User talk:Tommiks

Bulgaria

I wasn't vandalizing the article. It just looked worse the way you did it. If you put a small paragraph about each time period and put a link above it leading to the main article, then it will be a lot better.

The Epic Barnstar

I, Fire Star award you this Epic Barnstar for your consistently excellent recent contributions of articles on Hittite and other related history.

Ottoman Empire

There is nothing wrong with the paragraphs being short. I placed the cleanup tag mostly because the style and grammar needs to be improved in many sections. I —tried to explain on the talk page. I started some editing but found the task overwhelming with the small amount of time I have. --Yodakii 15:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Detail is certainly important, but so is style and grammar. I think a short well-written article is still better than a long, hard to understand one. In any case, I'll try to fix what I can. --Yodakii 15:49, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the work on Geography of Turkey. I've found that all but a couple of countries have geography articles that are just a list of facts, so I've been using this Library of Congress source to expand all of them. Unfortunately, the source isn't always neutral, and doesn't have entries for every country. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-10-26 16:25

I oppologize

I may have been a little harsh with my comment, I thought you were someone I knew of in the past elsewhere with a similar alias, which you obviously are not. Thanks for your answer, it satisfy me. Fadix 20:40, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anatolia

"Please, you do not have to change the Anatolia to Asia Minor. It is an international definition. If you like you can put your argument in the discussion page."

The two geographic names (one Greek, one Latin) are pretty much interchangeable and I guess both are international, aren't they? No big difference.

"I was wondering, if you dare to create page, that will collect the migrations in&out of Anatolia through out time. Maybe you can develop a timeline with referances... That would be ver usefull, and we can put a link to your page under demographics of Republic of Turkey."

I don't have the full picture about all the many many waves of migrations, but there's probably already a timeline under History of Turkey somewhere. All I know is that many peoples have passed through and left their genetic footprint in the contemporary population. :)

--Big Adamsky 22:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you've deleted my entire contribution to Turkey. I urge you to put it back as soon as you can. If you change or delete a sentence or a paragraph you need to state why and then replace the text with something better (if you can). I'll check the page sometime soon to see whether you've improved anything on that particular page. --Big Adamsky 22:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, what you have done is you've deleted every word of what I contributed as if my contribution were irrelevant or untrue or misplaced. And apparently you haven't read (or understood) what it was you deleted. In stead of deleting you should try to contribute or clarify. I'll deal with this later, when I have the time. --Big Adamsky 23:07, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I should calm down and listen to your reason for deleting, without writing in something better yourself. So.. what was your reason? And why do you refer to my contribution as "vandalism"? Are you going to explain your actions at all? --Big Adamsky 00:01, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How to put legend below the grid on the bottom

Hi Tommiks,

you are the one that creates the most sophisticated timelines on wikipedia. I need your help on the German Wikipedia. I want to put the Legend on the bottom of the grid, but it wont work. Can you help? --Saharadesertfox 14:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template that needs the legend on the bottom of the grid:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorlage:Rheinischer_Münzverein

Lifestyle of the Ottoman Empire

What is going on this page: Lifestyle of the Ottoman Empire? -- Perfecto 08:04, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tommiks, this page will be deleted at the moment someone familiar with policies notices it. WP:NOT specifically proscribes articles which are image galleries. Of my watchlist, Gallery of Socialist Realism was deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Socialist Realism. So I suggest you to upload the images into wikiCommons instead. You can refer to images from there in wikipedia with exactly the same syntax. mikka (t) 01:46, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Empire

I am truly amazed of the job done by you!

I noticed that the template:History of the Ottoman Empire sidebar in some articles was on top, in others is on bottom and started moving them all on bottom. But then decided that you probably know better where it should be. From my experience, horizontal templates are usually at the bottom. If someone wants the article series template on top, he makes it bertical and laces on top right. Please look around and make a proper decision. mikka (t) 01:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I went ahead and changed the template:History of the Ottoman Empire sidebar to be more like other templates of this type (narrow, for display at top right of page). It looks better this way, I think. --JW1805 (Talk) 20:22, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adnan Menderes.png

Please add a source who can verify that this photo is PD. Thuresson 00:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kurtulussavasi.gif

The map is fine though, please enlarge it. It will be more accurate.

Middle Eastern theatre of World War I

Please see Talk:Middle Eastern theatre of World War I#Rename? --Philip Baird Shearer 10:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Poetry of the Ottoman Empire article

Tommiks, while I admire your work on timelines and think you have done a fine job on them in general, I also think that the timeline used on the Poetry of the Ottoman Empire article is far too cluttered to be of much use, and that the table that was already there (which I have moved closer to the timeline so as to unclutter the beginning of the article) would probably serve better to give a sense of the historical progression of poetry in the Ottoman period. Let me know, on my talk page, what you think about this idea. —Saposcat 10:20, 9 February 2006 (GMT +02:00)

Pictures of Republic of Turkey

Pictures of Republic of Turkey has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 05:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Turkish literature peer review

Hello. I've noticed that you have an interest in Turkish literature, and that is why I am leaving you a message. I have recently entirely rewritten the Turkish literature article with a view to getting it up to Featured Article status, and have placed the article up for peer review. If you could possibly take the time to look at and review the article, I would greatly appreciate it. If not, thank you for taking the time to read this message. Saposcat 10:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian issues

Would you help me? What do you think about this? If you like the design, I'm going to add more data.

Image Tagging for Image:PKK_Urban_War.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:PKK_Urban_War.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Turkey_road.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Turkey_road.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Paddu 20:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note that just specifying that it is the work of the United States government isn't enough. In order to allow others to verify that it is indeed the work of the US govt. you have to cite the source from where you got that image in the image description page. I notice that you have earlier ignored the request to add the source and reverted the {{nosource}} template added to the image description page without adding any indication of the source of the image. This is inappropriate. -- Paddu 20:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both Image:Turkey road.png and Image:Turkey-Regions.png have now been deleted due to lack of source information — [1], [2]. You could reupload these images with proper source information. -- Paddu 05:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Hi. Following from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People of Turkey between 1900-1909, some articles you created have been deleted. Please be aware that pictures not used in articles might also be deleted at some point in the future. This is just a courtesy note in case you should be interested in reusing them elsewhere. --kingboyk 12:18, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:27px-Turkey-Regions.png

Thanks for uploading Image:27px-Turkey-Regions.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Ottoman Empire

User Miskin is making redundant additions to the article, hurting its quality. Here it is (diff. in bold letters):

"Despite its extremely multi-ethnic character, the Ottoman state was commonly known in its days as the Turkish Empire."

This is the introduction sentence to the article. I explained to him/her every recognised empire in history is multi-ethnic therefore that is a redundant addition to that sentence making it look like it was written by an elementary school kid, as if all empires aren't multi-ethnic and Turkish Empire is an exception. Please revert the part to maintain quality. Regards.--Kagan the Barbarian 09:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Turkish Empire is the English word then what is Ottoman Empire? I know you did that with good faith but it looks even more redundant now. Miskin very well knows it is redundant and unnecessary, don't give in to this. The old form of the paragraph was:

"The Ottoman Empire (Ottoman Turkish: دولتِ عَليه عُثمانيه, Devlet-i Âliye-i Osmaniye, literally "Ottoman Sublime State"), commonly known in its days as the Turkish Empire, was an imperial power, bordering the Mediterranean Sea, that existed from 1299 to 1922."

And it was added by Thomas Bloomberg, an apperantly neutral user, who is citing only facts. Do a Google search you get 2,000,000 hits for Turkish Empire. Please revert it to that version.--Kagan the Barbarian 10:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how much I confused you, but you definitely lost me with that last message. I was just asking you to change the first paragraph back to this:

"The Ottoman Empire (Ottoman Turkish: دولتِ عَليه عُثمانيه, Devlet-i Âliye-i Osmaniye, literally "Ottoman Sublime State"), commonly known in its days as the Turkish Empire, was an imperial power, bordering the Mediterranean Sea, that existed from 1299 to 1922."

Ottoman Empire and Turkish Empire are both the same thing and both are English; it is redundant to say Ottoman Empire (In English: Turkish Empire). I've seen many Western sources, Italian, Spanich etc., where it is regarded as Turkish Empire. Anyway I can't revert because I broke the 3RR and you are probably gone by now, I'll do it later.--Kagan the Barbarian 12:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I wasn't aware of the separate article which focuses on the politics of the Ottomans. In any case I'll make an effort to improve and expand the article according to some unbiased sources that I have under my possession. Miskin 20:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you should know

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fadix/evidencepage

The question is why? If you wanted to participate in the edition of the Armenian genocide page, why havn't you said so? Why have you used socks insteed? I wasn't expecting you to do something like that, now I just don't know of what to think about you.

Tommiks, there are few things you should know, and I advice you to read another time the merging test, since you are a grad student and seem to be good at programming I guess you know what a regression test is. While I have not included the third part, since it includes much of text materials, I thought this was enought for you to come clean, which basically it wasn't.

If you pay attention, you will see that this is not about you having exams and not being able to contribute, but rather those three users which will cover the holes. If you pay attention to the texts I have bolded you will see that a regression test will yeild a p<0.05. I think you already know what I am trying to say, but still for the sake of 'assuming good faith' I will try to explain you this.

I really first thought that all this was Coolcat doings, the layouts and stuff etc. I knew that the one that was doing it was not a dumb and that probably a checkuser based on IPs will not yeild any results, and it was apparent that the one that was doing it was faking his English, which was also admitted by Tonny. Slowly I have started this from zero, searching and searching, I have viewed all tha active editors of Ottoman related materials here and Turkish Wikipedia, I have uncovered Nafiz, which I thought was Coolcat, but after intense work, I have started having doubts, because it was as if the pro was not Coolcat but another user. When I checked the statistics of Erik Zatche EasyTimeline, I by mistake found that this design was probably not originating from Coolcat but that he had barrowed it from someone, since two users were using that design you and Coolcat and that most complex versions were worked by you. So, like you see I was not after searching about you, I ended up there because I have realised that I was being wrong all along, while Coolcat and you were working in tandem, you were the brightest between the two of you(I am not trying to to underestimate Coolcats intelligence there). Then, I had the briliant idea of merging contributions, I did that with various users, I thought that no one would be obsessed enought to sporadically contribute in various articles with various usernames and that a merging would show heterogenouty, the user for sure will make mistakes. When I did that, I quickly learned that while there is some form of communication between you and Coolcat beyond Wikipedia talk page, Coolcat inclusion in this merging was problematic, from a series of eliminations only you matched, and this again has nothing to do with your lack of time.

There still were few problems with that, and it is Coolcat uses of similar edit summeries, the note about 'not everyone has new tecnology' when reducing the size of an image was problematic, since Coolcat was editing for this reason. The answer came when I have read something from you, to the effect that you yourself didn't have a high resolution monitor and that not everyone had one. This was it, in fact in some way or another, you were the one having this idea of reducing resolutions not Coolcat, Coolcat was just the barrower there. So, the edit summaries could have been explained from this, also I have noticed that Coolcat was barrowing expressions and style from many members, started with your own layouts.

Now comming to the merging test, I think that this would be a very good complement to the checkuser test for many reasons, because only this way was I able to conclude what I have concluded. If you don't mind, pay attention again to that page. In January 27, Karabekir makes his last edit for the day, no edits in January 28, you then appear in January 29, and continue the work of Karabekir, as you say, fx formats. You make your last edit of January 30, in Turkey, the next day, Karabekir reappear and finish what you have left. Each time you disapear, Karabekir reppear and continue your own work.

