Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/April 2024

2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season[edit]

The 2004–05 season was Arsenal Football Club's 13th season in the Premier League and their 79th consecutive season in the top flight of English football. The club ended the campaign as FA Cup winners, but failed to retain their Premier League title as they finished second to Chelsea. In the UEFA Champions League, Arsenal made an exit in the knockout stages to Bayern Munich.

2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season

4 articles

2004 FA Community Shield

Battle of the Buffet

2005 FA Cup final

Contributor(s): Lemonade51, PeeJay

I am nominating this topic because I believe these articles now collectively constitute a complete topic. The topic was nominated in January 2019, but was not listed because the articles overlapped with another topic. However, this topic has since been delisted due to its incompleteness; it is also my opinion that that the rivalry topic should not have existed. Nonetheless, I think this should be a straightforward addition. See also: 1991–92 season & 2002–03 season --Idiosincrático (talk) 07:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support igordebraga ≠ 16:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - all looks good -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Phikia (talk) 15:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nothing wrong here. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 17:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work NapHit (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. Aza24 (talk) 02:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 03:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Green Bay Packers presidents[edit]

The Green Bay Packers are an American football team in the National Football League (NFL). Unlike all other teams in the NFL, the Packers are owned by a public, non-profit corporation made-up of over 500,000 shareholders. The shareholders elect a board of directors each year that is led my an executive committee. The head of that committee is the president of the team. Since the team's formation in 1923 as a public, non-profit entity, the Packers have had 11 presidents in their history. The current president, Mark Murphy, has led the team since 2008.

Green Bay Packers presidents

12 articles

Contributor(s): Gonzo_fan2007

The topic covers the bios of all 11 presidents, as well as the overview list of presidents. These articles are linked by a navbox template. All other criteria are met. -- « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. All articles cover the topic. Wonderful work! TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 05:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: List is promoted to featured list and all 11 people included in the list have been promoted to GA. Looks good and makes sense to me. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Everything looks good to me. -- ZooBlazer 17:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. Aza24 (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Green Bay Packers presidents}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 03:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asteroid belt[edit]

The asteroid belt is a torus-shaped region in the Solar System, centered on the Sun and roughly spanning the space between the orbits of the planets Jupiter and Mars. It contains a great many solid, irregularly shaped bodies called asteroids or minor planets. The identified objects are of many sizes, but much smaller than planets, and, on average, are about one million kilometers (or six hundred thousand miles) apart. The asteroid belt is the smallest and innermost known circumstellar disc in the Solar System. About 60% of the main belt mass is contained in the four largest asteroids: Ceres, Vesta, Pallas, and Hygiea. The total mass of the asteroid belt is estimated to be 3% that of the Moon.

5 articles

Contributor(s): Serendipodous; RJHall; Deuar; Nergaal; Ruslik0; Urhixidur; Kwamikagami

Demoted in 2020 once Ceres lost FA status, the article has since gotten its star back, so there are no impediments for a restoration. --igordebraga ≠ 17:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 08:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work getting it back to FA! Reywas92^Talk 22:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Per nom and bc of restoration, it's now eligible -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom -- ZooBlazer 20:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 17:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. Aza24 (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Coord note: We're testing a bot promotion with this one, since its a former topic. If there are any glitches I'll step in with a manual promotion. Aza24 (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Asteroid belt}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 06:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topic was promoted by MaranoFan via NovemBot (talk) 07:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase One films[edit]

Phase One of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) is a group of American superhero films produced by Marvel Studios based on characters that appear in publications by Marvel Comics. The films include Iron Man (2008) with Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark / Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk (2008) from Universal Pictures with Edward Norton as Bruce Banner / Hulk, the sequel Iron Man 2 (2010), Thor (2011) with Chris Hemsworth as Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) with Chris Evans as Steve Rogers / Captain America, and the ensemble The Avengers (2012) with Downey, Hemsworth, Evans, Scarlett Johansson, and Jeremy Renner reprising their roles and Mark Ruffalo replacing Norton. Samuel L. Jackson has the most appearances in the Phase, starring or making cameo appearances as Nick Fury in five of the films. The six films grossed over US$3.8 billion at the global box office. Phase One, along with Phase Two and Phase Three, constitutes the MCU's "Infinity Saga".

Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One

7 articles

Iron Man

The Incredible Hulk

Iron Man 2

Thor

Captain America: The First Avenger

The Avengers

Contributor(s): ZooBlazer, Adamstom.97, Favre1fan93, Richiekim, TriiipleThreat, among others

After the MCU films GT was demoted a while back, it was suggested to instead make the individual Phases their own GTs. Now that Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One is a GA, it's time to set that plan into motion. For now I just have the films, but wasn't sure if List of Marvel Cinematic Universe film actors (The Infinity Saga) should be included or not. I just know that the old topic included it. -- Zoo Blazer 16:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Marvel Cinematic Universe film actors (The Infinity Saga) should be excluded as it includes more than just Phase One. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Good job on the nomination. Okmrman (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: As per the nom, all the films are GAs, good work overall :) Dcdiehardfan (talk) 22:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Great work on MCU as always! Pseud 14 (talk) 01:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good to see the Phase articles are getting good enough to make proper topics out of them. igordebraga ≠ 02:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 04:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great work. NapHit (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This will be the first step out of many... TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 01:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Great work all involved! Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted.--N Ø 06:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase One films}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 07:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The topic was promoted by Novem Linguae via NovemBot (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hypericum sect. Androsaemum[edit]

This topic is a section of related species of flowering plants in the genus Hypericum. They are well-attested in literature, with a wide distribution and use as garden or ornamental plants. All four species and the one hybrid are Good Articles, as is the section itself, and I am nominated them for the first of (hopefully) several Good Topics on the genus Hypericum. Fritzmann (message me) 13:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hypericum sect. Androsaemum

6 articles

Hypericum androsaemum

Hypericum hircinum

Hypericum foliosum

Hypericum × inodorum

Hypericum grandifolium

Support – This is an awesome collection, very well done. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 05:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job, I hope you continue with this thorough work! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. AryKun (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted.--N Ø 06:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
* There was an issue that prevented the promotion bot from promoting this topic. Please solve the issue and run the bot again. The error description is: On page Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Hypericum sect. Androsaemum/archive1, when parsing the list of topics in {{t|featured topic box}}, found some templates. Try subst:-ing them, then re-running the bot. NovemBot (talk) 07:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Hypericum sect. Androsaemum}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The topic was promoted by Novem Linguae via NovemBot (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1989 (Taylor's Version)[edit]

1989 (Taylor's Version) by the American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift is a re-recording of her 2014 studio album. Released on October 27, 2023, 1989 (Taylor's Version) includes re-recorded versions of all songs on the original album and five unreleased "From the Vault" tracks. The re-recorded album became Swift's sixth release to sell over one million first-week US copies.

1989 (Taylor's Version)

5 articles

"'Slut!'"

"Say Don't Go"

"Now That We Don't Talk"

"Is It Over Now?"

Contributor(s): Ippantekina, Ronherry, Gained

All articles within scope are GA. If promoted, this will be a subtopic to 1989 (album). --Ippantekina (talk) 13:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – The topic only includes the new "from the vault" songs released with the album; because this is a subtopic on 1989, the exclusion of the original songs shouldn't be a problem. I assume there's some legitimate reason why there's no "Suburban Legends" article as WP:SWIFT is usually quite thorough. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a draft for Suburban Legends in the works... might have to promote it to GA status as soon as possible (should it go into ~~the outside~~ mainspace) Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the editor who is expanding the draft, I don't think I'm gonna work on it until "Mr. Perfectly Fine", the article I'm currently working on, is GA-ready. Gained (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understandable... (be sure to make Suburban Legends GA-ready for it). Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support igordebraga ≠ 02:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support! — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 04:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted.--N Ø 06:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
* There was an issue that prevented the promotion bot from promoting this topic. Please solve the issue and run the bot again. The error description is: On page Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/1989 (Taylor's Version)/archive1, when parsing the list of topics in {{t|featured topic box}}, found some templates. Try subst:-ing them, then re-running the bot. NovemBot (talk) 07:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/1989 (Taylor's Version)}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Celebration (Madonna album)[edit]

Celebration is the third greatest hits album by American singer-songwriter Madonna, released on September 18, 2009, by Warner Bros. Records. The album features 34 songs spanning Madonna's career since signing up with the label in 1982. It also includes three new songs: "Celebration" which is included on all versions, "Revolver" which is included on the two-disc editions, and "It's So Cool" which is included as a bonus track on some digital two-disc editions. The compilation DVD Celebration: The Video Collection was released alongside the album.

Celebration (Madonna album)

38 articles

"Hung Up"

"Music"

"Vogue"

"4 Minutes"

"Holiday"

"Everybody"

"Sorry"

"Borderline"

"Secret"

"Erotica"

"Revolver"

"Lucky Star"

"Burning Up"

"Crazy for You"

"Who's That Girl"

"Frozen"

"Miles Away"

"Take a Bow"

"Hollywood"

"Cherish"

"Celebration"

