Jump to content

User talk:Ipoellet/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hiya--In case you didn't notice, this article was created and I was doing a search for more mentions of it and saw your sandbox if you want to spruce it up a bit. Have fun. Katr67 19:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPOR Collaboration of the Week

[edit]

Hello again WikiProject Oregon team members, its time for the next Collaboration of the Week. First a shout out to Sprkee for putting together some templates for this project. Now, in honor of Labor Day weekend and the outdoor nature of the activities that often accompany the three-day weekend, this week’s item is to de-redlink as many parks from the List of Oregon State Parks. Some may even by going to one of these places, a great opportunity to take a picture or two for an article. As always, participation is not required, though it is appreciated. And if you are caught, we will disavow any knowledge of your existence. Since we don’t want to waste any effort through duplication, please make a note on the talk page of which park article you are going to start. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Good day! Aboutmovies 19:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unlinking dates

[edit]

Hi, Lightmouse. I notice that you removed the links from years and similar date elements in List of U.S. National Historic Landmarks by state. I appreciate that the use of links on plain-English phrases can seem excessive. But my logic was that, in the case of historic sites, linking the dates could be a quick and easy way to provide the reader with a way to look at the wider historic context for a site. Can you share your thinking on why the links should be removed? Ipoellet 21:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, linking all years and centuries in that article appears to me to conflict with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). If a reader really wants to know about a year, all they have to do is type four characters into the search box, that is quite different than the effort to find out about 'Gothic Revival architecture'. It is clear that we have a different view of context. If you think they are important, feel free to revert my edit.
I certainly think the whole 'list of <Protected areas> of the United States> needs reviewing. Some of them have titles like 'list of US <protected>' others are titled '<protected> of the US'. That is why I moved that one. Lightmouse 07:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You may well have a good point. I'll read up on those MOS entries. Your reasoning for the move is sound, and I have no objection. Ipoellet 16:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September WPOR Collaboration of the Week

[edit]

First off, great job to all WikiProject Oregon folks for last week’s List of Oregon State Parks work. We pounded out six new state park articles: Sarah Helmick, Bald Peak, Bob Straub, Sumpter Valley Gold Dredge, Tumalo, and Peter Skene Ogden. Plus numerous other edits to improve the existing articles. As a reward, we are introducing the COTW award {{WPOR COTW award}}, and this time it goes to User:Woodstein52 for starting three of the articles.

On to this week. We are back to the usual two Top importance Stubs: Sunstone and Oregon, My Oregon. Both are stub pluses, so it shouldn’t take much to upgrade them both. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Good day! Aboutmovies 22:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPOR Collaboration: 09172007

[edit]

All righty WPOR ladies and gentleman, great job last week with our state song and gemstone. I have bumped them up to Start class. I haven’t looked at the contributions, so the COTW award will be later. This week’s articles are Darlene Hooley, by special request, and another Top stub, our very own state rock, the Thunderegg. Yes, apparently we have a state rock and state gemstone. No word on whether there is a state stone too. Hooley basically needs some sources to make it to the next level. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. In the words of Beaver Joe, whoop! Aboutmovies 18:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fall WPOR COTW

[edit]

Welcome to autmun and the weekly COTW news. Great job to those who helped out with last week’s articles: Darlene Hooley & Thunderegg. Both made great improvements. This week, something a little different. With fall upon us, the photo ops are going to be harder to get, so we have a photo request fulfillment drive. Take a look at the requested pictures for Oregon category or the graphics subproject for what’s needed. Then go take a picture, or search online for a free picture to upload (US gov sites are great and there are links available from the above links). If you fill a request, be sure to remove the request template from the article’s talk page. Our other item is another red link removal drive, this time on the flagship Oregon article. Like the state parks red link drive, try to coordinate on the talk page. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 01:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NS-Flag.png

[edit]

Image:NS-Flag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whole situation is not worth the bother. I removed all the flags of the states/territories/provinces. Problem, such as there was of it, solved. Ipoellet 04:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Week 1 October WP:ORE COTW

[edit]

I know everyone has been waiting anxiously for this week’s COTW, so here they are: Barlow Road and Columbia River Plateau. Both are almost Start class, just some formatting and referencing, plus a little expansion and they will be there!

