User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 99

Archive 95

←

Archive 97

Archive 98

Archive 99

Archive 100

Archive 101

→

Archive 105

Your draft article, Draft:Christian Watchman and Reflector

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christian Watchman and Reflector".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

The leading Baptist paper in New England that published anyi-slavery letters. Let's delete it from our pageless encyclopedia. [1]. Thoughts User:Jimbo Wales and User:Urve? FloridaArmy (talk) 07:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Definitely notable. I've requested a 'refund', and I share your annoyance with our deletion practices. About to head to work so can't look too much, but "The Boston-based Baptist periodical the Christian Watchman was later called the Watchman-Examiner, and libraries generally catalog it under that name" says [2], so that's another search term. Other sources that discuss the paper at least a bit include [3] [4] [5]. Urve (talk) 18:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Legg has been accepted

Edwin Legg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Jamerson Reed has been accepted

Betty Jamerson Reed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

New book resource

Hey FloridaArmy, I found this book today and I thought you may also find it useful. Particularly if you are doing any African-American WP articles related to Kentucky. It has a lot of helpful historical information and it is free to access online via Google Books.

• Smith, Gerald L.; McDaniel, Karen Cotton; Hardin, John A. (2015-08-28). The Kentucky African American Encyclopedia. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-6066-5.

PigeonChickenFish (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John S. W. Eagles has been accepted

John S. W. Eagles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Grafter and the Girl

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Grafter and the Girl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Missing piece userpage

Hi FloridaArmy, I just discovered Template:Editable user page and Template:unlocked userpage, based on your comments on the XFD I believe they may be something you might like to add to User:FloridaArmy/Missing Pieces (especially the second one). Best, CMD (talk) 16:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humphrey's Journal of Photography has been accepted

Humphrey's Journal of Photography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 07:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Little Maestro (American film)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Little Maestro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mattie Howard has been accepted

Mattie Howard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 10:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Cresswell has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephen Cresswell. Thanks! Star Mississippi 15:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sallie Walker Stockard has been accepted

Sallie Walker Stockard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 18:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Rita Flynn

Rita Flynn in The Public Enemy (1931)

Hi @FloridaArmy:, could you please create a draft for American actress Rita Flynn, who appeared in with James Cagney and Jean Harlow in The Public Enemy (1931) and also has an article but in the Italian Wikipedia 190.140.147.233 (talk) 14:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tally Ho Township has been accepted

Tally Ho Township, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 11:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

David Kranes moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to David Kranes. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and Lacking credible claim of significance which puts it at risk of deletion as-is. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 17:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Henry Anderson has been accepted

Dennis Henry Anderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 16:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enon Ridge has been accepted

Enon Ridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: College Hill School has been accepted

College Hill School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Clifford (actor) (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Clifford (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pittsfield phylactery has been accepted

Pittsfield phylactery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pittsfield Phylactery (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pittsfield Phylactery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 04:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 04:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

What is wrong with the cited sources User:Stuartyeates? FloridaArmy (talk) 10:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Looks like User:S0091 has dealt with the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

@Stuartyeates it was improved after your decline. I would have likely declined it as well given the state it was in when you reviewed it. S0091 (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fleta, Alabama (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fleta, Alabama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Down in Mississippi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Down in Mississippi. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Oneonta High School (Alabama) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oneonta High School (Alabama). Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint Site has been accepted

Stephen C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint Site, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Down in Mississippi has been accepted

Down in Mississippi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Submitted drafts question by Blaze and note about Down in Mississippi

@Blaze Wolf I noticed your question on the draft. See the very top of FA's talk page which has a link to their all their pending submissions and at this moment is 16. I think the restriction is 20 or maybe 25?, but either way FA is under it. However, you can check anytime.

