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy

Philosophy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 4714 daily hits

  • Level 1 vital article, rated C-Class.

Highly important topics: Level 1 vital article and Top Importance to WikiProject Philosophy and Top Importance to Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.5 / Core.
Interesting to the general public: 5.5K daily pageviews and one of the core concept of society.
Needing of improvement: C-Class, Eastern Philosophy just links to the main article.
Not targets of controversy: Stable edit history and Philosophy itself is not a target of controversy.
So I think this article meets the AFI criteria and should be improved. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 01:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support, could expand more. SVcode(Talk) 21:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Long, only obvious issue is the sourcing in the #Historical overview section. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support: The citations remains patchy, despite ample child articles to refer to. Many sections with child articles could likewise do with expanded summaries. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support, Important subject that could use editing. It is a huge article. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Society and social sciences

Agriculture in Haiti

Agriculture in Haiti – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 29 daily hits

  • Very complex and interesting topic with global implications. The article needs attention, specifically copy editing and additional sources. --Wil540 art (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

99-year lease

99-year lease – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 120 daily hits

  • This legal topic is interesting, yet is Start-rated, with some unsourced claims and specifically marked weasel-worded phrases.--RekishiEJ (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Very interesting article subject. The article itself needs work. --Wil540 art (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain Day

Public Domain Day – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 80 daily hits

  • Public Domain Day is a yearly celebration of works entering the public domain, a highly relevant topic to Wiki-work, no matter what country you are editing from. The article is start class and could absolutely use improvements. Wil540 art (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of Texas

Economy of Texas – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 275 daily hits

  • This article definitely needs to be an AFI, because it is tagged with {{Update}} and widely read on the Internet. I discovered the issue after trying to confirm my impression that Texas is economically more equal than California by reading the article (by the way, I finally knew that my impression is true by reading List of U.S. states and territories by income inequality, yet confused because one article in HK01 says that America's Gini index (after governmental intervention) is lower (lower than 0.4) than Hong Kong's (higher than 0.4)). --RekishiEJ (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC) altered diction a little 09:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, Interesting topic but too regional for AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Comment Not too regional for AFI, since Texas is the 2nd-most populous state in the U.S.A, a very strong economy and is now a popular destination for people that emigrate from California, Illinois and New York.--RekishiEJ (talk) 16:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      1. Support RekishiEJ you make good points about the significance of Texas's Economy that I did not consider. I've changed my mind and I now support this nomination. --Wil540 art (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated Care System

Integrated Care System – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 29 daily hits

  • ICSs have become statutory in England since 1 July 2022, and I don't think the article explains them accurately at all or references more recent NHS guidance on them. Still largely in future tense. Highly important as they are the bodies that commission all the nationalised health and care services in England. The page for the bodies they replaced, clinical commissioning groups, has 55 daily views. Djelibey (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, less hits and isn't vital article. SVcode(Talk) 23:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, too regional for AFI. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fenghuang

Fenghuang – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 508 daily hits

  1. Support, Lots of hits but needs expansion and more citations. SVcode(Talk) 00:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Media literacy

Media literacy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 597 daily hits

Important topic with a poor lead and overly technical content. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support, per above. SVcode(Talk) 01:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Could need projects help.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Important topic that could use expansion/attention. Wil540 art (talk) 17:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grading in education

Grading in education – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 347 daily hits

  • Article that needs to be expanded and updated. SVcode(Talk) 00:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose Not that short, merely orange-tagged, sourcing isn't too bad. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose, Per above. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Godi media

Godi media – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 287 daily hits

  1. Support, higher than 200 hits and needs expansion. SVcode(Talk) 14:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support needs the help of the project.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral Article can definitely be improved but is low-importance Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Low importance. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose, Article looks fairly long as of 2022. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bois Locker Room

Bois Locker Room – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1413 daily hits

  • An incredibly confusing and poorly written article about... something? Nigh incomprehensible 00aa0 (talk) 19:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Indeed. Needs help from us.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Seen this before, probably needs taking to AfD. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 19:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, this article has high hits and needs improvement. SVcode(Talk) 20:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - Should be made identifiable and comprehendible at least to a basic level so it would truly benefit from the spotlight provided by this project, before consideration here. Rubbish computer may be correct. Honestly, I am surprised this was not draftified. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose Article should be draftified Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Not vital-y enough. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose, Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Constitutional law of the United States

