Jump to content

User talk:Keyboard warrior killer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Keyboard warrior killer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 05:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

November 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bitch (band) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/bitchmetal (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Damnation alley 4 5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Leo 20:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Esther's Diary (film)

[edit]

I have nominated Esther's Diary (film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther's Diary (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 06:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther's Diary (film)

[edit]

The concerns at the AFD needed addressing, as we really cannot use IMDB or youtube or the company's own website or its press releases as references. But even without those references, I was still able to create an decently encyclopedic article... but under the film's original name. As the film had its initial release and set of awards and reviews under the name Forgiveness, that is the name best to be used... with contextual mention of the newer release and name as a sort of "director's special edition". See User:MichaelQSchmidt/workspace/Forgiveness (2008 film). What I think will best serve is for me to use my test article as the basis to edit the existing article, and then to suggest at the AFD that as concerns have been addressed, the article can be "moved" to Forgiveness (2008 film). This preserves the histories and GFDL, sets a better version in mainspace, and leaves a redirect of Esther's Diary as a reasonable search term. Then, as the director's cut hits more festivals, gets more awards, and more coverage, such can be included in the revamped article. It just should not be so spammy. What'cha think? --Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:13, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bonnie Orr

[edit]

I have nominated Bonnie Orr, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie Orr. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 10:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deeper and Deeper (film) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Deeper and Deeper (film), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeper and Deeper (film) until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User sub-pages...

[edit]

Are you aware that you can build articles in a user workspace, tweak them to perfection, and seek input about their quality from helpful editors, before turning them loose in mainspace? Or if an article is found wanting, you can always request userfication to a userspace to continue work? You have some great ideas, but if you begin them out of mainspace, they can be as strong as possible before being presented to the world. You can begin with a few like these (links turn blue when content added)...

User:Keyboard warrior killer/sandbox/Gary Glitter's Gangshow (1988)
User:Keyboard warrior killer/sandbox/Corruption.gov (film)
and User:Keyboard warrior killer/sandbox/Alex Harvey discography

Its just like creating an article in mainspace as you have... but OUT of mainspace... so they are not judged as "wanting" before all issus are addressed. THEN its time for mainspace, and the move is easy.

And you can always ask the closer of the Bonnie Orr AFD to userfy it to you at User:Keyboard warrior killer/sandbox/Bonnie Orr so you can keep working on it... specially as only one editor commented at that AFD. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deeper and deeper cover 4.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deeper and deeper cover 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deeper and Deeper (film)

[edit]
This user played a significant role in helping Deeper and Deeper (film) graduate from incubation.
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Die Augen der Mumie Ma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Davidson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining Reversion

[edit]

Hiya. I reverted your edit on Eureka, California because of lack of notability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything gets reverted for lack of "notability". If Brian Ladd is not notable enough, that I can see. If The Psyclones are not notable enough, that I can see. But Blackhouse has a long running reputation going back to the 1980's. They are notable as the very first Christian industrial band and have influenced many artists within the industrial genre that came after them. And they are based in Eureka. Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 00:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps if your edits are getting reverted for lack of notability, it is time to read up on the process. Even though the links above in your welcome note include the pathways to get to these sections, I have included a few hot links for you here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For Biographies of Living People:
Regarding the two named musical entities to which you refer:


WP:ENT Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities:
 *Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
 *Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
WP:MUSICBIO A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, instrumentalist, etc.) may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria:
 *Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, 
  and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1]
 *This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions
  of print media, and television documentaries...
Blackhouse counts as notable under all of these criteria.
I am not Brian Ladd, and don't work for him, but I do happen to be a longtime fan of Blackhouse, which is how I know about Eureka, CA to begin with. Much of Blackhouse's coverage was in print magazines in the 1980's and 1990's. How do I provide proof of notability so that either Brian Ladd or Blackhouse is included in this list?
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Spiders & Snakes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to British and Electro
Adam Hamilton (musician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alternative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian roulette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adam Hamilton (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mick Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adam Hamilton (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Lynch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pola Negri Richee 5.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pola Negri Richee 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

[edit]