FA - I removed some entries from Down in Mississippi because there currently are no articles related to them (that I saw anyway). S0091 (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh. I'm clearly blind lol. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

@Blaze Wolf this is a very busy talk page so understand how things can be missed. :) S0091 (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh and FA, you are welcome to ping me to dab pages you create rather than submitting them as it seems like a "waste" of your submissions given the restrictions. If/when I am around, I will just move them mainspace directly as those are eezy peezy. S0091 (talk) S0091 (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Benjamin Hayes has been accepted

Robert Benjamin Hayes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Revington Arthur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Revington Arthur. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Revington Arthur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Revington Arthur. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revington Arthur has been accepted

Revington Arthur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oneonta High School (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oneonta High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 07:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

user:Pbritti could you please point out the mistakes? FloridaArmy (talk) 07:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

One is mentioned in my comment. Another is There was also a West Oneonta High School in West Oneonta, New York. There are others, but I don't want to further beleaguer the point unless you're willing to make the changes. ~ Pbritti (talk) 07:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't know what changes need to be made. There was not a West Oneonta High School? Why is it noted in the source? FloridaArmy (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

The 104 year old source cites that "In 1918 at the school's 42nd commencement 53 students graduated, the largest class in the school's history." So I assume you want clarification that it was then the largest class. No problem. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

I would point out that the opening paragraph states that there are 477 students and the class size bit you target appeared in a history section in chronological order. But I have clarified as per your request. What other changes would you like User:Pbritti? You're welcome to make them yourself instead of asking me to guess at them. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

For at least two and a half years you've had the same problem: asking other editors to correct your mistakes. If your high volume of submissions continue to demonstrate failures to follow some of the more basic requirements for a new article, I will request another discussion regarding your competency to continue submitting AFCs. ~ Pbritti (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Improving each other's work is what we do on Wikipedia. I am human as are most editors here. FloridaArmy (talk) 08:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Pbritti do you think the opening paragraph of Durham Rite, an entry you highlight on your user page, adequately summarizes the entry? FloridaArmy (talk) 08:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

In the last two threads here you have repeated three behaviors that have seen you become a heavily restricted editor. I will be filing an ANI tomorrow. I am sorry—I know many editors are rooting for you to succeed but you have not changed course. ~ Pbritti (talk) 08:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

In Kettle War, another entry you note on your userpage, after the into paragraph only the last section appears to cover the incident? The whole entry is rather hard to follow and make sense of. Is it about the broader conflict or the incident?

It's my experience that people attacking me and my work are every bit as imperfect as I am. I hope you take time to reflect on how you can improve your own work and interactions with others before disrupting my work and the good work of others here making every effort to improve this encyclopedia. It's strange to me that even after I pointed out that the "correction" you demanded addresses an ambiguity and not a glaring error or a blatant falsehood you've still gone ahead and doubled down on your attacks. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 08:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Unbelievable. Also, you're attacking me with article's I didn't create or substantially write. ~ Pbritti (talk) 09:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm not attacking you. I'm pointing out that all of our work could stand to be improved and Wikipedia is a collaborative enterprise. We help one another. What's incredible is that you come here lashing out at me and complain about being attacked when I point out that none of us are perfect. FloridaArmy (talk) 09:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Louis J. Wortham

Just a note that I've fleshed out and mainspaced Louis J. Wortham. Good find, as usual. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 03:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Looks good. I think I made a couple fixes. He was a Democrat? FloridaArmy (talk) 03:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I saw it in an unreliable source, am trying to find a RS that states as much Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 03:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

... and added Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 03:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

thanks for the copyedits. Always useful to have multiple pairs of eyes Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 03:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure why note of his business partner Amon G. Carter and the cite for it were removed? Was it moved innthe entry and I'm not seeing it? FloridaArmy (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

The Last White Knight

Hi! I came upon this film when we were working on the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission article, but didn't get to it until now. Sharing in case you've found anything on it in your general research. Thanks for flagging your drafts, I always love the rabbit holes to which they lead me. Hope you're well. Star Mississippi 02:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks User:Star Mississippi. I watched a few clips and it was pretty shocking stuff. Thanks for helping with these subjects. Hopefully over time the film's entry will be expanded with details about the people and events covered. And hopefully Wikipedia will be expanded with coverage of those same people and wvents. I started a draft on one of them. He got shot up for trying to register voters. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

