User talk:Love19886

December 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to FC Barcelona, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blair - Speak to me 22:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to FC Barcelona, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquim Rifé[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joaquim Rifé, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fcbarcelona.com/web/english/club/historia/jugadors_de_llegenda/rife.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Ronaldinho, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -- Alexf⁴² 21:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1731745405_c77a4bd9c0_o.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:1731745405_c77a4bd9c0_o.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nilf anion (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:FC_Barcelona_Campo_de_futbol_.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:FC_Barcelona_Campo_de_futbol_.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nilf anion (talk) 21:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FC Barcelona[edit]

I saw the page you created in relation to FC Barcelona Stats and Records. May i point out that there is a similar page that is already on wikipedia here I advise you to take a look at it and i assume it would be easier to add any info you have on your page to the already created page. Thanks Roadrunnerz45 ^{(talk 2 me)} 12:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Johan cruijff.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:Johan cruijff.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 15:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source for Image:Squad 1951-52.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Squad 1951-52.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Firsteam.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Firsteam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Joan Gamper.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joan Gamper.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False licenses on images[edit]

Please don't add patently false licenses to images as you did to above three photographs. If you did not take the pictures yourself, or otherwise own the copyright, you CANNOT add a {{GFDL-self}} and other licenses meant for images you've created yourself. If those pictures are in public domain, please provide a proper explanation and an appropriate license. --Mosmof (talk) 20:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Oxymoron⁸³ 17:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give FC Barcelona a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. srushe (talk) 11:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop moving stuff[edit]

Stop moving articles like FC Barclona to F.C. Barcelona, especially without seeking consensus... Your actions will be reverted c h ¹⁰ · 10:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FC Barcelona Museum[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FC Barcelona Museum, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.spanish-fiestas.com/football/museum.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the [[:FC Barcelona Museum]] article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. MLauba (talk) 08:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Real Madrid C.F.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 20:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Real Madrid C.F. season 2009–10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 20:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

José Antonio Zaldúa[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: José Antonio Zaldúa. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:La Liga 2006-07. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Giant Snowman 09:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He won't give up. He's already been blocked in Spanish Wikipedia. I'm tired of spellchecking his appalling Moroccan-English. Oh, by the way... don't expect any answer from him. --Arinsau (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at FC Barcelona, you will be blocked from editing. --Angelo (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Justo Tejada[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Justo Tejada. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to FC Barcelona. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Arbero (talk) 16:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valencia CF in Europe[edit]

The article Valencia CF in Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INDISCRIMINATE - information should be covered in the main club's article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --SquidSK ^(1MC^•^log) 03:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on the List of FC Barcelona records and statistics[edit]

Hey! your edit was reverted because it is vandalism; removing sources and written information with out a valid reason, what's going on? This issue have been discussed before, every reference is provided by the official website of FC Barcelona, to support the statements, while you have'nt provided any source what so ever. Again, what's going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.192.149 (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:You obviously do not understand what your talking about, how many times do we have to discussed this issue. Common what's going on? where are your common sense?. Your are trying to dispute the facts provided by FC Barcelona, its very simple too understand. Bad luck and thats a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.193.101 (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Love19886! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 902 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Pedro María Artola - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lorenzo Buenaventura - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits, point of views and vandalism on List of FC Barcelona records and statistics[edit]

Stop adding "point of views" and reverting edits on the List of FC Barcelona statistics and records when you don't even have a clue what your talking about. You need to provide reliable references or source to this specific article and not point of views. Thanks Nciqu talk 22:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Thanks for providing references but its not accurate enough. The list you provided needs to be verified and im getting all information straight from the official website of FC Barcelona which is the correct information. Nciqu (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:: Judging on your last comment you posted on my talk account, it appears that you copied what im saying, you obviously do not know how to speak English? I've already reported you for sock-puppetry, providing false information and promotional information relating to the FC Barcelona football club. And also stop adding all statistic accurate as of 19th January, when the date today is the 24 January. Nciqu talk 11:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply::I understand the FC Barcelona statistics, Im cleaning up the article to meet with Wikipedia encyclopedia regulations. The only problem is, it is unsourced and you are only providing the La Liga statistics and not the whole statistics achieved by the club, including all games they played in all football competitions, whether it is friendly matches, professional matches, non-professional and so on. And also i did not delete Cesar Rodriguez, i just put him into one sentence, because im cleaning up and fixing written information. You need to provide reliable sources because this could harm or damage FC Barcelona's professionality and its popularity status. Nciqu talk 13:49, 24 2010 (UTC)

January 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of FC Barcelona records and statistics. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. EyeSerene^talk 12:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to remove sourced content, by reverting without discussion, from List of FC Barcelona records and statistics. This is your final warning - if it happens again I will block this account. EyeSerene^talk 18:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Barcelona legends[edit]

Hi. I'm reverting all of your edits as they are not referenced. Sandman888 (talk) 13:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Lionel Messi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Please stop your edits to FC Barcelona seasons as webdelcule is not meeting the criteria at WP:RS. If you persist I'll have to report you. Sandman888 (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Enric Reyna[edit]

The article Enric Reyna has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Xtzou (Talk) 14:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manuel Parera Penella[edit]

The article Manuel Parera Penella has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TFOWR 00:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/FC Barcelona in Europe/archive1[edit]

Above is nominated for Featured List. If you want to review it, please do. If you wd like to become co-nom just say so :). Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) 21:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FC Barcelona[edit]

Being a regular contributor I thought you would like to know that FC Barcelona is currently at FAC with 1 support, but could do with more reviews. See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/FC Barcelona/archive3. Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is constantly messing FC Barcelona pages up. He's using an online translator! Just take a look at seasons 1900-1911. I revised the text in season 1899-1900 but can't keep watching on him forever! Arinsau (talk) 00:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

I have nominated List of FC Barcelona seasons for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 13:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lorenzo Buenaventura[edit]

The article Lorenzo Buenaventura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, the fitness coach of a team is generally not notable, dosen't appear to be notable in this case either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:17, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/FC Bayern Munich/archive1[edit]

Would you be able to help out with the peer review? Kingjeff (talk) 02:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Canada18. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of football stadiums in Morocco have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Canada18 (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for History of FC Barcelona[edit]

History of FC Barcelona has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]