M60 Patton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
M60 Patton
American M60A3 tank Lake Charles, Louisiana April 2005.jpg
An M60A3 Patton on display in Lake Charles, Louisiana, in April 2005.
Type Main battle tank
Place of origin United States
Service history
In service 1961–present
Used by See Operators
Wars Yom Kippur War
Iran–Iraq War
Beirut, Lebanon
Invasion of Grenada
Persian Gulf War
Western Sahara War
Shia insurgency in Yemen
Turkey–PKK conflict
Sinai insurgency[1]
Yemeni Civil War (2015)[2]
Production history
Manufacturer Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant, Chrysler
Produced 1960–87
Number built Over 15,000 (all variants)
Variants See Variants
Weight M60: 50.7 short tons (46.0 t; 45.3 long tons)
M60A1: 52 to 54 short tons (47 to 49 t; 46 to 48 long tons) depending on turret design.
Length M60: 6.946 meters (22 ft 9.5 in) (hull), 9.309 meters (30 ft 6.5 in) (gun forward)[3]
Width M60: 3.631 meters (11 ft 11.0 in)[3]
Height M60: 3.213 meters (10 ft 6.5 in)[3]
Crew 4

Armor Upper Glacis[4]
M60: 3.67 in (93 mm) at 65°
8.68 in (220 mm) LoS
M60A1: 4.29 in (109 mm) at 65°
10.15 in (258 mm) LoS
M60A2: same as M60A1
M60A3: same as M60A1
Turret Front[4]
M60: equals 7 in (180 mm)
M60A1: equals 10 in (250 mm)
M60A2: equals 11.5 in (290 mm)
M60A3: same as M60A1
105 mm (4.1 in) M68 gun (M60/A1/A3)
152 mm (6.0 in) M162 Gun/Launcher (M60A2)
.50 cal (12.7 mm) M85
7.62 mm M73 machine gun
Engine Continental AVDS-1790-2 V12, air-cooled Twin-turbo diesel engine
750 bhp (560 kW)[3]
Power/weight 15.08 bhp/t[3]
Transmission General Motors, cross-drive, single-stage with 2 forward and 1 reverse ranges[3]
Suspension Torsion bar suspension
Ground clearance 0.463 meters (1 ft 6.2 in)[3]
Fuel capacity 1,457 liters (320 imp gal; 385 U.S. gal)[3]
300 miles (500 km)[3]
Speed 30 miles per hour (48 km/h) (road)[3]

The M60 Patton is a main battle tank (MBT)[5] introduced in December 1960.[6] With the United States Army's deactivation of their last (M103) heavy tank battalion in 1963, the M60 became the Army's primary tank[7] during the Cold War. Although developed from the M48 Patton, the M60 series was never officially classified as a Patton tank, but as a "product-improved descendant" of the Patton series.[8] In March 1959, the tank was officially standardized as the 105 mm Gun Full Tracked Combat Tank M60.

The M60 underwent many updates over its service life. The interior layout, based on the design of the M48, provided ample room for updates and improvements, extending the vehicle's service life for over four decades. It was widely used by the U.S. and its Cold War allies, especially those in NATO, and remains in service throughout the world today, despite having been superseded by the M1 Abrams in the U.S. military. Egypt is currently the largest operator with 1,716 upgraded M60A3s, Turkey is second with 866 upgraded units in service, and Israel is third with over 700 units of Israeli variants.



During the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, a Soviet T-54A medium tank was driven onto the grounds of the British embassy in Budapest by the Hungarians. After a brief examination of this tank's armor and 100 mm gun, British officials decided that their 20 pounder was apparently incapable of defeating it. There were also rumors of an even larger 115 mm gun in the works. Hence there was a need to adopt a 105 mm gun, which emerged as the famed Royal Ordnance L7.[9] This information made its way to the United States, where the Army had been experimenting with a series of upgrades to their M48 Patton tanks. These experiments were concerned with improving the armor and the introduction of a variety of autoloader systems, such as that used in the 105mm gun tank T54, and upgraded rangefinders.