There seems to be a lot of info we can use to build out the article. I was having issues with the Wikipedia Library last night to access some of the paywalled sources, but will come back to it. Which draft are you referencing? Happy to see if I can help. Apologies if it's one you flagged and I missed. Was offline a lot the last few months. Star Mississippi 23:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:James Travis User:Star Mississippi. FloridaArmy (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

I thought I started a Draft:Jimmy Lee Travis but I can't find it. I must need a lot more sleep. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 09:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Apparently I didn't start his draft but added Travis with some cited sources to User:FloridaArmy/Missing Pieces FloridaArmy (talk) 14:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Jeanne Luckett (Draft:Jeanne Luckett) is an interesting subject interviewed here. FloridaArmy (talk) 09:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks on both of these. Have a great day. Star Mississippi 14:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

She's done several interesting film projects. Take care. Thanks again for all your help. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Another interesting piece on Luckett. Will see what I have time to do soon-ish. Star Mississippi 15:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Judson Smith

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Judson Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oneonta High School has been accepted

Oneonta High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Joseph Harris Chappell has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph Harris Chappell. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks User:Gerda Arendt! FloridaArmy (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tachira Railway (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tachira Railway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Lewis Peyton (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Lewis Peyton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendell Peters (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendell Peters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe M. Richardson has been accepted

Joe M. Richardson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 08:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Ellis (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anne Ellis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Pbritti I am not clear on exaclty where you are finding issues? What's there appears to me to be a good start with a summary, some cited sources, and a list of her books. What suggestions do you have specifically for improvements? Maybe you can go ahead and fix what's bothering you? FloridaArmy (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

A great many more details regarding her biography are readily accessible in the sources you have cited, suggesting that the draft, if approved in its current state, would provide insufficient encyclopedic coverage on Ellis (meanwhile, you noted inline that she was pictured in front of her home–not encyclopedic). Additionally, you have a really cool source engaging with one of the books she wrote. You should embrace that and actually use it to discuss her writing style. As it is, the article is only used to note Ellis was at one time featured in a museum (the draft should note that the exhibit was present in 1996; I don't know if it's still there but a source older than me isn't good enough to make claims about present exhibits}. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Pbritti I agree the subject should be greatly expanded and the entry improved. The best place for that is in mainspace where our readers and editors can get to work on it. It's bad enough we've excluded her for the last 15 or so years. Let's at least get her started. Please go ahead and make the changes you suggest. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

The draft would make an incomplete article. I would encourage you to perform the rewrite yourself, but I am more than glad to help if you like as I have written quite a bit on Coloradans involved in mining! Again, there were other issues that need to be addressed beyond the broad coverage. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:28, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

I believe all of Wikipedia's entries are incomplete. Right now we have nothing on her, so what I wrote is I think a substantial inprovement on the status quo. You are most welcome to make changes. The reason I included the bit on her photograph is because it provides the reader with access to a photo of her, establishes where she lived at that time, establishes that there are in fact photos of her, and perhaps helps moves us toward getting that image and others included here. So as you see different editors have different perspectives. I wrote up what seemed most pertinent to me but I'm sure a great deal of additions and changes will be made over time as people with other persepctives and interests contribute. Hopefully the entry will get a great deal better. Elisabeth Hubbard Lansing (Draft:Elisabeth Hubbard Lansing) is another interesting writer who seems very notable to me but I haven't been able to find great sources for her and coverage of her work. Her Seeing New York is pretty fascinating. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi. You should know better than this by now. Creation of sketchy articles is why your ability to create them in mainspace had to be limited. Please l

isten to the good advice you're getting from User:Pbritti. Deb (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Kernot (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Kernot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

User:Asilvering according to our entry on the subject, that encyclopedia is authoritative but did suffer from one or two contributors putting in fake people. It appears to me based on the various other sources covering this subject that he was not made up. Encyclopedias often have multiple contributors. Bad contributions from one or two do not mean the rest of the content is bad do they? This subject is certainly esoteric, but I think he's quite fascinating as an immigrant New York bookseller from that time who wrote an interesting bibliography of books about the devil and published some interesting works including a society sheet rankling elite New Yorkers. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't think he's made up, I just don't think we've got a WP:GNG pass on the basis of significant coverage in reliable sources here yet. -- asilvering (talk) 04:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

