User talk:Helenrp

Greetings!

Hello, Helenrp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to The Brecon County Times. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Efe (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Write it in your own words

It's great to see more coverage of Welsh topics but please respect the copyright of the National Library of Wales. Much of the text you have added is a straight copy and paste from the Welsh Newspapers Online website. It needs to be reworked so that the content of the Wikipedia articles is in your own words. When there is only a few sentences to work from it's not easy but please make the effort. Nthep (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nthep, Thanks for your message. I just wanted to clarify, that this user, and several others are working with the National Library to create the article stubs for Welsh newspapers. The Library does not wish to claim copyright on the text about these newspapers, and are working to make that more clear on the Newspapers Website. Thanks for your interest! Jason.nlw (talk) 13:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason.nlw: Thanks for the explanation but without something clearer it won't just be me asking and there will be numerous copyright discussions. The best thing would be to place a copyleft notice on the website pages. Nthep (talk) 13:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep: Yes, as I say, I am working with NLW policy makers and Web team to try and incorporate a copyright waver into the this website and other NLW web pages...but as i'm sure you can appreciate these things take time. Thanks Jason.nlw (talk) 08:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason.nlw: I know (from bitter experience). Although you don't want to enforce copyright, the copyright exists so for the text to be reused the permission needs to exist. Other than the copyleft on the NLW website an alternative would be the process detailed at WP:CONSENT. An email listing all the pages where copyrighted text is used confirming that the text on the relevant NLW pages is freely licenced would suffice. Nthep (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for all your great work on the Welsh newspaper articles!!! Jason.nlw (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur ap Gwynn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur ap Gwynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur ap Gwynn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Spark (talk) 04:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diana Barham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elisha Beadles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Andrews. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicholas Bennett (historian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Llanfihangel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Bevan (antiquary)

A tag has been placed on Thomas Bevan (antiquary) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from wbo.llgc.org.uk/en/s-BEVA-THO-1802.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same message applies to the following articles:

Robert Beynon: copied from http://yba.llgc.org.uk/en/s2-BEYN-ROB-1881.html
Llywelyn Bevan (Independent minister): copied from http://yba.llgc.org.uk/en/s-BEVA-LLY-1661.html

I have removed copyright material from several of your other recent additions. Please stop what you are doing. The Dictionary of Welsh Biography is under copyright, and there's no evidence that you have permission to copy the material to this website. Any further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 02:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thomas Beynon (Archdeacon of Cardigan)

added a link pointing to Llanfihangel

Tom Beynon (Presbyterian minister)

added a link pointing to Bala

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 23:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two of your four article creations yesterday contained copyright violations. — Diannaa (talk) 23:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Hello. I am the Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Wales and user:helenrp has been working on a project managed by myself to create stub articles for individuals in the Dictionary of Welsh Biography as part of her work as a member of the National Library of Wales Volunteer Team. The user only uses Wikipedia one day a week at most and was not given enough time to respond to the Copyright violations. Although the Library (as copyright holders of the source in question) fully supports the use of this content on Wikipedia, they cannot release all content openly as individual authors retain rights in some cases. Therefore Helenrp and our other volunteers have received training on avoiding copyright violations. The user has created around 60 articles for this project and very very few have been flagged as violations. I'm sure you can appreciate that avoiding violations is difficult in some cases when only limited information is available. I have spoken to the user and they fully understand the need to avoid copyright violations and they will work to ensure it doesn't happen again, or if it does, to correct it as quickly as possible, baring in mind the user only has limited access to the website and cannot check it on a daily bases. Please unblock the user immediately, and feel free to ping me if there are any problems with this user in the future. Remember, Wiki is built by people like Helenrp, giving their free time to make it better, yes mistakes happen, but in this case i can assure you it was not malicious and the user has the full support of the copyright holders. Thank you for your vigilance Jason.nlw (talk) 15:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helen, I have unblocked your account based on Jason's request. Please be careful to heed copyright and ask questions if you're not sure that something is safe on copyright grounds. Nyttend (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As comment, I recommend that to avoid copyright violations, you use and cite sources other than the DWB. If all you are doing is pretty much copying out the DWB entry, it's inevitable that your articles will be close to being copyright violations. So I suggest slow down and try to write longer entries - Google Books is often helpful here. In fact, see suggestion below for an extra thing to link to. Also, I do recommend that you explain who you are and what you're doing on your user page - to be honest, users with a blank user page tend to be less trusted on here. Blythwood (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Bird (artist)

