User talk:DellShivajiCrit53
Welcome[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
August 2020[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bhopal has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bhopal was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.mapsofindia.com/bhopal/history.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
September 2020[edit]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rahul Roushan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 13:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
GS alert[edit]
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Editors are specifically forbidden from adding content that is not supported by a source of the standard required by WP:MEDRS. --RexxS (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ram Janmabhoomi, you may be blocked from editing. Vanamonde (Talk)
Can you define what would be reliable source from more than 20,000 old event? Here: Supreme Court of India have identified that Bhagwan Ram was born there according to Valmiki Ramanaya. This is enough to add in wikipedia. For example- Jesus birth was came to a queen's dream and there is no proof of it but it was added to Betlehem article
16:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- That's a bit of a leading question. The point I'm trying to make is that no reliable sources support the content you wish to add. Whether the deity Rama was in fact born at that particular site is an article of faith, not a historically documented fact. I'm not saying it's false; I'm saying there's not enough support for it in reliable sources to say it's true in Wikipedia's voice. Please read WP:NOR, and become comfortable with editing in compliance with that policy. Vanamonde (Talk)
ok, then why is it this policy is selectively applied to this article and not in Bethlehem article? Why this selective bias? Wikipedia doesn't explicitly define what is reliable source here. So I should look at some star articles to infer some conclusion. I can't look from your point of view since person's point is biased. What do you think?
- I do not understand what you are saying, but let me try explaining it a different way; Bethlehem doesn't say "Bethlehem was the birthplace of Jesus"; it says "according to the Bible, Bethlehem was the birthplace of Jesus". Our articles about the Ayodhya dispute all say "According to the Ramayana, Ayodhya was the birthplace of Rama". There's no double standard. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
22:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RexxS (talk) 19:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Anand Ranganathan[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anand Ranganathan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Ranganathan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
February 2021[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Narendra Modi, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 14:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi ManishSahu53! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Narendra Modi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 14:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 14:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
per request --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Swarajya (magazine). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 20:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Alt News, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tayi Arajakate, My edits are based on facts with proper referencing. First: Dont threaten me with wikipedia policy when I am stating facts. Second, If you think, I have made wrong edits, then please enlighten me. Abuse use of power by blocking people who make edits based on facts should be avoided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DellShivajiCrit53 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- You edit was a consequence of synthesis of two citations. It also contained the sentence "Zubair...for spreading fake news provoking riots over social media by UP Police" which fails verification, the reference provided for it attributes these claims to the UP police which is not an independent party, you would need reliable secondary sources to make such claims regardless of whether you attribute these claims or not. On the other hand, the POSCO case is present in its context as covered by reliable sources in the body of the article, your presentation of it in the lead neither adequately summarised the section in the body nor does it have due weight to be present in the lead. These are also violations of WP:BLP considering it is specific to a person. You have been warned more than once for similar violations and have been made aware of discretionary sanctions in this topic area, at this point I would recommend that you go through Wikipedia policies which have been highlighted to you repeatedly. If your sole objective on Wikipedia is to push your point of view while disregarding policies, then you probably don't belong here. Please read the essay on verifiability not truth. Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
August 2021[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rahul Roushan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 17:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Swarajya (magazine), you may be blocked from editing. -- DaxServer (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 00:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Image without license[edit]
Unspecified source/license for File:BuntyAurBabli2-Actress-Sharvari-Wagh-Latest-Photos-KoolImages.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:BuntyAurBabli2-Actress-Sharvari-Wagh-Latest-Photos-KoolImages.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:BuntyAurBabli2-Actress-Sharvari-Wagh-Latest-Photos-KoolImages.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:BuntyAurBabli2-Actress-Sharvari-Wagh-Latest-Photos-KoolImages.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://iphonewallpaperworld.com/sharvari-wagh/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Sharvari Wagh[edit]
Hello, DellShivajiCrit53,
Thank you for creating Sharvari Wagh.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
** This article does not meet the requirements of Wikipedia policy for actresses: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. See WP:NACTOR.
- Also, there is a need to adhere to the guidelines for living persons. See WP:BLP for your guidance. Kindly do the needful.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.