User talk:Bloomshouse

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Yaw Sarpong-Kumankuna, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Uncle Roy (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaw Sarpong-Kumankuna[edit]

A tag has been placed on Yaw Sarpong-Kumankuna, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uncle Roy (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Speedy Deletion

Hello, Bloomshouse. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. See the message above this one for more information about why this was deleted.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.

You can make test edits in your sandbox.

You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search

Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE

Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaw Sarpong-Kumankuma[edit]

Hello Bloomshouse,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yaw Sarpong-Kumankuma for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Reb1981 (talk) 01:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Yaw Sarpong-Kumankuma, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Reb1981 (talk) 01:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Hello,
Please have a read of WP:REFB to see how to correctly add references. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Justice Nyarko(Just Ice)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Justice Nyarko(Just Ice) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited R2Bees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wizkid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PossiGee for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PossiGee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PossiGee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Starr FM (Ghana)[edit]

Hello Bloomshouse,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Starr FM (Ghana) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kagundu Talk To Me 13:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deon Boakye[edit]

A tag has been placed on Deon Boakye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden, the Ghanaian act mentioned got several credible references online and was nominated at the Vodafone Ghana Music Awards. I am creating adding up references on this page. Please consider. Thank You so much.

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deon Boakye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manifest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waka Waka (This Time for Africa), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for the barnstar. Much appreciated. On this occasion I dedicate to song from South African snger Refentse "Sonvanger" in Afrikaans and Taps Mugadza from Zimbabwe "Waiting for You". Plus wanted to inform you of my personal website http://www.1wxrld.com with choice of recent songs from everywhere and in many languages. By the way, in case you need any help on Wikipedia or subjects covered by you or articles created by me or suggestions, count me in werldwayd (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just-Ice GH moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Just-Ice GH, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — Za wl 13:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M.O.G Beatz[edit]

A tag has been placed on M.O.G Beatz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 04:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M.O.G Beatz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fuji, Wizkid and Sarkodie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Starr FM (Ghana)[edit]

The article Starr FM (Ghana) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a paid editor?[edit]

Hi there Bloomshouse. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:25, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bri,

Thanks so much for your question. NEVER! I am not a paid editor. I do these work for FREE and the passion i have for writing. You can check a lot of edits I have done regarding articles especially from Southern Africa.

I do love writing and enjoy doing it.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Just-Ice GH[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Just-Ice GH".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sista Afia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sista Afia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sista Afia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quata (singer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quata (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quata (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 13:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Bri.public (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Enam Tugbefia[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse,

Thank you for creating Enam Tugbefia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa Ree (rapper) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Rosa Ree (rapper), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain?[edit]

Hello, could you explain this? I do not see a conflict of interest being declared anywhere? How is this so? are you oblivious of WP:COI? Celestina007 (talk) 13:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enam Tugbefia moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Enam Tugbefia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There is also a WP:UPE concern, as well as one of notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the notability issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the article into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:56, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chuks Omalicha[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chuks Omalicha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheChronium 08:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charass moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Charass, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UPE warning[edit]

Hello Bloomshouse. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Charass, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bloomshouse. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bloomshouse|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 19:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before officially reporting you to WP:COIN for possible undisclosed paid editing can you explain how you have the file on the article as your “own work” without declaring a COI? Celestina007 (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enam Tugbefia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enam Tugbefia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enam Tugbefia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Omalicha Chuks[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse,

Thank you for creating Omalicha Chuks.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 12:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rex Nosa moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Rex Nosa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 12:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain[edit]