On January 3, Karabekir disappear, you reappear and continue your work, on January 4 after a minor edit on the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I, you disappear, Karabekir reappear and answer in the talk page of the same article. On January 5, before disappearing you edit Aftermath of World War I, Karabekir reappear and use the talk page of the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I. And here I am not talking about the content of your edits which clearly present a correlation of near 1. On January 6, Karabekir edit World War I, you appear then for the Template:Timeline of campaigns during WWI of the Ottoman Empire, after you disappear again, Karabekir reappear editing the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I (fixing the minor format).

This continuity is repeated again and again in the entire process by the three usernames.

But if you don't mind, let me highlight some other constatations. Karabekir started editing the Armenian genocide article on Febuary 27, 2006, on March 3 he made repeated edits, then he made a mistake that gave him away, let see what it was. March 3, 2006 22:48, Karabekir made an edit deleting temporarly the Turkish position section [3], it was in fact to reorganize it, we understand this after it has been reintroduced after working on it, 20 minutes after, they were reintroduced by pieces, NOT by Karabekir but you Tommiks [4], [5], [6]. You probably made the mistake, because you probably had different browsers each configurated with different user names and set proxies, while you were making those changes you did not realise that it was made under your Karabekir alias. But, this was not it, Ottomanreference too interceded in such a series of edits. First, Ottomanreference was registered Febuary 17, 2006, the same date when after 4 months of silence from the Armenian genocide article, Coolcat started editing. What is interesting is that Ottomanreference started editing the Armenian genocide article the same exact date that Karabekir started editing it (Febuary 27, 2006), Karabekir has made an edit, a little over half an hour after, Ottomanreference makes an edit [7], continuing what Karabekir has started, when we check his contributions, we understand why Karabekir by mistake continued with his other alias, since he had to login in his other alias to make other contributions in other articles. Tommiks, Ottomanreference AND Karabekir few times have made common mistakes, the three write 'grammar,' 'grammer,' the three have already used the word 'paragraf' insteed of 'paragraph.' For example see: [8], [9], [10]. (see summary) Both Karabekir and you have made the exact same edit summaries, example, the claim of making things easier to read as pretext: [11], [12].

Those are few examples Tommiks of my research, and don't worry, you are not the only implicated, other people using socks are too, one user for example that I also passed the test of merging has been exposed using by socks and not by me.

You know, everyone make mistakes, not just you, I really first thought that Coolcat was behind that, and I was wrong.

You will read the rest of my report in this next week, you will see that those evidences I have provided are just some which I decided to present you here. RegardsFad (ix) 00:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Either you haven't read what I wrote, either you are doing that on purpouses Tommiks. Your answer has nothing to do with my post in your talk page. This is not about copyedit. This is about your login leaving and another comming just after and continuing the work you have left, and this for few days, then that login leaving and you comming back continuing the same exact work. Not only Karabekir and you have worked in the same articles, some VERY specific, but that there is a continuity between both users would convince the most skeptical person, in fact, it was first a Turk that suggested me to merge you while I was previously attempting with Coolcat and other users. Not only Karabekir has identicial edit summeries, not only both of you have made the same exact proper mistakes like writting 'paragraph' 'paragraf,' not only there are continuities between your presences and his, but there are things that just don't fool, example you working on World War I related articles and then after you disappear Karabekir comming back and continuing with that. Besides like I have previously said, one much telling mistake of yours was when Karabekir deleted temporarly the Turkish position section to organize it and minutes after you reintroduced them organized. I believe you when you say that you use student softwares, but like I am sure, any such softwares will yield the same result. I just hoped you would come clean, but you haven't. I just hope that I won't find other logins as I will be trying to close the gap for previous contributions too. Regards. Fad (ix) 16:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links on Kurdistan Workers Party tagged for speedy deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, External links on Kurdistan Workers Party, has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AmiDaniel (Talk) 09:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Timeline of Russo-Turkish Wars

