Linear Tape-Open

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Accelis)
Jump to: navigation, search
LTO-2 cartridge

Linear Tape-Open (LTO) is a magnetic tape data storage technology originally developed in the late 1990s as an open standards alternative to the proprietary magnetic tape formats that were available at the time. Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Quantum control the LTO Consortium, which directs development and manages licensing and certification of media and mechanism manufacturers.

The standard form-factor of LTO technology goes by the name Ultrium, the original version of which was released in 2000 and could hold 100 GB of data in a cartridge. The sixth generation of LTO Ultrium was released in 2012 and can hold 2.5 TB in a cartridge of the same size.

Upon introduction, LTO Ultrium rapidly defined the super tape market segment and has consistently been the best-selling super tape format.[1][2] LTO is widely used with small and large computer systems, especially for backup.

Historical context[edit]

Half-inch (½-inch, 12.65 mm) magnetic tape has been used for data storage for more than 60 years. In the mid 1980s, IBM and DEC put this kind of tape into a single reel, enclosed cartridge. Although the physical tape was nominally the same size, the technologies and intended markets were significantly different and there was no compatibility between them. IBM called its format 3480 (after IBM's one product that used it) and designed it to meet the demanding requirements of its mainframe products. DEC originally called theirs CompacTape, but later it was renamed DLT and sold to Quantum Corporation. In the late 1980s, Exabyte's Data8 format, derived from Sony's dual-reel cartridge 8 mm video format, saw some popularity, especially with UNIX systems. Sony followed this success with their own now-discontinued 8 mm data format, Advanced Intelligent Tape (AIT).


By the late 1990s, Quantum's DLT and Sony's AIT were the leading options for high-capacity tape storage for PC servers and UNIX systems. These technologies were (and still are) tightly controlled by their owners. Consequently, there was little competition between vendors and the prices were relatively high.

To counter this, IBM, HP and Seagate formed the LTO Consortium, which introduced a more open format focusing on the same mid-range market segment.[3] Much of the technology is an extension of the work done by IBM at its Tucson lab during the previous 20 years.[4] Initial plans called for two LTO formats to directly compete with these market leaders. Ultrium was half-inch tape on a single reel, optimized for high-capacity and Accelis was supposed to be 8 mm tape on dual-reels, optimized for low-latency.

Around the time of the release of LTO-1, Seagate's magnetic tape division was spun off as Seagate Removable Storage Solutions, later renamed Certance, which was subsequently acquired by Quantum.



LTO Ultrium was developed as a replacement for DLT and has a similar design of ½-inch wide tape in a (slightly smaller) single reel cartridge. This made it easy for robotic tape library vendors to convert their DLT libraries into LTO libraries.

Compatibility between generations of drives, formats, and cartridges is as follows:

  • An Ultrium drive reads data from a cartridge in its own generation and at least the two prior generations.
  • An Ultrium drive writes data to a cartridge in its own generation and to a cartridge from the immediate prior generation in the prior generation format.


As of December 2012 LTO-6 was the latest generation; further generations are planned as tabulated below.