Information icon Your recent edit to List of baroque pop artists appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Explain to me please why you did not also take down the mention of The Byrds as Baroque Pop, as they are not sourced. Also, why did you leave all of those recent artists in that are not sourced? I have left a message in the article's talk section explaining why I think it's important that non-notable artists be allowed to be put up if they can be sourced as baroque pop elsewhere. People come to Wikipedia expecting a large list of artists that they can use as a resource for discovery. Removing lesser known artists because they are lesser known runs counter intuitive to this discovery process. Let's face it, a minor artist from the 1960's is likely to have fallen through the cracks in 45 years time and therefore would not be notable in Wikipedia today. But why should that mean that their work can't even be listed in the very genre it played a role in?--Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 05:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • By the way, I will accept New Trolls as not being Baroque Pop because it cannot be sourced; that is fine. For whatever reason, the handful of blatant baroque pop songs that they did (e.g. "Io che ho te" from 1971) have never been called such for who knows what reason; probably because they are usually associated with progressive rock and general Italian pop.

Hi. Just to clarify, the sourcing only has to exist at the artist's article or on the list. That said, it's certainly possible others on the list do not meet that criteria. It's true that new changes to articles/lists on Wikipedia are likely to be more closely scrutinized than those that have been there for a while. But that doesn't mean those other entries shouldn't be removed -- if there is indeed no source justifying their inclusion, you're more than welcome to do so. I'll respond to the other part on the article talk page. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robbie Robertson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Wesley Harding and Tiny Tim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robbie Robertson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Scott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Robertson

[edit]

It's impossible that Robbie Robertson's "Birth Name" (the title of the infobox field) was "Jaime Royal Robertson" when his mother hadn't married James Patrick Robertson at the time of his birth.
Ulmanor (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi there Ulmanor! Thanks for connecting with me about this. I've been talking with the Robertson family (i.e. Robbie's kids) and they have talked to me extensively about their and Robbie's shared concern about the portrayal in Wikipedia and elsewhere of Robbie's birth name; apparently this has been a pretty frustrating issue for them. To the best of my knowledge, the claim that Robertson was born with the last name Klegerman comes from the book Whispering Pines (2009) by Jason Schneider, and this was published in Wikipedia and then repeated elsewhere because it was in Wikipedia. But according to Robbie and his kids, this information is incorrect. If you look at the bio on Robbie's official website and in the book Rock and Roll Highway (2014), the latter a children's book about Robbie that his son Sebastian wrote about him, both of these sources state in no uncertain terms that his name is Jaime Royal Robertson. That said, I do agree that neither says he was "born" with that name, so that makes it a little more difficult. My understanding is that Robbie is going to explain that his birth name is Jaime Royal Robertson, and explain how it happened that his biological father was named Klegerman but his birth name is Robertson, in his autobiography Testimony, which is coming out in November. I've been asked to keep the way this happened quiet for now, but I will say that there is one highly unlikely but plausible way that it can happen, and amazingly enough, it did indeed happen. What I'm thinking we could do to make everyone happy for the time being is follow the suggestions suggested recently by TheScotch in the Robbie Robertson talk page, and then after Robbie goes public with the full information in the Testimony book, we will use the birth name info as presented therein here in Wikipedia. If it continues to be an issue after Testimony comes out, I will talk to Robbie's family and management and see about having them put up a dedicated page on Robbie's website explaining this issue. I sure hope this explanation helps, my friend. I understand you wanting to get the right info up and I definitely do too. Please let me know that you got this info if you can, and I hope this will be a fair compromise. Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for reaching out with such a thorough explanation, User:Keyboard warrior killer. I see how this could be a sensitive subject for him as it regards his self-identity. While I usually operate under the philosophy of "Get it right, no matter whom it may offend," I think the solution currently worked out on the Talk Page is a good one, and I'll refrain from further reversion. It'll be interesting to read Testimony, especially vis-à-vis This Wheel's on Fire. I'll keep an eye on the Talk Page. Thanks again.
    Ulmanor (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robbie Robertson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Graham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robbie Robertson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • thumb|350px|The Band in 1969. Robertson is second from the right.]] Robertson is on the far right.]]In early 1969, Robertson and ''Music From Big Pink'' producer John Simon flew to Hawaii to plan the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robbie Robertson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tiny Tim and 2000s. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Daniel Davies

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for clarification on my talk page. I thought it might be the case that you had the article ready, but you should add the wikilinks after the article is created in future. No harm done, so it's all good :) Andre666 (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andre! Good idea; I appreciate the tip and I will try to do that in the future. Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 21:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Keyboard warrior killer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Keyboard warrior killer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Daniel Davies (musician)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Daniel Davies (musician), Keyboard warrior killer!