Hello Helenrp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Bird (artist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 18:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bleddyn Ddu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aberconway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samuel Bowen (Independent minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newtown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Onllwyn Brace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bala. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Breese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Matthew Brwmffild) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Matthew Brwmffild, Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Conway Brown, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages King's College and Hale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bryan (Wesleyan Methodist minister), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caernarvon and Wesleyan Methodist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bulmer (Independent minister), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Newbury and Ruxton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dafydd Cadwaladr

Is Betsy Cadwaladr his daughter? If so that should be mentioned and linked to in his article. See here and here. Let me know if you have any thoughts. Blythwood (talk) 18:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dafydd Cadwaladr

added a link pointing to Bala

Ellis Cadwaladr

added a link pointing to Bala

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caradog ap Iestyn

A tag has been placed on Caradog ap Iestyn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://wbo.llgc.org.uk/en/s-CARA-ABI-1130.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 20:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dafydd ap Hywel ap Ieuan Fychan

Hello. A tag has been placed on Dafydd ap Hywel ap Ieuan Fychan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 16:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dafydd ap Dafydd Llwyd

added a link pointing to Talyllyn

Dafydd ap Hywel ap Ieuan Fychan

added a link pointing to Llandrillo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Helenrp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dafydd Epynt) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dafydd Epynt, Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor PRehse just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on PRehse's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dafydd Llwyd ap Dafydd ap Einion ap Hywel

Just out of sheer, unadulterated curiosity: is that a patronym, loconym or somesuch? The repeated 'ap' sound a bit like 'of this-that-and-the-other...' Kleuske (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard William Dafydd

Btw, what is am exhorter. I imagine it is a preacher of some sort, but the word really need a wikilink to help make sense of the article.TheLongTone (talk) 16:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please add {{WikiProject Wales}} to the Talk pages of your Wales articles

Thanks for doing such a great job improving Wales coverage! Can you please add one tiny step to your method, just open up the Talk page of each new article you make and add {{WikiProject Wales}} to the top of the talk page? That way the project will be listed on the statistics for WP Wales so that more interested people can help track the article. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alun Herbert Davies

A tag has been placed on Alun Herbert Davies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Necrosis Buddha 17:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dafydd ap Iorwerth

The article Dafydd ap Iorwerth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 13:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Christopher Davies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Christopher Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Christopher Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMagikCow (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed for deletion:Dafydd Cadwaladr

==  Proposed deletion of Dafydd Cadwaladr‎ ==

The article Dafydd Cadwaladr‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DarkChicao (talk) 07:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Rees Davies

Hello Helenrp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David Rees Davies for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 12:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Stephen Davies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve David Stephen Davies

Hi, I'm Teblick. Helenrp, thanks for creating David Stephen Davies!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You have made a good start on this article, but it needs more references. Take a look at the link I posted on the article's talk page. It will lead you to some additional sources that might be helpful. If you use them, be sure to use the cite book template for formatting your citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Eddie Blick (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Tegfan Davies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Tegfan Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Tegfan Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Owen Davies

A tag has been placed on Edward Owen Davies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://wbo.llgc.org.uk/en/s-DAVI-OWE-1864.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TopCipher (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ellis Davies (priest), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Llaniestyn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ellis Thomas Davies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moelfre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evan Davies (Calvinistic Methodist minister, and writer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bala and Ceiriog. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Evan Thomas Davies (cleric)

added links pointing to Bangor and Betws

Gethin Davies

added a link pointing to Bangor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Griffith Davies (poet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penllyn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Davies (composer and stone-mason)

The article John Davies (composer and stone-mason) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianga (talk) 15:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Charles Davies (Baptist minister)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Charles Davies (Baptist minister), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 15:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyright problem with John Davies (composer and stone-mason)

  DGG ( talk ) 07:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC) -->[reply]