The T95 program, launched after the Questionmark III conference in June 1954, was the intended replacement to the M48. It featured a host of innovative and experimental components such as its 90 mm smoothbore T208 cannon rigidly affixed to its turret, and its new powertrain and suspension. The burden of developing them however slowed the overall program to a crawl. General Taylor approved of a new tank development program in August 1957. This incorporated many ARCOVE recommendations and foresaw the eventual replacement of the light, medium, and heavy tanks with two types the airborne reconnaissance/assault vehicle and the Main Battle Tank. The MBT was to combine the firepower and protection sufficient for the assault role with the mobility to perform as a medium tank.[10] A tank of the T95 series, armed with a smoothbore cannon and powered by a compression ignition engine, was envisaged by the Army Staff as the bearer of the role of future MBT.[11]

The course of this tank program was the source of widespread debate. The Bureau of Budget (BOB) believed that the Army was not progressing with sufficient speed in its tank modernization program and recommended the immediate replacement of the M48A2. Correctly predicting that the BOB would not approve the procurement of the M48A2 after the fiscal year of 1959, the Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics (DCSLOG) proposed a tank based on the M48A2 featuring improved firepower and the AVDS-1790 engine. Of course the alternative was to introduce a tank from the T95 series but it remained highly experimental with its compression ignition engine not as developed as the AVDS-1790. An influential group of senior officers, by May 1958, concluded that the T95 had only marginal advantages over the M48A2. They proposed that the most important improvements, better firepower and fuel economy, could be achieved by mounting a compression ignition engine and a more powerful gun on the M48A2.[11]

Choice of components[edit]

The main gun was chosen after a comparative firing test on the Aberdeen Proving Grounds. Participating in the test were six guns: the 90 mm M41 (armament of the M48A2 although tested with the new T300E53 HEAT round), the 90 mm T208E9 (a smoothbore weapon firing T320E62 APFSDS), the 105 mm T254 (an American gun firing the same APDS ammunition as that of the British), the 105 mm X15E8 (a British gun developed from the 20 pdr), the 120 mm T123E6 (a lightened variant of the M58), and the 120 mm M58 (armament of the M103). The 120 mm T123E6 was preferred by the Ordnance Department because its ammunition, the same as that for the M58 gun, was already at an advanced state of development.[12] The T123E6 however had a slow rate of fire as, unlike the M58 on the M103, there would be only be one loader servicing it.[13] This led to the weapon having a max rate of fire of 4 rpm vs. the T254's 7 rpm.[14] The factors evaluated were accuracy, lethality of a hit, rate of fire and penetration performance. Based on these tests, the 105 mm T254E2 was selected and standardized as the M68. Until American-made tubes could be obtained with comparable accuracy, British tubes were to be used.[15]

Composite armor made with fused silica glass was intended on the turret and the hull. This composite armor provides protection against HEAT, HEP, and HE rounds. However, repaired castings suffered a loss of kinetic energy protection.[16] This led to the front of the hull taking the shape of a flat wedge, instead of the M48's elliptical front, as it simplified the installation of this armor.[17] Limitations in manufacturing capacity and the added cost however lead to this special armor being dropped and all M60 series tanks were protected with conventional steel armor.[18]

Initial versions[edit]

M60A1 tank of the U.S. Army maneuvers through a narrow German village street while participating in the multi-national military training exercise, REFORGER '82.

In 1957, plans were laid in the US for a universal or all purpose tank.[10] Fulfilling this requirement with an interim tank resulted in the M60 series,[19] which largely resembles the M48 it was based on, but has significant differences. The M60 mounted a 105 mm M68 main gun with the bore evacuator mounted towards the middle of the tube, compared with the M48's 90 mm M41, which mounted the bore evacuator towards the end of the tube right after its T-shaped muzzel brake. It also had a hull with a straight front slope whereas the M48's hull was rounded, had three support rollers per side to the M48's five, and had road wheels constructed from aluminum rather than steel, although the M48 wheels were often used as spare parts.

The improved design incorporated a Continental V-12 750 hp (560 kW) air-cooled, AVDS-1790-2 diesel engine, extending operational range to over 300 miles (480 km) while reducing both refueling and servicing. Power was transmitted through a CD-850-6 cross drive transmission, a combined transmission, differential, steering, and braking unit.

