Talk:Sara Paxton

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sara Paxton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sara Paxton was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 6, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Jewish culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Hispanic and Latino / Mexican-Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Mexican-American task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sara Paxton be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Hi, I added a 'music' section with two bullet points of factual information, as I thought it was needed. -Baberlp

Picture

I have read these things about why this article failed to acheive GA status, and have come to the conclusion that the picture is a major reason why it has failed. Right now, there is no picture so I am contacting Sara Paxton over her official Myspace account to ask for permission to upload one. Then I know it'll comply with the Fair Use Rationale. Lowri (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

I think there are problems at the moment with the lead section (should be a little bit longer and summarise more of the article's content) and 'Early life', which reads like a fan piece and is also in the present tense which can't be right if it's describing her early life. Otherwise it meets the criteria. Worldtraveller 23:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remove it from the nominations for now to avoid cluttering it up. Feel free of course to renominate it when you feel it meets the criteria. Worldtraveller 00:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I've fulfilled the requirements now. Mad Jack O'Lantern 00:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

USC Application

The article mentions that Sara Paxton applied to USC but was not accepted. This seems a bit anomalous, and calls for an explanation - can't just state this and leave it at that. There must be some reason for the USC decision. Also, most people apply to more than one program, so there must be more to say about all this.

Well, all the info we have is what's on the cited source for that bit. She says she wasn't accepted and leaves it at that, so we don't know anything else... Mad Jack 23:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically all it says is: "her disappointment at not getting into USC's film program" Mad Jack 23:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the USC web site at: USC CNTV It appears that to be admitted you need a creative portfolio (which she certainly has covered) and "a strong academic record", so it's likely that her marks were not up to scratch, possibly because she was so busy with acting and music. She does have the option of re-applying at any time,and could also take some of the courses while studying in a different program. User: JD_Fan

Good Article nomination has failed

The Good article nomination for Sara Paxton has failed, for the following reason:

I have failed Sara Paxton's good article nomination on two grounds, one of which really spills into the other creating a third. First, there is not nearly enough content. An article with one section of text and some tables is not Good or Featured Article quality just because it is about a pretty lady. Second, the text that is there could probably use some heavier sourcing, certainly some sourcing on her CD release and hopefully move her IMDB page from an external link to ref'ing filmography info. See Diane Keaton for a truly fantabulous article on an actress. Staxringold 14:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And on further review, the images could use some better info. Staxringold 14:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Death

Is Sara PAxton really dead now?Read the stuff below her pic.Alyssacarmillo 04:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

She is not dead Fearstorm 14:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 6, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass

2. Factually accurate?: Pass - excellent

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Fail Image:DWL.jpg needs a fair use rationale and Image:Photo06sarapaxton01.jpg needs a more detailed rationale.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far.

Kindest Regards
The Sunshine Man 15:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pic

I think this picture stinks, it is boring, the same one over and over again!

Her mother

Is her mother Ashkenazi or Sephardi?

There's something missing...

I was watching the credits for the popular Nicktoon "SpongeBob SquarePants," and I 'm positive that Sara Paxton's name was on one of the credits for voice talents for the episode containing "Mid-Life Crusteacean". However, the credits went by so fast I couldn't tell which role she played. If anybody could find out what role she played, it should be added to her Career profile because it isn't there.

Eenyminy (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that Sara was indeed credited on the programme, as several extras. I think her name has been down for various roles such as "Fish #1" and stuff like that, so it wasn't anything major, but it is relevant and if it's not already up I'll add it. 81.100.55.173 (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Eenyminy (talk) 04:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this a page?

This page looks like her mom wrote it. She has a "mixed family" why is this important? She isn't famous and it seems unnecessary but hey you know whatever. I'll write one about my sister who is an extra in movies sometimes. No Offense —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.138.45 (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Friends007 15:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some pictures [1] [2] of Sara.--Friends007 16:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Persona life

She is currently dating Nico Tortorella from Make it or break it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.2.187 (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image used in article

An image used in this article, File:SPaxton2.jpg may be deleted per discussion here: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Sarauntitled.jpg_and_File:SPaxton2.jpg. If a valid fair use rationale can be given, then I suggest that this file be uploaded locally. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 14:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sara paxton02.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Sara paxton02.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

at first : i want 2 say that i love you so much

i saw most of your films and i liked them so much

i hope u send me back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afa moka (talk • contribs) 00:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sara Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100507140004/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/news/e3ib6c66237fa7a658dc756e3b5a3701416 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ib6c66237fa7a658dc756e3b5a3701416

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sara Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sara Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Sara Paxton in 2018.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]