[[copyright problem with John Davies (Unitarian minister and schoolmaster)

   DGG ( talk ) 07:55, 22 June 2017 (UTC

Status and Advice

I've seen the notices about copyright above. The original print version of the DWB is copyright by the original authors of the articles in the prints version published by The Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion of London, 1953-2001." see [1]. Neither the Society nor the National Library of Wales owns the copyright, and nothing they can say here can release it under a free license. They can only license what they themselves own. Thee articles I have marked are very close paraphrases from the DWB, with some sentences literally identical. This is not acceptable here. The NLW asserts they have been obtaining copyright from the individual authors to publish their electronic version. If they have merely obtained permission to publish it in their version, this does not give them the right to publish it otherwise, and even if they have obtained the right to publish it on WP, this still does not enable us to use it--we need a CC_BY license or equivalent, irrevocably granting everyone in the world a right to use copy republish and modify the material, provided they give attribution. And if they do have such a license, you must, in order to abide by it, include the full source on the article, including the name of the author of the original text.

I understand the purpose of your project, but as with all projects involving legacy content, there can be problems of this sort. The principle of WP:COPYRIGHT at WP is to at least ensure that the problems will extend no further--that what is in WP is free to reuse.

The advice you were given above remains correct: avoid WP:Close paraphrase and have sources other than the DWB. DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Davies (Independent minister)

On quick glance it seems that John Davies (Independent minister) is the same as Reverend John Davies. The other article is better but your title is better. if you agree I will delete your article and move the other. Agathoclea (talk) 14:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (John Davies (printer and journalist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating John Davies (printer and journalist), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (John Davies (Independent minister and magazine editor)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating John Davies (Independent minister and magazine editor), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (John Davies (Independent minister)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating John Davies (Independent minister), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Eirian Davies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating James Eirian Davies, Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Davies (Iago ap Dewi)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating James Davies (Iago ap Dewi), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Davies (schoolmaster)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating James Davies (schoolmaster), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Henry Davies (Baptist minister)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Henry Davies (Baptist minister), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Griffith Davies (poet)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Griffith Davies (poet), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Gethin Davies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gethin Davies, Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Evan Thomas Davies (cleric)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Evan Thomas Davies (cleric), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Evan Davies (educationalist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Evan Davies (educationalist), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ellis Thomas Davies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ellis Thomas Davies, Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (David Davies (harpist)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating David Davies (harpist), Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dan Isaac Davies) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dan Isaac Davies, Helenrp!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John Ossian Davies

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Helenrp, thanks for creating John Ossian Davies!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged with 'orphan', 'refimprove' and 'stub'.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew William Davies

A tag has been placed on Matthew William Davies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Owen Humphrey Davies

A tag has been placed on Owen Humphrey Davies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://yba.llgc.org.uk/en/s-DAVI-HUM-1828.html?query=anglesey&field=content. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Picton Davies (journalist) - copyvio issues

Hello,

Much of the content of the article had copyvio issues (which appears to be well-explained above).

I paraphrased the content and then requested that previous versions were hidden, so the article was able to be saved. Please note that continued copyvio issues can result in your being blocked.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa, Nyttend, and Sphilbrick:

It appears that this user has been notified of the issues regarding copyvio and close paraphrasing over time, had an indef block, and has returned to a very rough attempt at close paraphrasing from this article... as well as Owen Picton Davies being tagged for speedy delete for copyvio issues.

What is the next step at this point? A warning, go directly to a block, other?

I will check some other articles by the user as well in the meantime.

Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyttend: I think the user should be re-blocked until they provide a clear statement that demonstrates they have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CaroleHenson and Diannaa, sorry for the delays; I've been popping in, here and there, but didn't have a chance to make a solid response on this situation. See bottom section. Nyttend (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other copyvio issues

Copyvio detector report links for:

Owen Davies (Baptist minister) - report, needs to either be deleted or paraphrased
Oliver Davies (harpist) - report, although a very short stub, there was no attempt to change the order of the words or paraphrase. Since it's so short though, it's an easy fix.
Moses Davies - report - not a great job paraphrasing, three copyvio phrases in author's voice (e.g., "to substitute women for men in the singing of treble parts.")
Morris Davies - report - not a great job paraphrasing. Words in the same order, except mixing up names of four towns he worked as a carpenter.

Comment: in general, even if there is slight paraphrasing, the information is in the same order as the source. Even simple sentences would benefit from reordering and paraphrasing.

-–Work in progress...–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa How would you recommend handling these items in the short-run: 1) tag with close paraphrasing tag, 2) tag with CSD G12, 3) other? Thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Each article created since Nyttend unblocked in May will have to be checked for copyvio. There's nearly a hundred articles created since that date, and over 250 articles edited all told. If the copying is extensive, they should be nominated for deletion or cleaned and tagged for revision deletion. If you are not prepared to take this on I suggest filing a case at WP:CCI. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my! What a mess. Based on the volume, CCI seems like the way to go.

I don't mind taking on some of the articles, but up to 250 articles is a huge effort. I assume that since there's a backlog, it's ok to still work on cleaning up the articles. The good thing is that they are short articles, and adding additional content from other sources could help.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jason.nlw, I am gathering information to create a WP:CCI posting and saw that you wanted to be pinged if further issues arose regarding this user. So, please see the previous section regarding a discussion about blocking the user again... as well as this conversation about how to deal with the hundreds of articles affected by this user.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CaroleHenson: Hi, thanks for making me aware of the latest developments. I should firstly state clearly my interest here. I coordinate volunteers at the National Library of Wales, including Helenrp and i am a member of the Dictionary of Welsh Biography development committee. I regularly report on volunteers work to the Editor and the Board of the Dictionary of Welsh Biography. The Biography team are very keen that we create Wikipedia articles (stubs) using information from the Dictionary but the problem is that many of the articles are quite short, and there are only so many ways of saying 'John Jones was born in Aberystwyth, Wales'.. for example. so there will inevitably be some level of copy vio flagged. Our hope is that over time these stubs will be added to using further sources, and by other editors which will reduce the similarity to the original text. From previous conversations, above, my understanding is that most of Helenrp's articles are not automatically flagged as copy vio's as the difference from the original is sufficient. Where the users articles have been flagged we have endevoured to change them as sson as possible. The user has created these articles in good faith on my direction and is aware she must re-write content in her own words. I therefore find it really sad and frustrating that she has been banned. The user is not an experienced Wikimedian and does not have the experience or confidence to defend her actions or to fight the blocking of her username. The user is a fantastic hard working volunteer and i'm deeply saddened that she might not be able to contribute to Wikipedia in future. I really hope we can find a resolution which means we can keep the 200+ articles she has created - is there an agreed % threshold for copy vio? how many of the articles exceed the threshold?. I would very much appreciate your response to my comments before any further action is taken. Regards Jason.nlw (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jason.nlw, Thanks for weighing in on this discussion.

Based upon the state of the 258 articles that I have been reviewing, her activities kind of fell through the cracks after the initial block. I am finding that so far every article has issues - some are significant enough that I am posting a {{copyvio-revdel}} to hide the previous versions and some that are some form of WP:Close paraphrasing. While there is an attempt to make some minor changes in some places, for the most part there is just minor modification of the content. It is generally in the same word order, perhaps a word or two changed to synonyms, but a significant lack of true paraphrasing.

In addition, many of the subjects of the articles do not meet the criteria for notability for Wikipedia, one of the best examples is Robert Allen (Baptist minister) - and this isn't based just on the lack of notability in the Wikipedia article, and the DWB article, but lack of content or sources that can be found to explain why an article would be created for this individual over the many other ministers in Wales... and the world. Please see WP:GNG and WP:Notability (people).

I was discouraged when I offered to help the user paraphrase content - and resolve some of the article that were created - and instead the user was able to create 3 more articles, each of which have issues.