The hull of the M60, like its predecessor the M48, could be cast as a single piece or by welding smaller castings. The turret was similar to the M48A2's and was made as a single piece casting although it was modified to accept the new larger diameter cupola and the M116 mount for the 105mm gun.[20] The hull was divided into three compartments, with the driver in front, fighting compartment in the middle and engine at the rear.[21] The driver looked through three M27 day periscopes, one of which could be replaced by an M24 infrared night vision periscope.[21]

The M60 was the last U.S. main battle tank to utilize homogeneous steel armor for protection. It was also the last to feature an escape hatch under the hull. (The escape hatch was provided for the driver, whose top-side hatch could easily be blocked by the main gun. Access between the driver's compartment and the turret fighting compartment was also restricted, requiring that the turret be traversed to the rear).[citation needed]

Originally designated the XM60, the new vehicle was put into production in 1959, standardized as the 105 mm Gun Full Tracked Combat Tank M60 on 16 March 1959,[22] and entered service in 1960.[23] There was a proposal in April 1959 to change the nomenclature to 105 mm gun main battle tank M60; this was however rejected due to a conflict with the Federal Cataloging Agency Policy.[24] Over 15,000 M60s (all variants) were built.[citation needed]

M60A1 series[edit]

Approved in March 21, 1960 was the initial program that lead to the M60A1.[25] This new variant was first produced in October 1962[26] and stayed in production until 1980, featured a larger, better-shaped turret and improvements to the armor protection and shock absorbers.

While the M60 continued to use the turret based on the M48A2's, T95E7 style turrets were not abandoned. Work continued on an elongated turret based on its design. The turret, even without the siliceous cored armour, provided improved ballistic protection. Additional space for the turret crew was also made available by mounting the cannon 5" forward.[25] In addition to the added protection offered by this turret on production M60A1s, the upper glacis armour was increased from 3.67" to 4.29" at 65 degrees while the sides over the crew compartment went from 1.9" to 2.9" at their apex.[27] This brought the frontal armour up to the same 10" line of sight armour standard of the M103 heavy tank.[28] Shock absorbers were installed in the first two and last road wheel arms. The uncomfortable wire mesh seats were replaced by padded seats. The brake and accelerator pedal were rearranged for more efficient and comfortable operation while the steering wheel was replaced by a T bar steering control.[29] The engine and power train were upgraded by the addition of the Continental AVDS-1790-2A and the CD-850-6A. The new engine lowered fuel consumption and smoke emissions. Combination day-IR periscopes were introduced, the M32 for the gunner and the M36 for the commander although the commander's periscope could be substituted with the M34 for binocular vision without IR.[30]

As development of a new main battle tank stalled with problems and cost escalating quickly, the M60A1 was forced to serve longer than originally intended with production lasting over 20 years. In that time span numerous product improvement programs were put forward. The first of which was TLAC, for Top Loading Air Cleaner. This reduced dirt and dust ingestion, which increased engine life. Its top loading configuration also made it easier to service.[31] Next came the AOS meaning Add-On Stabilization was introduced in late 1972.[32] As its name implies, this was an add on stabilizer kit made to fit with minimum modifications to the existing hydraulic gun control system. It was made up of several components: the rate sensor package, a control selector box, the electronics package, a shut-off valve, the traverse servo-valve assembly, the elevation servo-valve assembly, the handle shaping assembly, an hydraulic filter, and an antibacklash cylinder. At short to medium ranges, hit probabilities better than 50% from a moving M60A1 were obtained in Aberdeen test results while without a stabilizer it was essentially zero. M60A1(AOS) was the designation received by M60s equipped with the TLAC, AOS and the new T142 steel track, which had replaceable rubber pads and improved service life.[33]

In 1975, the M60A1(RISE) meaning Reliability Improved Selected Equipment was introduced. Its AVDS-1790-2C diesel engine engine featured several changes in order to improve service life and reliability: new top-loading air cleaners; stronger cylinders; improved starter, fuel injection lines, and nozzles; and better turbosuperchargers. A new 650 ampere oil cooled alternator, a solid state regulator and new wiring harness with more accessible disconnect were also incorporated into its electrical system.[34] The M60A1(RISE)(PASSIVE), which debuted in 1977, featured passive night vision sights for gunner and commander, a new night vision device for the driver and a deep water fording kit.[35]

M60A2 "Starship"[edit]

M60A2 tank is driven off LARC 60 amphibious landing craft during the Army exposition PROLOG '85.