I have moved your most recent article from Rex Nosa to Draft:Rex Nosa for diverse serious reasons, notability, a potential COI and factual inaccuracies, but allow me begin with this image, please how did you obtain this image? Secondly, in the Awards section the claim that he won the city people best actor award is not true, the inline citation you placed adjacent the claim invalidates that as the clearly states Yul Edochie was the winner in that category, Furthermore it appears the WP:COMMONNAME of the article is “Nosa Rex” I stumbled on this. Could you please explain how you got the image and why you made a claim that isn’t accurate in the article? Celestina007 (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on a second it appears it is who is misreading this, there seems to be a category for “best actor” and “best new actor” allow me cross check this, for now, if you could explain how you got the image to be your “own work” ? I’ve completed the re-examination and you are right, I’m sorry, they won the award, “Best actor” and “best new actor” are clearly different categories. Furthermore please moving forward, do not use BellaNaija as a reliable source, the reason is; it is a blog thus there isn’t and real editorial oversight neither do they have a reputation for fact checking. Furthermore I observe that in 2018, Bri asked you this question. Prior leaving this message I didn’t see that notice and if in 2021 similar concerns are being raised, it doesn’t look good. Please see WP:COIDISCLOSE if you haven’t. Thank you for your time. Celestina007 (talk) 13:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Communication and COI[edit]

You appeared to have done this without replying to this. If an article is drafitified for potential COI it differs from draftification due to notability, this was drafitified due to serious COI possibility thus it is good practice to communicate and explain certain things before the article is published. If you refuse to communicate it does the collaborative project a disservice and may lead to you being indefinitely blocked if a case is officially opened at WP:ANI. Furthermore if you move it back to mainspace, I’d be left with no other option than to use {{UPE}} tag that mandates you to communicate before editing any further and if you ignore that I would be left with no option than to officially report this due to the fact that you have refused to answer cogent queues and posses a history of doing so. Please I do not want that to be the case here if at all, please use the WP:AFC method to create the article. Celestina007 (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ani Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 20:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Director Kenny[edit]

A tag has been placed on Director Kenny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Director Kenny. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nthep (talk) 16:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moe Musa moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Moe Musa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charass[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OB Amponsah moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, OB Amponsah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abraham Moise Dedou for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham Moise Dedou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Moise Dedou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

agtx 21:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraham M. Dedou (footballer)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Abraham M. Dedou (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Moise Dedou. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraham Moise Dedou[edit]

A tag has been placed on Abraham Moise Dedou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Moise Dedou. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the deletion following the AfD linked above then you can either make that appeal at User talk: Liz (the admin who deleted the article) or WP:DRV. Please stop recreating the exact same article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Abraham Moise Dedou, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Recreating deleted pages following AfD and in exact same form is unacceptable Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manuel E. Johnson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manuel E. Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel E. Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Owlxe[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Owlxe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:OB Amponsah[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OB Amponsah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to footballer notability guideline[edit]

Hi Bloomshouse. There were concerns about the article on Yves Nyami which you created, and I wanted to make you aware of recent changes to the notability guideline on sportspeople and especially footballers. Following a recent community discussion a number of notability criteria changed, and in general footballers and other professional athletes need to satisfy some basic criteria including at least once citation to significant coverage (not a database or statistical entry) of the subject in order to be included. Hopefully this helps, and let me know if you have further questions. — Wug·a·po·des 19:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghana Entertainment Awards USA for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghana Entertainment Awards USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghana Entertainment Awards USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A loose necktie (talk) 04:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Hover moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jay Hover, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Abban[edit]

A tag has been placed on Robert Abban requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lewolka (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moe Musa[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moe Musa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jabari Garibaldi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jabari Garibaldi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello Bloomshouse. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bloomshouse. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bloomshouse|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ingenuity, thank you so much for your message. I am never connected to any subject I write or edit about. I have no connections, I love editing and working on wikipedia articles. I have done this for a while now. I have no connection besides, I am not being paid anything for doing this. Thank you so much for your concern and nice meeting you. Have a wonderful day, Bloom. Bloomshouse (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Geezygee per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Geezygee. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 23:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghana Music Awards USA for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghana Music Awards USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghana Music Awards USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 00:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Afrorolls[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Afrorolls, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Afrorolls[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Afrorolls".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jabari Garibaldi[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jabari Garibaldi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jabari Garibaldi[edit]

Hello, Bloomshouse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jabari Garibaldi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]