As to last week, it is difficult to track the items we were working on, but I know some pictures were added and at least three red links were removed from Oregon, so thank you to all those who participated. The award winner will be GoodDamon for their creation of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute article. We have now worked through all the Top class stubs and are into the High class stubs. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Happy editing, and remember if you see a downed power line, don’t pick it up. Aboutmovies 20:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings WPOR world. Last week was great with the Barlow Road seeing lots of improvement, maybe even B class. Columbia River Plateau also saw some improvement, maybe enough to bump it to Start. On with the countdown, another two Stubs in the High category, both happen to be people: Don Schollander a multi-gold medalist; and then world-renowned bridge architect and all-around swell guy Conde McCullough. Schollander needs sources more than anything, and McCullough needs more of a bio, plus maybe a nice chart for the bridges with type/year/location/length. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. This week’s safety tip, stranger=danger. Aboutmovies 18:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiOregon COTW

[edit]

Greetings once again WikiProject Oregon members. Thank you to those who help out with improving Conde McCullough and Don Schollander last week. This week is a Stub break, with a Ref improvement drive for Oregon and a request for work on Portland Police Bureau. For the ref improvement, this means sourcing tagged statements and standardizing all existing citations, both of which are needed for GA and FA status. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 18:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

California NHLs, and PD request

[edit]

Hi. Great job in reorganizing the List of National Historic Landmarks in California! I think your pioneering use of the numbered list format for NHLs works well, and the reorganization just makes the whole article a lot more manageable for the reader. I like the black styling.

One thing though, I don't like the verbatim use of the NHL summary material to describe Harada House and a few other sites. Per discussion on "Fair Use of PD material vs. Plagiarism in WP:NRHP articles" on the wp:nrhp talk page, I personally would really rather head off use of verbatim text from NHL summaries, as I think it undermines the quality of what we are accomplishing together with all this work. I don't want each page to have to show a label that it includes public domain text from the National Park Service, like the ship articles have to do with respect to DANFS. I expect that once a page is tainted with such a label, it becomes difficult to ever eliminate it all and especially difficult to document that it is no longer tainted. Would you mind deleting them from the California page, or would you mind if I did so, so that the page can be a new model? Those passages are too long now, anyhow, and the passages will be accessible from the articles themselves that each will have a link to its NHL summary. Sincerely, doncram 21:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am in complete agreement with your concerns about verbatim copying of PD material. At very least it needs to be properly attributed, and far better to rewrite the information in original text.
In the case of what you observe in List of National Historic Landmarks in California, I have copied the NPS text verbatim as a temporary placeholder until I can wikify, paraphrase, reorganize, and condense (yes, they are too long!) the description, while still using the NPS description as the primary source. Eventually, they will be cleaned up. (The entry at Santa Cruz Looff Carousel and Roller Coaster is one such that I have rewritten from the NPS text.) In the meantime, I have attributed them - the reference mark is in the column header, as for most of the other columns.
But I recognize and respect your discomfort. I'm preoccupied with non-wiki business this evening, but I commit in the next day or so to either rewrite or remove each of those particular descriptions.
Meanwhile, thank you for the compliment! Ipoellet 02:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your prompt and substantive reply here, and for alerting me to it. Whew, great, i am relieved we are on the same track about this. Glad to understand your intentions/process more fully now. A further small point: such paste-ins of material from elsewhere could be enclosed by quotation marks, when you put them in, clarifying to others that they are indeed quotes, and probably suggesting an intent to replace them, and keeping it squeaky clean as we go along. But the main thing is your intent, which I know you can implement from your other work, for California and for other open state lists of NHLs. I myself have been calling "finished" state list pages that are really incomplete in their descriptions (like descriptions of multiple sites as "A house", in the List of National Historic Landmarks in Illinois article), while I have focused on getting an article with NHL summary source and perhaps more sources for every site. Just minor variation in our style of getting to the same place. You told me once to "Be Bold" though, so I thought i should bring it up. :) doncram 02:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI the List of National Historic Landmarks in California list is almost completely populated with at least stub articles now, as you may have noticed. Recently in new articles I have been adding HABS photo links where available, and/or putting photo requests in the corresponding talk pages. There are about 10 yet to create, which I may or may not get started during this week, before going on a trip and taking a vacation from wikipedia for a while. I hope you feel free to take the list forward any way you like, hopefully towards FL someday.... doncram (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I got your reply. I wholeheartedly approve of effort for, and hope for success of, FL review for some smaller state lists of NHLs, before the big ones like CA and NY which are just too unwieldy. FWIW, I visited your 16-NHL-List of National Historic Landmarks in Oregon and added NHL summary, NRHP text and photo references, and HABS link for the first NHL on its list, the Bonneville Dam. I'll help out more, when time allows. All my secrets, such as they are, are embodied in User:Doncram/Recipe, User:Doncram/NHLtemplate, and User:Doncram/NHLinfo, in case those are ever useful. You have a good vacation, too! Cheers, doncram (talk) 02:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration of the Week