The M60A2 was intended as a stop-gap solution until the projected replacement by the MBT-70.[36] The M60A2, nicknamed the "Starship"[37] due to its "Space Age" technology, featured an entirely new low-profile turret with a commander's machine-gun cupola on top, giving the commander a good view and field of fire while under armor but spoiling the low profile. It featured a 152 mm (6.0 in) main gun similar to that of the M551 Sheridan light tank, which fired conventional rounds as well as the MGM-51 Shillelagh anti-tank missile system. The fitting of a CBSS (closed breech scavenger system), which used pressurized air to clear the breech after each shot, solved the problem of unburnt propellant from the main gun rounds fouling the barrel and pre-detonating subsequent rounds. The M60A2 proved a disappointment, though technical advancements would pave the way for future tanks; the MBT-70, which relied on much of this technology as it was used in the M60A2, never advanced beyond prototype stage. The Shillelagh/M60A2 system was phased out from active units by 1981, and the turrets scrapped. Most of the M60A2 tanks were rebuilt as M60A3, or the hulls converted to armored vehicle-launched bridge (AVLB) vehicles.[37]

M60A3 series[edit]

In 1978, work began on the M60A3 variant. It featured a number of technological enhancements, including smoke dischargers, a new flash-lamp pumped ruby-laser based rangefinder (AN/VVG-2) that could be used by both commander and gunner, and an M21 ballistic computer, and a turret stabilization system.

M60A3 main battle tank of the 3rd Armored Division, 3-32nd Armored Regt, moves along a street in Germany during Exercise REFORGER '85.

Late production M60A3s omitted the commander's cupola (Israel Defense Forces armor doctrine required tank commanders to fight commander-exposed,[citation needed] and it was discovered that non-penetrating hits on the vehicle could dislodge the cupola from its mount while the commander was in it). Compared to a conventional pintle mount, the remote-controlled M85 machine gun was relatively ineffective in the anti-aircraft role for which it was designed. Removing the cupola lowered the vehicle's relatively high silhouette. The cupola's hatch also opened toward the rear of the vehicle and was dangerous to close if under small-arms fire owing to an open-locking mechanism that required the user to apply leverage to unlock it prior to closing.[citation needed] U.S. Army A3 version all retained the cupola until the tank was phased out of service.

The M60A3 was phased out of US service in 2005,[38] but it has remained a front-line MBT into the 21st century for a number of other countries.

While overall a less advanced tank than the M1 Abrams, the M60A3 did have some advantages over some M1 models:[citation needed]

  • The M60A3 TTS had a better thermal imaging system than that of M1 tanks up into the 21st century, when many M1s were upgraded with newer 2nd generation systems.
  • The M60A3 had an exterior phone for infantry to talk directly to the crew inside, though this feature was removed from most M60A3s in its later life. This feature was also installed on some M1 tanks with the TUSK upgrade kit.
  • The M60A3's diesel engine had lower overall performance, but also it had lower cost, required less maintenance, and had better fuel efficiency.
  • The exhaust temperature of an M1's turbine is very high, which makes it dangerous for infantry to take cover behind it. This was and is not the case with the diesel engine on the M60.
  • The escape hatch located under the hull of the M60A3 is not present on the M1 Abrams, making it more difficult for the crew to escape a battle-damaged Abrams or evacuate casualties than from an M60A3.
  • The M60 series' M68A1 105 mm main gun fires a much wider variety of ammunition than the 120 mm smoothbore on the M1A1 series, because doctrine only required APFSDS and HEAT.[citation needed]
  • The M60 series has instrumentation that allows indirect fire as ad-hoc artillery if needed by virtue of having a M28A1/M28E1 azimuth indicator and M13A3 quadrant elevation on board.

Service history[edit]

United States[edit]

Marines from Company D, 2nd Tank Battalion, drive their M60A1 main battle tank during a breach exercise in Operation Desert Storm in 1991. The tank is fitted with reactive armor and an M9 bulldozer kit.

