Talk:Andrea Dworkin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Andrea Dworkin has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
April 30, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
July 19, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept
March 16, 2016 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Andrea Dworkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Andrea Dworkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

subsubsection called Contains[edit]

I'm confused about the subsubsection titled "Contains". What does that title mean? That her work is contained in someone else's work? Some entries don't seem to fit that meaning. That her work contains someone else's work? Does that mean that she was the editor but not entirely the author? I don't remember when this title appeared, but it seems to need retitling and maybe the subsubsection needs the moving of some list items to elsewhere in the section. Nick Levinson (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Without reviewing the edit history, it looks to me like the list may have once said that the last entry in the preceding section, The Reasons Why, a 1985 book (edited?) by Dworkin and MacKinnon, contains the next two entries, "Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech" by MacKinnon and "Against the Male Flood" by Dworkin, both of which were journal articles. (I don't won a copy of The Reasons Why and I can't confirm that.) The rest of the list, starting with Intercourse, are books written or co-written by Dworkin. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
That turns out to be exactly the case. I'll fix it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Your edit looks good; and it looks simple. I hadn't thought of trying that, although I still might have hesitated if I had. Thanks. Nick Levinson (talk) 04:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)