User talk:El cid, el campeador/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions with User:El cid, el campeador. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Notability
From the Essay WP:USCITIES "To be included in a list of notable people, individuals must still meet the notability requirements per WP:PEOPLE. A fast and easy way to establish this is if they already have an article written about them on Wikipedia, since it would have never been approved, or would have been deleted, if they did not meet notability requirements. This is not the sole rationale for inclusion, since some people who might meet notable standards may not have an article, but it is a quick reference."--Asher196 (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Asher196: - look, if you want to include the clearly non-notable trick shot pool player who you likely know personally, go ahead. I'm done arguing with you about it. Just leave me out of it. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm just making a point that an article is not required for notability since you were so insistent that it was. Also, you accused me of being disruptive, and I don't take kindly to that.--Asher196 (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Archiving
I manually archived Talk:Iron Man because User:MiszaBot doesn't work anymore and hasn't for years now (and that's why I removed the code as well). FYI - theWOLFchild 02:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Thewolfchild:- hey! Sorry about that. I did not notice until after I reverted that the bot wasn't working. I rolled myself back after I did. Cheers! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Review page
Hi. Review the Sheena Allen page. Cheers
Aghachi7 (talk) 12:18, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crate Entertainment Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Crate Entertainment Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello El cid, el campeador, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Here is an article you can help me with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percs ColorTheoryRGB (talk) 00:10, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Sumo
Can you stop flagging the Sumo article and help me add to it? ColorTheoryRGB (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for removing the notice. At least can you help me add to the Sumo article?ColorTheoryRGB (talk) 23:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hey, I added some sources to the page. I also unreviewed it - a 3rd party, uninvolved editor may now come and see if it passes inclusion criteria. The biggest thing to remember on WP is that you need to provide reliable sources for anything you add to WP. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 00:05, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
You are welcome. And also check the other messages I sent you. ColorTheoryRGB (talk) 00:14, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
A NOTE
Oh, and can you help with my Sirens and Black Metal Terrorist, and Clout Cobain articles? You have hospitality. ColorTheoryRGB (talk) 00:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @ColorTheoryRGB: - when I have time later I will try and take a look at these articles you created. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
OK. ColorTheoryRGB (talk) 01:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
66 & nowhere
When there's a draft duplicating an article, we normally emove the draft , not the article. If Iahve misunderstood , pls explain it to me on m talk p. DGG ( talk ) 17:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey El cid! Not sure if you are still interested, but I have made some effort to get WP:PACKERS a little more active. It would be great to have a few editors interested in the Pack to coordinate improvements. Hope all is well! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gonzo fan2007: I'm down, that sounds like a great idea! I will check out the WikiProject now. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 02:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Awesome! I mostly tried to get all of the tools working and cleaned up. The article alerts, stats, new pages, etc. I have Packers sweep at WP:GAN and List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers at WP:FLC. Really just want to work on WP:FLs, WP:GAs, and WP:DYKs. Let me know if there is anything you want to collaborate on. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 04:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Gonzo fan2007: - as I get more time I'm planning on going through and making sure Packers is sufficiently cited, so I can remove the template on top. After that it -should- be ready to be nominated for good article status? I've never really been involved in nominating though. Is there anything I can do to help with Packers sweep or the Retired numbers? Just let me know. Cheers, it's good to see the project being active! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Replied here. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Gonzo fan2007: - as I get more time I'm planning on going through and making sure Packers is sufficiently cited, so I can remove the template on top. After that it -should- be ready to be nominated for good article status? I've never really been involved in nominating though. Is there anything I can do to help with Packers sweep or the Retired numbers? Just let me know. Cheers, it's good to see the project being active! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Awesome! I mostly tried to get all of the tools working and cleaned up. The article alerts, stats, new pages, etc. I have Packers sweep at WP:GAN and List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers at WP:FLC. Really just want to work on WP:FLs, WP:GAs, and WP:DYKs. Let me know if there is anything you want to collaborate on. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 04:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Amy Tan
Hello. I disagree with you that my edits were pushing a point of view. I was only restating and summarizing what was in the corresponding criticism section. Sawnew (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Sawnew: - please start a discussion on the article's talk page regarding this issue, so we can get other people involved in the conversation ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 21:06, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have started the discussion. Sawnew (talk) 21:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Hathaway's Flash
No, my removal of the redirect wasn't constructive, but keeping the redirect isnt constructive either. The redirect of Mobile Suit Gundam: Hathaway's Flash to Yoshiyuki Tomino's page is a very useless move. Yoshiyuki created the Gundam series, sure, but not once is "Hathaway's Flash" even mentioned in the article, and so it's unnecessary to redirect a page to his. That's why I removed it. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 02:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Greece
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greece. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello El cid, el campeador, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
- Project news
- The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
- As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
- There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.
