Jump to content

Talk:Divya Saxena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk22:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Bahnfrend (talk). Self-nominated at 08:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Bahnfrend: New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Looks good from a reference standpoint. But I'm really not sure about this hook. From reading the obstructing the field article, this is clearly a very rare event. Our readers that understand cricket will understand why this would have, ahem, sparked a row. But this isn't very obvious to me. Is there a way to reword this in a way that might make it more accessible to readers that don't know the sport and provide some context? Perhaps... Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 06:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0a: ... that Canadian cricketer Divya Saxena was almost dismissed for allegedly obstructed the field but was ruled "not out"?
@Sammi Brie: Thanks for your review. Sorry about the slow response. Yes, obstructing the field is very rare, especially in international matches. I suggest the following further modified hook:
ALT0b: ... that Canadian cricketer Divya Saxena was accused of obstructing the field in an international match but was ruled "not out"?
Bahnfrend (talk) 02:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]