The M60-based M60 AVLB (Armored Vehicle Launch Bridge) and the M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle were the only variants of the M60 deployed to South Vietnam. The AVLB, commonly referred to as the "bridge tank", was mounted on an M60 tank hull, and the M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle was an M60 tank mounting a short-tubed 165 mm (6.5 in) main gun that fired a shaped charge.[37]

Late in the M60's U.S. Army service a number of prototype upgrades were evaluated. These were passed over in favor of simply producing more M1 Abrams. Due to the end of the Cold War, surplus US Army M1s were absorbed into the remaining USMC units, allowing the Marine Corps to become an all-M1 tank force at reduced cost. Except for a small number in active service, most M60s were placed in reserve, with a few being sold to US allies.

A 401st TFW (P) M60 seen at Doha, Qatar during the Gulf War of 1991

The M60A3 participated in close air support trials with the F-16 in the 1980s. M60A1s are still used by the USAF for testing of ground radar equipment on new aircraft and for ground force adversarial work at Red Flag at Nellis AFB Nevada.[citation needed] USMC M60A1 tanks were used in Grenada and Beirut in 1983.

During Operation Desert Storm in 1991 at least one US Air Force unit was equipped with M60s. The 401st TFW (P), deployed to Doha, Qatar had two M60s for use by explosives ordnance disposal personnel. It was planned that using the MBTs would allow the EOD crews to remove unexploded ordnance from tarmac runway and taxiway surfaces with increased safety.[39]

In early February 1991, US Marines used 200 M60A1s of the 2nd Battalion drove north from Khafji, Saudi Arabia into Kuwait. In Kuwait, they encountered an Iraqi force of T-54/55, Type 69, and T-72 tanks at Kuwait City International Airport. The Marines won this battle, destroying some 100 Iraqi tanks with only one M60A1 lost.[40]


Israeli M60 tank captured by Egypt in 1973

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) purchased its first M60A1 tanks from the US in 1971. M60s and M60A1s saw action with Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War in both the Sinai and the Golan Heights (although mainly in the Sinai). The United States sent additional M60s to Israel just before and during hostilities. Israel had about 150 M60A1 tanks in service at the start of the war. Many Israeli M60s were destroyed by Egyptian troops with AT-3 Sagger anti-tank missiles in the first few days after Egyptian forces crossed of the Suez Canal. The tank is highly regarded in Israeli service and been praised for its firepower and maneuverability.[41][42][43][44][40][unreliable source?]

Following the war, the IDF received many more M48s, M60s and M60A1s from the U.S. Israel further upgraded their inventory of M60s through the 1970s and into the 1980s. The Israeli modifications included new tracks and explosive reactive armor (ERA). This variant was known as the Magach. Further work in Israel has been done on the upgraded Magach models, adding new armor, new fire control system, a thermal sleeve and smoke dischargers. The latest versions, the Magach 7 (with variants A through C), have been used by some IDF units.

M60 Patton with M9 dozer blade in Yad la-Shiryon Museum, Israel

In the 1982 Lebanon War (Israeli Operation Peace in Galilee), M60 Pattons (named Magach 6) encountered Syrian T-54/55 and T-72s as well as PLO T-34s. Some were destroyed by Syrian infantry hunter-killer teams with ATGMs and supplemented by RPG-7s. Several other M60s were damaged by HOT missiles fired from Syrian Gazelle helicopters. One was destroyed by a T-72 and another was abandoned by its crew after taking damage.[40]

In July 2013, Israel began a program called Teuza (boldness) for the purpose of turning some military bases into sales lots for obsolete IDF equipment. Older models that are not suited for Israel's forces will be sold off, or sold for scrap if there are no buyers. M60A1/A3 and Magach tanks are among those being offered. Main buyers are expected from Latin American, Asian, and African countries.[45]

With the disbanding of the last M60-equipped divisions in 2014, the tank is no longer in service with the Israel Defense Forces.[46]