Template:Timeline of Russo-Turkish Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. John Reid 10:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help me, please

Can you teach mea how to draw a map like Ottoman small animation.gif? I’m trying to write some articles about great battles of the Romanian Army and such animation would be very useful for my purpose. Thank you! User:Valip Talk Valip May 3, 2006 10:23 (EET)

Image copyright problem with Image:Greek Zone of Occupation.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Greek Zone of Occupation.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 23:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed that you have interacted with Philip Baird Shearer who is currently undergoing an RfA and thought that you might be interested in participating at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Philip Baird Shearer. You have received this message without the endorsement of the candidate involved, and this is not a solicitation of support, it is only an effort to make RfA discussions better (for more information see user:ShortJason/Publicity). Thank you in advance for your participation. ShortJason 23:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Apocular_information_flow.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Apocular_information_flow.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russo-Ottoman Wars box

Hi, just wondering if you had any thoughts on turning the Template:Russo–Ottoman War Series into a campaignbox for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Campaignboxes project I've been working on. I wanted to check with you since you looked like the creator. Basically, it's a style change but I wasn't sure about changing it since I'm not familiar with the "series" style it is currently in. Thanks. Publicus 18:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:20px-Flag of Turkey.svg.png

Thanks for uploading Image:20px-Flag of Turkey.svg.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:A_Turkish_Kaleidoscope_(1926)-_Anatolia_shepherd.png

Thanks for uploading Image:A_Turkish_Kaleidoscope_(1926)-_Anatolia_shepherd.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 02:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also Image:Constantinople_settings_and_traits_(1926)-_Cholera.png, Image:Constantinople_settings_and_traits_(1926)-_Turkish_Refugees_from_balkans.png and Image:Constantinople_settings_and_traits_(1926)-_Turkish_refugees_seeking_help.png.

Image source problem with Image:Mustapha Kemal -(1931) -New parliament building in Ankara.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mustapha Kemal -(1931) -New parliament building in Ankara.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 21:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:The short cut to india (1909). Harran ovasi farmland-2.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:The short cut to india (1909). Harran ovasi farmland-2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 21:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Political Murders in Turkey (1970s).GIF

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Political Murders in Turkey (1970s).GIF. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 18:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Turkish ministery of culture - green mosque.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Turkish ministery of culture - green mosque.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of countries and organizations that list the PKK as a terrorist group

An editor has nominated List of countries and organizations that list the PKK as a terrorist group, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries and organizations that list the PKK as a terrorist group and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Adnan_Menderes.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Adnan_Menderes.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 00:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Afyon-memorial-Turkish_ministery_of_culture.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Afyon-memorial-Turkish_ministery_of_culture.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 00:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A middleast mosaic -1999 - The original caricature is dated 1885. counsultative menagerie.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:A middleast mosaic -1999 - The original caricature is dated 1885. counsultative menagerie.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. X clamation point 18:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:With the conquered Turk (1913) Two Ottoman soldiers walking towards the Istanbul.png

File:With the conquered Turk (1913) Two Ottoman soldiers walking towards the Istanbul.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ottoman soldiers after the First Balkan War.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Ottoman soldiers after the First Balkan War.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantinople(1878)-Armenian and Turkish retailers.png is now available as Commons:File:Constantinople(1878)-Armenian and Turkish retailers.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantinople(1878)-Armeni mrs.png is now available as Commons:File:Constantinople(1878)-Armeni mrs.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantinople(1878)-park.png is now available as Commons:File:Constantinople(1878)-park.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of History of Bulgaria (1878–1946)

The article History of Bulgaria (1878–1946) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.TrustWorthy----Got Something to Tell Me? 22:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of History of Bulgaria (1878–1946)

A tag has been placed on History of Bulgaria (1878–1946) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr.TrustWorthy----Got Something to Tell Me? 03:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:Ataturk-(1967) - Sivas congress Refet-Rauf-bekir.png