Attribute LTO-1 LTO-2 LTO-3 LTO-4 LTO-5 LTO-6 LTO-7 LTO-8 LTO-9 LTO-10
Release date 2000 2003 2005 2007 2010 Dec. 2012[5] TBA TBA TBA TBA
Native data capacity 100 GB 200 GB 400 GB 800 GB 1.5 TB[6] 2.5 TB[7] 6.4 TB[8] 12.8 TB[8] 26 TB[9] 48 TB[9]
Max uncompressed speed (MB/s)[8][Note 1] 20 40 80 120 140 160 315 472 708 1100
Compression capable? ALDC "2:1" LTO-DC "2.5:1" Planned "2.5:1"[10][9]
WORM capable? No Yes Planned
Encryption capable? No Yes Planned
Partition capable? No (1 allowed) Yes (2 allowed) Yes (4 allowed) Planned
Tape thickness 8.9 µm 8 µm 6.6 µm 6.4 µm 6.1 µm[11]
Tape length 609 m 680 m 820 m 846 m[12]
Tape tracks 384 512 704 896 1280 2176[13]
Write elements 8 16[6][13]
Wraps per band 12 16 11 14 20[6] 34
Linear density (bits/mm) 4880 7398 9638 13,250 15,142[14] 15,143[15]
Encoding RLL 1,7 RLL 0,13/11; PRML RLL 32/33; PRML 32/33 RLL NPML[15]
Cartridge memory 4 KB 8 KB 16 KB[13]:5
Magnetic pigment material Metal Particulate (MP) MP or BaFe[16]
Comparison of "supertape" capacities, including LTO.
  • First commercially available in September 2000.[17]
  • Ultrium-1 specification is now Standard ECMA-319[18]
  • Initial capacity of 100 GB, data transfer speed of 20 MB/s (maximum)
  • First mechanisms approved in February 2003.[19] First media approved in March 2003.[20]
  • Doubled capacity to 200 GB, increased data transfer speed to 40 MB/s (maximum).
  • First media approved in November 2004.[21]
  • Doubled capacity to 400 GB, increased data transfer speed to 80 MB/s (maximum).
  • Introduced WORM feature.
  • First mechanisms approved in April 2007.[22] First media approved in May 2007.[23]
  • Doubled capacity again to 800 GB, increased data transfer rate to 120 MB/s (maximum).
  • Introduced drive level encryption feature using 256-bit AES-GCM.
  • Specifications announced January 19, 2010. The first LTO-5 drives appeared on the market in Q2, 2010.[24]
  • Nearly doubled capacity to 1.5 TB (1500 GB), increased data transfer rate to 140 MB/s (maximum).
  • Introduced partition feature that allows tape to be "split" into two separately writable areas. This feature is required by LTFS.[25][26]
  • Licensing Specifications announced June 11, 2012.[7]
  • Increased capacity to 2.5 TB, data transfer rate to 160 MB/s (maximum).
  • Increased estimated data-compression ratio due to a larger compression buffer.


  • Data capacity and speed figures above are for uncompressed data. Most manufacturers list compressed capacities on their marketing material. Capacities are often stated on tapes as double the actual value; they assume that data will be compressed with a 2:1 ratio (IBM uses a 3:1 compression ratio in the documentation for its mainframe tape drives. Sony uses a 2.6:1 ratio for SAIT). See LTO-DC below.
  • The units for data capacity and data transfer rates generally follow the "decimal" SI prefix convention (e.g. mega = 106) and not the binary prefix convention (e.g. mega = 220).
  • Minimum and maximum reading and writing speeds are drive-dependent.

Core technology[edit]

Tape layout[edit]

LTO Ultrium tape is laid out with four wide data bands sandwiched between five narrow servo bands. The tape head assembly straddles two adjacent servo bands, with 2 servo read heads and 8 or 16 data read/write heads. Each data head moves up and down within its own data sub-band the same width as the servo band. First, the head assembly is positioned so all tape heads are at the top of their sub-bands and 8 or 16 tracks are written in the forward direction. Then the head assembly is moved to the bottom of each sub-band and 8 or 16 tracks are written in the reverse direction. The set of tracks written at the same time is referred to as a "wrap". Alternating forward and reverse wraps are written as each data sub-band is filled up in 0, 2, 4, ..., 5, 3, 1 order.

When the first data band is filled (they are actually filled in 3, 1, 0, 2 order across the tape), the head assembly is moved to the second data band and a new set of wraps is written. The total number of tracks on the tape is (4 data bands) × (11–20 wraps per band) × (8 or 16 tracks per wrap). For example, an LTO-2 tape has 16 wraps per band, and thus requires 64 passes to fill.