The M60A1 RISE Passive of the U.S. Marines saw action during Operation Desert Storm in the 1991 Persian Gulf War, opposing Iraqi armor which included the T-54, T-55, T-62, Type 69, and T-72. The M60A1s were fitted with add-on explosive reactive armor (ERA) packages and supported the drive into Kuwait City, where they were involved in a two-day tank battle at the Kuwait airport with ten tanks lost. They saw service with the United States Marine Corps and the Saudi Arabian Army.[47][48]

Other users[edit]

A Bosnian M60A3 type tank

As of 2005, M60 variants were in service with Bahrain, Bosnia, Brazil, Egypt, Greece, Israel, Jordan, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, Thailand, Taiwan, Iran, and some other nations to varying degrees.[49] Royal Thai Army M60A3s were engaged in combat to recapture Border Post 9631 from Myanmar Army forces in 2001, and reportedly exchanged fire with Type 69 tanks.

The U.S. military continues to have significant stockpiles of M60s waiting to be scrapped, sold-off, converted, or used as targets in weapons testing, or used for radar objects for jet attack planes. Some vehicles that use the chassis are still in use, however. Most of the M60s still used are much upgraded models. Pattons formed the basis for many 'new' tank designs, some using the chassis but with all-new turrets, others using various upgrade packages. Jordan, for example, is modifying two battalions of M60A3 with the IFCS system.

Greece offered to donate 13 M60A3 tanks to Afghanistan in 2007.[50]


M60A1E1 tank
  • XM60/M60: Bearing a strong familial resemblance to the M48, the M60 has a wedge shaped hull, three return rollers, and aluminum road wheels, features not found on previous M48s. Featured a turret with 105 mm M68 gun. Some early production units for this and for A1 version, did not have the commander's cupola.
  • M60A1: First variant to feature the distinctive "needle-nose" long nosed turret, along with better armor protection and improved hydraulics.
    • M60A1 AOS: Add-On Stabilization, introduced in 1972 for the M68 gun.
    • M60A1 RISE: Reliability Improvements for Selected Equipment, featured improvements of almost all the basic systems including an upgraded engine design that allowed easier access to components to allow removing the engine pack in less time and a new track type, T142, that helped reduce wear and improve track life.
      • M60A1 RISE Passive: RISE, but with a smaller infra-red/white light capable search-light and passive night vision equipment. USMC M60A1 RISE Passives were outfitted with explosive reactive armor (ERA) in the late 1980s.
  • M60A1E1: Developmental test vehicles fitted with the 152 mm M162 gun-missile launchers.
    • M60A1E2/M60A2: Turret design finalized, giving the distinctive "starship" look. A variant was tested with a remote controlled 20 mm cannon as well.
  • M60A1E3: prototype, M60A1E2 fitted with 105 mm gun.
  • M60A1E4: Experimental type with remote control weapons.
  • M60A3: M60A1 fitted with a laser rangefinder, M21 solid state ballistic computer, and a crosswind sensor. Late production units omitted the commander's cupola.
M60A3 TTS tank of the Turkish Army at the IDEF'07 Show, Ankara, Turkey
    • M60A3 TTS: Tank Thermal Sight; M60A3s fitted with the AN/VSG-2 thermal sight.
  • M60 Super/AX: Uparmored versions with minor improvements. Main version also featured no optical rangefinder.
  • M60-2000/120S: M60/Abrams hybrid vehicle developed by General Dynamics Land Division. Not adopted by the United States military.


A remotely controlled Panther armored mine clearing vehicle leads a column down a road in Bosnia and Herzegovina, May 16, 1996.
  • M60AVLB: baseline M60-based chassis armored vehicle-launched bridge with 60-foot (18 m) scissors bridge.
    • M60A1: Upgraded version of the M60 AVLB based on the M60A1.
  • M60 AVLM: Armored Vehicle Launched MICLIC (Mine-Clearing Line Charge), modified AVLB with up to 2 MICLIC on M60 chassis.
  • M60 Panther: M60 modified into a remotely controlled mine clearing tank.
  • M728 CEV: baseline M60-based Combat Engineer Vehicle fitted with a folding A-frame crane and winch attached to the front of the turret, and an M135 165mm demolition gun. Commonly fitted with the D7 bulldozer blade, or a mine-plow for the clearing of land mines.
    • M728A1: Upgraded version of the M728 CEV based on the M60A1.

Additional equipment:

  • M9: Bulldozer and earthmoving equipment for the M60.


  • M60T or Sabra: highly upgraded version of the M60A1 which is designed for the MBT modernization program of the Turkish Army. It features a new 120 mm smoothbore gun, electric stabilization system, new fire control system, and new armor package.[51][52][53] M60T is also known as Sabra Mk.II.
  • E-60
    • E-60: basically unmodified main production M60
    • E-60A: basically unmodified M60A1
      • E-60A Dozer: version with M9 bulldozer kit installed
    • E-60B: basically unmodified M60A3
  • M60VLPD 26/70E: Spanish Army bridgelayer based on the M60 with "Leguan bridge system". 12 converted from M60A1.
  • M60CZ-10/25E Alacran: Spanish Army combat engineer variant. 38 converted from M60A1.
  • Israeli variants: Many of the Israeli M60s have been upgraded with additional reactive or passive armor, drastically improving their armor protection. These up-armored versions are called Magach 6 / Magach 7.
  • Perah: A secret Israeli modification covertly used for the past 30 years installed a fake gun on the front of the turret, while the rear of the turret concealed a pop-up Spike anti-tank guided missile launcher.[54]
  • M60 Phoenix: Jordanian upgrade, being carried out by the King Abdullah II Design And Development Bureau.[55] Upgrade includes shoot-on-move capabilities, increased firepower (with a RUAG 120 mm smoothbore gun) and armor protection scheme upgrade.
  • Samsam (Sword): Iranian upgraded version of M60A1 tank, fitted with reactive armor (presumably Kontakt-5), EFCS-3 Fire Control system, Laser warning system and IR jammers.[56]


Map of M60 Patton operators in blue with former operators in red
Egyptian modified version of the M60A1 participates with the Egyptian Army in Operation Bright Star.
Magach 7C in Yad la-Shiryon museum, Israel
M60A3 TTS of the Republic of China Army
Tunis M60

Former operators[edit]

See also[edit]

Tanks of comparable role, performance and era[edit]


