Talk:Andrea Dworkin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Good articleAndrea Dworkin has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 19, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
March 16, 2016Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Andrea Dworkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Andrea Dworkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

subsubsection called Contains[edit]

I'm confused about the subsubsection titled "Contains". What does that title mean? That her work is contained in someone else's work? Some entries don't seem to fit that meaning. That her work contains someone else's work? Does that mean that she was the editor but not entirely the author? I don't remember when this title appeared, but it seems to need retitling and maybe the subsubsection needs the moving of some list items to elsewhere in the section. Nick Levinson (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Without reviewing the edit history, it looks to me like the list may have once said that the last entry in the preceding section, The Reasons Why, a 1985 book (edited?) by Dworkin and MacKinnon, contains the next two entries, "Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech" by MacKinnon and "Against the Male Flood" by Dworkin, both of which were journal articles. (I don't won a copy of The Reasons Why and I can't confirm that.) The rest of the list, starting with Intercourse, are books written or co-written by Dworkin. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
That turns out to be exactly the case. I'll fix it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Your edit looks good; and it looks simple. I hadn't thought of trying that, although I still might have hesitated if I had. Thanks. Nick Levinson (talk) 04:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)