- Other
- A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
- Moving to Draft and Page Mover
- Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
- If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
- Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
- The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
- The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
|
Hello El cid, el campeador, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello El cid, el campeador,
- Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
- Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
- If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
- We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
- With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, El cid, el campeador. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Kettle war
I changed it because it was Called the kettle war because that is the only thing damaged/broken Pedropostman (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Ted Hawkins edits
Thanks a lot for these. Great work. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Koavf: - It's my pleasure! Thanks for the recognition :) Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 23:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bootleg Series
Sorry about mistaking the topic of the AfDs. The PRODded article (about 10K of text) was on the Bob Dylan albums, however. It had the rationale "All of the information is covered at the respective album articles--all that's needed is a mention at Bob Dylan." Would you like me to refund the PRODded version? Dekimasuよ! 20:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Dekimasu: - hey, no worries! I... just didn't really think it through. I wanted it to serve mainly as a DAB page, but didn't consider that links to DAB pages need to be disambiguated. It was my mistake and right now I think it's fine as a redirect. Thanks for following up! And sorry that you probably got a notice that I reverted your edit. Best! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello El cid, el campeador,
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
- Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
- Less good news, and an appeal for some help
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
- Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
- Training video
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
KF Llapi squad listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect KF Llapi squad. Since you had some involvement with the KF Llapi squad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
ElSidCampeador
Hello, El. Do you think this user - ElSidCampeador, is pretending to be you?-- Flooded. Treated like dirt by many admins since 2016 (sig inspired by Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Flooded with them hundreds: - hey, thanks for the heads up! However, it looks like it might just be a coincidence. El Cid was referred to as El Cid and El Campeador, and also El Cid Campeador. Since it's not a vandalism account (from what I can tell) I assume it's in good faith. HOWEVER, I genuinely appreciate you bringing it to my attention. Thank you! Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Great! So I guess we have nothing to worry about. -- Flooded. Treated like dirt by many admins since 2016 (sig inspired by Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Flooded with them hundreds: - hey, thanks for the heads up! However, it looks like it might just be a coincidence. El Cid was referred to as El Cid and El Campeador, and also El Cid Campeador. Since it's not a vandalism account (from what I can tell) I assume it's in good faith. HOWEVER, I genuinely appreciate you bringing it to my attention. Thank you! Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 18:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Don't blame me...
... when someone comes along to call you a sexist. See Wikipedia_talk:Disruptive_editing#Picture_of_woman. Or maybe you're mocking a disabled person. Or both. EEng 14:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- @EEng: haha I was not aware of the conversation, so I apologize. I assume you're kidding, but either way, feel free to disregard my edit. I was trying to make a compromise - i.e. include 1 picture as opposed to 0 or 2. But, as I said, I was unaware of the potentially satirical discussion, so feel free to pretend like my edit didn't happen. Cheers! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- You have nothing to apologize for. I suggest we let the thought police decide between 1 and 2. EEng 15:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- @EEng: haha sounds good to me! Thanks ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- You have nothing to apologize for. I suggest we let the thought police decide between 1 and 2. EEng 15:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- @EEng: haha I was not aware of the conversation, so I apologize. I assume you're kidding, but either way, feel free to disregard my edit. I was trying to make a compromise - i.e. include 1 picture as opposed to 0 or 2. But, as I said, I was unaware of the potentially satirical discussion, so feel free to pretend like my edit didn't happen. Cheers! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.17
Hello El cid, el campeador,
- News
- The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.
- Discussions of interest
- Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
- {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
- A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
- There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
- Reminders
- NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
- NPP Tools Report
- Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
- copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
- The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Vietnam War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vietnam War. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:1948 United States presidential election
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1948 United States presidential election. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.18
Hello El cid, el campeador,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
- Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
- Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
- Reliable Sources for NPP
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
- Backlog drive coming soon
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
- News
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
- Discussions of interest
- A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
- There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
- What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Keeping up with those IP edits
Thanks for keeping up with the disruptive edits from Basquiat by IP 24.91.224.247. You left them a message on their Talk page which they ignored and I am counting six straight disruptive edits coming from that account. If you report that IP account as not doing anything constructive and only making consecutive disruptive edits then please ping me for support. CodexJustin (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Added Sources to Baby annie page
Added links in the references section which are related to Baby annie — Preceding signed comment added by Chinnu1215 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 June 2019 (UTC)