Jump to content

User talk:Eron Lushaj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Eron Lushaj, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kosova Airforce (July 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
google searches are not valid references - results change - use any actual sources directly
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eron Lushaj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Framawiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Vitomiricë—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 19:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Eron Lushaj/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Eron Lushaj/sandbox. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kosovo Air Force (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kosovo Airforce (July 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo Security Forces Equipment

[edit]

Pershendetje shpresoj qe te jeni mire, kam nje kerkes nga ti eron mos posto gjera te pa baza edhe shume pak info per to, ose perndryshe me duhet te raportoj te wikipedia... Leotrimylli (talk) 13:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Si pershembull qka i nderum, un ti kam dergu infot edhe pse nuk e di se sa auteritet ki per me ti dergu por gjithsesi… Ju lutem verifikoni sakt dhe me pas me keshilloni! Eron Lushaj (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
une nuk i kam hequr i kan heqt tjert shiqoje pak histroin e aksesit ne kete faqe se kush i ka hequr, por gjithsesi mua me kan hequr licensen per editim mendoj qe kjo eshte qe than edhe ne lajme qe kan me majt gjana sekrete per armatimin e FSK konfedeciale se cka posedojn... Leotrimylli (talk) 17:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Po edhe marrveshja u bo me ameriken, por gjithsesi! 178.175.117.174 (talk) 18:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
e vertet prandaj ma hoqen edhe editimin edhe nese editoj meniher me hiqet dhe ma qojn parlajmrim per bllokim nga wikipedia, sepse po i dergojsha publikut per armatimin e FSK-se te cilin e pesova pak, sepse te dhenat i mersha nga disa miq ne FSK qe jan edhe oficer dhe major. qe kan akses ne fsk armatimet. Leotrimylli (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Militrex Kosova Defense (August 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 09:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elsa shala

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elsa shala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. StartOkayStop (talk) 00:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elsa Shala (September 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
References need to verify the statements they're used for. For example, linking to a source about the history of Kosovo does nothing to either establish notability, or verify the specific statement, and is a form of WP:REFBOMB.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 18:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kosovo Airforce (September 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't really see sources talking about this division in-depth. I recommend you expand the Kosovo Airforce section on Kosovo Security Force instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 00:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kosovo Airforce (September 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
These sources don't seem to indicate notability; also note that the aircraft mentioned are all unmanned aircraft, but the article suggests that manned aircraft exist? This is dubious. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elsa Shala (November 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Oltrepier were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No significant progress has been made since the last review, unfortunately...
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Oltrepier (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kosovo Air Force for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kosovo Air Force is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo Air Force until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pbritti (talk) 23:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what is the problem? Please improve the mistakes and everything is good to go. I created an article for Kosovo Airforce as already all region states have done. I am Eron Lushaj by the way, I would like to know you and your position in Wikipedia Pbritti? 185.179.31.32 (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for starters, I'm logged in. Do not remove the AfD tag again and or you'll be blocked. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you are logged, but what’s your excuse to do that nomination, there is everything right and there is not potential hoax! You can literally block me as long as I am not opening the laptop and enter this topic seriously, please tell me your excuse? 185.179.31.32 (talk) 00:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's no Kosovo Air Force. It's not entirely clear what air assets the Kosovar government possesses beyond a handful of drones, but there is certainly no independent air wing classified as an "air force". Thank you ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is true that there are not wing crafted air assets, but while the symbols, pilots, uniforms, command, and air assets exist it can be called an Airforce even tho it isn’t fully formed. As much as I saw it was reviewed and there was no violation! 185.179.31.32 (talk) 07:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The one time that the article was thoroughly reviewed was this AfC review in July. The draft was declined. If it was patrolled, it was patrolled improperly. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now it is improved, there is a latter that came to me tfrom Wikipedia that says, “The article reviewed” and everything was right. ~ 46.99.127.82 (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Letter* 46.99.127.82 (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You probably got an email saying that your article had been reviewed–compare this link with said letter. This is standard procedure: by reviewing your article, a new page patroller is saying an article doesn't qualify for speedy deletion and the article's visibility settings are increased. It does not mean that the article is actually everything was right, as many articles are reviewed prior to deletion via the PROD or AfD processs. This is actually one of the more complex elements of Wikipedia's bureaucracy, so I can understand if you are confused why you got a notification that a review was completed while other editors are saying the article should be deleted. You can ask the Teahouse if you have remaining questions. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One editor is saying that this will need to be deleted, por gjithsesi faleminderit dhe shpresoj që të mos hiqet pasi do me nxjerr punë ta shkruaj prap! 46.99.127.82 (talk) 15:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kosovo Air Force

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kosovo Air Force, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kosovo Air Force

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kosovo Air Force requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo Air Force. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elsa Shala for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elsa Shala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsa Shala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fermiboson (talk) 01:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kosova Airforce

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eron Lushaj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kosova Airforce, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kosovo Airforce

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kosovo Airforce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kosovo Air Force. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ZLEA T\C 16:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Militrex Kosova Defense

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eron Lushaj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Militrex Kosova Defense, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elsa Shala

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eron Lushaj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elsa Shala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eron_Lushaj&oldid=1224410793"