Wikipedia editor DrStrauss just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi, I've reviewed your page - it's brilliant - well done! Thanks, DrStrauss talk 18:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on DrStrauss's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Rating

[edit]

Hi, the article is very good now. Have moved it to C class on the bio project, I'm not qualified to assess for B class or good article or to assess for its other projects so its probably best you enquire at the help desk, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Angels bend closer.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Angels bend closer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Keyboard warrior killer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Keyboard warrior killer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Jordan (photographer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elle, Vogue and Vanity Fair. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Tav falco rome 2018.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tav falco rome 2018.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tav falco rome 2018.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tav Falco's Panther Burns

[edit]

There's 4 citations classifying the band as psychobilly, more than any other genre cited for the group's musical style. That's why it was listed. You can't just remove citations and sourced information just because you don't like it. I don't know what you're trying to accomplish, but you're being disruptive. Please stop. There's a way to handle articles on musicians where the musician doesn't like being classified as a genre he is classified. See Slim Cessna's Auto Club#Musical_style for example, where it notes that Cessna rejects the classification of his music as alternative country and gothic country, but still lists them in both the article and the infobox because they are well sourced. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 12:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Rockabilly Raccoon. I am working with Tav Falco himself on the Tav Falco and Tav Falco's Panther Burns Wikipedia pages, and am the one that rewrote the Tav Falco Wikipedia page on his behalf.
Mr. Falco despises the term "psychobilly" and specifically requested that the term "psychobilly" not be used to reference what he does. I talked to him and his manager about this extensively a few days ago, and long story short, Mr. Falco was not happy about that being added to his Wikipedia pages at all.
I would be happy to assemble a set of genre references for what he does, and source those in the Tav Falco and Tav Falco's Panther Burns infoboxes. Within my memory, most of the references that I sourced do not call him "psychobilly." And Tav Falco's Panther Burns is certainly not exclusively "psychobilly" as one of the recent edits suggested. Please work with me on respecting the artist's wishes.
Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 15:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that Wikipedia isn't built on editor's opinions? Or that editing an article on behalf of it's subject or it's subject editing an article to fit his own biases is frowned upon? You do realize that Wikipedia isn't built on editor's opinions? Or that editing an article on behalf of it's subject or it's subject editing an article to fit his own biases is frowned upon? "The subject of the article doesn't like it" isn't a good reason to delete references and sourced statements. Also there's no sources for Rock and Roll, Rockabilly, Blues, Rhythm & blues, Alternative rock, Psychedelic rock, Cabaret music or Outsider music. I specifically searched for sources discussing the band and found references discussing styles the band was classified as and you purposefully deleted them. You've made it clear that you have no intention of working with other editors. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 16:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rockabilly Raccoon, I would like to point out that making "psychobilly" the one and only genre in Tav Falco's Panther Burns' infobox is itself an editor bias that you are imposing on Wikipedia, so exactly what you are accusing me of. Not to mention that finding a source for Tav Falco being "rock and roll" or "rockabilly" is extremely easy, despite what you say.
I just now spoke to Mr. Falco's manager, and there is a very good reason for keeping "psychobilly" out of his Wikipedia pages: People go to Wikipedia and regurgitate whatever is already there, which then creates the sources that one can then use to say Mr. Falco's music is "psychobilly." Here is a quote from Mr. Falco's manager that I just now received:
"The reason there are so many online references to Tav being 'psychobilly' is because people read his Wiki entry while writing their stories. They see the term 'psychobilly' in the first paragraph, think to themselves 'that sounds catchy,' and include it in their coverage. It's like a dog chasing its own tail."
I will assemble a list of genres that Mr. Falco has been classically considered to be going back to the 1980s and 1990s, and will be happy to remove some like "Outsider music" if they cannot be sourced. I will also not use "art damage" as a genre because this is not considered an actual genre. Again, work with me here.
Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RockabillyRaccoon I just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about adding the paragraph on musical style to the Tav Falco and Tav Falco's Panther Burns articles. I haven't been able to get to it because I'm running behind on other projects, but I will get to it soon. I sure appreciate you working with me on refining that. Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Cheer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steppenwolf.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Garett Nolan for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garett Nolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garett Nolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 07:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Keyboard_warrior_killer&oldid=1258270324"