The block structure of the tape is logical so interblock gaps, file marks, tape marks and so forth take only a few bytes each. In LTO-1 and LTO-2, this logical structure has CRC codes and compression added to create blocks of 403,884 bytes. Another chunk of 468 bytes of information (including statistics and information about the drive that wrote the data and when it was written) is then added to create a 'dataset'. Finally error correction bytes are added to bring the total size of the dataset to 491,520 bytes (480 KB) before it is written in a specific format across the eight heads. LTO-3 and LTO-4 use a similar format with 1,616,940-byte blocks.[27]

Error detection and correction[edit]

The tape drives use a strong error correction algorithm that makes data recovery possible when lost data is within one track.[28] Also, when data is written to the tape it is verified by reading it back using the read heads that are positioned just 'behind' the write heads. This allows the drive to write a second copy of any data that fails the verify without the help of the host system.

Positioning times[edit]

While specifications vary somewhat between different drives, a typical LTO-3 drive will have a maximum rewind time of about 80 seconds and an average access time (from beginning of tape) of about 50 seconds.[29] Because of the serpentine writing, rewinding often takes less time than the maximum. If a tape is written to full capacity, there is no rewind time, since the last pass is a reverse pass leaving the head at the beginning of the tape (number of tracks ÷ tracks written per pass is always an even number).

Tape durability[edit]

  • 15 to 30 years archival.[30][31]
  • Approximately 200-364 full file passes. (One full file pass is equal to writing enough data to fill an entire tape.)[30]

The following durability figures are quoted from Imation's Expected Usage Life of Imation Media:[32]

General specifications Lifetime tape durability Approximate years of life
assuming one tape filled...
Tape type Capacity Tracks Tracks
per pass
to write
entire tape
Per month Per week
LTO-1 100 GB 384 8 48 9600 200 17 4
LTO-2 200 GB 512 8 64 16,000 250 21 5
LTO-3 400 GB 704 16 44 16,000 364 30 7
LTO-4 800 GB 896 16 56 11,200 200 17 4
LTO-5 1500 GB 1280 16 80 16,000 200 17 4
LTO-6 2500 GB 2176 16 136

There is a large amount of lifespan variability in actual use:

  • Regularly writing only 50% capacity of the tape results in half as many end-to-end tape passes for each scheduled backup, and doubles the tape lifespan.
  • LTO uses an automatic verify-after-write technology to immediately check the data as it is being written,[33][34] but some backup systems explicitly perform a completely separate tape reading operation to verify the tape was written correctly. This separate verify operation doubles the number of end-to-end passes for each scheduled backup, and reduces the tape life by half.

Technical features[edit]

In addition to increasing data capacity and data transfer rates, several generations of LTO have introduced new technical features.


The original LTO specification describes a data compression method LTO-DC, also called Streaming Lossless Data Compression (SLDC).[35][36] It is very similar to the algorithm ALDC[37] which is a variation of LZS. LTO-1 through LTO-5 are advertised as achieving a "2:1" compression ratio, while LTO-6, which applies the same compression algorithm to larger blocks of data, is advertised as having a "2.5:1" ratio. This is inferior to slower algorithms such as gzip, but similar to lzop and the high speed algorithms built into other tape drives.

The primary difference between ALDC and SLDC is that SLDC does not apply the compression algorithm to incompressible data (i.e. data that is already compressed or sufficiently random to defeat the compression algorithm). Every block of data written to tape has a header bit indicating whether the block is compressed or raw. For each block of data that the algorithm works on, it saves a copy of the raw data. After applying the compression function to the data, the algorithm compares the "compressed" data block to the raw data block in memory and writes the smaller of the two to tape. The extra bit used by SLDC to differentiate between raw and compressed blocks effectively places an upper bound on the expansion of incompressible data.


New for LTO-3 was write once read many (WORM) capability. This is normally only useful for legal record keeping. An LTO-3 or later drive will not erase or overwrite data on a WORM cartridge, but will read it. A WORM cartridge is identical to a normal tape cartridge of the same generation with the following exceptions: the cartridge memory identifies it to the drive as WORM, the servo tracks are slightly different to allow verification that data has not been modified, the bottom half of the cartridge shell is gray,[38] and it may come with tamper-proof screws.[39] WORM-capable drives immediately recognize WORM cartridges and include a unique WORM ID with every dataset written to the tape. There is nothing different about the tape medium in a WORM cartridge.


The LTO-4 specification added a feature to allow LTO-4 drives to encrypt data before it is written to tape.[40] All LTO-4 drives must be aware of encrypted tapes, but are not required to actually support the encryption process. All current LTO manufacturers support encryption natively enabled in the tape drives using Application Managed Encryption (AME). The algorithm used by LTO-4 is AES-GCM, which is an authenticated, symmetric block cipher. The same key is used to encrypt and decrypt data, and the algorithm can detect tampering with the data. Tape drives, tape libraries, and backup software can request and exchange encryption keys using either proprietary protocols, or an open standard like OASIS's Key Management Interoperability Protocol.


The LTO-5 specification introduced the partitioning feature that allows a tape to be divided into two separate paritions. LTO-6 extends the specification to allow 4 separate partitions.


The Linear Tape File System (LTFS) is a self-describing tape format and file system made possible by the partition feature. File data and filesystem metadata are stored in separate partitions on the tape. The metadata, which uses a standard XML schema, is readable by any LTFS-aware system and can be modified separately from the data it describes.

LTFS allows:

  • Files and directories to appear on desktop and directory listings
  • Drag-and-drop files to/from tape
  • File level access to data
  • Supports data exchange

With LTFS tape media can be used in a fashion like other removable media (USB flash drive, external hard disk drive, etc.). With LTFS the drive may behave like a disk (drive) but it is still a tape with serial access. Files are always appended to the end of the tape. If a file is removed from the listing the associated tape blocks used are not freed up, they are simply marked as unavailable. Data is only deleted if the whole tape is reformatted.

LTFS now supports 'Library mode' facilitating access to multiple tapes in a tape library.

LTFS was first introduced with the IBM LTO Gen5 drive.[41] The Linear Tape File System Technical Work Group of SNIA works on the development of the format for LTFS.[42]


LTO-2 cartridge with the top shell removed, showing the internal components.
Top right corner: tape access gate.
Bottom left corner: write-protect-tab.
Bottom right corner: cartridge memory chip

Compliance-Verified licensed manufacturers of LTO technology media are EMTEC, Imation, Fujifilm, Maxell, TDK and Sony.[43] All other brands of media are manufactured by these companies under contract. Since its bankruptcy in 2003, EMTEC no longer manufactures LTO media products. TDK[44] withdrew from the data tape business in 2014. Verbatim[45] and Quantegy[46] both licensed LTO technology, but never manufactured their own compliance-verified media.

An Ultrium cartridge's dimensions are 102.0 × 105.4 × 21.5 mm.[47]


The colors of LTO Ultrium cartridge shells are mostly consistent, though not formally standardised. HP is the notable exception. Sometimes similar, rather than identical, colors are used by different manufacturers (slate-blue and blue-gray; green, teal, and blue-green).

Typical Black Black Purple Slate-blue / Blue-gray Green / Green-gray / Teal Dark red[48] Black[49]
HP Orange Blue Dark red Yellow Green[50] Light blue[51] Purple[52]
  • UCC means universal cleaning cartridge, which works with all drives.
  • WORM (write once, read many) cartridges are two-tone, the top half of the shell is the normal color of that generation for that manufacturer, and the bottom half of the shell is a light gray.

Cartridge memory[edit]

LTO cartridge memory

Every LTO cartridge has a cartridge memory chip inside it. It is made up of 256 (128 on LTO-1, 2 and 3) blocks of memory, where each block is 32 bytes for a total of 8 KB (4 KB on LTO-1, 2 and 3). This memory can be read or written, one block at a time, via a non-contacting passive 13.56 MHz RF interface. This memory is used to identify tapes, to help drives discriminate between different generations of the technology, and to store tape-use information.

Every LTO drive has a cartridge memory reader in it. The non-contact interface has a range of 20 mm.[53] External readers are available, both built into tape libraries and PC based. One such reader, Veritape, connects by USB to a PC and integrates with analytical software to evaluate the quality of tapes.[54] This device is also rebranded as the Spectra MLM Reader[55] and the Maxell LTO Cartridge Memory Analyzer.[56]


An example of an LTO-6 label

The LTO cartridge label uses the bar code symbology of USS-39. A description and definition is available from the Automatic Identification Manufacturers (AIM) specification Uniform Symbol Specification (USS-39) and the ANSI MH10.8M-1993 ANSI Barcode specification.