[edit]

Howdy doody ya’ll WPOR poke, time for more COTW. Thanks for the work on Portland Police Bureau and improving the references at Oregon. This week we are back to Stubs with Eastern Oregon and Fort Vancouver National Historic Site. Both need just a little TLC to make it to Start. Again to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts click here. Aboutmovies 01:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SPAM ala COTW

[edit]

Ladies and Gentlemen its time for another episode of Collaboration of the Week. Last week’s show starring Fort Vancouver National Historic Site & Eastern Oregon received high ratings. This week’s show star two more stubs, Johnny Kitzmiller & John Wesley Davis. As always, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Don’t delay, act today! Aboutmovies 18:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


New COTW

[edit]

Hello again from WikiProject Oregon. A round of applause for the project in October when we added three GAs, one FA, plus 10 DYKs! Next, thanks to all those who participated in last week’s Collaboration of the Week, John Wesley Davis & Johnny Kitzmiller. This week we have the Cayuse War, and in honor of the home opener, the Portland Trail Blazers. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies 18:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the merge...

[edit]

... of Officers Row and Fort Vancouver National Historic Site.

Go ahead and remove the merge tags.

--EngineerScotty 22:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPOR's newest COTW

[edit]

Thank you to all those editors who helped improve Cayuse War and Portland Trail Blazers last week as part of the Collaboration of the Week. They are looking much better. This week, with the election season over, we’ll tackle a request for Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004), which should have plenty of WP:RS available to work with on improvement. Our other article is another Stub in the High category, our only Miss America, Katie Harman. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Legal disclaimer: WikiProject Oregon and its affiliates are not liable for any personal injuries acquired while editing on the COTW including but not limited to carpel tunnel syndrome, Wikistress, alcoholism, anxiety attacks, or extreme emotional distress. Aboutmovies 20:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carleton College

[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up the Carleton College NRHP infoboxes. I was more interested in getting the infoboxes in than worrying about what the page looked like. I'll have to go back and clean up the other colleges' pages. Cheers! Einbierbitte (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

np -Ipoellet (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon COTW version 11.20

[edit]

Welcome to the jungle folks. Thanks to those who helped out with Katie Harman and Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004) last week. This week, we have two high priority stubs, one of the two major hospitals in Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center, and Oregon Department of Education. Enjoy your turkeys, or for some enjoy your tofurkeys. As always, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPORE Civil War COTW

[edit]

Hello again to WikiProject Oregon members, time for this week’s Collaboration of the Week. Thank you to those who helped out improving Legacy Emanuel Hospital & Health Center and Oregon Department of Education last week. This week, in honor of the annual Civil War, we have the University of Oregon Ducks and the Oregon State University Beavers. Or if you attended some other school, feel free to improve your alma mater’s article. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FA for WPORE COTW

[edit]

Greetings boys and girls from the fine folks at The Wettest Place on Earth! A thank you to those who helped last week make some good improvements on the U of O and OSU OS articles. For this week, the next stub on the list is Fortune 1000 company Lithia Motors, Inc. way down south in Dixie, which only needs a little added to make it to Start. The other is a bit more of a challenge, but Linus Pauling I believe is our only Nobel Prize winning Oregonian, and a former FA. So hopefully we can get it back to FA, check the talk page’s article history template for comments. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies 20:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, I'm trying to clear up some old Oregon-related merge proposals and was wondering if you had a minute or two to take care of this one. I haven't looked at your sandbox to see if it's actually ready for prime time, so apologies if this will take more than a minute or two. Let me know if I can help, thanks! Katr67 (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, not trying to be a pest, just bumping this post in case you missed it after AM rudely interrupted with his COTW nonsense. ;) Katr67 (talk) 22:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon COTW #25 (or so)

