User talk:KhabarNegar

Hello Every one,

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

This is KhabarNegar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Interesting Categories

Wikipedia:Picture of the day

Picture of the day

European bison

Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp

Sharing files with commons

Hi,

How can I share the file with commons?

Cheers, Lamro (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, I have no Idea. I will ask and let you know. KhabarNegar (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one knows exactly, I give up using them. Thanks. KhabarNegar (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Persian vs. Farsi

Hi there. I just corrected it in your user page. Please read this page as well. Regards, In fact 05:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir, How are you? Nice to see you here in EN.wiki. Sir I do appreciate your good Patriotism & thank you for this. But common! Persian and Persia is a traditional name, nowadays we talk Farsi and we live in Iran. You know, I mean if we want to be called Persia again so we have to do it from our side, if not it actually makes others confused. If that country name is Iran so where is Persia! If that language is Persian so what’s the different between Persian and Farsi? Anyway, thank you so much for spending time and make the world aware of our honorable history and culture. Best Regards,KhabarNegar (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add the source you provided is respected by me, what I'm talking is about something which should happen, Do you agree? KhabarNegar (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Well Persia and Iran is a different story. Here we are talking about the name of the language which is spoken in Iran. This article is also a good thing. Regards, In fact 11:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I really admire you, because you always provide the source of your sayings, I always try to do the same too. Regards, KhabarNegar (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful

Many thanks for joining the translation efforts. We will get content out to you soon.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:38, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I receive a message in my Talk page in Fa.Wikipedia is that you? The page he asked me to review, is complete now. KhabarNegar (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide me a link? Also there is an article ready to be integrated here. [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles ready for integration

Here [2] Let me know if you need help. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 22:46, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you email me. I am working on improving co ordination of the translation project. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 23:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article waiting for upload

Some more articles have been translated and are ready for upload to the Persian wiki. I tried to upload it myself but my Persian wikicode skills are horrible. 4 are waiting here. Thanks for your help. Peter.C • talk • contribs 19:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Am needing your help here

[3] I have added a recently translated article to the talk page. Wondering if you can integrate it into the main article and drop me a note when you are done. Many thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if you can give us a hand fixing this one to [4] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translated articles awaiting integration

Dear KhabarNegar,

I see your name listed on our project page as the Persian lead integrator - nice to meet you. :) I was wondering if you had some time to look into the integration of the completed Persian translations of Hepatitis C, Hypertension & Gastroenteritis. Please drop me an email here: ildikosantana at gmail dot com, so that I can send you the target files for integration, in case you don't have access to the TwB Workspace.

I would also appreciate it if you could let me know the status of the translated Anaphylaxis, Common cold, Croup and Dengue fever. Regrettably, I cannot (yet) read in your beautiful language to check if integration has been completed... ;)

Many thanks in advance for your assistance! Ildiko Santana (talk) 02:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An Apology

Hello KhabarNegar,

I just wanted to apologize for implying on that DNS/attack stuff the other day. I am doing preliminary sockpuppet research, and I needed to know who was watching me, (and it was successful in doing so). The Iran talk page just happened to be a convenient cover, so for that I am sorry - but you did help me out and I thank your for that, (so hopefully you will forgive me!).

When I am done with this, I look forward to helping you work on this article, inshāllā. I have been near Khorramshahr, (and got stuck in the swampy sand a few times). Someday I would like to visit the place my Tree of Life silk rug comes from ;) Patriot1010 (talk) 02:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ugg boots trademark disputes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ugg boots trademark disputes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silk Road

My sincere apologies.

I got confused because I didn't notice that your edit duplicated all the place names.

Sorry if I confused you too... Begoon ^talk 14:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is O.K. I checked it ;), Good Luck. KhabarNegar (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Per the following WP:MEDRS we typically uses high quality sources such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DoneKhabarNegar (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:BP

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Middle Eastern American, KhabarNegar!

Wikipedia editor RDN1F just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article. Remember to separate the different points in your article using sections. Makes it a lot easier to read

To reply, leave a comment on RDN1F's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Done, :)KhabarNegar (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Good work on your article Middle Eastern American, keep working on it to try and get the style right. RDN1F TALK 21:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right-libertarianism edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

See comments on why it is edit warring and why you don't understand point that this is a descriptive term, not the accepted one by pro-property libertarians. Discuss there, not here. Thanks. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 15:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This alert is WP:Harassment I am going to take you for an admin decision on this. so you may keep more calm next time, and learn how to not bite anyone. This is the history as anyone can see no Edit war happened(1-[5], 2-[6], 3-[7], 4-[8] That is all and nothing else, no other revert or something by anyone actually you deleted sourced parts of article). Plus Talk Page used before my edit[9]. Be ready to apologize. KhabarNegar (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer here: Talk:Right-libertarianism#User:Carolmooredc_Harassment KhabarNegar (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Learn KhabarNegar (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also gave you an alert on your talk page, for deleting sourced parts of the article and placing your own view which have no source. Read the alert and always remember that to yourself.KhabarNegar (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1- Its continued [10]

2- Response [11] KhabarNegar (talk) 08:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TippyGoomba (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. See my conclusions here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 16:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An indef block doesn't mean forever, but you need some mentoring, some remedial work on copyright, reliable sources and collaboration. At this point, your participation is disruptive and causing unnecessary stress for a number of people. Hopefully, this is something you can address then come back in a productive way, but I feel I have no choice but to block here. Any admin is free to modify this block as they see fit without my prior permission, although a note afterwards is requested. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 16:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KhabarNegar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the case for this decision which is made by User:Dennis Brown, [12]. Not a single link to the reason for this block... For a block two things are needed: One which is most important is link of dif which is the problem, two the any talks which had happened about that difs and shows I acted against a rule of Wikipedia and have repeated that too. Not a single links about these issues are provided , so the decision which made by User:Dennis Brown is wrong according Wikipedia methods & standards. KhabarNegar ^Talk 18:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A link and reason were clearly provided making your unblock rationale inapplicable. Mkdw ^talk 19:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KhabarNegar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In all time which I was in Wikipedia till now I always use & answer & talk in Talk pages of the articles, There is not a single time which a direct transparent request from me, which I did not answer. I always listen to any specific thing which is told in any Talk page of the articles. I here ask to provide me with one time which a direct specific clear ask in any Talk page from me with I don’t answer and act in a good appreciated way… Any edit here from me is from good faith, if anyone feels it’s disruptive (the reason this block happened) it’s may be because of his/her own prejudgments about me, so he/she sees anything I do not good. I am neutral, 100% but if anyone things I’m not, 1- I want to tell him/her he had been wrong, 2- I will not again do any contribution about such articles again, because I learn that as much as you act according facts and logic accepted by all again there are something people really don’t like, so don’t bother them, so you are right I am not going to put something which majority of en.wikipedia see as not acceptable & not good, OK. But really I just thought Wikipedia as a good place to talk about facts about realities which are important, but Okay, I don’t care from now on. I also want to ask Users to keep calm, and do not judge too soon… what they may see as not good if they think twice they may feel that is actually right… Never mind… I request to 1- If someone have the time read this[13] , OR 2- If you do not have time just unblock this account to see my further contribution to get to the point which I am not really a disruptive editor as mentioned in Block reason. I will not do any contribution in articles which have Users that don’t agree with me, even though I may think I am doing a positive thing. I think I should be unblocked because I never ever rejected any request for discussion in Talk pages of the articles… Please provide differential edits that shows I have not accepted a reliable specific advice in any Talk page. So I will be able to answer. Here[14] you see all that is said. Anything else? I think I do understand the things mattered to the admin. As I have had good faith, so I think I just should quit editing in the specific articles… And that is Understand… & learn. I in fact have good faith when I do edited here, but I can understand probably it were not received by others, I do believe probably it’s because hurry stereotyping prejudgments, But anyway I should just quit editing in certain articles, and I will do that, because I understand that as a normal ordinary user it is not actually that much important what I think specially when there a group of Users that feel they don’t like your edits, so why to bother… OK I will just quit editing in those pages… As I actually have done this already if you see & check that… I think you all may ask User:NPguy(The user which filled the AnI), to know more if I am a disruptive editor, or I always have Good faith about anything. KhabarNegar ^Talk 21:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See below and #Unblock. Please note that Jmh649 unblocked. Mkdw ^talk 04:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This block seems a little heavy handed. This user has made a number of positive contributions [15], [16], [17] and has never been blocked before. Looks like the issues primarily relate to middle east politics. A topic ban of 6 month to a year widely construed would likely have been sufficient. But than again maybe I am overly optimistic. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Agree the block was excessive. A topic ban would have accomplished the same palliative result at the articles under dispute and would have given KhabarNegar plenty of room to gain experience and recognition for his positive contributions here. Moreover, regardless of their concerns, the editors really piled on this relative newbie and there was plenty of borderline personal animosity in their complaints. Really gratuitous to this uninvolved observer. I think that the block should be modified as proposed to a six-month topic block which would allow the editor to branch out and contribute in less contentious areas. SPECIFICO talk 02:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that I am the primary advocate for action against KhabarNegar's disruption. The ban certainly solves my issues. However, if someone wants to take responsibility for his edits, I would be comfortable with no block nor topic ban and heavy mentoring. The pact would be something like, if he is objectively disruptive and ignores the mentor, we revisit the ban. Any volunteers? I'd love to (and tried to) but I'm sure he hates me by now. TippyGoomba (talk) 03:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The block was strong, I know because I did it, with the understanding that someone would work with him to understand what he is doing wrong. There is no fixed period of time that would solve the problem. When someone is clueless as to the issue, giving them a 24 hour or 1 week block is useless and is only ticking off "incremental block" boxes until he gets an indef that no one will unblock, ever. Their best chance at coming back in a productive way is to indef and engage here. I clearly gave any admin permission to unblock without even asking my opinion first above. I just didn't know if a week or a month was going to be long enough to fix the problem. I have no problem with others want to work with him, figure out a topic ban or other solution, and have any admin unblock based on those determinations. As a matter of fact, I encourage it strongly. His behavior at the ANI and clear indication he wouldn't discuss there but just give the one long tirade of diffs (many of which didn't prove his points) pretty much demanded this. Again, it was never intended to be forever[18] only for as long as was needed. If people can get him to engage here and find a solution, nothing would make me happier. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 19:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If a user is entirely blocked, there's not going to be any constructive mentoring, just abstract discussion, to which neither party is likely to devote much time or attention. A much better way to engage mentors and to allow the user to hone his skills would be a topic block so that he can re-engage in other articles which do not trigger the problematic behavior and frankly in which he will not be likely to encounter a cabal of impatient and hostile editors. I didn't see any good faith effort to mentor him in the history of his difficulties, just accusations, namecalling, policy citations and challenges. Please consider changing this to a topic-related block. SPECIFICO talk 21:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't want you to think I was ignoring you, but I did spend a great deal of time pouring over probably 100 diffs and trying to determine the least aggressive way to deal with the problem. Looking at the issue at a glance, it is easy to dismiss, which is probably why so few participated at the ANI. (That, and it was an insanely long and convoluted set of diffs that were provided there). As I said, any admin can take any action they choose without any hard feelings from me, and without my permission. My recommendation is that Khabar discuss here, discover what the problems are, simply indicate a willingness to work on them, and help us provide a path forward. The type of disruption here is very broad, it isn't a singular thing. I didn't have the authority at ANI to impose a topic ban, although an unblocking admin can do that as a pre-condition of an unblock if Khabar agrees to it. Admin can't just unilaterally impose a "ban" on someone, that is against policy. I will be happy to help, but Doc James has already indicated he will consider the unblock. Now it is up to Khabar to start the dialog in a calm manner, address the concerns and agree to whatever terms Doc James puts on him, if any. I won't interfere with that process, although I am willing to help it. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 01:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doc James has shown an interest, I will happily leave to him. I do think that the disruption needs to be addressed by the editor themselves and they need to at least understand and be able to articulate the concerns, but I will leave that to him. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 22:00, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the offer out to Khabar. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the ideal solution. James, thank you for offering. Dennis, thank you for working on this, it's a tough situation with nothing but tough decisions to make. TippyGoomba (talk) 01:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think a fair compromise would be:

He will not edit any articles related to politics (that includes all articles about countries and religious groups)
He is free to revert obvious vandalism (we really need more people doing this and I see many example of him doing this well)
If he wishes to edit medical content in English I will be happy to help with guidance. Requirements include paraphrasing (copy and pasting not allowed), and high quality sources must be used per WP:MEDRS

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to these requirements.KhabarNegar ^Talk 03:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KhabarNegar, the article Sanctions against Iran would benefit from your input. If you have suggestions or sources, please take them to my talk page. I would love to rebuild our relationship. TippyGoomba (talk) 03:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tippy, Khabar is unable to contribute to this article due to the topic ban he is under. Maybe in 6 month or a year he can apply to have this lifted. I consider the topic ban to also apply to the talk pages. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd considered that and thus suggested that he leave suggestions on *my* talk page, rather than the article page. I'm more interested in his sources, he's been good at finding them, less so at introducing them. Conveniently, I love reading them, but hate looking for them. It's a good relationship. I leave the final word on the matter at your discretion, of course. TippyGoomba (talk) 03:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that would be fine. If you are happy with him leaving comments on your talk page I would not have an issue with it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(I was going to send it after first sentence by TippyGoomba but it looks like 3 more edits are before me, I'm not read them yet)

No, Thanks…

If I tried to edit that article in first place the reason was because, I really had tried to give some information I thought maybe you guys don’t know, I’m not that much interested any politic the reason I start to make Sanctions against Iran more neutral because actually something happened as a result of this sanctions and I saw there is no mention of these effects of sanctions in the article (just right now as they are removed by you :)) I really don’t care that much about Wikipedia articles being neutral and complete…, AND TippyGoomba, I know you don't believe me but I do not hate you,(as you have said above). This is the problem, you guys are making all these USA vs. Iran or you hate me so I hate you back & these kinds of logic. No one hates anyone, logic, facts; mathematics & reality do not need hate at all. Try to see the world and understand it by Logic & Mathematics (Facts), so I’m not interested in wasting my time anymore. KhabarNegar ^Talk 04:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you review the record, I hope you will find that none of my assertions were any sort of USA vs Iran thing. I object mostly on technical reasons. Sources convince me, not reasoned arguments. TippyGoomba (talk) 04:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best for Khabar to spend time working on other topic areas.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Sure.

@TippyGoomba: TippyGoomba, the only thing that I wanted to tell above is, I think there is a little mistake in your judgment about me, I do not hate anyone, anything, any... . No one hates you, please think this way, maybe you find interesting things. Anyway, Never mind..., & I don't think if I have any more interest in that subject anymore, Regards,KhabarNegar ^Talk 10:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I have unblocked this user per the discussion above and with the restrictions mentioned. I will keep this talk page watched and if further issues occur please leave me a note on my talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Doc, that seems to have worked out for the best, hopefully it will. I appreciate the time invested. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 10:59, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
About this I actually didn't want my log history became like this even with one block, in this case I was not in acceptance of what happened in AN/I, but not a big deal really. I wish you all success, I want to ask you be more fair next time, Thank-you, I will not do edit in such articles again, because right now & from now on, I am sure, or lets say I am not sure if there is everything goes fair, I wish That you all keep up with positive energy, Regards, KhabarNegar ^Talk 19:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Original ANI discussion. KhabarNegar ^Talk 18:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Translation for wikiproject medicine

I recently directed by Amir to Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Translation task force. I see some articles there with completed status, what can I do to finalize them for Persian Wikipedia?Achaemenes (talk) 13:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The table is here [19] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at WP:Editing restrictions

If you continue to revert your own sanction terms at WP:Editing restrictions you may be blocked for edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything wrong, Please do a double check, & tell me if you got what I mean. someone else changed that, I did revert the change. I will put changes here, in a minutes. Regards, KhabarNegar ^Talk 16:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should not be editing your own entry at all, even if you think it is a mistake. You can easily request an admin or an uninvolved editor to fix any problems that you see. EdJohnston (talk) 16:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was this at first:

"13:33, 18 December 2013‎"