  1. ^ http://ia601408.us.archive.org/23/items/sawla333333/sawla.mp4
  2. ^ Yemeni Houthi forces ATGM attack on a Saudi tank (apparently M60 Patton) (in Arabic). Yemen. 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2015. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Foss, p. 166
  4. ^ a b Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. pp. 439 to 443. 
  5. ^ Hunnicutt[page needed]
  6. ^ Hunnicutt p. 165.
  7. ^ Hunnicutt/Firepower p. 181.
  8. ^ Hunnicutt pp. 6, 408.
  9. ^ Steven Zaloga & Hugh Johnson, "T-54 and T-55 Main Battle Tanks 1944–2004", Osprey, 2004, pp 13, 39.
  10. ^ a b Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 149. 
  11. ^ a b Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 150. 
  12. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 153. 
  13. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 155. 
  14. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. pp. 453–454. 
  15. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 155. 
  16. ^ Salter, Charles B.; Spiro, Harry. "Evaluation of Siliceous Cored Armor for the XM60 Tank". Defense Technical Information Center. Retrieved 9 September 2015. 
  17. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 150. 
  18. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 156. 
  19. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 152. 
  20. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 158. 
  21. ^ a b "M60 Patton Main Battle Tank (USA)". Historyofwar.org. Retrieved 2010-03-26. 
  22. ^ Hunnicutt p. 157.
  23. ^ Bishop, Chris, ed. The Encyclopedia of Tanks and Armored Fighting Vehicles, pp. 232–33. Thunder Bay Press, 2002. ISBN 978-1571458063.
  24. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 157. 
  25. ^ a b Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 168. 
  26. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 165. 
  27. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 174. 
  28. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. Firepower. Presidio. p. 205. 
  29. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 169. 
  30. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 440. 
  31. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 199. 
  32. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 199. 
  33. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 200. 
  34. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 200. 
  35. ^ Hunnicutt, R.P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American MBT. Presidio. p. 202. 
  36. ^ United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services (1978). Hearings, reports and prints of the House Committee on Armed Services, Issue 56. U.S. GPO. p. 8961. Retrieved 19 February 2011. 
  37. ^ a b c "Development and History of the M-60 tank". Patton Mania. 
  38. ^ a b "Hohenfels trades ‘The Butcher’ for new ‘Tonka tank’". Stars and Stripes. Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  39. ^ Mike Kopack. "The Gulf War with the 401TFW/614TFS Lucky Devils". Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  40. ^ a b c "?". harpoondatabases.com. Archived from the original on October 18, 2014. Retrieved 13 February 2015. 
  41. ^ Gawrych, Dr. George W. (1996). The 1973 Arab-Israeli War: The Albatross of Decisive Victory. Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. pp. 43-50.
  42. ^ Hammad, Gamal (2002). Military Battles on the Egyptian Front (First ed.). Dār al-Shurūq. pp. 176-177.
  43. ^ O'Ballance, Edgar (1997). No Victor, No Vanquished: The Arab-Israeli War, 1973. Presidio. p. 104.
  44. ^ el-Shazly, Saad (2003). The Crossing of the Suez, Revised Edition (Revised ed.). American Mideast Research. p. 233.
  45. ^ "Israeli army is planning to sell second-hands Merkava main battle tanks and F-16 fighter aircraft". Armyrecognition.com, 16 July 2013.
  46. ^ "Israeli military retires Patton tanks"
  47. ^ David Isby, Lon Nordeem. M60 vs T-62, p. 73. Osprey Publishing, 2010.
  48. ^ Zaloga, Stiven. T-62 Main Battle Tank 1965–2005, стр. 46-47. Osprey Publishing, 2009.
  49. ^ "Burma/Myanmar, 1948-1999". Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  50. ^ [1]. US. Central Command
  51. ^ Turkish Defence Industry Products M60 T
  52. ^ M60 Tank Modernization Project
  53. ^ Jane's Defence Weekly – June 06, 2007 Archived February 7, 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  54. ^ [2]
  55. ^ "Projects – Phoenix M60 Upgrade". KADDB. Archived from the original on 18 April 2009. Retrieved 2010-03-26. 
  56. ^ آشنایی-با-صمصام-ناشناخته-ترین-تانک-ایرانی-عکس (in Persian), mashreghnews.ir 
  57. ^ John Pike. "Army Equipment – Brazil". globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  58. ^ John Pike (2009-02-13). "Iranian Ground Forces Equipment". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2010-03-26. 
  59. ^ Zaloga, Steven J. and Hugh Johnson (2004). T-54 and T-55 Main Battle Tanks 1944–2004. Oxford: Osprey. p.13
  60. ^ واشنطن تزوّد لبنان أسلحة ثقيلة قبل استحقاق حزيران (in Arabic). Annahar Newspaper. April 9, 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-09. 
  61. ^ "Heavy U.S. Military Aid to Lebanon Arrives ahead of Elections". Naharnet Newsdesk. April 9, 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-09. 
  62. ^ "300 Ex-US M60A1 from 1991 to 1994 and 120 M60A3TTS and 7 M60A1 in 1997". SIPRI. Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  63. ^ "Morocco's M60A1 tanks were upgraded to M60A3's as these became available." [3]
  64. ^ 140 Upgraded to M60A3TTS in 2009 Source: Army-guide
  65. ^ Richard Lobban, Jr. Global Security Watch: Sudan (2010 ed.). Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-313-35332-1. 
  66. ^ John Pike. "Army Equipment – Taiwan". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  67. ^ John Pike. "Army Equipment – Israel". globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  68. ^ "משוחרר! צה"ל נפרד מהטנק שחצה את התעלה - חדשות". ynet. Retrieved 13 November 2014. 
  69. ^ http://www.i24news.tv/app.php/en/news/israel/diplomacy-defense/140425-israeli-military-retires-patton-tanks.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • Foss, Chris (2005). Jane's Armour and Artillery: 2005–2006. Jane's Information Group. ISBN 978-0-7106-2686-8. 
  • Hunnicutt, R. P. (1984). Patton: A History of the American Main Battle Tank. Volume 1. Novato: Presidio Press. ISBN 978-0-89141-230-4. 

External links[edit]