[edit]

Hello again from the COTW of WikiProject Oregon. We thank ye who went forth through the rain and mud and helped out with last week’s articles Lithia Motors and Linus Pauling. Hopefully Linus can return to FA status early next year. This week we have the request of Oregon Ballot Measure 5 (1990) and High importance article Portland Rose Festival. Whatever work you can contribute would be greatly appreciated by our master. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here.[citation needed] Aboutmovies (talk) 08:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Small World

[edit]

Hello lpoellet

I saw your photo of Nehalem Bay Airport, with a plane tied down there. I noted you also made a post about Piarco. Attached is a picture of that same plane at Piarco in 2003! Small world.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:StepUp.jpg


Macadam (talk) 01:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Macadam[reply]


That is funny! I flew through POS a couple of times in the last few weeks - odd to see something familiar in a place that feels so far from home. Thanks!! Ipoellet (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays from WP:ORE

[edit]

Hello again from the Collaboration of the Week for WikiProject Oregon. This week are two more stubs, the Oregon Garden and former Congressman Robert B. Duncan. Both are close to moving up to Start class, so only a little work is needed. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 00:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin D. Roosevelt

[edit]

Hi. I reverted your change to the war declaraton photo caption. FDR was, in fact, signing the German war declaration in that photo. He is seen wearing a gray suit. He wore a black suit when he signed the Japanese war declaration. This subject has been gone over in some detail on the discussion page.THD3 (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite correct, and mea culpa. Ipoellet (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday COTW

[edit]

Greetings to all the WikiProject Oregon crew. Happy holidays to those who celebrate holidays. Thanks to those who helped out with last week’s articles Oregon Garden and Robert B. Duncan. Due to the holidays and people likely to be spending less time on Wikipedia, the new Collaboration of the Week will run for two weeks (OK actually I’ll be out of the country, but same difference). The first item will be a general Reference Improvement Drive. So find an article, source an tagged sentence or bring all the citations up to WP:CITE standards. The other item is a Tagging Drive, looking for those random articles about Oregon that do not yet have a {{WikiProject Oregon}} tag on the talk page. In the past I’ve found the Category:People from Oregon and its sub cats fertile ground for the lost Oregon souls. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Year COTW from WP:ORE

[edit]

Happy New Year to all the Oregon WikiProject People. A big round of applause for everyone last year, we got a lot done. A thank you to everyone who helped with the last Collaboration of the Week, I saw a large number of articles in the unassessed section and our total number of articles is over 5000 (we were around 4000 in June when the assessment program finished the initial run) so I know at one person was busy tagging. This week we are back to a High importance Stub article the one and only max security prison, first prison, and only one with a death row in the state, the Oregon State Penitentiary. Then, by request we have one of the most prolific ballot measure sponsors in Mr. Bill Sizemore. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alaska NHLs

[edit]

Hi Ipoellet -- I have finished creating stub articles for all the NHLs listed in List of National Historic Landmarks in Alaska, unless I missed one or two where there is a blue-link pointing to something other than an article. In the process I should have effectively moved each site's link to an NHL webpage, which you had put in the description column, into the site's article. I've added in NRHP text and photos links, and HABS photo and description links, where available. I may have changed a couple article names from those you set up, but for the most part the way you had it set up worked very well. Some of the sites seem really interesting, like Leffingwell's Camp Site, when I see the NRHP texts for them. They all seem exotic and far away.

I wonder, would you care to browse the articles and material, and see what you'd care to add now? It would be nice to get a presentable article out of it, with new short descriptions for the sites, and so on. Cheers, doncram (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon GA COTW

[edit]

Howdy to WikiProject Oregon members, time for another edition of the Collaboration of the Week. As you may have already noticed, our flagship article Oregon is up for the third time as we make a push to get WP:GA status before going for WP:FA. Since this will take some time to get where it needs to be, this will be the COTW for more than just a week. Also, so we hopefully don’t trip over ourselves, try to coordinate on the article’s talk page. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here.