What would be wonderful is an effort to 1) identify whether the subjects of the DWB articles meet Wikipedia's definition for inclusion (Wikipedia is not here to be a repository of all DWB articles) and 2) learn properly paraphrase content. Since the user has ignored all notifications about this, I don't think it is likely that this user will be unblocked, unless there is a clear expression of understanding what is needed to create articles without copyright violations.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CaroleHenson: My understanding is that anyone in the Dictionary of Welsh biography is notable as per 'The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication'? This has been agreed to in previous debates over the notability of these items. If the experts have seen fit to include one minister in the dictionary and not another, who are we to question that - that is not our job as Wikipedia editors - we simply take information from reliable sources and present it in Wikipedia. This should address your first point. As for the second, I would still like some clarification on the criteria for Copy vio. Is there a standard formula? or is it down to individual editors? Also, if an article is very short and contains only key statements like 'the person was born in...' 'and educated at...' There is very little that can be changed in the structure or order of these statements. And one could argue that there is no violation of copyright if there is no literary merit or creativity in the statements. The facts are simply being transmitted. I have given the editor plenty of training and advice on paraphrasing, but in many cases it is simply not possible without making an article look like it was written by Yoda. Jason.nlw (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jason.nlw

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales#Dictionary of Welsh Biography inclusion. I pinged you into that discussion when I started it.

You may want to look at User:CaroleHenson/Helenrp copyvio check#Working. (There are others that are really much better at it than I am, but my versions at least don't make the copyvio detector see red). A really good example of a problematic article was Leon Atkin - which was easier to completely rewrite. See the previous version, where there were major issues with the content. When I looked at the copyvio detector analysis of the article, it was practically a copy-paste of the DWB article.

I agree that it's tricky when the article have bare facts and there's only so many ways that you can write them, but what is problematic is taking the source information, changing one or two words, keeping the same word order, and thinking that constitutes paraphrasing. Elisha Beadles another article where I completely rewrote the article (still a work in progress) is a good example of where there are only so many facts... but I did the best I could to paraphrase the DWB content.

One thing that helps a lot is adding content from other sources, but there are several articles that I worked on where I could not find other sources, but was able to reword the content.

There are plenty of really good tips at WP:Close paraphrasing and the external links at the bottom of that page. With all due respect, there are really two choices: 1) have contributors learn and follow Wikipedia guidelines or 2) don't work on Wikipedia.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CaroleHenson:, thank you for your in depth reply and for all your hard work in correcting articles. Articles such as Leon Atkin were written by Helenrp over a year ago and i know the quality of her work and her understanding of the copyright rules has improved greatly since then, although i acknowledge there are still some issues but generally with shorter articles, and for the reasons outlined above. So it sounds to me like the majority of articles do not red flag and can therefore stay? I still think that the wording of the Biog notability criteria means these articles pass. I guess a debate could be had in extreme cases, but if there is doubt (it looks like a grey area), why not just keep them? They are not offensive or inaccurate. I believe that the user does understand the rules, but due to the nature of the content she is working on, there will occasionally be unintended violations, which should be dealt with on a case by case bases rather than bundling all her work together, and punishing her with a ban. The irony in all this is that the Dictionary of Welsh Biography are working hard to make all there content available openly, but its a slow process, as individual contributors often hold copyright for there articles and as with all open access projects there are concerns in some quarters. It will happen though, eventually! As for the editors ban, i feel partly responsible because i set the work and ran the training. She was simply following directions to the best of her ability. What if we were to agree she made no further edits to English Wikipedia until we have an agreement on notability and she has received further training, could the editor be re-instated? Regards Jason.nlw (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree about her having learned anything along the way about the right way to write an article. See all the tags posted in the past week or two, including the last three articles she added, each of which had issues. Also, see the CCI notice message posted just below this section.

Please weigh-in on the WikiProject Wales page about notability of DWB articles.

I am not the person that would make the decision about removing the block, but I haven't heard anything yet about why that makes sense. I made an offer to work with her to improve the articles, which is posted below. Crickets. (I recently worked with another editor who created problematic articles. The user worked with me to improve articles that she had created through postings on her talk page and was unblocked.)–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

