Containment: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:12, 23 April 2008

Containment refers to the foreign policy strategy of the United States in the early years of the Cold War. Its policy was to stop what is called the domino effect of nations moving politically towards Soviet Union-based communism, rather than European-American-based capitalism.

Theory

Containment springs up from the idea that isolation will lead to stagnation. In earlier times, containment was followed as a tactic, rather than a strategy or a policy. Laying a passive siege to a castle where a powerful or influential lord resided and cutting off the supply lines was a form of containment. This made the lord helpless since his tactical ability was limited with only a few soldiers at his command. Another way to maximize the damage done by containment was, after creating a situation of relative isolation, to subvert the enemy. In practice, this is achieved using espionage and sabotage. The anticipated result is that any subversion introduced will have a high cost and will take a long time to rectify if left alone, or will consume resources (particularly in the form of security measures) to avoid. This serves the purpose of maintaining a strategic upper hand. Eventually, the United States and satellites hoped, containment would cause the fall of the Soviet Union and its satellite nations.

and a policy

it developed later

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 and a policy
+it developed later
-== Later developments ==
-U.S. containment policy developed into a principled opposition to the Soviet ratcheting of its sphere of influence.  However, the policy suffered setbacks, and after the U.S. pullout from the Vietnam conflict, the policy of containment was somewhat discredited.  U.S. politicians advanced new theories of “[[détente]]” and “peaceful co-existence”.
-At the end of the 1970s—a particularly ineffective decade for U.S. foreign policy—the U.S. elected [[Ronald Reagan]] for what became an 8-year term.  Reagan believed that détente was misguided and that [[peaceful co-existence]] was tantamount to surrender to relentless Soviet ratcheting of influence.  Reagan believed that the policy of containment did not go far enough. His policies were highly controversial and unpopular in many countries.  They included new missile systems in Europe, and significantly, plans for a [[Strategic Defense Initiative]] (SDI), or "Star Wars", that would render the U.S. immune to a first strike.  Later on, Reagan's actions were interpreted as being aimed at defeating the Soviets by the use of an expensive arms race that the Soviets could not match. There is no contemporary evidence, however, that this was indeed a planned strategy. It was never formulated as a strategy by anyone within the Reagan government. Reagan also pursued the comprehensive disarmament initiative [[START I]], which would have been completely at odds with a strategy of bankrupting the USSR through an arms race.
-The [[History of the Soviet Union (1985–1991)#Yeltsin and the dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]] in 1991. This marked the official end of U.S. containment policy, though it kept its bases in the areas around the former Soviet Union, such as ones in Iceland, Germany, and Turkey. (The [[Naval Air Station Keflavik]] in Iceland was closed in September 2006.) [[As of 2005]], the U.S. had at least 700 military bases around the world. Some estimates suggest that the real number is much higher.
-===Iraq===
-A containment policy, was also applied by the U.S. to [[Iraq]] from 1991 to 2003. When [[Saddam Hussein]], contrary to the hopes of the [[George H.W. Bush]] administration, was not ousted from power after the [[Gulf War]] the U.S. adopted containment towards Iraq via severe [[Iraq sanctions|sanctions]], U.N. weapons inspections, basing of troops in [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Kuwait]], patrol of the [[Iraq no-fly zones]], and periodic airstrikes. By 2000, these elements of containment were fraying because Iraq was able to smuggle many prohibited items via [[Jordan]], [[Syria]], [[Turkey]], and [[Iran]]. The [[Oil for Food]] which began in 1996 was also corrupted, and the U.N. withdrew their inspectors in [[1998]] because of Iraqi non-cooperation and were unable to verify whether or not Iraq's prescribed weapons programs were destroyed. The U.N. was divided. Meanwhile, Arab public opinion in [[Saudi Arabia]] and elsewhere became increasingly hostile to the U.S. military presence in their nations because of renewed violence in the [[Israeli-Palestinian conflict]]. After 1998 Iraq began to fire on allied aircraft in the no-fly zones and thus suffered from retaliation via bombing, but such strikes did not threaten Saddam's grip on power. Containment was abandoned by the [[George W. Bush]] administration which opted for regime change via military action in 2003.
-===Asia===
-In the post-Cold War world, scholars have debated the extent to which containment—or some variant of that strategy—continues to animate U.S. diplomacy, particularly vis-a-vis China. At [http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2005/43655.htm a speech to Tokyo's Sophia University in March 2005], U.S. Secretary of State [[Condoleezza Rice]] paid abundant tribute to Kennan and his intellectual legacy and then elaborated on the logic of the new alliances Washington was building in Asia: "[As] we look to China's life... I really do believe the U.S.-Japan relationship, the U.S.-South Korean relationship, the U.S.-Indian relationship, all are important in creating an environment in which China is more likely to play a positive role than a negative role. These alliances are not against China; they are alliances that are devoted to a stable security and political and economic and, indeed, values-based relationships that put China in the context of those relationships, and a different path to development than if China were simply untethered, simply operating without that strategic context."
 ==Further reading==