User:ThadeusOfNazereth this one's pretty niche, but you might be interested? FloridaArmy (talk) 03:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

It's definitely a little outside what I normally do but I can take a look tomorrow and see if I come up with anything else! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 03:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole W. Troxler (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carole W. Troxler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

User:S0091 I believe she passes WP:Author. Her husband is also quite notable. I wasn't sure how best to include them. I think a combined article makes sense in some ways but probably the coverage treats them largely as separate entities. I believe they collaborated on some projects? Is the encyclopedia better off excluding her? At the very least I think the subject deserves an AfD hearing so we can have wider input and a community consensus. Thanks for your many reviews of AfC submissions!!! FloridaArmy (talk) 03:12, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

If you find some academic reviews of her books you should be able to get her to a WP:NAUTHOR pass I think. -- asilvering (talk) 04:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@FloridaArmy Before asking other editors to take time to review your articles, please take the time yourself to check for typos, and to make sure that your references are properly formatted. Apart from anything else, a reviewer is likely to be unconsciously negatively influenced by carelessness such as "Carole Watterson Troxler os a historian" and references like the current references 1 (garbled) and 7 ("Author"). PamD 08:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

• User:S0091, I have not seen the Scopus site before but Google Scholar results show citations to her work here. Is Scopus reliable? Are those a different kind of cite? I'm just trying to understand. Thanks for your help. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

  To show a WP:NPROF pass you're not trying to show that she is cited, but that she is cited unusually highly for her field. Scopus has its problems for sure, and especially does for humanists, so I would never use it as a sole check on a historian's notability myself, but the references currently in the article don't show that she passes WP:NAUTHOR either - and that's usually how humanists survive AfD discussions. -- asilvering (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. In order to meet the Author criteria I've been trying to find some good reviews but weirdly the Google Scholar cites I'm finding giver her accolades in reviews of books by other people about similar subjects. I'd be happy to have some help. She seems to be of some influence and has received recognition I will try again with different search terms when I have a chance. Thanks for your help. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I usually use my university library's search to find reviews, but google scholar will probably work too. Regular google should also, though it won't be as convenient as either of the other options. Search for the title of the book, adding the author last name if the title is generic enough that it gives you problems getting the right thing to come up. On a uni library search the first hit should be the book, and the next hits will be reviews of the book (if there are any). Reviews conventionally have the bibliographic information of the book as the "title" in search databases, or they might say "Review of (bib info goes here)". -- asilvering (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I should add: the standard is usually "multiple books with multiple reviews". If the best you can do is two reviews of two books, you might as well submit it and cross your fingers, but that might not be enough, and it might depend on where the reviews are. In the sciences you have to watch out for predatory journals named plausible things like "Journal of Cancer Research", but in the humanities if something is named after its discipline, like "Journal of Eighteenth-century Studies", it's probably legit and often the field standard. Something named "Florida Review" or whatever is more likely to be a nothingburger. -- asilvering (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@Asilvering I didn't use it as the sole reason for the decline but I can see how my comment made it seem that way. It was an additional check and knew about Scopus/h-index from reading AfD discussions. Academia is a weak spot for me so any guidance is helpful and I will try to remember humanists usually need to meet NAUTHOR.

FA, I see you have made some updates to the draft but I am going to leave this one for someone else to take up given my weakness in the area. S0091 (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion, I didn't mean to imply that you had declined the draft improperly. I don't think it meets the criteria either. I do think it would be unusual for a prof emerita with four books to not be able to meet WP:NAUTHOR, but there's no obligation for an AfC reviewer to go find sources that aren't in the draft. -- asilvering (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

All good, @Asilvering! I didn't take your comment in any negative way. S0091 (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don Noble (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Don Noble and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Minnie T. Wright has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minnie T. Wright. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Minnie T. Wright has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minnie T. Wright. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Does that clarification help, Hoary? Silverseren^C 03:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, well done, Silver seren. The problem remaining is that I see negligible notability (as defined by/for Wikipedia). But maybe some other reviewer will manage to do so. -- Hoary (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clement Richardson has been accepted

Clement Richardson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

William Sherman Savage and Blacks in the West. Was going to comment at ANI but closed while i was reading Ray Allen Billington's foreword. Sorry, no time. fiveby(zero) 18:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks User:Fiveby! I will look into those subjects. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Clayton School for Boys has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Clayton School for Boys. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

What name should be the primary title for an article on this school? Robert McClenon (talk) 02:12, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Drafts I am inable to submit due to an editing restriction

• Draft:William W. Hence
• Draft:Leona Egeland Rice
• Draft:Dorothy Donohue
• Draft:Eleanor Miller
• Draft:Sarah E. Kellogg
• Draft:Charles Decker
• Draft:William H. Tunnard
• Draft:Wanda Sankary
• Draft:Beth Deare
• Draft:Embark Trucks
• Draft:Reade Brower
• Draft:California state funded travel ban
• Draft:Thomas Reed (Alabama politician) article
• Draft:Neeta Mehta
• Draft:Albert J. Farrah
• Draft:Wilbur Homer Grant
• Draft:Bernard White Jr.
• Draft:Audrey Thomas McCluskey
• Draft:Ben McGee (politician)
• Draft:Andrew Zenas Adkins
• Draft:Abutilon hulseanum article
• Draft:A. G. Washburn article
• Draft:1903 Gainesville, Georgia tornado
• Draft:Robert Crowther (author)
• Draft:Susan Greenbaum article
• Draft:Armistead Pride
• Draft:Lindol Smith article
• Draft:Kathryn Niehouse article
• Draft:President of the Arkansas Senate
• Draft:Mayors of Fayetteville, Arkansas
• Draft:Roy Milum
• Draft:Fred H. Stafford
• Draft:Trees of Peace
• Draft:Jimmy Jeffress article
• Draft:Pam Adcock
• Draft:Q. Byrum Hurst article
• Draft:Deep Creek Preserve (Volusia County, Florida)
• Draft:Down in Mississippi article
• Draft:Stephen C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint Site article
• Draft:Oneonta High School (Alabama)
• Draft:Oneonta High School article
• Draft:Ersa Poston
• Draft:Matthew Simpson Davage
• Draft:College Hill School article
• Draft:Opposition Party
• James Myles Hinton (Draft:James Myles Hinton)
• Earl Matthew Middleton (Draft:Earl Mattthew Middleton)  Done S0091 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
• Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama) (Draft:Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama))
• Louis J. Wortham (Draft:Louis J. Wortham)
• West A. Hamilton (Draft:West A. Hamilton)
• Draft:Post-Newsweek Productions
• Draft:Hryhoriy Omelchenko
• Draft:Horace Neide
• Draft:Jesse Dungee article
• Draft:Broadway High School, a disambig page articlespace
• Draft:South River Forest article
• Draft:Beverly Middleton, needs expansion. I started it because his papers include a Norfolk paper's clippings and I was working on that. But notable as a state legislator

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayton School for Boys has been accepted

Clayton School for Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Drafts I am inable to submit due to an editing restriction

• Draft:William W. Hence
• Draft:Leona Egeland Rice
• Draft:Dorothy Donohue
• Draft:Eleanor Miller
• Draft:Sarah E. Kellogg
• Draft:Charles Decker
• Draft:William H. Tunnard
• Draft:Wanda Sankary
• Draft:Beth Deare
• Draft:Embark Trucks
• Draft:Reade Brower
• Draft:California state funded travel ban
• Draft:Thomas Reed (Alabama politician) article
• Draft:Neeta Mehta
• Draft:Albert J. Farrah
• Draft:Wilbur Homer Grant
• Draft:Bernard White Jr.
• Draft:Audrey Thomas McCluskey
• Draft:Ben McGee (politician)
• Draft:Andrew Zenas Adkins
• Draft:Abutilon hulseanum article
• Draft:A. G. Washburn article
• Draft:1903 Gainesville, Georgia tornado
• Draft:Robert Crowther (author)
• Draft:Susan Greenbaum article
• Draft:Armistead Pride
• Draft:Lindol Smith article
• Draft:Kathryn Niehouse article
• Draft:President of the Arkansas Senate
• Draft:Mayors of Fayetteville, Arkansas
• Draft:Roy Milum
• Draft:Fred H. Stafford
• Draft:Trees of Peace
• Draft:Jimmy Jeffress article
• Draft:Pam Adcock
• Draft:Q. Byrum Hurst article
• Draft:Deep Creek Preserve (Volusia County, Florida)
• Draft:Down in Mississippi article
• Draft:Stephen C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint Site article
• Draft:Oneonta High School (Alabama)
• Draft:Oneonta High School article
• Draft:Ersa Poston
• Draft:Matthew Simpson Davage
• Draft:College Hill School article
• Draft:Opposition Party
• James Myles Hinton (Draft:James Myles Hinton)
• Earl Matthew Middleton (Draft:Earl Mattthew Middleton)  Done S0091 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
• Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama) (Draft:Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama))
• Louis J. Wortham (Draft:Louis J. Wortham)
• West A. Hamilton (Draft:West A. Hamilton)
• Draft:Post-Newsweek Productions
• Draft:Hryhoriy Omelchenko
• Draft:Horace Neide
• Draft:Jesse Dungee article
• Draft:Broadway High School, a disambig page articlespace
• Draft:South River Forest article
• Draft:Beverly Middleton, needs expansion. I started it because his papers include a Norfolk paper's clippings and I was working on that. But notable as a state legislator

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayton School for Boys has been accepted

Clayton School for Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole W. Troxler has been accepted

Carole W. Troxler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 18:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Drafts I am inable to submit due to an editing restriction

• Draft:William W. Hence
• Draft:Leona Egeland Rice
• Draft:Dorothy Donohue
• Draft:Eleanor Miller
• Draft:Sarah E. Kellogg
• Draft:Charles Decker
• Draft:William H. Tunnard
• Draft:Wanda Sankary
• Draft:Beth Deare
• Draft:Embark Trucks
• Draft:Reade Brower
• Draft:California state funded travel ban
• Draft:Thomas Reed (Alabama politician) article
• Draft:Neeta Mehta
• Draft:Albert J. Farrah
• Draft:Wilbur Homer Grant
• Draft:Bernard White Jr.
• Draft:Audrey Thomas McCluskey
• Draft:Ben McGee (politician)
• Draft:Andrew Zenas Adkins
• Draft:Abutilon hulseanum article
• Draft:A. G. Washburn article
• Draft:1903 Gainesville, Georgia tornado
• Draft:Robert Crowther (author)
• Draft:Susan Greenbaum article
• Draft:Armistead Pride
• Draft:Lindol Smith article
• Draft:Kathryn Niehouse article
• Draft:President of the Arkansas Senate
• Draft:Mayors of Fayetteville, Arkansas
• Draft:Roy Milum
• Draft:Fred H. Stafford
• Draft:Trees of Peace
• Draft:Jimmy Jeffress article
• Draft:Pam Adcock
• Draft:Q. Byrum Hurst article
• Draft:Deep Creek Preserve (Volusia County, Florida)
• Draft:Down in Mississippi article
• Draft:Stephen C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint Site article
• Draft:Oneonta High School (Alabama)
• Draft:Oneonta High School article
• Draft:Ersa Poston
• Draft:Matthew Simpson Davage
• Draft:College Hill School article
• Draft:Opposition Party
• James Myles Hinton (Draft:James Myles Hinton)
• Earl Matthew Middleton (Draft:Earl Mattthew Middleton)  Done S0091 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
• Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama) (Draft:Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama))
• Louis J. Wortham (Draft:Louis J. Wortham)
• West A. Hamilton (Draft:West A. Hamilton)
• Draft:Post-Newsweek Productions
• Draft:Hryhoriy Omelchenko
• Draft:Horace Neide
• Draft:Jesse Dungee article
• Draft:Broadway High School, a disambig page articlespace
• Draft:South River Forest article
• Draft:Beverly Middleton, needs expansion. I started it because his papers include a Norfolk paper's clippings and I was working on that. But notable as a state legislator