She probably has not even seen the messages yet as she only checks Wikipeia on days she is volunteering. Jason.nlw (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CaroleHenson: Hi. I'm pleased to see that the notability issue has been put to bed. I would now like to focus on sorting out Copyright violations. Would it be possible to have a list of all articles created by User:helenrp which are currently flagged by the copy vio software as being over the threshold of similarity? - i think it would be best to ficus on these articles in the first instance. This would be really useful in working out how much work needs to be done to get all her articles below that threshold. Many thanks Jason.nlw (talk) 16:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jason.nlw, This is a tool to check for copyright violations: [2]. There is also still the open request at CCI - see the section below.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Helenrp. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. –CaroleHenson (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As an FYI, I have started this list to start to work some of these articles.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Getting unblocked after being indefinitely blocked for repeated copyright infringement isn't a particularly common thing; it's only done if there's reason to believe that you now understand (and are willing to follow) our standards related to copyright law. When this happens, and you simply return to the behavior that got you blocked the first time around, it's much more serious — it seemed that you were improving when you weren't, so why should there be any reason to believe a future unblock request? Our policies do not demand that this be a permanent block, but the likelihood of it being removed or reduced is extremely small. Nyttend (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helenrp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

These articles are being added to Wikipedia with the full consent of NLW, and are considered to be valid contributions on account of the various characters' previous inclusion in the 'Dictionary of Welsh Biography', which provides limited but important information on them, to which other interested Wikipedia users are effectively being invited to expand on / improve if possible

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This account is not blocked. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions which appear when you try. Note, though, that "full consent of NLW", etc. is completely irrelevant to editing here. That's not relevant to your inability to edit, mind you. Yamla (talk) 13:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just as a side comment, each page on the Dictionary of Welsh Biography site has the copyright symbol at the bottom of the page. There were some minor attempts at paraphrasing the content, but often much of it was copy-pasted from the source, and was often in the author's voice and in the same word order. I am working through the list of 258 articles that you created and so far almost all of them I have worked on so far have had significant copyvio issues. Please note Nyttend's comment regarding being unblocked: it's only done if there's reason to believe that you now understand (and are willing to follow) our standards related to copyright law

If you are interested in learning how to properly paraphrase, please see WP:Close paraphrasing and Paraphrase: Write it in Your Own Words, Purdue University.

If you would be willing to take one of the articles from the list and work on paraphrasing it properly here, I would be happy to work with you. Please note, you cannot copy-paste content anywhere in Wikipedia, even here, so anything that is posted here should be paraphrased.–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It also helps quite a lot if information is gathered from more than one source.–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An an example, see the versions of the Elizabeth Baker article: DWB article, your last edit on the article, and the revised article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 13:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User rights log changes

@Nyttend and Yamla: What does it mean that this user's rights "was automatically updated from (none) to extended confirmed user"?

Does that mean that the user is no longer blocked? I see that this user is creating articles again!–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(1) See WP:ECP. The ability to edit through this protection is granted automatically, just like autoconfirmed is. (2) Helen wasn't blocked until just a moment ago, for the simple reason that I forgot to impose any new block. I've fixed that. Nyttend (talk) 17:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rhisiart Morgan Davies

A tag has been placed on Rhisiart Morgan Davies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://yba.llgc.org.uk/en/s2-DAVI-MOR-1903.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –CaroleHenson (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rees Davies (Independent minister)

A tag has been placed on Rees Davies (Independent minister) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –CaroleHenson (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reuben Davies (poet) - Close paraphrasing

Reuben Davies (poet) was tagged for close paraphrasing.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John David (Independent minister)

A tag has been placed on John David (Independent minister) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MutchyMan112 (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cadwgan Ffol for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cadwgan Ffol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadwgan Ffol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 02:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evan Owen Allen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Owen Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Owen Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 02:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bleddyn Ddu

A tag has been placed on Bleddyn Ddu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hugh Bold

A tag has been placed on Hugh Bold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivor Bowen

A tag has been placed on Ivor Bowen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Bowen (Independent minister)

A tag has been placed on Thomas Bowen (Independent minister) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samuel Breeze

A tag has been placed on Samuel Breeze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dafydd Cadwaladr

A tag has been placed on Dafydd Cadwaladr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dafydd Alaw

A tag has been placed on Dafydd Alaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dafydd ap Harri Wyn

A tag has been placed on Dafydd ap Harri Wyn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dafydd ap Gruffydd (poet)

A tag has been placed on Dafydd ap Gruffydd (poet) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hugh Bulkeley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugh Bulkeley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Bulkeley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]