19:55, 18 December 2013‎

15:43, 19 December 2013‎KhabarNegar ^Talk 16:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok.KhabarNegar ^Talk 16:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your last change before I read this discussion. My reaction was the same as Ed's. You shouldn't be touching this. However, I have looked back at the history, and Zad68 added the restriction here with the language that you want restored (recently removed by Armbrust, probably for clerical reasons). Frankly, I don't think it matters whether the language is there or not, but I'd rather let Zad68 make the decision.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Ed and Bbb3. KhabarNegar it's simply never a good idea to try to clerk or administer areas related to your own restrictions. Just please do not do it. Let the admins (or others) do that. Please just leave your WP:RESTRICT entry alone; if you want it modified, make a request at WP:ANI. If your request is reasonable it'll be done, no problem, and there will be no concerns that an editor is trying to modify text regarding their own restrictions. Thanks... Zad68 02:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I DIDN'T EDIT (or modify) ANYTHING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE DO READ HERE[20]. Someone else had changed the terms. I am an editor in fa.Wikipedia, and let me be honest with you guys, the behavior I see here, is not friendly at all. but I don't care I will remain positive & will not get involve in any conflict, I will do anything according Wikipedia policy. AND till now I Have done nothing against any rules of Wikipedia, & just look how I got treated here. Anyway please DO read here for more info[21], Regards,KhabarNegar ^Talk 06:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simply ignore it is best. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to revert this deletion[22](which we all know now, that have wrong description), cause I'm Not convinced why it should be removed?! Its simply not fair, and there no reason behind it! Even in the first place as everyone can see above these bans where not acceptable, Simply its asked to stop being illogical, Thanks. Any one disagree? KhabarNegar ^Talk 16:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay have restored as it was there before as you stated. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:32, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Late reply

Hello, KhabarNegar. You have new messages at Talk:List_of_companies_of_Iran.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kuru (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Progressive tax

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Progressive tax. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Georgism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Rama

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rama. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Labour Party (UK)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Labour Party (UK). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014
by CFCF

sign up for monthly delivery

Feature – Ebola articles

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

Just some of our over 60 translations:

New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

Some more stats

In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTT), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live (WP:RTTS)!
We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!

Further reading

Translators Without Borders
Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Peter Principle

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Peter Principle. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Renault

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Renault. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for insightful edits here and there ... Baklava is for you but of course after Iftar :) Sattar91 (talk) 08:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:)) Thanks! KhabarNegar ^Talk 08:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Supply-side economics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supply-side economics. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of best-selling music artists

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of best-selling music artists. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Housing in the United Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Housing in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Penny

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Amway

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Amway. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits at Malcolm X

Please stop your disruptive editing at Malcolm X. The article cites multiple reliable sources that say he became a Sunni Muslim. There is no policy or guideline that requires a citation quoting Malcolm X himself saying he was a Sunni Muslim.

If you have concerns about the sourcing of the article, please start a discussion at Talk:Malcolm X. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care what you like to put in that article, I did not do any disruptive editing, & now I just put links here so other people can judge.

My edit: [23],

Your edit: [24],

Article and sources right now: [25],

Have Fun, KhabarNegar ^Talk 17:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:In the news/2016 RD proposal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:In the news/2016 RD proposal. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion

A page you have contributed to that is being considered for deletion: Anti-Middle Eastern sentiment (2nd nomination).E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:S&P 500 Index

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:S&P 500 Index. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Slut-shaming

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Slut-shaming. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Gawker Media

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gawker Media. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KhabarNegar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Nissan Caravan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nissan Caravan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Your addition to Iran–Turkey relations has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa,

It for sure was changed, but anyway, as the edit is hidden right now, Please make it back here, and then I will be able to rewrite and put it back in the article then. Or at least make a subsection on the talk page of the article so I rewrite the texts once more and make more changes.

Thanks,KhabarNegar ^Talk 22:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:American Automobile Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Automobile Association. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Business-agile enterprise

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Business-agile enterprise. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tomb of Shams Tabrizi

Hi, I'm Kudpung. KhabarNegar, thanks for creating Tomb of Shams Tabrizi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Could you please include details of the location, especially the country, and more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Peter Hore

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Hore. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KhabarNegar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, KhabarNegar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Kobo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Kobo. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Detransition

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Detransition. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frederick H. Fleitz on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Assassin's Creed on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Queer erasure on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:James M. Buchanan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Roman Catholic prayers on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Authoritarianism on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shooting of Mark Duggan on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox province or territory of Canada on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kazem Rajavi on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Hispanic and Latino Americans in the United States Congress on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tom Brady on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Ganja missile attacks on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Odal (rune) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment, and at Talk:Postcrossing on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Königsberg on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of association footballers who died during their careers on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Senedd on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi KhabarNegar! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
Paste {{Frs user|KhabarNegar|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]