Talk:Prince Lorenz of Belgium

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was not moved due to no consensus. -- Kjkolb 03:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PageName → New Name – Belgium is integral to this man's identity, IMHO, as much as Austria-Este is. I feel that there are a few options which I will list below. Charles 22:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Prince Lorenz of Belgium

Prince Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este

Support (First) Lorenz is primarily known as a member of the Belgian royal family, even though he heads an Austrian branch of it. Charles 22:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archduke Lorenz, Prince of Belgium

Support (Third) This was the form decided upon for Louise of Tuscany. Charles 16:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenz, Archduke of Austria-Este

Support (Second) This would place Lorenz's title as it is, as the head of a house, rather than as a prince carrying a substantive title. Charles 16:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenz of Austria-Este

First choice. Let's keep it simple, on the analogy of George of Denmark, who is chiefly (perhaps only) known as a member of the British royal house. Septentrionalis 16:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment George is so named because of his status as consort to a sovereign. Charles 16:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Lorenz of Austria-Este

Second choice, for those who insist on including a title. This one is presumably ratified by usage, and does not involve any PoV on the status of Modena. Septentrionalis 16:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The title "Prince of Austria-Este" does not exist. Charles 16:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - This comment would be relevant to Lorenz, Prince of Austria-Este, if anyone had proposed it. Septentrionalis 18:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I feel that a form incorporating both designations would be optimal, but the length may be cumbersome. Charles 22:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An English-language search of Factiva (the world's largest newspaper database) shows the following:

"Archduke Lorenz" 27 occurrences (the most recent of which is June 2002)
"Prince Lorenz" 46 occurrences (including 37 since June 2002); I checked that these were all either "Prince Lorenz of Belgium" or "Belgian's Prince Lorenz" or something similar (i.e. they are not references to some other prince named Lorenz)

I personally always refer to this individual as "Archduke Lorenz of Austria-Este", but the Factiva numbers would suggest that "Prince Lorenz of Belgium" would be the appropriate Wikipedia article title. This is one of those many occasions when general usage is different from those of us who hang out in royalty discussion groups. Noel S McFerran 22:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though I am favorably inclined to "Lorenz of Austria-Este" as the French, Dutch (and Catalan) Wikipedias have, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) would indicate using the current name (as with Prince Andrew, Duke of York). —Centrx→talk • 18:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More thoughts: I firmly feel that Prince Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este is the best title for a few reasons... Even though Austria is obviously a country, it makes it clear that the archducal title is not a grant of the Kingdom of Belgium (e.g., such as Prince Andrew, Duke of York... Prince and Duke are both UK titles in this instance). Belgium should either be mentioned with the princely title or omitted altogether in the article title (e.g., Lorenz, Archduke of Austria-Este).

Another issue that I would bring up but think would be better to discuss in one place is the titles of his children. Appending the title Archduke of Austria-Este to the end of each of their names is a form used for the head of the house. If they were each titled Archduke Name, Prince of Belgium, I think it would be a better form because there is no one who is "the" Prince of Belgium anyway, since Belgium has a king. A longer form would be Archduke Name of Austria-Este, Prince of Belgium. Charles 22:02, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Duke of Modena

is he really considered the heir to the dukedom of Modena? I know when Francis V died, he willed his wealth to Franz Ferdinand, who took the Este name and arms, but normal succession would make Franz Duke of Bavaria, Duke of Modena. so I guess the question is there a source of the Archduke of Austria-Este using this title? 71.194.44.209 (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prince Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040918054909/http://www.investors.ucb-group.com:80/VisitorsWeb/Staging/group/biographical_cards/HRHPrinceLorenzofBelgium.asp to http://www.investors.ucb-group.com/VisitorsWeb/Staging/group/biographical_cards/HRHPrinceLorenzofBelgium.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Belgium and Archduke of Austria-Este

The official website of the Belgian Monarchy states on this page that Prince Lorenz "became Prince of Belgium in 1995". It also refers to him as "Archduke of Austria-Este". I therefore revised the infobox's "title" line to reflect that. -- Blairall (talk) 00:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prince Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.almanachdegotha.com/site/soc.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140102205319/http://picture.belga.be/belgapicture/picture/271955.html to http://picture.belga.be/belgapicture/picture/271955.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Prince Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus for the proposed move, though some modifications such as Amakuru's might have a chance. (non-admin closure) Dicklyon (talk) 05:05, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:CONCISE and WP:CONSISTENCY (Robert, Archduke of Austria-Este, Margherita, Archduchess of Austria-Este). I also want to point out that these two are among the titled royals, and in such cases where the individual is an heir or head of a house we follow the format "Name, Title" (Charles, Prince of Wales, Jean-Christophe, Prince Napoléon, Catharina-Amalia, Princess of Orange, etc). Keivan.f^Talk 01:05, 14 May 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency and conciseness. bd2412 T 02:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Amakuru, you have moved the articles to titles that were not suggested here. Can you please correct the mistakes? Surtsicna (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Surtsicna:: Ah, apologies, I thought the request was just about removing the word "Prince". In that case I've reopened the move and would Oppose this proposal. They are primarily known as prince/princess of Belgium, so that should be the way they're titled. The situation is not the same as "Charles, Prince of Wales" because his title is a British one, directly linked to his status as a British prince. — Amakuru (talk) 10:19, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the examples you've gave are of heirs of ruling royal houses, their titles are substantive. in this case, while the house of Austria-Este exists, its dominion does not. therefore i propose to treat it the same way we treat [[Prince Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex if not by your own proposition these pages should be renamed to Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh etc. just Prince Phillip was made a british prince, Lorenz was also made a belgian prince. thus the same rule that applies to them should apply here as well. etc. CharlesViBritannia (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And? The examples that you have given are in no way related to this case. The Duke of Edinburgh, for example, has never been the title of a ruling monarch. Even if Lorenz is not an actual ruler, he carries a title that once belonged to a group of rulers. Now if we were to title this page based on Lorenz's position, then Prince Lorenz of Belgium would have been enough, since he is a Belgian prince by marriage and it would also make the title more concise. Keivan.f^Talk 20:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for Astrid, who should be Princess Astrid of Belgium for simplicity. There aren't any other princesses of Belgium called Astrid, the disambiguator is unnecessary and we should use the common name. Princess Astrid of Belgium is about 200-times more common on google news searches than Astrid, Archduchess of Austria-Este. It's split about evenly for Prince Lorenz of Belgium and Lorenz, Archduke of Austria-Este. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 4 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: uncontested move. DrKay (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lorenz, Prince of Belgium → Prince Lorenz of Belgium – Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility), as Prince in this case is not a substantive title. 2601:241:301:4360:E8B6:A58:7A05:DC21 (talk) 21:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, usual format. Surtsicna (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, The page was since moved back to its original title, which seems to negate the need for the move. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:301:4360:39E5:ACCF:BE8B:B41A (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It is unusual indeed but I still support the move to Prince Lorenz of Belgium. It is the title by which he has been commonly known for over twenty years. Concision is appreciated too. The articles about his children have been moved already. Surtsicna (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Perhaps this would require a new move request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:301:4360:39E5:ACCF:BE8B:B41A (talk) 12:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.