SpaceX Kestrel
Country of origin | United States |
---|---|
First flight | 2006 |
Last flight | 2009 |
Designer | Tom Mueller |
Manufacturer | SpaceX |
Application | upper stage boost |
Liquid-fuel engine | |
Propellant | LOX / RP-1 |
Cycle | pressure fed |
Performance | |
Thrust, vacuum | 6,900 pounds-force (31 kN) |
Thrust-to-weight ratio | 65 |
Chamber pressure | 135 pounds per square inch (930 kPa) |
Specific impulse, vacuum | 317 seconds (3.11 km/s) |
Dimensions | |
Dry mass | 52 kilograms (115 lb) |
References | |
References | [1][2][3] |
The Kestrel engine is an LOX/RP-1 pressure-fed rocket engine. The Kestrel engine was developed in the 2000s by SpaceX for upper stage use on the Falcon 1 rocket.
Kestrel was built around the same pintle architecture as the Space X Merlin engine but does not have a turbo-pump and is fed only by tank pressure.
Kestrel is ablatively cooled in the chamber and throat and radiatively cooled in the nozzle, which is fabricated from a high strength niobium alloy. As a metal, niobium is highly resistant to cracking compared to carbon-carbon. According to SpaceX, an impact from orbital debris or during stage separation might dent the metal but have no meaningful effect on engine performance.[4] Helium pressurant efficiency is substantially increased via a titanium heat exchanger on the ablative/niobium boundary.[5]
Thrust vector control is provided by electro-mechanical actuators on the engine dome for pitch and yaw. Roll control (and attitude control during coast phases) is provided by helium cold gas thrusters.
A TEA-TEB pyrophoric ignition system is used to provide multiple restart capability on the upper stage. In a multi-manifested mission, this design would allow for drop off at different altitudes and inclinations.
Kestrel 2
Enhancements to the design of the original Kestrel engine were planned, called the Kestrel 2.[6]
The engine was planned to continue to be pressure-fed design, but was to have flown on a newly designed second stage that was to use Aluminium-lithium alloy 2195 rather than the 2014 Aluminum used in the Falcon 1 second stage.[6] Engine changes were to include tighter tolerances to improve consistency, higher Isp, and lighter weight.[7][needs update] The Kestrel 2 did not remain in active development after the Falcon 1 was replaced by the much larger Falcon 9 v1.0 which used an improved Merlin 1C for its upperstage.
See also
References
- ^ "Falcon 1 Users Guide" (PDF). SpaceX. 2008-09-28. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 1, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ spachelaunchreport.com - falcon
- ^ astronautix
- ^ Greg Zsidisin (23 March 2007). "SpaceX Confirms Stage Bump On Demoflight 2". Space Daily. Retrieved 2008-09-30.
- ^ "Falcon 1 Flight Three Press Kit" (PDF). SpaceX. Retrieved 2008-09-30.
- ^ a b Bjelde, Brian; Max Vozoff; Gwynne Shotwell (August 2007). "The Falcon 1 Launch Vehicle: Demonstration Flights, Status, Manifest, and Upgrade Path". 21st Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (SSC07 ‐ III ‐ 6). Retrieved 2013-12-06.
- ^ Bergin, Chris; Braddock Gaskill (2007-09-24). "Elon Musk Q and A - Updates SpaceX status on Falcon and Dragon". NASAspaceflight.com. Archived from the original on 2008-05-29. Retrieved 2008-06-16.