On another note, just a general good job/pat on the back to the project for a great 2007, the first full year of the project. We had 83 DYKs about Oregon, improved one article to FA, and went from around 4 GAs to 17 GAs. Plus numerous new articles, improvements to existing, the introduction of the COTW, and the introduction of article assessment at the project. Again, great job and here’s to a new year. Aboutmovies (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snowy COTW from WPOR

[edit]

Hello again from WP:ORE. Please note the Collaboration of the Week is running two hours late, no morning kindergarten, and routers are on snow routes. Thank you to those who helped improve Oregon, we are inching towards GA quality. This week we have another High importance Stub in our official state insect (who knew?) with the Oregon Swallowtail, and then a new article I came across, Biglow Canyon Wind Farm. Help if you can get out of the snow. Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Good day! Aboutmovies (talk) 16:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

[edit]

Um, excuse me..but..:) Dreadstar 01:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Peterson says it time for Oregon COTW

[edit]

Wake up! Wake up to a happy day! Says Tom Peterson. Greetings to the gang at WP:ORE, its time for another round of Collaboration of the Week. Last week was a very successful endeavor with great improvement to Oregon Swallowtail and Deuce Biglow Canyon Wind Farm. OK, so there’s no “e” but it makes me laugh. The Biglow production was so successful we got our first DYK out of it. So, let’s try for a second with the tallest building in the state, the Wells Fargo Center. Then by request we have the former governor (among other things) Neil Goldschmidt. Again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, visit here. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yunnan flag

[edit]

Sorry it wasn't from "flagpost" but from "flagspot". sorry about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestlyriccollection (talkcontribs) 05:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD - Wardrobe malfunction

[edit]

As an FYI, I've taken the liberty of testing community consensus on deleting Wardrobe malfunction here. Input welcomed! Achromatic (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is invited. I've gone ahead and asked for peer review on the List of National Historic Landmarks in New York list, including the List of National Historic Landmarks in New York City (hopefully to be considered by the peer reviewers as well). Open at Wikipedia:Peer review#List of National Historic Landmarks in New York. doncram (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Liveoak Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Nez Perce National Historical Park
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve
First light
Union Oil Company Building
Lake Clark National Park and Preserve
Wahkeenah Falls
Michigan Island Lighthouse
List of oil fields
Ventura County Courthouse
Bannock (tribe)
Mount Hood Community College
Expedition Island
Everett, Washington
Transhab
Rhododendron, Oregon
Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia
California Pizza Kitchen
WCWM
Betio
Cleanup
Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall
Rourkela
Clatskanie, Oregon
Merge
Hierarchical organization
Lymphocytopenia
Japanese baseball
Add Sources
Bobby Orlando
Félag íslenskra þjóðernissinna
Urecco
Wikify
Ontario, Oregon
Will Rogers State Historic Park
Jambalaya
Expand
Crown Point (Oregon)
Marin Headlands
Lewis and Clark National and State Historical Parks

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clown COTW

[edit]

Greetings once again to members of the best encyclopedia online about Oregon (aka WP:ORE)! Last week we improved Neil Goldschmidt to close to GA level, and moved the Wells Fargo Center from Stub to Start for the Collaboration of the Week. This week we’re clowning around with some bozo from Oregon, Pinto Colvig, and then in an attempt to garner another DYK, the rather stubby Cooper Spur. As always, any contribution is appreciated, and to opt out of these messages visit here.

As we have quite a few new members over the last six months, I’ll make another pitch for our various subprojects. Listed here, you will find a variety of groups focused on specific areas of Oregon from transportation to culture. Not only can you sign up and coordinate work there, but each often has useful sources and templates related to that topic. No pressure, just an introduction to those new to the project. Adios. Aboutmovies (talk) 16:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Park Image

[edit]

Hello and thanks for the message. I'm kinda new to Wikipedia, how do I remove the disclaimers from the GFDL tag for my image 2IndianPark.jpg ?

Thanks for your help.