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Empire era classification

Hi,Tommiks

The Ottoman Empire era classification needs to be reviewed. My note on the side bar (which is a summary of the text) [13] is on the discussion page. Being one of the main contributors, you may wish to reorganize it. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

help

Greetings. can you explain to me how can i translate a template, like this one which you created: Template:Timeline of Russo-Turkish Wars to any non-Latin alphabet language? i tried to translate it to Arabic, but all i get is lines and codes, no Arabic words.Bassem18 Bassem18 (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GAP Administration publication 2004- restoration.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GAP Administration publication 2004- restoration.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:GAP Administration publication 2004- application of new technologies.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GAP Administration publication 2004- application of new technologies.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Interegnum

Hello, Tommiks. You have new messages at Talk:Ottoman Interregnum.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination for deletion of Template:History of Hittites Series

Template:History of Hittites Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Story Line of the Kurdistan Workers Party

Template:Story Line of the Kurdistan Workers Party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Effects of the Turkey – Kurdistan Workers' Party conflict for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Effects of the Turkey – Kurdistan Workers' Party conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effects of the Turkey – Kurdistan Workers' Party conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Highly appreciate your work. please keep it up and keep going.LOL Ipadgonglu (talk) 22:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The sultan (1973) original caricature c1879 - british goverment forcing the sultan for reforms.png

Thank you for uploading File:The sultan (1973) original caricature c1879 - british goverment forcing the sultan for reforms.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:The sultan (1973) original caricature c1879 - british goverment forcing the sultan for reforms.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The sultan (1973) original caricature c1879 - british goverment forcing the sultan for reforms.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

Hi, I think you're no longer active. But please have your say in the deletion discussion of Lifestyle of the Ottoman Empire [14] Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkish Crossroads (1951). Turkish Army.png

This picture obviously isn't from 1918. In 1918 just a few amounts of German type stahlhelms were in use in Turkey beside other hats like the Enveriye and kalpaks. In the first years of the republic the French Adrian helmet was introduced into the army. For pictures depicting this just google "Atatürk cenaze 1938". The British Brody helmet which you can see in your picture was introduced sometime around World War II. If you google "Atatürk anitkabir 1953" you can see some sample images. There is no evidence that this type of helmet was in use in 1918 in the Turkish army. Again the uniform in this picture is the type which was introduced together with the Brody helmet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.187.123.155 (talk) 00:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Constantinople settings and traits (1926)- bulgarians dancing.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Constantinople settings and traits (1926)- bulgarians dancing.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. B (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantinople(1878)-Turkish Government information brocure (1950s) - Black Sea from istanbul.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Constantinople(1878)-Turkish Government information brocure (1950s) - Black Sea from istanbul.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantinople(1878)-Turkish Goverment information brocure (1950s) - Istanbul coffee house.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Constantinople(1878)-Turkish Goverment information brocure (1950s) - Istanbul coffee house.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Turkish theater 1933 - pishekar, kavuklu, three zenne, orchestra, on median (open space).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Turkish theater 1933 - pishekar, kavuklu, three zenne, orchestra, on median (open space).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkish Government information brocure (1950s) - Meddah-storyteller.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Turkish Government information brocure (1950s) - Meddah-storyteller.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The sultan (1973) original mansell collection - San Stefano.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The sultan (1973) original mansell collection - San Stefano.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Turkish theater 1933 - pishekar, kavuklu, three zenne, orchestra, on median (open space).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Turkish theater 1933 - pishekar, kavuklu, three zenne, orchestra, on median (open space).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ottoman governing structure.png

Thank you for uploading File:Ottoman governing structure.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:National Uprisings under the Ottoman Empire

Template:National Uprisings under the Ottoman Empire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of Folklore of the Ottoman Empire

Template:Timeline of Folklore of the Ottoman Empire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]