High-throughput satellite (HTS) is a classification for communications satellites that provide at least twice, though usually by a factor of 20 or more, the total throughput of a classic FSS satellite for the same amount of allocated orbital spectrum thus significantly reducing cost-per-bit. ViaSat-1 and EchoStar XVII (also known as Jupiter-1) do provide more than 100 Gbit/s of capacity, which is more than 100 times the capacity offered by a conventional FSS satellite. When it was launched in October 2011 ViaSat-1 had more capacity (140 Gbit/s) than all other commercial communications satellites over North America combined.
The significant increase in capacity is achieved by a high level frequency re-use and spot beam technology which enables frequency re-use across multiple narrowly focused spot beams (usually in the order of 100s of kilometers), as in cellular networks, which both are defining technical features of high-throughput satellites. By contrast traditional satellite technology utilizes a broad single beam (usually in the order of 1000s of kilometers) to cover wide regions or even entire continents. In addition to a large amount of bandwidth capacity HTS are defined by the fact that they often, but not solely, target the consumer market. In the last 10 years, the majority of high-throughput satellites operated in the Ka band, however this is not a defining criterion, and at the beginning of 2017 there was at least 10 Ku band HTS satellites projects, of which 3 were already launched and 7 were in construction.
Despite the higher costs associated with spot beam technology, the overall cost per circuit is considerably lower as compared to shaped beam technology. While Ku band FSS bandwidth can cost well over $100 million per gigabit per second in space, HTS like ViaSat-1 can supply a gigabit of throughput in space for less than $3 million. While a reduced cost per bit is often cited as a substantial advantage of high-throughput satellites, the lowest cost per bit is not always the main driver behind the design of an HTS system, depending on the industry it will be serving.
HTS are primarily deployed to provide broadband Internet access service (point-to-point) to regions unserved or underserved by terrestrial technologies where they can deliver services comparable to terrestrial services in terms of pricing and bandwidth. While many current HTS platforms were designed to serve the consumer broadband market, some are also offering services to government and enterprise markets, as well as to terrestrial cellular network operators who face growing demand for broadband backhaul to rural cell sites. For cellular backhaul, the reduced cost per bit of many HTS platforms creates a significantly more favorable economic model for wireless operators to use satellite for cellular voice and data backhaul. Some HTS platforms are designed primarily for the enterprise, telecom or maritime sectors. HTS can furthermore support point-to-multipoint applications and even broadcast services such as DTH distribution to relatively small geographic areas served by a single spot beam.
A fundamental difference between HTS satellites is the fact that certain HTS are linked to ground infrastructure through a feeder link using a regional spot beam dictating the location of possible teleports while other HTS satellites allow the use of any spot beam for the location of the teleports. In the latter case, the teleports can be set up in a wider area as their spotbeams' footprints cover entire continents and regions like it is the case for traditional satellites .
Industry analysts at Northern Sky Research believe that high-throughput satellites will supply at least 1.34 TBps of capacity by 2020 and thus will be a driving power for the global satellite backhaul market which is expected to triple in value – jumping from the 2012 annual revenue of about US$800 million to $2.3 billion by 2021.
List of high-throughput satellites
- Anik F2 (July 2004)
- Thaicom 4 (IPSTAR) (August 2005)
- Spaceway-3 (August 2007)
- WINDS (February 2008)
- KA-SAT (December 2010)
- Yahsat 1A (April 2011)
- ViaSat-1 (October 2011)
- Yahsat 1B (April 2012)
- EchoStar XVII (July 2012)
- HYLAS 2 (July 2012)
- Astra 2E (September 2013)
- O3b satellite constellation (2013-2014)
- Inmarsat Global Xpress constellation (2013-2015)
- Sky Muster (NBN Co-1A) (October 2015)
- Badr-7 for TRIO Connect (November 2015)
- Intelsat 29e (2016), part of Intelsat Epic series
- Intelsat 33e (2016), part of Intelsat Epic series
- ViaSat-2 (June 2017)
- Intelsat 32e (2017), part of Intelsat Epic series
- Intelsat 37e (2017), part of Intelsat Epic series
- Intelsat 35e (2017), part of Intelsat Epic series
- Eutelsat 172B (2017)
- GSAT-19 (2017)
- Fibersat-1 (Q4, 2018)
- Rajesh Mehrotra (7 October 2011). "Regulation of Global Broadband Satellite Communications" (PDF). discussion paper. ITU. Retrieved 22 July 2012.
- Patrick M. French (7 May 2009). "High Throughput Satellites (HTS) are pushing open the satellite market door" (PDF). guest column. Near Earth LLC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2012. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
- Krebs, Gunter. "Echostar 17 / Jupiter 1". Gunter's Space Page. Retrieved 9 July 2012.
- Peter B. de Selding (18 March 2010). "Satellite Broadband Industry Looks To Overcome Image Problem". news article. Spacenews.com. Retrieved 22 July 2012.
- Jonathan Amos (22 October 2011). "Viasat broadband 'super-satellite' launches". news article. BBC. Retrieved 22 July 2012.
- Giovanni Verlini (1 April 2011). "Next Generation of Satellite: High Capacity, High Potential". news article. Satellite Today. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
- David Bettinger (2 July 2012). "Virtual Partner Series – HTS and VSAT: New Implications, New Opportunities". blog article. iDirect. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
- Nick Ruble (18 July 2012). "Market Shift: HTS and O3b Satellites on the Rise". feature article. Satellite spotlight. Retrieved 22 July 2012.
- "GSAT-19 - ISRO". www.isro.gov.in. Retrieved 2017-06-05.