User talk:Ambrosia10/Archive 2
Wellington meet-ups Reply
[edit]Hey there - thanks so much for dropping me a line about supporting our meet-ups. Sounds like you've had some interesting experiences you could share!
We haven't started organising regular meet-ups yet but we are running another training / editing day on 13 june. All dets on our website. Let me know if you're keen to take part/help put, it would be great to have you there. Auchmill (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Ella Orr Campbell has been nominated for Did You Know
[edit]![]() | Hello, Ambrosia10. Template:Did you know nominations/Ella Orr Campbell, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know![]() |
Adding threat classificaitons
[edit]Hi there! I see you are working on adding DOC threat classification rankings. I have just started editing Wikipedia, focusing on native freshwater fishes. Tonight I discovered how to add IUCN rankings to the sidebar and have added a few, but now I see it is possible to do the DOC ones there instead. I want to know more about the comparison between IUCN and DOC rankings. I guess the DOC ranking is most identifiable and quoted in NZ? StellaMcQ (talk) 10:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Ella Orr Campbell has been nominated for Did You Know
[edit]![]() | Hello, Ambrosia10. Ella Orr Campbell, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know![]() |
Ways to improve Opacuincola dulcinella
[edit]Hi, I'm Musa Raza. Ambrosia10, thanks for creating Opacuincola dulcinella!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've added orphan tag.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Musa Talk 07:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
Thank you for all of your work on women botanists, who are so, so often ignored. Keilana (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC) |
You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science
[edit]You are invited! Join us remotely! | |
---|---|
![]() ![]()
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Elinor Francis Vallentin has been nominated for Did You Know
[edit]![]() | Hello, Ambrosia10. Elinor Francis Vallentin, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know![]() |
Thanks for participating
[edit]
Thank you for your participation in the Women in Science Virtual Edit-a-thon, 8 to 29 November 2015, hosted by Women in Red together with Women scientists. It was held in parallel with a meet up at the New York Academy of Sciences on 22 November. In addition to improvements, we created well over 300 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated!
Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon from 5 to 15 December.--Ipigott (talk) 12:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Elinor Francis Vallentin
[edit]![]() | On 17 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elinor Francis Vallentin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that collaboration between botanists Elinor Francis Vallentin and A.D. Cotton resulted in the first comprehensive study of cryptogams from the Falkland Islands? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elinor Francis Vallentin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
On images and attribution in captions.
[edit]Hello! Thanks for your many contributions as well as your images uploaded to Commons. I've noticed you adding external links, as well as CC-licenses, to the captions of images you've added to Wikipedia. This is unwarranted, per WP:CREDITS, and WP:EL (and is also often unsightly and unnecessarily wordy: see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions). Full author, source, and license should of course be on the file description page, but captions should focus on largely subject (what is illustrated), not metadata. I notice you have Creative Commons Best practices for attribution linked on your Userpage, and may be striving to abide by such recommendations, but that is a separate Wiki, and as such is external, secondary, and largely irrelevant, to Wikipedia guidelines, policies, and best practices. Note also that images in infoboxes or taxoboxes should not be in thumbnail form: rather, the file name and caption (if needed), are entered separately in different fields. Lastly, purely descriptive text about an image (e.g. "a woman standing in a field") should not be in the caption, but can be included in Alternative text fields, e.g. to assist visually impaired readers that would not otherwise get the visual information. All the best! --Animalparty! (talk) 06:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Have you seen Ambrosia10's explanation, at for example Talk:Hyphalus wisei?-gadfium 07:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- This is the message I left in reply on User:Animalpartys talk page -
Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I appreciate the advice and the help. However having previously had difficulties with copyright and licenses on the Wikipedia I'm now so risk adverse that I'm ensuring I comply completely with any copyright licenses and follow the advice given to ensure compliance unless advised legally otherwise. I've researched the ideal attribution and am following exactly the advice given by the Creative Commons website, the organisation that created the original licenses. As I understand it, this is the ideal attribution and is correct. I recognise that it may not be elegant but I'm confident I'm legally complying with both copyright and the CC BY 4.0 license by attributing the images this way. I'm following this advice in the caption and have improved my citation techniques in line with advice from other Wikipedia editors. Obviously I'd be prepared to adapt my attribution techniques if given legal advice of the same by either Wikipedia or Creative Commons lawyers but until then will be following the exact advice given by the Creative Commons website as regards ideal attribution. As explained, I've been bitten by copyright infringement previously on Wikipedia and refuse to put myself into that situation again. I'd also like to point out the other reason why I attribute images as I do. Please read my message on Talk:Hyphalus wisei. However I do very much appreciate your point of view and your assistance. Ambrosia10 (talk) 08:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Very worthy, but I think it would be better to attempt to change the wikipedia policy/guideline on photo attribution, rather than adding such attributions - either all creative commons photos need to be attributed this way (as per creative commons guidelines?) or none (as per wikipedia guidelines). If creative commons, or media providers have a problem with the way wikipedia attributes images (at present attribution is on the image's individual wiki page), then that is a huge issue that needs to be addressed directly. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Ella Orr Campbell
[edit]![]() | On 18 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ella Orr Campbell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while everyone else thought the field horsetail growing on nursery land in Palmerston North was ornamental, Dame Ella Orr Campbell correctly identified it as an invasive species? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ella Orr Campbell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Ipigott (talk) 08:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Smithsonian Institution Archives Barnstar | ||
Thrilled you could join us in-person at Saturday's Color History with the Smithsonian! It was a lot of fun and I heard from a lot of new editors that they really enjoyed the day. I appreciate you helping out the new ones! With appreciation, --Digitaleffie (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC) |
Invitation to our April event
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Sent by Rosiestep (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) via WP:MassMessage
April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science
[edit]
Join us! | |
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
"Women are everywhere"
[edit]Hi Ambrosia10. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, --Kenzia (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Wikipedia_Autopatrolled.svg/80px-Wikipedia_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hi Ambrosia10, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 20:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
NZ Species Edit-a-thon
[edit]Hi Ambrosia10! Thanks for dropping me a line about the edit-a-thon. If I have any questions I'll let you know.
ParquetParquet (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Photography
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration
[edit]
You are invited... ![]() | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Thanks for participating
[edit]
![]() ![]() Thank you for your contributions
| |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women in Photography worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Spotlight on women entertainers!
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Another barnstar for you
[edit]![]() |
The Instructor's Barnstar | |
This Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have performed stellar work in the area of instruction & help for other editors. Thank you so much for all your hard work on the #NZspecies Edit-a-thon; your tireless promotion, tutoring of people on the day, and especially all the work you put into compiling a 10-page guide to stub creation that became the structure and reference for the whole day. Well done. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 03:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC) |
Celebrating Pride @ Women in Red
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Linking to an author of a citation
[edit]Hi, please note that the value of author parameters in a cite/citation template should never contain a wikilink (it pollutes the hidden data that can be extracted by various reference tools). Instead use the "author link" parameters. See Template:Citation#Authors. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to the Hall of Fame!
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Indigenous women & Polar women editathons
[edit]
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Indigenous women editathon & Polar women editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Upcoming editathons: Women in Nursing & Women Labor Activists
[edit]
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon & Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Invitation to Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
[edit]
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An invitation to November's events
[edit]
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Ambrosia10. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016 at Women in Red
[edit]
![]()
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging