Jump to content

Talk:Hottest chili pepper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The ghost pepper registers 1.3M on the Scoville scale
The ghost pepper registers 1.3M on the Scoville scale

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 19:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Huh, I assumed for lifestyle stuff, Maxim was probably as good as GQ etc.? No worries, though, I know I saw that multiple places, I'll go find it! --valereee (talk) 10:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, added second source, The Atlantic, "super-hot chili peppers—fruits that top one million on the Scoville scale" --valereee (talk) 11:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and here we go: Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science: "A novel class of chile peppers known as ‘‘super-hots’’ having greater than 1 million Scoville heat units", I've added that to the article too --valereee (talk) 11:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First things first, this is a touch confusing because the hook isn't really talking about the article. Wouldn't something like "... that the Carolina Reaper is currently the leader in the race to grow the hottest pepper?" be more appropriate? The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 13:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine with me...
Carolina Reaper, currently recognized as the world's hottest pepper
Carolina Reaper, currently recognized as the world's hottest pepper

ALT1:... that the Carolina Reaper (pictured) is currently the leader in the race to grow the hottest pepper, according to Guinness World Records?

Hm, maybe we'd want the photo to be of the Carolina Reaper? --valereee (talk) 18:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so a quick run over the article, I have a couple of things:
  1. I added a [citation needed] for one unref claim about the super-hots.
  2. Some empty cells in the table, not keen on that, looks like information has been forgotten.
  3. Some entries in the table appear to be completely unreferenced, is that the case?
I like the ALT1 hook, I'll do the technical verification of DYK criteria once we address the above issues. We may also need "according to Guinness World Records" in there as well because several other entries in the table are hotter than the Carolina Reaper.... The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
1: ugh, that's probably OR. I'll see if I can find someone who has said that. Maybe the academic journal article.
2: information I haven't found yet, not sure how to deal with blanks in the table while I look for the info. I've got a book on order from interlibrary loan that may fill at least some out.
3: to come, at least for the entries that have articles already.
Agreed on insertion, done. --valereee (talk) 20:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1a:... that according to Guinness World Records, the Carolina Reaper (pictured) is currently the leader in the race to grow the hottest pepper? The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 06:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the blanks in the table could be filled out with "Unknown" or similar. Otherwise I'm satisfied this is suitable for DYK and you have passed the pre-requisites. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 14:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reopening per the DYK talk page. @The Rambling Man: is invited to come back. SL93 (talk) 02:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reposting Bells' proposed hook here, as well as proposing new hooks based on their suggestions:
Just for disclosure, I kind of don't understand why there were concerns with the hook interest for the initially proposed hook. Readers probably would have thought that the mere fact that there's a race to grow the hottest pepper was interesting in of itself. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SL93, I don't think TRM can come back or even respond to your invitation here, as he can only comment if he's the first and only commenter on a nom. ALT1a and ALT2 are both fine with me, the original image can be used for ALT2. We'll need a new reviewer to approve either of them. --valereee (talk) 11:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, I am happy to reconfirm ALT1a. It is the most hooky of the proposals made so far, in terms of simplicity and interest - as noted, the race to grow the pepper is the interesting fact, and the current leader just gives a bit more insight into that. It also meets the other criteria per previous assessment. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 13:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the re-review! --valereee (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

heat rating

[edit]

Hey, N32756377, we've already got a column for the Scoville rating, does this provide additional information? We'd need a source for it. --valereee (talk) 22:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP edits

[edit]

@Cerebral726 and @Zefr, those edits look like copyvio to boot, if the IP tries to add again, maybe provide a link to this section and ask them to come to the talk page to discuss. —valereee (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Availability of seed

[edit]

The availability of seed is pretty easy now (2021). I'm just eating a Naga from a kit sold in the UK with seeds of California Reaper, Naga and Scotch Bonnet, three clay posts and coir compost for under £5. I can confirm the heat in the Naga is all in the seeds/pith. Stub Mandrel (talk) 14:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

guiness subsection

[edit]

This section is duplicative of the table and just keeps growing. I propose we remove it as not an improvement. valereee (talk) 18:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]