Leader pin[edit]

Leader pin on the end of a length of LTO tape

The tape inside an LTO cartridge is wound around a single reel. The end of the tape is attached to a perpendicular leader pin that is used by an LTO drive to reliably grasp the end of the tape and mount it in a take-up reel inside the drive. Older single-reel tape technologies, such as 9 track tape and DLT, used different means to load tape onto a take-up reel.

When a cartridge is not in a drive, the pin is held in place at the opening of the cartridge with a small spring. A common reason for a cartridge failing to load into a drive is the misplacement of the leader pin as a result of the cartridge having been dropped. The plastic slot where the pin is normally held is deformed by the drop and the leader pin is no longer in the position that the drive expects it to be.


The magnetic servo tracks on the tape are factory encoded. Using a bulk eraser, degaussing, or otherwise exposing the cartridge to a strong magnetic field, will erase the servo tracks along with the data tracks, rendering the cartridge unusable.


Current Compliance-Verified licensed manufacturers of LTO technology mechanisms are IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Quantum, and Tandberg Storage.[43] The mechanisms, also known as tape drives or streamers, are availabile in Full-height and Half-height form factors. These drives are frequently packaged into external desktop enclosures or carriers that fit into a robotic tape library.


Internal head cleaning brush from an IBM LTO-2 FH drive. Swipes once for every insert and eject

Although keeping a tape drive clean is important, normal cleaning cartridges are abrasive and frequent use will shorten the drive's lifespan. LTO drives have an internal tape head cleaning brush that is activated when a cartridge is inserted. When a more thorough cleaning is required the drive signals this on its display and/or via Tape Alert flags.[57] Cleaning cartridge lifespan is usually from 15 to 50 cleanings. There are 2 basic methods of initiating a cleaning of a drive: robot cleaning and software cleaning.

Market performance[edit]

LTO technology competes in the market against other tape technologies and hard disk technology. In the course of its existence, LTO has succeeded on both fronts, almost completely displacing all other mid-range and low-end tape technologies and preventing, or at least delaying, the predicted "death of tape"[58] at the hands of disk. At the high-end of the tape market, the IBM 3592 series and Oracle T10k series products are still viable and under active development.

The presence of five certified media manufacturers and four certified mechanism manufacturers has produced a competitive market for LTO products. This has led to attractive prices for customers and high sales volumes for manufacturers. In 2002 LTO out-shipped SDLT by nearly 2 to 1. Sales since then have dominated other "super" formats (SDLT, SAIT). As a result, Quantum discontinued development of new DLT products in February 2007 and Sony followed suit by declaring AIT End-of-Life in March 2010.

LTO drive sales.svg[59][60] LTO cartridge sales.svg[61][60]

As hard disk drive prices have dropped, disk has become cheaper relative to tape drives and cartridges. As of 2013 the cost of an LTO-5 drive taking tapes of up to 1.5 TB true (uncompressed) capacity was about US$1800. As of 2013 a tape cartridge is still cheaper than a disk drive, as a 1.5 TB magnetic tape cartridge costs about US$40 whereas a hard disk drive with the same capacity costs about US$70 to US$100.

Unsuccessful LTO variants[edit]

Some planned LTO variations were not produced, or produced only briefly.


LTO technology was originally designed to come in two form factors, Ultrium and Accelis.[62] As of 2008 LTO Ultrium was very popular and there were no commercially available LTO Accelis drives or media.[63] In common usage, LTO generally refers only to the Ultrium form factor.

Accelis was developed in 1997 for fast access to data by using a two-reel cartridge that loads at the midpoint of the 8 mm wide tape to minimize access time. IBM's (short-lived) 3570 Magstar MP product pioneered this concept. The real-world performance never exceeded that of the Ultrium tape format, so there was never a demand for Accelis and no drives or media were commercially produced.