Celebration: The Video Collection

Contributor(s): 11JORN, IndianBio, Legolas2186, Chrishm21, Theknine2

Back in 2010, this topic was promoted with just the album, the new songs, and the DVD, leading to a demotion for the obvious gap that it's the rest of the tracklist. Well, took WP:MADONNA long but the 34 (!) hits included in the compilation are now Good or Featured, and the Topic can earn the necessary Love Profusion to return to the GT. --igordebraga ≠ 05:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I never quite realised how impressive WP:MADONNA was. Having the songs and DVD listed instead of the individual albums is much better. For some songs such as Everybody, this would be their third topic; I'm supporting under the assumption that it is okay, despite not knowing of any other similar cases. Idiosincrático (talk) 04:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for a job well done Kekkomereq1 (talk) 08:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support 38 articles. Wow. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support; great work. ^Queenof_Hearts 19:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closing with consensus to promote.--N Ø 06:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topic was promoted by Aza24 via NovemBot (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Avengers films[edit]

The Avengers are a team of fictional superheroes and the protagonists of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) media franchise, based on the Marvel Comics team of the same name created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby in 1963. Founded by S.H.I.E.L.D. Director Nick Fury, the team is a United States-based organization composed primarily of superpowered and gifted individuals, described as "Earth's Mightiest Heroes", who are committed to the world's protection from a variety of threats. Initially arranged as an ensemble of core MCU characters consisting of Tony Stark / Iron Man, Steve Rogers / Captain America, Thor, Bruce Banner / Hulk, Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow, and Clint Barton / Hawkeye, and later expanding to 16 members. The Avengers are central to the MCU's first 23 films, collectively known as the "Infinity Saga", which included four Avengers films: The Avengers (2012), Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015), Avengers: Infinity War (2018), and Avengers: Endgame (2019). The franchise is the sixth highest-grossing film series of all-time, grossing more than US$7.7 billion at the worldwide box office. The Avengers are set to return in Avengers 5 (2026) and Avengers: Secret Wars (2027). Both will be part of the MCU's Phase Six, concluding the "Multiverse Saga".

5 articles

Endgame

Contributor(s): ZooBlazer, Adamstom.97, Favre1fan93, Trailblazer101, Facu-el Millo, InfiniteNexus, Chompy Ace, TriiipleThreat, Richiekim, Dcdiehardfan, among others

The Avengers is the biggest franchise within the MCU, so it felt like after four films, and two more announced, it was past time to make a GT of some sort. Due to there not being an article dedicated only to the Avengers franchise, making Avengers the lead article was the next best option. As a result, the accolades are included as they encompass the films and the actors/individual characters. -- Zoo Blazer 00:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Avengers (Marvel Cinematic Universe) should be a topic because it is a notable franchise. However, I think the collection of articles is incomplete; for example, there are articles covering the soundtracks and box office records which aren't included and are fundamental to the completeness of the films mentioned. Instead, I'd like to suggest that this topic include only the four current Avengers films, and that each film have a respective subtopic. For example, the Avengers: Infinity War subtopic would include its accolades, box office records, soundtrack and production. These subtopics can also be noted on the phase topics as well. This way, every article concerning the topic is covered and we still get an Avengers topic. Let me know if this doesn't make sense. Idiosincrático (talk) 05:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The soundtracks wouldn't make sense here as the scope is more about the team (which is what the lead article is) since it can't be entirely about the films without a dedicated article. The soundtracks have nothing to do with the team/characters. Subtopics could maybe work, but just an FYI, from what I've heard, the box office records lists are frowned upon at FLC, so they could likely ruin some topics since they probably will never get promoted. -- Zoo Blazer 05:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the Avengers (MCU) article is about the fictional superheroes and protagonists (like the lead says), should this topic not instead list the roster of characters within the team; ie. Tony Stark, Thor etc? I get that "the Avengers is the biggest franchise within the MCU", but there is no article about the 'Avengers film franchise'; Avengers (film series) redirects to List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Topics like Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase One films, in my opinion, are more than enough coverage for the film series alone. Instead, sub-topics for each individual film is more appropriate. These said sub-topics should include both the soundtracks and any respective box office list/article; a topic constitutes a complete grouping of every article/list related to the lead article (so long as the article/list exists). The reason why the box office records lists are unpopular is because they're not encyclopaedic and content-forking, this was discussed here with no consensus to delete in 2018. This was done at the time of film release, a nomination to delete or merge now would be probably be more successful. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I will narrow this down to just the films as you suggested above. -- Zoo Blazer 07:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think Idiosincrático is right that the Avengers character article should probably by part of a character topic with the individual character articles. I don't think it makes sense to treat it like an Avengers film franchise topic. These films all fit well in the Phase topics that we are already planning. - adamstom97 (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice effort. And given that somehow there are a lot of separate articles for the MCU incarnations of the characters, the top article can even be used if there's ever an "MCU Avengers members" topic. igordebraga ≠ 18:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on the narrowed down GT of including the Avengers films only. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I see the above suggestions have been implemented and it meets all the necessary criteria for inclusion. -Dcdiehardfan (talk) 02:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. Aza24 (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Avengers films}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.