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayton School for Boys has been accepted

Clayton School for Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole W. Troxler has been accepted

Carole W. Troxler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 18:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Drafts I am inable to submit due to an editing restriction

• Draft:George Moseley
• Draft:William W. Hence article
• Draft:Leona Egeland Rice
• Draft:Dorothy Donohue
• Draft:Eleanor Miller article
• Draft:Sarah E. Kellogg
• Draft:Charles Decker article
• Draft:William H. Tunnard article
• Draft:Wanda Sankary
• Draft:Beth Deare
• Draft:Embark Trucks
• Draft:Reade Brower
• Draft:California travel ban
• Draft:Thomas Reed (Alabama politician) article
• Draft:Neeta Mehta
• Draft:Albert J. Farrah
• Draft:Wilbur Homer Grant
• Draft:Bernard White Jr.
• Draft:Audrey Thomas McCluskey
• Draft:Ben McGee (politician)
• Draft:Andrew Zenas Adkins
• Draft:Abutilon hulseanum article
• Draft:A. G. Washburn article
• Draft:1903 Gainesville, Georgia tornado article
• Draft:Robert Crowther (author)
• Draft:Susan Greenbaum article
• Draft:Armistead Pride
• Draft:Lindol Smith article
• Draft:Kathryn Niehouse article
• Draft:President of the Arkansas Senate
• Draft:Mayors of Fayetteville, Arkansas
• Draft:Roy Milum
• Draft:Fred H. Stafford
• Draft:Trees of Peace
• Draft:Jimmy Jeffress article
• Draft:Pam Adcock
• Draft:Q. Byrum Hurst article
• Draft:Deep Creek Preserve (Volusia County, Florida)
• Draft:Down in Mississippi article
• Draft:Stephen C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint Site article
• Draft:Oneonta High School (Alabama)
• Draft:Oneonta High School article
• Draft:Ersa Poston
• Draft:Matthew Simpson Davage
• Draft:College Hill School article
• Draft:Opposition Party
• James Myles Hinton (Draft:James Myles Hinton)
• Earl Matthew Middleton (Draft:Earl Mattthew Middleton)  Done S0091 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
• Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama) (Draft:Capitol Park (Tuscaloosa, Alabama))
• Louis J. Wortham (Draft:Louis J. Wortham)
• West A. Hamilton (Draft:West A. Hamilton)
• Draft:Post-Newsweek Productions
• Draft:Hryhoriy Omelchenko
• Draft:Horace Neide
• Draft:Jesse Dungee article
• Draft:Broadway High School, a disambig page articlespace
• Draft:South River Forest article
• Draft:Beverly Middleton, needs expansion. I started it because his papers include a Norfolk paper's clippings and I was working on that. But notable as a state legislator

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayton School for Boys has been accepted

Clayton School for Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole W. Troxler has been accepted

Carole W. Troxler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 18:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Embark Trucks (Draft:Embark Trucks)

Can someone restore this page to draftspace so it can be worked on? I don't think the deleting admin is available. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:William E. Shay

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William E. Shay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayton School for Boys has been accepted

Clayton School for Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carole W. Troxler has been accepted

Carole W. Troxler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 18:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Embark Trucks (Draft:Embark Trucks)

Can someone restore this page to draftspace so it can be worked on? I don't think the deleting admin is available. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:William E. Shay

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William E. Shay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richardia grandiflora has been accepted

Richardia grandiflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:48, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Henry Fitzbutler has been accepted

William Henry Fitzbutler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi FloridaArmy, I did not create the redirect for Sarah because she is mentioned in a few articles so think it better if someone searches for her, they get hits on all of them rather than being directed to only one. Happy Friday! S0091 (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roswell Field has been accepted

Roswell Field, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)