Constitutional law of the United States – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 32 daily hits

  • An important article, yet requires jurists' attention because the overall organization requires refinement, large parts of this article are quite poorly sourced and seem to contain a significant amount of original research.--RekishiEJ (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, even though with low hits, this article definitely has more room for improvement. SVcode(Talk) 17:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose an important topic for sure, but only to one nation; even then, despite the USA being a first world country the hits here are very low. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Comment this topic is important not just for Americans, since American Supreme Court cases have been studied and used by Taiwanese legal professionals, and Taiwan does not implement common law system at all, unlike America.--RekishiEJ (talk) 08:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per SVcodes rationale.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Tagged as needing expert attention: AFI should be friendly towards new editors. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 11:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Article is used a standard in law and can be improved Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Per Rubbish computer. Also, article is long and appears well-sourced at a glance (probably better from when this was nominated). Better to AFI the worse articles. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c)
  7. Comment I've altered the name, since the target article has been renamed, and updated the "hits" parameter.--RekishiEJ (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose, Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sport

Defense (sports)

Defense (sports) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25 daily hits

  • Defense is used to defend the offense from scoring a point, and it is highly important in the sports world. Sportsfangnome (talk) 21:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, highly important article in need of help. SVcode(Talk) 23:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as per SVcode. Wil540 art (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support BorgQueen (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pool (cue sports)

Pool (cue sports) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 18,943 daily hits

Vital Article Lvl 4, Top Importance within cue sports, start,fits everything. Danubeball (talk) 01:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support, vital article with lots of hits that needs expansion. SVcode(Talk) 23:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support BorgQueen (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eight-ball

Eight-ball – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 23 daily hits

Vital article lvl 5,citation template ever since 2009, despite not as much hits,it still needs some help. Danubeball (talk) 01:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support, important article in need of help.SVcode(Talk) 20:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support as per SVcode. Wil540 art (talk) 17:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia McKinney

Cynthia McKinney – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 46,382 daily hits

  • This article is completely out of date, and is written in a completely non-encyclopedic manner that gives false credence to the conspiracy theories she has spread. Cpotisch (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per AFI.SVcode(Talk) 23:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, The article absolutely needs an informed CE but I don't think AFI is appropriate. --Wil540 art (talk) 03:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Bowling

Fast Bowling – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 291 daily hits

  • Important article that is underdeveloped and needs more citations. SVcode(Talk) 15:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Could get help from project.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Plenty of potential for improvement. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 11:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose. There are many many areas of Wikipedia without an active editor base that desperately need this project's help. Cricket articles are absolutely not one of them. Can we please try harder to make this project one that reduces Wikipedia's systemic bias rather than reinforcing it? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:10, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    We are here to evaluate this article, not the area of the articles scope. Nor the fact that other articles might need our help even more. If you have those concerns, then nominate those articles. A nomination concerns the article, not the scope.BabbaQ (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @BabbaQ, there can only be one weekly AFI at a time, and giving it to this article would mean denying it to a different one. So yes, I think it matters if there are other articles that need our help far more. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose, concur with Sdkb. Scope should matter at AFI, some topics are just never suitable. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 10:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral Article can be improved but does not have a large scope Varedev2 (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose Too long, not vital-y enough. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose, Too regional --Wil540 art (talk) 03:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FK Mladá Boleslav

FK Mladá Boleslav – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1036 daily hits

  • This Czech association football club has some recent history of getting to European football and managed to get 7th place in the 2021-22 Fortunaliga, but it has a bad article, at least in my opinion. SpyridisioAnnis Discussion 14:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Neutral, article looks fine but can do with a bit more expansion. SVcode(Talk) 22:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Draft:Thunkable

(Draft:Thunkable) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - (Number of daily hits) daily hits

  • The draft Draft:Thunkable needs improvement. It is a draft, but we can still improve this because after it gets improved, it will finally be edited again and submitted. I don't know what the class is. Cleanup has already been done, so don't need to say "cleanup".Thanks, WPchanger2011 (page | talk | contributions) 21:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations&oldid=1139189989"