User talk:Chuckjav

Image copyright problem with Image:MHS 1955.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MHS 1955.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chuckjav here.

I have no way of obtaining permission to post the 1955 yearbook picture of dear old (Detroit) Mackenzie High School; the school is closed...there are no students in the picture - just the building.

Do what you must; delete the photo as appropriate.

Chuckjav

WP:AIV Report

Thank you very much for the valuable information. Your reply has been forwarded to the Centerville Police Department

Chuckjav

I removed your report because it was not concerning viable vandalism/a threat and it was posted inappropriately. However, it is unlikely that we would be able to help you regarding this matter. The only possible slander I see can be found in this diff added by an IP address. You may reference to that to correct any misunderstandings.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles B. "Chuck" Greene

This article as been nominated for deletion. Please see [WP:PROD]] and the article to see how you can dispute this, if you wish to do so. Boleyn2 (talk) 14:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Franklin T. Baxter

A tag has been placed on Franklin T. Baxter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ju66l3r (talk) 19:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Coach Jack Shaw.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Coach Jack Shaw.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Coach Jack Shaw.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Coach Jack Shaw.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Cruz

Thanks!The Ink Daddy! (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing your edits

Hello, Chuckjav. I am WhisperToMe and I would like to discuss your edits to Martin Luther King High School (Michigan).

1. You removed the refimprove tag without adding refs to all of the unreferenced material. Do not remove improvement tags unless you fully address the issue that the tag requests.
2. You added Duffield to the list of stuff in King's attendance zone. - That list was there to show what neighborhoods are zoned to King, not what schools feed into King; the schools thing is an altogether different subject.
3. When you did add a reference to the basketball thing, it was from a site that does not pass Wikipedia:RS - Blogs that are not from staff members of a newspaper or major magazine generally cannot be used as sources. Try to use old newspaper articles to reference stuff.
4. Lists of alumni should not exist unless there are reliable sources for each and every entry.
5. As for this kind of citation: ".<ref>http://www.detroitk12.org/schools/</ref>" - I don't know if you added it or if someone else, but just to demonstrate, this reference isn't specific enough. Please try to get the exact page, the access date, the name of the page, and the name of the publisher in your ref.

Please review WP:V, WP:BLP, and WP:RS. Thank you. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also I nominated Duffield Elementary for deletion because I don't see anything about it that is notable: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Bethune Duffield Elementary School (Detroit) WhisperToMe (talk) 02:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Modifying closed AfD pages

Now that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Bethune Duffield Elementary School (Detroit) has been closed no further comments should be added to the page. If you wish to continue the discussion please do so at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/D. Bethune Duffield Elementary School (Detroit) where I have moved your last comment. If you consider that the close was in error then please make your case on the closing admin's talk page. If, after doing this, you are still unhappy then you may appeal at WP:DRV. TerriersFan (talk) 21:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Robert Dozier

I have nominated Robert Dozier, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Dozier. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Spell4yr (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Collins Jr

A tag has been placed on Edward Collins Jr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. allstar✰echo 00:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Edward Collins Jr

Judging from the content of the article, I'm sure that Edward Collins Jr was a brave and honourable man. However, he does not meet either Wikipedia's notability guideline nor the more specific guideline for people, since there seem to be little to no reliable sources, thus failing our verifiability policy. Therefore, Wikipedia should not have an article on him.

Winning the Silver Star is a great achievement, but only winners of the highest level of military awards for bravery are inherently notable on Wikipedia (e.g. Medal of Honour, Victoria Cross) It is tragic that such a hero died in a preventable accident, but unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a memorial. If you would like, I can redirect Edward Collins Jr to Battle of Khe Sanh, the battle where he won his Silver Star, as a plausible search term, but other than that, without further reliable sources, we cannot include him.

Also, please refrain from making personal attacks, or you can be blocked under the provisions of our civility policy. Thanks, --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 19:39, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally regarding Mr. Collins, please stop adding him to List of people from Mississippi as well as Drew, Mississippi and List of people from Detroit. Wikipedia policies on notability and memorials apply to lists as well. Thanks. - allstar▼echo 19:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the understanding. --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:Allstarecho, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. allstar✰echo 17:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you allstar✰echo

Chuckjav (talk) 18:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan

Hi! Why not join Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan? It is a project devoted to helping Michigan-related articles. I am trying to get a WikiProject Detroit created. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan/Detroit task force dedicated to Detroit. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Anita Baker. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ford High School

Hi! A few things 1. Do not use overly promotional names in section headings. "Proud history of alumni achievement" is not necessary. Just use "notable alumni" 2. Don't cite fansites 3. Don't cite other Wikipedia articles Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 11:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. IMDB also is a source that should not be used as a citation. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That bodybuilders website seemed like a personal website, and not an RS. RSes are generally newspaper articles, journal articles, etc. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources. The Ford High official website is a good RS in this case. One strategy I like to use is news.google.com - Do a search, then select any of the headings under "any recent news" and then select "Archives" WhisperToMe (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mackenzie High School 1949 football.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mackenzie High School 1949 football.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Cooley High 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cooley High 2008.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Chuckjav. You have new messages at Talk:Osborn High School.
Message added 10:39, 5 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Chuckjav. You have new messages at Muhandes's talk page.
Message added 13:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Osborn High School

I truly hope that "have to settle things in court" was a joke. Anyway, I'm afraid I had to revert that edit. WP:NLIST applies to any list of people. If they are not notable, they do not belong in any list, or anywhere in Wikipedia. That's what the notability guidelines are for. --Muhandes (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ford High School (Detroit, Michigan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MHSAA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello. Your recent edit to Denby High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Hall (diver), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chuckjav. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carla Battaglia-Greene for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carla Battaglia-Greene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carla Battaglia-Greene until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jb45424 (talk) 02:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chuckjav. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding MHS

I reverted an edit you made, reverting a professional football player from the notable list. Per the general consensus on Wikipedia school articles, a person needs only to have attended the school to be considered an alumni. Graduation is not a requirement. See the essay WP:ALUMNI, which applies to both secondary schools and colleges and universities. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to Redford High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Redford High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MHS 1955.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MHS 1955.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chuckjav. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chuckjav. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Eugene Beatty

The article Charles Eugene Beatty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He competed in non-notable events and did well. DOesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]