Multiple lengths of LTO-1 tapes[edit]

The first generation of Ultrium tapes were going to be available with four types of cartridge, holding 10 GB, 30 GB, 50 GB, and 100 GB. Only the full length 100 GB tapes were produced.[64]

HP LTO-1 cleaning strategy[edit]

HP LTO Gen.1 drives have a cleaning strategy[65] that will prevent the drive from actually using the cleaning tape if it is not needed. In a change of strategy, HP LTO Gen 2, 3 and 4 drives will always clean when a Universal Cleaning Cartridge is inserted, whether the drive requires cleaning or not.[65]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Super tape drive shipments double in" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-03-06. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  2. ^ "New Freeman Study Projects Major Shifts In Compact Tape — Industry Growth In Units, Revenue Seen" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-03-06. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  3. ^ "HP, IBM, And Seagate Agree to Establish Open Format Specifications for Enterprise and Network Storage" (Press release). LTO. November 4, 1997. Retrieved 2007-10-15. 
  4. ^ "IBM storage history". IBM. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  5. ^ from Quantum and Tandberg, Bechtle Direct catalog 09/2012, p. 450
  6. ^ a b c "The Linear Tape File System". 2010. 
  7. ^ a b "Licensing Specs for LTO-6 Available in August, 2012". Micro-Journal / The LTO Program. 
  8. ^ a b c "Ultrium Generations LTO". Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Quantum. 
  9. ^ a b c Mellor, Chris (11 Sep 2014), "No TKO for LTO: Tape format spawns another 2 generations, sports 120TB bigness", The Register 
  10. ^ Mellor, Chris (2010-04-15). "Two new LTO tape gens announced". The Register. 
  11. ^ "Fujifilm LTO-6 specifications" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  12. ^ Rivera, Rogelio; Vargas, Gustavo; Vázquez, Marco (September 2012), IBM® System Storage® LTO Ultrium 6 Tape Drive Tape Drive Performance White Paper (PDF), IBM Guadalajara, This new capacity is achieved in the same tape length (846 m) as the gen5 media due to a higher density format (gen6 format).  Note that another IBM announcement disagrees: "This is achieved by increasing the linear density, track density, and the media length." (IBM TS1060 LTO-6 tape drive announcement, p. 3.) Note: the difference on the length from LTO5 and LTO6 media is only 1 m.
  13. ^ a b c IBM System Storage TS1060 Tape Drive offers an Ultrium 6 Tape Drive for the TS3500 Tape Library, IBM, 2012-10-03, IBM Hardware Announcement, retrieved 2012-11-05, There are 2,176 data tracks in Ultrium 6 versus 1,280 data tracks in Ultrium 5. 
  14. ^ "LTO-5 Tape Drive User's Guide" (PDF). Quantum. 
  15. ^ a b "LTO-6/LTO-5 Tape Drive Datasheet". Quantum. 
  16. ^ Imation whitepaper: LTO-6 MP or BaFe?
  17. ^ "Linear Tape-Open Program Ships One Million Ultrium Tapes in First 12 Months of Availability for market" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. November 5, 2001. 
  18. ^ "Standard ECMA-319, Ultrium-1". Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  19. ^ "HP, IBM Pass LTO Ultrium Format Generation 2 Mechanism Compliance" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. February 12, 2003. 
  20. ^ "LTO Program Announces LTO Ultrium Generation 2 Compliance-Verified Licenses" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. March 27, 2003. 
  21. ^ "Fujifilm, Imation, Maxell, Sony, TDK Pass LTO Ultrium Generation 3 Data Interchange Compliance Testing" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. November 8, 2004. 
  22. ^ "HP And IBM Pass Mechanism Compliance Testing For LTO Ultrium Format Generation 4 Tape Drives" (Press release). LTO. April 11, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-15. 
  23. ^ "Fujifilm, Imation, Maxell, Sony and TDK Pass LTO Ultrium Generation 4 Data Interchange Compliance Testing" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. May 7, 2007. 