Jbermudez (talk) 01:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our weekly COTW message from WPOR

[edit]

Welcome to another wonderful world of WP:ORE COTW. Thanks again to those who lent a hand improving Pinto Colvig and Cooper Spur ski area this past week or so. This week we return to the High importance Stubs, with the mighty Seal of Oregon and former governor and legal superstar Sylvester Pennoyer. To opt out of these messages, or suggest an article, swing by here. Or to stop receiving any WPORE messages just remove your name from the list of members at WP:ORE. Auf Wiedersehen. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinook Point

[edit]

hey there Ipoellet, thanks for writing. I'm sorry you took offense to my somewhat flippant edit summary. Your explanation of your motivations behind the wording and linking is pretty refreshing. I still think that the way it is worded now is a bit less ambiguous, and doesn't require someone to read a separate article to get the implications of the wording. However, I definitely didn't mean the summary as a personal attack. I'm convinced that it's impossible for those of us (I don't know where you were raised, so don't want to lump you into this collective "us") raised in the "West" to be completely free of the trappings of racism that come along with our culture and education system, so usually just fix some problem instead of sweating an editor about it. I hope you'll take this as an olive branch, I don't want to offend editors who are obviously doing good work with obviously good intentions. Please let me know if you have other concerns. By the way, I'm going to be working on expanding that list, filling out the descriptions for all the sites, and I'm getting close to being done with the Marmes Rockshelter article. I'd definitely like to be able to get the list up to FL, and if you'd be into helping out, it would be more than welcome. Murderbike (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I went to Junior High, High School, and a bit of college in southern Illinois, where I guarantee it was worse only in the lack of subtlety. Alas, I'd love to see the Oregon (and the rest of them for that matter) list get elevated, it seems like there's a lot of good editors working in Oregon. Murderbike (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding copy to Commons

[edit]

You wrote to me about the Jesse H. Settlemier House picture in Woodburn, Oregon. I changed the tag. Let me know if this is what is needed. Thanks. -- Andrew Parodi (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Andrew Parodi (talk) 07:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Nice work adding the images to the NRHP lists! Nice pics too. Katr67 (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Old Buildings and Pictures

[edit]

Greetings from WP:WikiProject Oregon. Blah blah blah. This week we have our semi-annual Picture Drive and a article creation drive for the NRHP List. For the picture drive, go take a picture, or find a free use one (lots of links to gov sites above) and upload it Wikipedia. For the National Register of Historic Places, find a red link on the main Oregon list or one of the county lists at start a new article. If its more than just a stub, don’t forget to nominate it for a DYK! Once again, to opt out or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 14 OR COTW

[edit]

Hello again or welcome if you are new to WP:WikiProject Oregon! Last week we did a picture drive and a NRHP creation drive. It’s hard to track the picture results, but I know I saw quite a few pictures added, so great job. With NRHP we added 7 that I saw: Mitchell Recreation Area, Salem First United Methodist Church, Portland City Hall, Crater Lake Lodge, Central Library (Portland, Oregon), Watchman Lookout Station, and Alvin T. Smith House; with most now nominated for DYK’s! So great work everybody.

This week, its back to stubs with one of the largest newspapers in the state, The Register-Guard, and a request with Oregon Coast. Feel free to help with either one, and the paper article is so short a DYK should be pretty easy to get (just need 5X expansion). As always, to opt out, opt in, or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Katz and History

[edit]

Howdy folks, its time for another installment of WikiProject Oregon’s Collaboration of the Week! Last week we made some improvements to the Oregon Coast and brought The Register-Guard up to B class while garnering a DYK! Great job to those who lent a hand. This week we finish up the High priority Stubs with former mayor and Speaker of the House, Vera Katz, which is pretty much a Start class now and could easily get to B class. We also have History of Oregon by request. Help out if you can, where you can. As always, to opt out, opt in, or suggest future collaborative efforts, click here. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Dalles Airport

[edit]

Good day, Just a heads up the reason why The Dalles Airport is on the Oregon list of airports is the list is based off of the FAA Airport Data (Form 5010). When you filter their database the airport comes up as an Oregon airport. My guess is that this is due in two parts: 1 the airport is owned in part by an Oregon Municipality (City of The Dalles), 2 the city served is The Dalles. Again, this is only my guess. Either way it would probably be best to have the airport listed under both Washington & Oregon lists. --Trashbag (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Albany Municipal Airport I did not now about it being a registered historic place. I was actually there twice last week. Here are a couple of interesting links: [1] & [2] --Trashbag (talk) 19:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]