  24. ^ "LTO-5 expected in H1 2010 with 1.6 TB–3.2 TB storage". Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  25. ^ "Trust LTO website". Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  26. ^ "LTO Program Frequently Asked Questions". 2010-04-04. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  27. ^ "Patent application number 20090208018: Data Transfer Device". Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  28. ^ LTO‐3 tape specs, CA: Maxell .
  29. ^ Dell PowerVaultTM 110T drive specification. Retrieved 2009-05-16.[dead link]
  30. ^ a b HP Ultrium Media QuickSpecs v13 (PDF), UK: HP, March 29, 2010, DA-11529 .
  31. ^ "Storage tek tape storage media LTO specs". Oracle and Sun. Sun. 2011-10-04. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  32. ^ "Expected Usage Life of Imation Media" (PDF). Imation. Retrieved 2013-07-16. 
  33. ^ "Primer 3". Ultrium – LTO Technology. LTO. 2010-04-04. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  34. ^ News bytes (PDF), LTO, Jun 2011 .
  35. ^ Standard, ECMA, 321 
  36. ^ Specification of SLDC (PDF), ECMA, 321 .
  37. ^ ALDC documentation, IBM .
  38. ^ "Image of Dell LTO-3 WORM cartridge with gray bottom". 2012-06-06. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  39. ^ "HP Forum: LTO 3 WORM info". Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  40. ^ LTO-4 encryption whitepaper (PDF), HP, p. 11, retrieved 2013-03-29 
  41. ^ "IBM LTO Gen5 drive". IBM. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  42. ^ "Linear Tape File System (LTFS)". SNIA. Retrieved 20 November 2013. 
  43. ^ a b "LTO Compliance-Verified Licencees". Ultrium. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  44. ^ "Notice Concerning Dissolution of Consolidated Subsidiary Due to Business Withdrawal" (Press release). LTO. August 29, 2013. 
  45. ^ "Emtec, Imation, and Verbatim License Linear Tape-Open Technology" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. August 3, 1998. 
  46. ^ "Linear Tape-Open (LTO) Technology Continues Licensee Momentum with Signing of Fujitsu and Quantegy" (PDF) (Press release). LTO. October 21, 1998. 
  47. ^ "LTO cartridge specifications". USA: Fujifilm. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  48. ^ Dark Red Fujifilm LTO-5 cartridge (JPEG), Fuji film [dead link]
  49. ^ "Black Imation LTO-6 WORM cartridge" (JPEG). Nov 2011. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  50. ^ "Green HP LTO4 cartridge" (GIF). AU: Tammex. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  51. ^ Lt Blue HP LTO5 WORM cartridge, Span .
  52. ^ HP LTO‐6 Ultrium tape cartdrige (JPEG), EU: Misco .
  53. ^ "Fujitsu Cartridge Memory documentation" (PDF). US: Fuji film. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  54. ^ "VeriTape the trusted Cartridge Quality Analyzer". MP tapes. 2010-06-15. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  55. ^ "Spectra MLM Reader". Spectra logic. 2007-11-15. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  56. ^ "Maxell LTO Cartridge Memory Analyzer". US: Maxell. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  57. ^ Tape alert .
  58. ^ Data Tape: Dying a Slow Death or Already Dead?
  59. ^ "Freeman Reports". Retrieved 2013-06-02. 
  60. ^ a b Press releases, LTO consortium [dead link]
  61. ^ "Santa Clara Consulting Group - Tape tracker". Retrieved 2015-06-02. 
  62. ^ "Advanced Research, Exabyte, Matsushita, Mitsumi Electric and Otari License Linear Tape-Open Technology". Find articles. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  63. ^ "What Happened to Accellis?". Enterprise storage forum. 2002-09-11. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 
  64. ^ "Consommables informatiques" [Computer supplies] (EMTEC site offering LTO-1 tape cartridges in multiple sizes) (in French). RPS data. 2005-05-09. Archived from the original on 2005-05-09. Retrieved 2013-03-29.  |chapter= ignored (help)
  65. ^ a b "HP cleaning strategy" (PDF). Sundds LTO. Retrieved 2013-03-29. 

External links[edit]